Comparison of pre- and post-contrast-enhanced attenuation correction using a CAIPI-accelerated T1-weighted Dixon 3D-VIBE sequence in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI

Structure-guided MR-to-CT synthesis with spatial and semantic alignments for attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging

Image synthesis from Magnetic Resonance (MR) to Computed Tomography (CT) can estimate the electron density of tissues, thereby facilitating Positron Emission Tomography (PET) attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR imaging. Whole-body MR-to-CT synthesis faces several challenges including the spatial misalignment caused by tissue variety and respiratory movements, and the complex intensity mapping due to large intensity variations across the whole body. However, existing MR-to-CT synthesis methods mainly focus on body sub-regions, making them ineffective in addressing these challenges. Here we propose a novel whole-body MR-to-CT synthesis framework, which consists of three novel modules to tackle these challenges: (1) Structure-Guided Synthesis module leverages structure-guided attention gates to enhance synthetic image quality by diminishing unnecessary contours of soft tissues; (2) Spatial Alignment module yields precise registration between paired MR and CT images by taking into account the impacts of tissue volumes and respiratory movements, thus providing well-aligned ground-truth CT images during training; (3) Semantic Alignment module utilizes contrastive learning to constrain organ-related semantic information, thereby ensuring the semantic authenticity of synthetic CT images. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method produces visually plausible and semantically accurate CT images, outperforming existing approaches in both synthetic image quality and PET attenuation correction accuracy.

Systematic evaluation of human soft tissue attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR: Implications from PET/CT for optimization of MR-based AC in patients with normal lung tissue

BACKGROUND

Attenuation correction (AC) is an important methodical step in positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) to correct for attenuated and scattered PET photons.

PURPOSE

The overall quality of magnetic resonance (MR)-based AC in whole-body PET/MRI was evaluated in direct comparison to computed tomography (CT)-based AC serving as reference. The quantitative impact of isolated tissue classes in the MR-AC was systematically investigated to identify potential optimization needs and strategies.

METHODS

Data of n = 60 whole-body PET/CT patients with normal lung tissue and without metal implants/prostheses were used to generate six different AC-models based on the CT data for each patient, simulating variations of MR-AC. The original continuous CT-AC (CT-org) is referred to as reference. A pseudo MR-AC (CT-mrac), generated from CT data, with four tissue classes and a bone atlas represents the MR-AC. Relative difference in linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) and standardized uptake values were calculated. From the results two improvements regarding soft tissue AC and lung AC were proposed and evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall performance of MR-AC is in good agreement compared to CT-AC. Lungs, heart, and bone tissue were identified as the regions with most deviation to the CT-AC (myocardium -15%, bone tissue -14%, and lungs ±20%). Using single-valued LACs for AC in the lung only provides limited accuracy. For improved soft tissue AC, splitting the combined soft tissue class into muscles and organs each with adapted LAC could reduce the deviations to the CT-AC to < ±1%. For improved lung AC, applying a gradient LAC in the lungs could remarkably reduce over- or undercorrections in PET signal compared to CT-AC (±5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The AC is important to ensure best PET image quality and accurate PET quantification for diagnostics and radiotherapy planning. The optimized segment-based AC proposed in this study, which was evaluated on PET/CT data, inherently reduces quantification bias in normal lung tissue and soft tissue compared to the CT-AC reference.

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Attenuation Does Not Impact PET Quantification in Simultaneous Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Breast PET/MR

PURPOSE

Simultaneous PET/MR imaging involves injection of a radiopharmaceutical and often also includes administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). Phantom model studies indicate that attenuation of annihilation photons by GBCAs does not bias quantification metrics of PET radiopharmaceutical uptake. However, a direct comparison of attenuation corrected PET values before and after administration of GBCA has not been performed in patients imaged with simultaneous dynamic PET/MR. The purpose of this study was to investigate the attenuating effect of GBCAs on standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification of ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in invasive breast cancer and normal tissues using simultaneous PET/MR.

METHODS

The study included 13 women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer imaged using simultaneous dedicated prone breast PET/MR with FDG. PET data collection and two-point Dixon based MR attenuation correction sequences began simultaneously before the administration of GBCA to avoid a potential impact of GBCA on the attenuation correction map. A standard clinical dose of GBCA was intravenously administered for the dynamic contrast enhanced MR sequences obtained during the simultaneous PET data acquisition. PET data were dynamically reconstructed into 60 frames of 30 seconds each. Three timing windows were chosen consisting of a single frame (30 seconds), two frames (60 seconds), or four frames (120 seconds) immediately before and after contrast administration. SUV_max and SUV_mean of the biopsy-proven breast malignancy, fibroglandular tissue of the contralateral normal breast, descending aorta, and liver were calculated prior to and following GBCA administration. Percent change in the SUV metrics were calculated to test for a statistically significant, non-zero percent change using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

No statistical change in SUV_max or SUV_mean was found for the breast malignancies or normal anatomical regions during the timing windows before and after GBCA administration.

CONCLUSIONS

GBCAs do not significantly impact the results of PET quantification by means of additional attenuation. However, GBCAs may still affect quantification by affecting MR acquisitions used for MR-based attenuation correction which this study did not address. Corrections to account for attenuation due to clinical concentrations of GBCAs are not necessary in simultaneous PET/MR examinations when MR-based attenuation correction sequences are performed prior to GBCA administration. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.