Cumulative effective dose and cancer risk for pediatric population in repetitive full spine follow-up imaging: How micro dose is the EOS microdose protocol?

Radiation exposure in multiple hereditary exostoses: A retrospective review

Background

Exposure to ionizing radiation in patients with Multiple Hereditary Exostoses (MHE) is inevitable and necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of MHE. Radiation exposure has many potentially dangerous consequences, including the increased risk of developing cancer. This is especially concerning in the pediatric patient population since children are more likely to develop adverse effects from radiation than adults. This study aimed to quantify radiation exposure over a five-year period among patients diagnosed with MHE since such information is not currently available in the literature.

Methods

Diagnostic radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, nuclear medicine studies, and intraoperative fluoroscopy exposures were analyzed for radiation exposure in 37 patients diagnosed with MHE between 2015 and 2020.

Results

Thirty-seven patients with MHE underwent 1200 imaging studies, 976 of which were related to MHE and 224 unrelated to MHE. The mean estimated MHE cumulative radiation dose per patient was 5.23 mSv. Radiographs related to MHE contributed the most radiation. Patients from the ages of 10- to 24-years-old received the most imaging studies and exposure to ionizing radiation, especially compared to those under age 10 (P = 0.016). The 37 patients also received a total of 53 surgical-excision procedures, with a mean of 1.4 procedures per person.

Conclusions

MHE patients are exposed to increased levels of ionizing radiation secondary to serial diagnostic imaging, with those ages 10-24 years old being exposed to significantly higher doses of radiation. Because pediatric patients are more sensitive to radiation exposure and are at an overall higher risk, the use of radiographs should always be justified in those patients.

Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems

The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of the low dose 2D/3D slot scanner (LDSS) imaging system compared to conventional digital radiography (DR) imaging systems. Visual image quality was assessed using the visual grading analysis (VGA) method. This method is a subjective approach that uses a human observer to evaluate and optimise radiographic images for different imaging technologies. Methods and materials: ten posterior-anterior (PA) and ten lateral (LAT) images of a chest anthropomorphic phantoms and a knee phantom were acquired by an LDSS imaging system and two conventional DR imaging systems. The images were shown in random order to three (chest) radiologists and three experienced (knee) radiographers, who scored the images against a number of criteria. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss’ kappa and weighted kappa. Results: the statistical comparison of the agreement between the observers showed good interobserver agreement, with Fleiss’ kappa coefficients of 0.27–0.63 and 0.23–0.45 for the chest and knee protocols, respectively. Comparison of intraobserver agreement also showed good agreement with weighted kappa coefficients of 0.27–0.63 and 0.23–0.45 for the chest and knee protocols, respectively. The LDSS imaging system achieved significantly higher VGA image quality compared to the DR imaging systems in the AP and LAT chest protocols (p < 0.001). However, the LDSS imaging system achieved lower image quality than one DR system (p ≤ 0.016) and equivalent image quality to the other DR systems (p ≤ 0.27) in the knee protocol. The LDSS imaging system achieved effective dose savings of 33–52% for the chest protocol and 30–35% for the knee protocol compared with DR systems. Conclusions: this work has shown that the LDSS imaging system has the potential to acquire chest and knee images at diagnostic quality and at a lower effective dose than DR systems.

Hand Bone Age Radiography: Comparison Between Slot-scanning and Conventional Techniques

BACKGROUND

Determination and longitudinal monitoring of progressive skeletal maturity are essential in the management of children with scoliosis. Although different methods for determining skeletal maturity exists, the most widely practiced method relies on the ossification pattern of the bones of the hand and wrist, which is traditionally acquired using conventional techniques and after the acquisition of the spine using the low-dose slot-scanning technique. Whereas the existing published literature has published promising results on the use of the slot-scanning technique to acquire these hand and wrist radiographs, image quality and radiation dose have not been systematically compared between these techniques. Thus, the objective of our study is to compare image quality, interpretation reliability, and radiation dose of hand bone age radiographs between slot-scanning and conventional techniques using age- and sex-matched children.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children who underwent hand radiographs using slot-scanning between October 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019; and matched children who underwent conventional radiography. Blinded to technique, 5 readers reviewed all radiographs after randomization to rate image quality and to determine bone age using the Greulich and Pyle classification. Dose area product was recorded. Mann-Whitney and t tests were used to compare variables between techniques and intraclass correlation (ICC) to determine observer agreement.

RESULTS

Our study cohort of 194 children (128 girls, 66 boys; mean age: 13.7±2.3 y) included 97 slot-scanning and 97 conventional radiographs. One (1%) slot-scanning and no conventional radiograph was rated poor in image quality. There was almost perfect interpretation reliability with slot-scanning with high interobserver (ICC=0.948) and intraobserver (ICC=0.996) agreements, comparable with conventional radiographs (ICCs=0.919 and 0.996, respectively). Dose area product (n=158) was lower (P<0.002) with slot-scanning than with conventional techniques.

