A CT-based radiomics signature for preoperative discrimination between high and low expression of programmed death ligand 1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

A whirl of radiomics-based biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy, why is large scale validation still lacking?

The search for understanding immunotherapy response has sparked interest in diverse areas of oncology, with artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics emerging as promising tools, capable of gathering large amounts of information to identify suitable patients for treatment. The application of AI in radiology has grown, driven by the hypothesis that radiology images capture tumor phenotypes and thus could provide valuable insights into immunotherapy response likelihood. However, despite the rapid growth of studies, no algorithms in the field have reached clinical implementation, mainly due to the lack of standardized methods, hampering study comparisons and reproducibility across different datasets. In this review, we performed a comprehensive assessment of published data to identify sources of variability in radiomics study design that hinder the comparison of the different model performance and, therefore, clinical implementation. Subsequently, we conducted a use-case meta-analysis using homogenous studies to assess the overall performance of radiomics in estimating programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Our findings indicate that, despite numerous attempts to predict immunotherapy response, only a limited number of studies share comparable methodologies and report sufficient data about cohorts and methods to be suitable for meta-analysis. Nevertheless, although only a few studies meet these criteria, their promising results underscore the importance of ongoing standardization and benchmarking efforts. This review highlights the importance of uniformity in study design and reporting. Such standardization is crucial to enable meaningful comparisons and demonstrate the validity of biomarkers across diverse populations, facilitating their implementation into the immunotherapy patient selection process.

A Radiomics Approach to Identify Immunologically Active Tumor in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

We recently developed a gene-expression-based HOT score to identify the hot/cold phenotype of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), which is associated with the response to immunotherapy. Our goal was to determine whether radiomic profiling from computed tomography (CT) scans can distinguish hot and cold HNSCC.

METHOD

We included 113 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and 20 patients from the Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière (GHPS) with HNSCC, all with available pre-treatment CT scans. The hot/cold phenotype was computed for all patients using the HOT score. The IBEX software (version 4.11.9, accessed on 30 march 2020) was used to extract radiomic features from the delineated tumor region in both datasets, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed to select robust features. Machine learning classifier models were trained and tested in the TCGA dataset and validated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) in the GHPS cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 144 radiomic features with an ICC >0.9 was selected. An XGBoost model including these selected features showed the best performance prediction of the hot/cold phenotype with AUC = 0.86 in the GHPS validation dataset.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

We identified a relevant radiomic model to capture the overall hot/cold phenotype of HNSCC. This non-invasive approach could help with the identification of patients with HNSCC who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Radiomics models based on multisequence MRI for predicting PD-1/PD-L1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of radiomics based on multisequence MRI in predicting the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). One hundred and eight patients with HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI 2 weeks before surgical resection were enrolled in this retrospective study. Corresponding paraffin sections were collected for immunohistochemistry to detect the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. All patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to select potential clinical characteristics related to PD-1 and PD-L1 expression. Radiomics features were extracted from the axial fat-suppression T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) images and the arterial phase and portal venous phase images from the axial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the corresponding feature sets were generated. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select the optimal radiomics features for analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to construct single-sequence and multisequence radiomics and radiomic-clinical models. The predictive performance was judged by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the training and validation cohorts. In the whole cohort, PD-1 expression was positive in 43 patients, and PD-L1 expression was positive in 34 patients. The presence of satellite nodules served as an independent predictor of PD-L1 expression. The AUC values of the FS-T2WI, arterial phase, portal venous phase and multisequence models in predicting the expression of PD-1 were 0.696, 0.843, 0.863, and 0.946 in the training group and 0.669, 0.792, 0.800 and 0.815 in the validation group, respectively. The AUC values of the FS-T2WI, arterial phase, portal venous phase, multisequence and radiomic-clinical models in predicting PD-L1 expression were 0.731, 0.800, 0.800, 0.831 and 0.898 in the training group and 0.621, 0.743, 0.771, 0.810 and 0.779 in the validation group, respectively. The combined models showed better predictive performance. The results of this study suggest that a radiomics model based on multisequence MRI has the potential to predict the preoperative expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in HCC, which could become an imaging biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment.

