1
|
Piro K, Ma IWY, Shokoohi H, Novak K. Intestinal Ultrasound in Common Gastrointestinal Disorders: An Evidence-Based Approach. Med Clin North Am 2025; 109:177-189. [PMID: 39567092 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2024.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
Patients with abdominal symptoms are among the most common to present both urgently and non-urgently for medical evaluation. While intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is useful to aid management of these patients, it is not routinely taught, performed, or included as part of the core set of point-of-care ultrasound competencies. The authors present an approach to performing a systematic, but focused, IUS at the bedside and diagnostic accuracies for small bowel obstruction inflammatory bowel disease, appendicitis, and diverticulitis. An approach on how to integrate IUS findings and common pitfalls will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Piro
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Point of Care Ultrasound, General Medicine Ultrasound Fellowship, Oregon Health & Science University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Point of Care Ultrasound, General Medicine Ultrasound Fellowship, Oregon Health & Science University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Irene W Y Ma
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Hamid Shokoohi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua Street, Suite 2424, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Kerri Novak
- University of Calgary Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Gioia CC, Alame A, Orso D. The Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound on the Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Obstruction in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Single-Center Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:2006. [PMID: 39768886 PMCID: PMC11727861 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) requires prompt diagnosis and management. Due to its advantages, POCUS can be beneficial when assessing SBO. However, it is still doubtful whether POCUS performed by an emergency doctor can prolong the time of patients with SBO in the emergency department (ED). The primary outcome was time to diagnosis when using POCUS compared to not using it. Secondary outcomes included the processing time in the ED, ED length of stay (LOS), rates of abdominal radiography, hospital LOS, and mortality. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study in our ED from 1 November 2021 to 31 December 2023, including patients aged 18 and older diagnosed with SBO. Both groups received confirmation of their diagnosis through contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The two groups of patients (POCUS group vs. non-POCUS group) were compared regarding the time needed to reach the final diagnosis (i.e., time to diagnosis), the ED LOS, the hospital LOS, and in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 106 patients were included. The median time to diagnosis was 121 min for the POCUS group vs. 217 min for the non-POCUS group (p < 0.001). Median ED processing time was 276 min in the POCUS group compared to 376 min in the non-POCUS group (p = 0.006). ED LOS was also shorter in the POCUS group (333 vs. 436 min, p = 0.010). Abdominal X-ray rates were lower in the POCUS group (49% vs. 78%, p = 0.004). Hospital LOS was similar between the two groups (p = 1.000). Five non-POCUS patients died during hospitalization; none died in the POCUS group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.063). Conclusions: POCUS significantly reduced time to diagnosis and ED LOS. Further exploration is needed to assess long-term outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of integrating POCUS into ED practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Cristiano Di Gioia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Community Hospital of Baggiovara (MO), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy;
| | - Alice Alame
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy;
| | - Daniele Orso
- Department of Emergency, “Santa Maria della Misericordia” University Hospital of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Damewood S, Finberg M, Lin-Martore M. Gastrointestinal and Biliary Point-of-Care Ultrasound. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2024; 42:773-790. [PMID: 39326987 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2024.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound has been shown to have excellent diagnostic accuracy for a variety of gastrointestinal and biliary pathologies. This review explores the evidence and scanning techniques for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, intussusception, appendicitis, small bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, hernias, pneumoperitoneum, and biliary pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Damewood
- BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, 800 University Bay Drive Suite 310 MC 9123, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| | - Maytal Finberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, 550 16th Street, Box 0649, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, 550 16th Street, Box 0649, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Margaret Lin-Martore
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, 550 16th Street, Box 0649, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, 550 16th Street, Box 0649, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shokoohi H, Al Jalbout N, Peksa GD, Mayes KD, Becker BA, Boniface KS, Lahham S, Secko M, Chavoshzadeh M, Jang T, Gottlieb M. Optimal bowel diameter thresholds for diagnosing small bowel obstruction and surgical intervention with point-of-care ultrasound. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 84:1-6. [PMID: 39043061 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A bowel diameter threshold of ≥2.5 cm, originally derived from the research using computed tomography, is frequently used for diagnosing small bowel obstruction (SBO) with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). We sought to determine the optimal bowel diameter threshold for diagnosing SBO using POCUS and its accuracy in predicting surgical intervention. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis using individual patient-level data from a previous systematic review on POCUS for SBO diagnosis across five academic EDs. Patient data were collected, including imaging results, surgical findings, and final diagnosis. The measured diameter of the small bowel using POCUS was recorded. ROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were constructed to determine the optimal threshold for bowel diameter in predicting SBO diagnosis and surgical intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex and age. RESULTS A total of 403 patients had individual patient-level data available, with 367 patients included in the final analysis. The most accurate bowel diameter overall for predicting SBO was 2.75 cm (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81). A bowel diameter of ≤1.7 cm had 100% sensitivity with no miss rate, while a bowel diameter of ≥4 cm had 90.7% specificity in confirming SBO. Patients under 65 had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm versus 2.95 cm in patients over 65. Females had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm, while males had a value of 2.95 cm. There was no significant correlation between bowel diameter thresholds and surgical intervention. CONCLUSION A bowel diameter threshold of 2.75 cm on POCUS is more discriminative diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing SBO. Patients' age and sex may impact diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that tailored approaches may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Shokoohi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Nour Al Jalbout
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Gary D Peksa
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
| | - Katherine Dickerson Mayes
- Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Brent A Becker
- Department of Emergency Medicine, WellSpan York Hospital, York, PA, United States of America
| | - Keith S Boniface
- Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Shadi Lahham
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA, United States of America.
| | - Michael Secko
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
| | | | - Timothy Jang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor UCLA, CA, United States of America.
