Sub-solid nodule detectability in seven observers of seventy-nine clinical cases: comparison between ultra-low-dose chest digital tomosynthesis with iterative reconstruction and chest radiography by receiver-operating characteristics analysis

Role of digital tomosynthesis in the context of tuberculosis contact investigation: comparisons with digital radiography

BACKGROUND

Chest radiography value as a screening tool in those exposed to pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is reduced by its lower sensitivity to detect small intrapulmonary lesions.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of digital tomosynthesis (DTS) screening of individuals that had contacted persons with active TB using low-dose computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, community-based screening study of 90 adults who had been in close contact with a TB case was undertaken at our institution. All individuals underwent clinical evaluation, digital radiography (DR), DTS, and low-dose chest CT. Observers assessed and classified DR and DTS images using CT as the reference-standard method. Based on clinical and imaging findings, TB status was classified as normal, latent, minimal, subclinical, and active. Diagnostic performances of DTS and DR for the interpretation of correct diagnosis were calculated.

RESULTS

The estimated effective doses for DR, DTS, and low-dose CT were 0.01 mSv, 0.1 mSv, and 0.33 mSv, respectively. TB statuses of the 90 individuals were as follows: 62 latent (68.9%); two subclinical (2.2%); and one minimal (1.1%). The sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of DTS and DR in the interpretation of correct diagnosis were 75.8%, 100%, 91.1% and 48.5%, 96.5%, 78.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DTS appears to be superior to DR for the detection of lung lesions in individuals with TB contacts. DTS can offer a reasonable option for TB contact investigation.

The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography

Purpose

We investigated whether the additional use of grey-scale inversion technique improves the interpretation of eight chest abnormalities, in terms of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.

Material and methods

A total of 507 patients who underwent a chest computed tomography (CT) examination and a chest radiography (CXR) within 24 h were enrolled. CT was the standard of reference. Images were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of atelectasis, consolidation, interstitial abnormality, nodule, mass, pleural effusion, pneumothorax and rib fractures. Four CXR reading settings, involving 3 readers were organized: only standard; only inverted; standard followed by inverted; and inverted followed by standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy, assessed with the area under the curve (AUC), and their 95% confidence interval were calculated for each reader and setting. Interobserver agreement was tested by Cohen’s K test with quadratic weights (K_w) and its 95%CI.

Results

CXR sensitivity % for any finding was 35.1 (95% CI: 33 to 37) for setting 1, 35.9 (95% CI: 33 to 37), for setting 2, 32.59 (95% CI: 30 to 34) for setting 3, and 35.56 (95% CI: 33 to 37) for setting 4; specificity % 93.78 (95% CI: 91 to 95), 93.92 (95% CI: 91 to 95), 94.43 (95% CI: 92 to 96), 93.86 (95% CI: 91 to 95); PPV % 56.22 (95% CI: 54.2 to 58.2), 56.49 (95% CI: 54.5 to 58.5), 57.15 (95% CI: 55 to 59), 56.75 (95% CI: 54 to 58); NPV % 85.66 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.74 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.29 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.73 (95% CI: 83 to 87); AUC values 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.66), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.67), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.66), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.67); K_w values 0.42 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.44), 0.40 (95% CI: 0.38 to 0.42), 0.42 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.44), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.43) for settings 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

Conclusions

No significant advantages were observed in the use of grey-scale inversion technique neither over standard display mode nor in combination at the detection of eight chest abnormalities.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11547-022-01453-0.