Effectiveness of a new radiation protection system in the interventional radiology setting

Efficiency in radiation protection of a novel exoskeleton-based interventional radiology apron and correlation with conventional aprons

PURPOSE

In interventional radiology (IR), safeguarding against ionizing radiation is imperative. This study evaluates the comparison of a lead-free exoskeleton-mounted radiation protection apron with an integrated head visor with conventional radiation protection aprons of varied materials. The goal is to contribute insights into optimizing safety for healthcare professionals and patients during IR procedures.

METHODS

The phantom study incorporates a variety of radiation protection aprons: an exoskeleton-mounted lead-free apron with an integrated head visor, a conventional lead apron, a lead- free and a lead-composite apron. The examiner assumed three common working positions (30° left, 0° center, 30° right) during a simulated intervention. A volume tomography cone beam protocol (CBCT) ensured a consistent spectrum of radiation energy. Real-time dosimeters were placed at the eyes, the left axilla, and the pelvis.

RESULTS

The exoskeleton-mounted apron with the integrated head visor demonstrated an average dose reduction of 93.4 % (p < 0.001), outperforming other aprons with shielding capacities only up to 66 % (p < 0.001). The other aprons were deliberately chosen without eye shielding. In the pelvic region, the exoskeleton-mounted apron achieved a 99 % (p < 0.001) dose reduction, with the lead-free apron providing 96 % (p < 0.001) shielding efficacy, and the conventional lead and lead-composite aprons achieving 94 % (p < 0.001) and 90.3 % (p < 0.001), respectively. However, the exoskeleton-mounted apron exhibited a lower dose reduction of 81.3 % (p < 0.001) in the left axilla compared to conventional aprons.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluated exoskeleton system demonstrated excellent eye protection through its circumferential head visor and notable reduction in the pelvic dose. However, despite these advantages, the exoskeleton did exhibit a particular deficit in the left axilla in our experimental setup. This research emphasizes the potential of innovative radiation protection solutions while highlighting specific areas that require further improvement.

A dual-centre study on the radioprotective effect of a novel X-ray protection device during coronary intervention

AIM

To investigate the shielding efficiency of a novel X-ray protection device (NPD) compared with the traditional lead clothing (TLC) during coronary intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed prospectively in two centres. A total of 200 coronary interventions were included and assigned equally into the NPD or TLC group. The NPD is a floor-standing X-ray protection device, which mainly composes of a barrel-like frame and two layers of lead rubber. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were adopted to detect the cumulative absorbed doses, and were attached outside the NPD or TLC or body of the first operator at four different height levels in four directions during the procedure.

RESULTS

The cumulative doses outside the NPD were comparable to that of the TLC (2,398.33 ± 2,341.64 versus 1,624.09 ± 1,732.20 μSv, p=0.366), and the cumulative doses inside the NPD were significantly lower than those inside the TLC (40 ± 0 versus 732.28 ± 919.83 μSv, p<0.001). As the TLC did not cover the calf segment of the operator, the area at 50 cm height from the floor in the TLC group was unshielded. The shielding efficiency of NPD was significantly higher than that of the TLC (98.2 ± 0.63% versus 52.11 ± 38.97%, p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

The NPD has a significantly higher shielding efficacy than that of the TLC, in particular, it protects the operators' lower limb, liberates their lower body from wearing heavy lead apron, and may consequently reduce the radiation or body-load associated complications.

Effect of new radioprotective equipment on reducing radiation exposure of participants in percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: The ionising radiation generated in percutaneous coronary intervention has the largest hazard to medical staff among all interventional procedures, and thus has gained the attention of various researchers. Radioprotective shielding equipment is an effective measure; however, it has poor applicability to diverse interventional procedures. The aim of this study was to develop a new radioprotective shielding equipment for percutaneous coronary intervention and determine its effectiveness and applicability. Methods: This study developed a radioprotective cabin for percutaneous coronary intervention and used fluoroscopy and cine models of a digital subtraction angiography machine to compare the effectiveness of experimental (radioprotective cabin) and control (current radioprotection strategies) groups. Radiation equivalent dose rates were measured at 231 data points: 210 points were distributed on four vertical planes around the therapy bed and 21 points were evenly distributed around the thyroid, head, and gonad areas of a standardised patient. Results: Based on the cine model, there were statistically significant differences in the radiation equivalent dose rates between the control and experimental groups in the left plane, right plane, foot plane, head area, and gonad area (Z = −6.645, −5.615, −6.204, −2.647, −2.882, respectively; P < 0.05). Based on the fluoroscopy model, there were statistically significant differences in the radiation equivalent dose rates between the two groups in the left plane, right plane, foot plane, and gonad area (Z = −6.060, −5.083, −5.203, −2.887, respectively; P < 0.05). Conclusion: The radioprotective cabin developed in this study can effectively reduce the radiation equivalent dose rates in the standing area of medical staff and radiation-sensitive areas of patients without affecting the operation, which can be promoted and applied in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Nursing care management in radiation protection in interventional radiology

OBJECTIVE

To reflect on the elements of nursing care management in radiological protection in interventional radiology.

