3D C-Arm cone beam CT for targeting the portal vein during TIPS: Initial clinical experience

CBCT-based three-dimensional dual-phase vascular image fusion: a novel technique for interventional real-time TIPS guidance

BACKGROUND

Due to the invisibility of the portal vein (PV), how to puncture the PV accurately and safely in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation remains a challenge of the procedure.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to provide the first evaluation of the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based three-dimensional (3D) dual-phase vascular image fusion for interventional real-time guided PV puncture during TIPS procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2021 to May 2021, 13 patients undergoing TIPS were prospectively enrolled in this study. Images of the hepatic artery (HA) and PV in 3D were acquired and overlaid on interventional fluoroscopy images in a dual-phase display mode for real-time PV puncture guidance. The number of PV puncture attempts, puncture time, overlaid image accuracy, dose area product, fluoroscopy time, and interventional complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Portal vein puncture guided by CBCT-based 3D dual-phase vascular image fusion was successfully performed on 92.3% (12/13) patients. The mean number of PV puncture attempts was 1.8 ± 0.7 (1-3). The mean puncture time and fluoroscopy time was 3.5 ± 1.2 (2-6) min and 25.1 ± 9.4 (15-45) min, respectively. The mean dose area product was 39.49 ± 7.88 (28.81-52.87) mGym2. The error between the reference position of the fusion image and the interventional PV angiography image was less than 0.5 cm. No interventional complication was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that 3D dual-phase vascular image fusion might be a safe and feasible technique for interventional real-time guided PV puncture during TIPS. This novel technique might help to reduce the number of PV puncture attempts and the puncture time as well as lower the risks of interventional complications.

Preliminary clinical observation of double C-arm digital subtraction angiography guidance during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the safety, preliminary clinical experience, and technical advantages of double C-arm digital subtraction angiography -assisted portal vein puncture for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

METHODS

Clinical data of 25 patients with portal hypertension caused by liver cirrhosis were retrospectively analyzed from January 2021 to June 2022. The fluoroscopy time, puncture time, mean portosystemic pressure gradient, dose area product, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed in all 25 patients, with a success rate of 100%. The fluoroscopy time, puncture time, and dose area product were 33.6 ± 8.5 min, 9.1 ± 5.7 min, and 126 ± 53 Gy·cm², respectively. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient decreased from 22.5 ± 6.3 mmHg to 10.5 ± 2.3 mmHg (p < 0.01). No serious intraoperative and postoperative complications were found.

CONCLUSION

Double C-arm digital subtraction angiography-assisted portal vein puncture is safe and feasible in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt operation. It can reduce the difficulty of the operation and possesses evident technical advantages.

A new alternative technique for the guidance of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using DSA overlay reference

BACKGROUND

Portal vein puncture (PVP) is a critical step during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and correlates to several complications. Techniques guiding PVP are needed.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) overlay reference during TIPS creation and compare it with transhepatic portal vein (THPV) guiding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The clinical records of 185 patients at three medical centers who underwent TIPS placement were reviewed. Portal vein access was guided by THPV guiding in 120 cases and DSA overlay reference in 60 cases. The number of punctures, portal vein entry time, procedural adverse events, technical and hemodynamic success rate were analyzed to compare the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of the two methods.

RESULTS

The median numbers of punctures in group 1 and group 2 were 2 (1-4) and 2 (1-5), respectively (P = 0.094). There was no statistical difference between two groups in needle passes. The median portal vein entry time of group 1 was 12 min (8-16 min) and 13 min (8-16 min) in group 2. No significant difference was found in the PVP time (P = 0.802). Arterioportal fistula formation occurred in 15 patients in group 1; two patients in group 2 had hepatic artery injury. The patients in group 2 had lower rates of procedural adverse events (P = 0.047). Median dose area product of G1 was lower than G2 statistically (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in total fluoroscopy time (P = 0.856).

CONCLUSION

DSA overlay reference has lower procedural adverse events rates compared with THPV guiding TIPS. It seems to be a safe and effective method for guiding PVP.

Advanced portal venous access techniques for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement

Introduction

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is a well-established but technically challenging procedure for the management of sequelae of end-stage liver disease. Performed essentially blindly, traditional fluoroscopically guided TIPS placement requires multiple needle passes and prolonged radiation exposure to achieve successful portal venous access, thus increasing procedure time and the risk of periprocedural complications. Several advanced image-guided portal access techniques, including intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided access, cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided access and wire-targeting access techniques, can serve as alternatives to traditional CO₂ portography-based TIPS creation.

Methods

A literature search was performed on the electronic databases including MEDLINE and Embase, from 2000 to the present to identify all relevant studies. The reference list also included studies identified manually, and studies referenced for other purposes.

Findings

The main benefit of these advanced access techniques is that they allow the operator to avoid essentially blind portal punctures, and the ability to visualise the target, thus reducing the number of required needle passes. Research has shown that ICE-guided access can decrease the radiation exposure, procedure time and complication rate in patients undergoing TIPS placement. This technique is particularly useful in patients with challenging portal venous anatomy. However, ICE-guided access requires additional equipment and possibly a second operator. Other studies have shown that CBCT-guided access, when compared with traditional fluoroscopy-guided access, provides superior visualisation of the anatomy with similar amount of radiation exposure and procedure time. The wire-targeting technique, on the other hand, appears to offer reductions in procedure time and radiation exposure by enabling real-time guidance. However, this technique necessitates percutaneous injury to the liver parenchyma in order to place the target wire.