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amimer S, Le Bastard Q, Berranger C, Batard E, Le Conte P. Abdominal point-of-care ultrasound for the exclusion of bowel obstruction: prospective multicentre observational study. Eur J Emerg Med 2023; 30:298-299. [PMID: 37387633 DOI: 10.1097/mej.0000000000001030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Amimer
- Service des Urgences, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Nazaire, Saint-Nazaire
| | - Quentin Le Bastard
- Service des Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
- Faculté de Médecine, Nantes Université
| | | | - Eric Batard
- Service des Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
- Faculté de Médecine, Nantes Université
| | - Philippe Le Conte
- Service des Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
- Faculté de Médecine, Nantes Université
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shokoohi H, Mayes KD, Peksa GD, Loesche MA, Becker BA, Boniface KS, Lahham S, Jang TB, Secko M, Gottlieb M. Multi-center analysis of point-of-care ultrasound for small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and individual patient-level meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 70:144-150. [PMID: 37290251 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in identifying small bowel obstruction (SBO) and to investigate the impact of clinician experience level and body mass index (BMI) on POCUS performance for diagnosing SBO in the Emergency Department. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 2011-2022. We performed a meta-analysis using individual patient-level data from prospective diagnostic accuracy studies from which we obtained data from the corresponding authors. Overall test characteristics and subgroup analysis across clinician experience levels and a range of BMI were calculated. The primary outcome was SBO as the final diagnosis during hospitalization. RESULTS We included Individual patient data from 433 patients from 5 prospective studies. Overall, 33% of patients had a final diagnosis of SBO. POCUS had 83.0% (95%CI 71.7%-90.4%) sensitivity and 93.0% (95%CI 55.3%-99.3%) specificity; LR+ was 11.9 (95%CI 1.2-114.9) and LR- was 0.2 (95%CI 0.1-0.3). Residents had exhibited a sensitivity of 73.0% (95%CI 56.6%-84.9%) and specificity of 88.2% (95%CI 58.8%-97.5%), whereas attendings had demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.7% (95%CI 71.1%-95.4%) and specificity of 91.4% (95%CI 57.4%-98.8%). Among those patients with BMI<30 kg/m2, POCUS showed a sensitivity of 88.6% (95%CI 79.5%-94.7%) and a specificity of 84.0% (95%CI 75.3%-90.6%), while patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 exhibited a sensitivity of 72.0% (95%CI 50.6%-87.9%) and specificity of 89.5% (95%CI 75.2%-97.1%). CONCLUSIONS POCUS correctly identified those patients with SBO with high sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic accuracy was slightly reduced when performed by resident physicians and among patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022303598.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Shokoohi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital- Harvard Medical School, 326 Cambridge Street, Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America.
| | - Katherine Dickerson Mayes
- Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Gary D Peksa
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Michael A Loesche
- Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Brent A Becker
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, PA, United States of America
| | - Keith S Boniface
- Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Shadi Lahham
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA, United States of America
| | - Timothy B Jang
- Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States of America
| | - Michael Secko
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boccatonda A, D’Ardes D, Tallarico V, Vicari S, Bartoli E, Vidili G, Guagnano MT, Cocco G, Cipollone F, Schiavone C, Accogli E. Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Emergency Setting. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12030799. [PMID: 36769448 PMCID: PMC9917741 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute bowel diseases are responsible for more than one third of subjects who were referred to the emergency department for acute abdominal pain and gastrointestinal evaluation. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is often employed as the first imaging method, with a good diagnostic accuracy in the setting of acute abdomen, and it can be an optimal diagnostic strategy in young females due to the radiation exposure related to X-ray and computed tomography methods. The physician can examine the gastrointestinal system in the area with the greatest tenderness by ultrasound, thus obtaining more information and data on the pathology than the standard physical examination. In this comprehensive review, we have reported the most relevant indications and advantages to using ultrasound in the investigation of abdominal acute pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Boccatonda
- Internal Medicine, Bentivoglio Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bentivoglio (BO), 40010 Bologna, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-051-664-4111
| | - Damiano D’Ardes
- Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Institute of “Clinica Medica”, “G. d’Annunzio” University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Viola Tallarico
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bologna University, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Susanna Vicari
- Internal Medicine, Bentivoglio Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bentivoglio (BO), 40010 Bologna, Italy
| | - Elena Bartoli
- Internal Medicine, Bentivoglio Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bentivoglio (BO), 40010 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Vidili
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Guagnano
- Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Institute of “Clinica Medica”, “G. d’Annunzio” University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Giulio Cocco
- Internistic Ultrasound Unit, SS Annunziata Hospital, “G. d’Annunzio” University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Cipollone
- Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Institute of “Clinica Medica”, “G. d’Annunzio” University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Cosima Schiavone
- Internistic Ultrasound Unit, SS Annunziata Hospital, “G. d’Annunzio” University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Esterita Accogli
- Internal Medicine, Centre of Research and Learning in Ultrasound, Maggiore Hospital, 40133 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|