Radiomics: A review of current applications and possibilities in the assessment of tumor microenvironment

With the recent success in the application of immunotherapy for treating various advanced cancers, the tumor microenvironment has rapidly become an important field of research. The tumor microenvironment is complex and its characteristics strongly influence disease biology and potentially responses to systemic therapy. Accurate preoperative assessment of tumor microenvironment is of great significance for the formulation of an immunotherapy strategy and evaluation of patient prognosis. As a research hotspot in medical image analysis technology, radiomics has been applied in the auxiliary diagnosis of the tumor microenvironment. This article reviews the current status of radiomics in the elective application on tumor microenvironment and discusses potential prospects.

Radiomics-based prediction of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for solid cancers using computed tomography: a real-world study of two centers

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an approved treatment for various cancers; however, only a small proportion of the population is responsive to such treatment. We aimed to develop and validate a plain CT-based tool for predicting the response to ICI treatment among cancer patients.

METHODS

Data for patients with solid cancers treated with ICIs at two centers from October 2019 to October 2021 were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment CT images of the tumor of interest. After feature selection, a radiomics signature was constructed based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model, and the signature and clinical factors were incorporated into a radiomics nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using the training and validation sets. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to visualize associations with survival.

RESULTS

Data for 122 and 30 patients were included in the training and validation sets, respectively. Both the radiomics signature (radscore) and nomogram exhibited good discrimination of response status, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.790 and 0.814 for the training set and 0.831 and 0.847 for the validation set, respectively. The calibration evaluation indicated goodness-of-fit for both models, while the decision curves indicated that clinical application was favorable. Both models were associated with the overall survival of patients in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a radiomics model for early prediction of the response to ICI treatment. This model may aid in identifying the patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics: fundamentals, applications, and challenges in immunotherapy

Immunotherapy offers the potential for durable clinical benefit but calls into question the association between tumor size and outcome that currently forms the basis for imaging-guided treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics allow for discovery of novel patterns in medical images that can increase radiology’s role in management of patients with cancer, although methodological issues in the literature limit its clinical application. Using keywords related to immunotherapy and radiomics, we performed a literature review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase from database inception through February 2022. We removed all duplicates, non-English language reports, abstracts, reviews, editorials, perspectives, case reports, book chapters, and non-relevant studies. From the remaining articles, the following information was extracted: publication information, sample size, primary tumor site, imaging modality, primary and secondary study objectives, data collection strategy (retrospective vs prospective, single center vs multicenter), radiomic signature validation strategy, signature performance, and metrics for calculation of a Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). We identified 351 studies, of which 87 were unique reports relevant to our research question. The median (IQR) of cohort sizes was 101 (57–180). Primary stated goals for radiomics model development were prognostication (n=29, 33.3%), treatment response prediction (n=24, 27.6%), and characterization of tumor phenotype (n=14, 16.1%) or immune environment (n=13, 14.9%). Most studies were retrospective (n=75, 86.2%) and recruited patients from a single center (n=57, 65.5%). For studies with available information on model testing, most (n=54, 65.9%) used a validation set or better. Performance metrics were generally highest for radiomics signatures predicting treatment response or tumor phenotype, as opposed to immune environment and overall prognosis. Out of a possible maximum of 36 points, the median (IQR) of RQS was 12 (10–16). While a rapidly increasing number of promising results offer proof of concept that AI and radiomics could drive precision medicine approaches for a wide range of indications, standardizing the data collection as well as optimizing the methodological quality and rigor are necessary before these results can be translated into clinical practice.

New Challenges in Evaluating Outcomes after Immunotherapy in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

In many recurrent and/or metastatic cancers, the advent of immunotherapy opens up new scenarios of treatment response, with new phenomena, such as pseudoprogression and hyperprogression. Because of this, different immune-related response criteria have been developed, and new therapeutic strategies adopted, such as treatment beyond progression. Moreover, the role of progression-free survival as a surrogate has been questioned, and new surrogate endpoint hypotheses have arisen. A proper understanding of radiological imaging, an assessment of the biological events triggered by therapy, and the clinical evolution of the lesions and of the patient performance status are all factors that should be considered to guide the oncologist’s treatment choice. The primary aim of this article is to discuss how all these concepts apply to recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients when treated with immunotherapy.