CONCLUSION

Almost perfect interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility with slot-scanning radiographs (performed using significantly lower radiation doses) suggest that this technique for hand bone age determination can be a reliable adjunct to scoliosis monitoring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Ultrasound volume projection image quality selection by ranking from convolutional RankNet

Periodic inspection and assessment are important for scoliosis patients. 3D ultrasound imaging has become an important means of scoliosis assessment as it is a real-time, cost-effective and radiation-free imaging technique. With the generation of a 3D ultrasound volume projection spine image using our Scolioscan system, a series of 2D coronal ultrasound images are produced at different depths with different qualities. Selecting a high quality image from these 2D images is the crucial task for further scoliosis measurement. However, adjacent images are similar and difficult to distinguish. To learn the nuances between these images, we propose selecting the best image automatically, based on their quality rankings. Here, the ranking algorithm we use is a pairwise learning-to-ranking network, RankNet. Then, to extract more efficient features of input images and to improve the discriminative ability of the model, we adopt the convolutional neural network as the backbone due to its high power of image exploration. Finally, by inputting the images in pairs into the proposed convolutional RankNet, we can select the best images from each case based on the output ranking orders. The experimental result shows that convolutional RankNet achieves better than 95.5% top-3 accuracy, and we prove that this performance is beyond the experience of a human expert.

Benefits of Low-Dose CT Scan of Head for Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage

Objectives:

For patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), routine follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans are typically required to monitor the progression of intracranial pathology. Remarkable levels of radiation exposure are accumulated during repeated CT scan. However, the effects and associated risks have still remained elusive. This study presented an effective approach to quantify organ-specific radiation dose of repeated CT scans of head for patients with ICH. We also indicated whether a low-dose CT scan may reduce radiation exposure and keep the image quality highly acceptable for diagnosis.

Methods:

Herein, 72 patients with a history of ICH were recruited. The patients were divided into 4 groups and underwent CT scan of head with different tube current–time products (250, 200, 150, and 100 mAs). Two experienced radiologists visually rated scores of quality of images according to objective image noise, sharpness, diagnostic acceptability, and artifacts due to physiological noise on the same workstation. Organ-/tissue-specific radiation doses were analyzed using Radimetrics.

Results:

In conventional CT scan group, signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of ICH images were significantly higher than those in normal brain structures. Reducing the tube current–time product may decrease the image quality. However, the predilection sites for ICH could be clearly identified. The SNR and CNR in the predilection sites for ICH were notably higher than other areas. The brain, eye lenses, and salivary glands received the highest radiation dose. Reducing tube current–time product from 250 to 100 mA can significantly reduce the radiation dose.

Discussion:

We demonstrated that low-dose CT scan of head can still provide reasonable images for diagnosing ICH. The radiation dose can be reduced to ∼45% of the conventional CT scan group.

Correlation between spinal coronal balance and static baropodometry in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Scoliosis is accepted as a 3-dimensional deformity involving axial, sagittal and frontal planes.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To evaluate the correlation between baropodometric parameters and coronal balance status for idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

44 patients (7 males and 37 females) of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) were recruited. All participants should have scoliosis confirmed by a spine X-ray performed less than one month ahead of the baropodometric study. Radiographic studies including Cobb angle, offset between Central Sacral Vertical Line (CSVL) and C7 Vertebra Plumb Line (C7PL) (considered as global coronal balance, GCB), Apical Translation of the major curve (AT, considered as regional coronal balance) as well as Lateral Pelvic Tilt (LPT) were examined. A static baropodometry was performed for each patient. The contact surface and load ratio (to the entire load of both feet) were measured.

RESULTS

On both sides, the surface of the forefoot was significantly larger than that of the rearfoot (P < 0.001) and the load ratio of the forefoot was significantly smaller than that of the rearfoot (P < 0.001). On the major curve side, GCB showed a positive correlation with the contact surface of the forefoot (r = 0.36, P = 0.019), as well as the load ratio (r = 0.40, P = 0.008). AT also showed a positive correlation with the load ratio of the forefoot (r = 0.331, P = 0.03) but no correlation with contact surface.

SIGNIFICANCE

In scoliosis, coronal balance is correlated to plantar pressure distribution. Apical translation of the major curve and offset between CSVL and C7PL are the best describers of coronal balance.

COMPARISON OF RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE PATIENT AND CONTRAST DETAIL RESOLUTIONS ACROSS LOW DOSE 2D/3D SLOT SCANNER AND TWO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS

PURPOSE

To assess and compare the radiation dose and image quality of the low dose 2D/3D EOS slot scanner (LDSS) to conventional digital radiography (DR) X-ray imaging systems for chest and knee examination protocols.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The effective doses (ED) to the patient in the chest and knee clinical examination protocols for LDSS and DR X-ray imaging systems were determined using the dose area product and PCXMC Monte Carlo simulation software. The CDRAD phantom was imaged with 19 cm, and 13 cm thick Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) blocks to simulate the chest and knees respectively of a patient of average adult size. The contrast detail resolution was calculated using image analysis software.