Conclusion

Advanced portal access techniques have certain advantages over the traditional fluoroscopically guided TIPS access. To date, few studies have compared these advanced guided access options, and further research is required.

Use of Virtual Target Fluoroscopic Display of Three-Dimensional CO2 Wedged Hepatic Vein Portography for TIPS Placement

PURPOSE

To describe and evaluate an image fusion technique for the portal vein puncture guidance during TIPS procedure: a three-dimensional (3D) virtual target fluoroscopic display obtained with an automated 3D carbon dioxide wedged hepatic vein portography (3D CO₂-WHVP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the 37 TIPS creations performed in our institution between 3/2017 and 12/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen procedures were guided using the 3D CO₂-WHVP technique (group 1) and were compared with the other 20 procedures performed under conventional 2D fluoroscopic guidance (group 2). Image acquisition for the 3D CO₂-WHVP consisted of combining a CBCT acquisition and an automatic CO₂ injection. Once located on the multiplanar reformatted images of the CBCT acquisition, the portal bifurcation was manually segmented to create a virtual target that was overlaid onto live fluoroscopy allowing a real-time 3D guidance during portal vein puncture.

RESULTS

Primary success was 100% in group1 and 95% in group2. Median intervention length, fluoroscopy time and dose area product (DAP) were, respectively, 124 min [IQR 94-137], 40 min [IQR 26-52] and 12140 cGy.cm² [IQR 10147-18495] in group 1 and 146 min [IQR 118-199], 40 min [IQR 36-60] and 13290 cGy.cm² [IQR 10138-19538] in group 2. No technical parameter was significantly different between the two groups. Intraprocedural complication rate was 0% in group 1 and 20% in group 2 (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional virtual target fluoroscopic display using a CBCT-acquired CO₂ wedged portography is an effective and safe technique to ease intrahepatic puncture of the portal vein during TIPS procedures.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement: portal vein puncture guided by 3D/2D image registration of contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography and fluoroscopy

Background

To assess the technical feasibility, success rate, puncture complications and procedural characteristics of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement using a three-dimensional vascular map (3D-VM) overlay based on image registration of pre-procedural contrast-enhanced (CE) multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for portal vein puncture guidance.

Materials and methods

Overall, 27 consecutive patients (59 ± 9 years, 18male) with portal hypertension undergoing elective TIPS procedure were included. TIPS was guided by CE-MDCT overlay after image registration based on fluoroscopic images. A 3D-VM of the hepatic veins and the portal vein was created based on the pre-procedural CE-MDCT and superimposed on fluoroscopy in real-time. Procedural characteristics as well as hepatic vein catheterization time (HVCT), puncture time (PT), overall procedural time (OPT), fluoroscopy time (FT) and the dose area product (DAP) were evaluated. Thereafter, HVCT, PT, OPT and FT using 3D-VM (61 ± 9 years, 14male) were compared to a previous using classical fluoroscopic guidance (53 ± 9 years, 21male) for two interventional radiologist with less than 3 years of experience in TIPS placement.

Results

All TIPS procedure using of 3D/2D image registered 3D-VM were successful with a significant reduction of the PSG (p < 0.0001). No clinical significant complication occurred. HVCT was 14 ± 11 min, PT was 14 ± 6 min, OPT was 64 ± 29 min, FT was 21 ± 12 min and DAP was 107.48 ± 93.84 Gy cm². HVCT, OPT and FT of the interventionalist with less TIPS experience using 3D/2D image registered 3D-VM were statistically different to an interventionalist with similar experience using fluoroscopic guidance (p_HVCT = 0.0022; p_OPT = 0.0097; p_FT = 0.0009). PT between these interventionalists was not significantly different (p_PT = 0.2905).

Conclusion

TIPS placement applying registration-based CE-MDCT vessel information for puncture guidance is feasible and safe. It has the potential to improve hepatic vein catherization, portal vein puncture and radiation exposure.

C-arm-based flat-panel detector cone-beam computed tomography venography in the diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome

Background:

C-arm-based flat-panel detector cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) venography has never been used in the management of iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS). This study aimed to determine the technical feasibility and safety of CBCT venography in the diagnosis of IVCS compared with conventional venography (CV).

Methods:

Twenty patients with clinical manifestations of lower extremity venous insufficiency were prospectively enrolled between May 2018 and December 2018. Each patient underwent both CV and CBCT venography. The feasibility and safety of CBCT venography were assessed by technical success rate and complication rate. The relationships between the clinical indexes and the results of CBCT venography and CV were analyzed with correlation analysis. The consistency of the diagnosis of IVCS using each modality was analyzed by the kappa test.

Results:

The technical success rate was 100% for CBCT venography and for CV, without any complications. Compared with CV, CBCT venography was able to show more details of adjacent tissues which might be helpful for making etiological diagnosis. The stenosis rate under CBCT venography had excellent consistency with that under CV (kappa = 0.78, Chi-square test). The stenosis rate under CBCT venography was positively correlated with the presence of collateral veins (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval: [1.00, 1.26], P = 0.049), while the stenosis rate under CV was not. Unexpectedly, only one patient had a venous pressure gradient of more than 2 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa).

Conclusions:

For the diagnosis of IVCS, C-arm-based CBCT venography was technically feasible, with good safety. The presence of collateral veins on CBCT was clinically significant. A C-arm fluoroscopy-based technique that combines CV and CBCT might be a promising protocol for the management of IVCS during a single session.