METHODOLOGY

A reflection paper based on national and international articles and laws addressing the nursing care management issue and radiological protection in interventional radiology.

RESULTS

From the conceptions of nursing care management and professional practice, the following elements were perceived in this management: expertise and applicability of the radiological protection principles, biological effects of ionizing radiation, occupational dose monitoring, personal and collective protective equipment, patient safety, training in radiological protection, quality assurance program.

CONCLUSION

The management of nursing care in radiological protection in interventional radiology is implemented in an elementary way regarding care aimed at dose reduction, either for workers or patients. There is a need to recognize, understand and characterize the management of nursing care in this scenario.

LENS EQUIVALENT DOSE OF STAFF DURING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: DOSE COMPARISON USING TWO TYPES OF DOSEMETERS

This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck. The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p < 0.01). For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.

CURRENT TRENDS OF RADIATION PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY

Interventional radiology represents subspecialty of radiology, which does not use imaging modalities only for diagnostics, but mostly for therapeutic purposes. Realisation of interventional procedures is done through X-rays, which replaces direct visual control done by interventional radiologist or cardiologist. For the targeted reduction of the radiation exposure, the interventional radiology staff use personal protective equipment. Usually, aprons with lead-equivalent are used, which provide protection for 75% of the radiosensitive organs. As the eye lens and thyroid gland belong to the radiosensitive organs, lead eyeglasses and thyroid collar are commonly used for their protection. Cap and gloves with lead-equivalent can be utilised as an additional personal protective equipment, that is commercially available. Innovative protection systems, such as mobile radiation protection cabin and suspended radiation protection, have been designed to ensure better radiation protection and safety. These systems provide the comfort for the interventional radiologists at work, while offering better protection against ionising radiation.

Physical strain while wearing personal radiation protection systems in interventional radiology

Objectives

Multiple studies show orthopedic health problems for medical staff due to wearing radiation protection aprons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the weight pressure on the shoulder as a marker of physical strain caused by different radiation-protection devices.

Methods

For the weight pressure measurement, a pressure sensor (OMD-30-SE-100N, OptoForce, Budapest, Hungary) placed on the left and right shoulder was used. Wearing different radiation protection systems the force measurement system was used to quantify the weight pressure. Measurements were acquired in still standing position and during various movements.

Results

A mean significant decreasing weight pressure on the shoulder between 74% and 84% (p<0.001) was measured, when the free-hanging radiation protection system was used in comparison to one-piece and two-piece radiation protection aprons and coats. Using two-piece radiation protection aprons, the weight pressure was significantly lower than that of one-piece radiation protection coats. If a belt was used for the one-piece radiation protection coat, the weight pressure on the shoulder was reduced by 32.5% (p = 0.003). For a two-piece radiation protection apron and a one-piece radiation protection coat (with and without belt) a significant different weight pressure distribution between the right and left shoulder could be measured.

Conclusions

The free-hanging radiation protection system showed a significant lower weight pressure in comparison to the other radiation protection devices. Apart from this, use of a two-piece radiation protection apron or addition of a belt to a radiation protection coat proved to be further effective options to reduce weight pressure.

What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Protection against occupational radiation exposure in clinical settings is important. This paper clarifies the present status of medical occupational exposure protection and possible additional safety measures. Radiation injuries, such as cataracts, have been reported in physicians and staff who perform interventional radiology (IVR), thus, it is important that they use shielding devices (e.g., lead glasses and ceiling-suspended shields). Currently, there is no single perfect radiation shield; combinations of radiation shields are required. Radiological medical workers must be appropriately educated in terms of reducing radiation exposure among both patients and staff. They also need to be aware of the various methods available for estimating/reducing patient dose and occupational exposure. When the optimizing the dose to the patient, such as eliminating a patient dose that is higher than necessary, is applied, exposure of radiological medical workers also decreases without any loss of diagnostic benefit. Thus, decreasing the patient dose also reduces occupational exposure. We propose a novel four-point policy for protecting medical staff from radiation: patient dose Optimization, Distance, Shielding, and Time (pdO-DST). Patient dose optimization means that the patient never receives a higher dose than is necessary, which also reduces the dose received by the staff. The patient dose must be optimized: shielding is critical, but it is only one component of protection from radiation used in medical procedures. Here, we review the radiation protection/reduction basics for radiological medical workers, especially for IVR staff.