RESULTS

The EDs for the LDSS default setting were up to 69% and 51% lower than for the DR systems for the chest (speed 4) and knee (speed 6) protocols, respectively, while for the increased dose level setting then the EDs were up to 42% and 35% lower than for the DR systems for the chest (speed 6) and knee (speed 8) protocols respectively. At the default setting, the contrast detail was lowest for the default setting of the 2D/3D low dose slot scanner (LDSS) for both chest and knee examinations, but at the highest dose levels then the threshold were equal or higher than the contrast resolution of DR imaging systems.

CONCLUSION

The LDSS has the potential to be used for clinical diagnosis of chest and knee examinations using the higher dose level. For speed 6 in chest protocol and speed 8 in knee protocol, the measured contrast detail resolution was comparable with the DR systems but at a lower effective dose.

Decreased Vertical Trunk Inclination Angle and Pelvic Inclination as the Result of Mid-High-Heeled Footwear on Static Posture Parameters in Asymptomatic Young Adult Women

The influence of high-heel footwear on the lumbar lordosis angle, anterior pelvic tilt, and sacral tilt are inconsistently described in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the impact of medium-height heeled footwear on the static posture parameters of homogeneous young adult standing women. Heel geometry, data acquisition process, as well as data analysis and parameter extraction stage, were controlled. Seventy-six healthy young adult women with experience in wearing high-heeled shoes were enrolled. Data of fifty-three subjects were used for analysis due to exclusion criteria (scoliotic posture or missing measurement data). A custom structured light surface topography measurement system was used for posture parameters assessment. Three barefoot measurements were taken as a reference and tested for the reliability of the posture parameters. Two 30-degree wedges were used to imitate high-heel shoes to achieve a repeatable foot position. Our study confirmed the significant (p < 0.001) reduced vertical balance angle and pelvis inclination angle with large and medium-to-large effects, respectively, due to high-heel shoes. No significant differences were found in the kyphosis or lordosis angles. High-heeled shoes of medium height in young asymptomatic women can lead to a straightening effect associated with a reduced vertical balance angle and decreased pelvic inclination.

Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS

INTRODUCTION

Scoliosis is defined as a deformity of the spine with lateral curvature in the coronal plane. It requires regular X-ray imaging to monitor the progress of the disorder, therefore scoliotic patients are frequently exposed to radiation. It is important to lower the risk from these exposures for young patients. The aim of this work is to compare organ dose (OD) values resulting from Scan Projection Radiograph (SPR) mode in CT against projection radiography and EOS^® imaging system when assessing scoliosis.

METHODS

A dosimetry phantom was used to represent a 10-year old child. Thermoluminescent dosimetry detectors were used for measuring OD. The phantom was imaged with CT in SPR mode using 27 imaging parameters; projection radiography and EOS machines using local scoliosis imaging procedures. Imaging was performed in anteroposterior, posteroanterior and lateral positions.

RESULTS

17 protocols delivered significantly lower radiation dose than projection radiography (p < 0.05). OD values from the CT SPR imaging protocols and projection radiography were statistically significant higher than the results from EOS. No statistically significant differences in OD were observed between 10 imaging protocols and those from projection radiography and EOS imaging protocols (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

EOS has the lowest dose. Where this technology is not available we suggest there is a potential for OD reduction in scoliosis imaging using CT SPR compared to projection radiography. Further work is required to investigate image quality in relation to the measurement of Cobb angle with CT SPR.

Data on the estimating the risk of cancer due to some common radiographs in Tehran city

The purpose of the data is to estimate the excessive risk of cancer due to some common radiographs in Tehran. The data were collected in 8 radiology centers in Tehran city and on 283 patients with eight radiographic views. To obtain the data, PCXMC 2.0 based on Monte Carlo calculations, has been used to calculate the effective dose of each organ, and annual effective dose. The effective dose, cumulative effective dose, number of radiographs per year and excessive cancer risk due to the type of radiographs calculated. The additional risk of lethal cancer resulting from these radiographs in the target population is about 14.81 cases of the total population of Tehran city in one year.

Knowledge and Awareness of CT Radiation Dose and Risk Among Patients

The study aims to assess the level of patients’ awareness and knowledge regarding radiation and dosage along with the associated risks from computed tomography (CT) scan. This cross-sectional study used questionnaires, which were distributed to the diagnostic imaging departments of six large local hospitals in Jordan between September 2014 and March 2015. A total of 600 patients completed the questionnaire, out of which, 52.33% of respondents were female and 47.6% male. The findings show insignificant effects of gender on patient’s knowledge ( P = .596) and significant effect of employment and profession on positive scores ( P = .000). Similarly, no statistical differences were found between gender and correct answers ( P = .707). This cohort of patients demonstrated a lack of awareness and knowledge about the use of ionizing radiation for diagnostic imaging. Thus, there may exist a similar lack of information that will require imaging professionals to raise patients’ awareness and offer them the appropriate information.