Gestão do cuidado em enfermagem na proteção radiológica em radiologia intervencionista

RESUMO Objetivo: Refletir sobre os elementos da gestão do cuidado em enfermagem na proteção radiológica em radiologia intervencionista. Metodologia: Estudo reflexivo realizado a partir de artigos e legislação nacional e internacional abordando a temática da gestão do cuidado em enfermagem e proteção radiológica em radiologia intervencionista. Resultados: A partir das concepções de gestão do cuidado em enfermagem e atuação profissional na prática vislumbrou-se como elementos dessa gestão: conhecimentos e aplicabilidade dos princípios de proteção radiológica, efeitos biológicos da radiação ionizante, monitoramento de dose ocupacional, equipamentos de proteção individual e coletiva, segurança do paciente, educação em proteção radiológica, programa de garantia de qualidade. Conclusão: A gestão do cuidado em enfermagem em proteção radiológica em radiologia intervencionista é implementada de forma incipiente no que tange aos cuidados voltados para redução de dose, seja para trabalhadores ou paciente. Torna-se necessário reconhecer, compreender e caracterizar a gestão do cuidado em enfermagem nesse cenário.

Effects of Occupational Radiation Exposure on Job Stress and Job Burnout of Medical Staff in Xinjiang, China: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND Although the potential effects of long-term and low-dose radiation exposure on physical health have attracted considerable attention, few systematic evaluations have been reported regarding the mental health of occupational groups. This study sought to investigate the effects of occupational radiation exposure on job stress and job burnout of medical radiation staff. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using cluster random sampling, a total of 1573 medical radiation workers were initially selected from 10 hospitals in Xinjiang, China, and 1396 valid questionnaires were finally collected. Job stress and job burnout were assessed using the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire and the Chinese Maslach Burnout Inventory (CMBI), respectively. RESULTS The percentages of medical radiation staff experiencing job stress and job burnout were 53.08% and 63.32%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in job stress was observed in association with age, ethnicity, professional title, marital status, radiation work type, radiation working years, family history, hypertension, obesity, smoking, and drinking (P<0.05). A statistically significant difference in job burnout was observed in association with age, sex, ethnicity, professional title, educational level, marital status, job post, radiation work type, radiation working years, family history, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity (P<0.05). Female (odds ratio [OR]=0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.98), senior professional title (OR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.96), and radiation work types of nuclear medicine (OR=0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.33) and radiotherapy (OR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.79) were protective factors, and job stress (OR=4.57, 95% CI: 3.55-5.91) was the risk factor for job burnout of medical radiation staff. CONCLUSIONS Medical radiation staff experience high levels of job stress and job burnout. The interventions of occupational physical examination, personal dose monitoring, occupational health education, and management optimization are recommended to relieve job stress and job burnout and enhance occupational health of medical radiation staff.

Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations

PURPOSE

Radiation-absorbing pads are an additional possibility to reduce scattered radiation at its source. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new reusable radiation-absorbing pad at its origin in an experimental setup.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All measurements were carried out using a clinical angiography system with a standardized fluoroscopy protocol, different C-arm angulations and an anthropomorphic torso phantom as a scattering body. An ionization chamber was used to measure the radiation exposure at five different heights of a simulated operator during a simulated transfemoral angiography intervention. Measurements were carried out with and without radiation-absorbing pads with lead equivalents of 0.25 and 0.5 mm placed onto the scattering body. For all measurements a mobile acrylic shield and an under-table lead curtain was used.

RESULTS

At all operator heights from 100 to 165 cm a significant radiation dose reduction of up to 80.6 % (p < 0.01) using the radiation-absorbing pad was measured, when compared to no radiation-absorbing pad. At the height of 165 cm the radiation-absorbing pad with a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a significant radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a radiation-absorbing pad to the standard protection means results in a significant dose reduction for the operator, particularly for upper body parts.

Cardiac catheterization real-time dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate lifetime attributable risk of cancer

Cardiac catheterization procedure is the gold standard to diagnose and treat cardiovascular disease. However, radiation safety and cancer risk remain major concerns. This study aimed to real-time dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence and mortality in operators. Coronary angiography (CA) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CA, and others (radiofrequency ablation, pacemaker and defibrillator implantation) procedures with different beam directions, were undertaken on x-ray angiography system. A real-time electronic personal dosimeter (EPD) system was used to measure the radiation dose of staff during all procedures. We followed the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII report to estimate the LAR of all cancer incidence and mortality. Primary operators received radiation dose in CA with PCI, CA, and others procedures were 59.33 ± 95.03 μSv, 39.81 ± 103.85 μSv, and 21.92 ± 37.04 μSv, respectively. As to the assistant operators were 30.03 ± 55.67 μSv, 14.67 ± 14.88 μSv, and 4 μSv, respectively. LAR of all cancer incidences for staffs aged from 18 to 65 are varied from 0.40% for males to 1.50% for females. LAR of all cancer mortality for staffs aged from 18 to 65 are varied from 0.22% for males to 0.83% for females. Our study provided an easy, real-time and dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate LAR of cancer for staff during the cardiac catheterization procedures. The LAR for all cancer incidence is about twice that for cancer mortality. Although the radiation doses of staff are lower during each procedure, the increased years of service leads to greater radiation risk to the staff.