Histogram analysis based on diffusion kurtosis imaging: Differentiating glioblastoma multiforme from single brain metastasis and comparing the diagnostic performance of two region of interest placements

Bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating high-grade gliomas from solitary brain metastases: a VOI-based histogram analysis

This study investigated the use of bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with structural features to differentiate high-grade glioma (HGG) from solitary brain metastasis (SBM). A total of 57 patients (31 HGG, 26 SBM) who underwent pre-surgical multi-b DWI and structural MRI (T1W, T2W, T1W + C) were included. Volumes of interest (VOI) in the peritumoral edema area (PTEA) and enhanced tumor area (ETA) were selected for analysis. Histogram features of slow diffusion coefficient (Dslow), fast diffusion coefficient (Dfast), and perfusion fraction (frac) were extracted. Results showed that HGG patients had higher skewness of Dfast (P = 0.022) and frac (P = 0.077), higher kurtosis of Dslow (P = 0.019) and frac (P = 0.025), and lower entropy of Dslow (P = 0.005) and frac (P = 0.001) within the ETA. Additionally, HGG exhibited lower mean frac in both ETA (P = 0.007) and PTEA (P = 0.017). Combining skewness of frac in ETA with clear tumor margin enhanced diagnostic performance, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.79. These findings suggest that histogram analysis of diffusion and perfusion characteristics in ETA and structural features can effectively differentiate HGG from SBM.

Multimodal MRI and 1H-MRS for Preoperative Stratification of High-Risk Molecular Subtype in Adult-Type Diffuse Gliomas

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) genes are critical molecular markers in determining treatment options and predicting the prognosis of adult-type diffuse gliomas. Objectives: this study aimed to investigate whether multimodal MRI enables the differentiation of genotypes in adult-type diffuse gliomas. Methods: a total of 116 adult-type diffuse glioma patients (61 males, 51.5 (37, 62) years old) who underwent multimodal MRI before surgery were retrospectively analysed. Multimodal MRI included conventional MRI, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Conventional visual features, N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA)/Creatine (Cr), Choline (Cho)/Cr, Cho/NAA, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and diffusion histogram parameters were extracted on the whole tumour. Multimodal MRI parameters of IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype gliomas were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, Student's t-test, or Pearson chi-square tests. Logistic regression was used to select the MRI parameters to predict IDH-mutant gliomas. Furthermore, multimodal MRI parameters were selected to establish models for predicting MGMT methylation in the IDH-wildtype gliomas. The performance of models was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristics curve. Results: a total of 56 patients with IDH-mutant gliomas and 60 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas (GBM) (37 with methylated MGMT and 17 with unmethylated MGMT) were diagnosed by 2021 WHO classification criteria. The enhancement degree (OR = 4.298, p < 0.001), necrosis/cyst (OR = 5.381, p = 0.011), NAA/Cr (OR = 0.497, p = 0.037), FA-Skewness (OR = 0.497, p = 0.033), MD-Skewness (OR = 1.849, p = 0.035), FAmean (OR = 1.924, p = 0.049) were independent factors for the multimodal combined prediction model in predicting IDH-mutant gliomas. The combined modal based on conventional MRI, 1H-MRS, DTI parameters, and histogram performed best in predicting IDH-wildtype status (AUC = 0.890). However, only NAA/Cr (OR = 0.17, p = 0.043) and FA (OR = 0.38, p = 0.015) were associated with MGMT methylated in IDH-wildtype GBM. The combination of NAA/Cr and FA-Median is more accurate for predicting MGMT methylation levels than using these elements alone (AUC, 0.847 vs. 0.695/0.684). Conclusions: multimodal MRI based on conventional MRI, 1H-MRS, and DTI can provide compound imaging markers for stratified individual diagnosis of IDH mutant and MGMT promoter methylation in adult-type diffuse gliomas.

Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases based on multidiffusion MRI model quantitative analysis

Background and purpose

Differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from solitary brain metastases (SBMs) using conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains challenging due to their similar imaging features. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of advanced diffusion models, such as neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and mean apparent propagator magnetic resonance imaging (MAP-MRI), incomparison to traditional techniques like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for distinguishing HGGs from SBMs.

Methods

In total, 17 patients with HGGs and 26 patients with SBMs were prospectively recruited based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Structural MRI sequences and diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) were utilized to assess quantitative parameter models, including NODDI, MAP-MRI, DWI, DTI, and DKI. Quantitative parameters were measured for both the tumor parenchymal area and the peritumoral edema area. The quantitative parameters of the two patient groups were compared using either the independent Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. The effectiveness of each model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Finally, the DeLong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of each model through pairwise comparisons of ROC curves.

Results

Isotropic volume fraction (Viso) based on NODDI; mean squared displacement (MSD) and the return to plane probabilities (RTPP) based on MAP-MRI; radial diffusivity (RDk) and mean diffusivity (MDk) based on DKI; and axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), and mean diffusivity (MD) based on DTI of the peritumoral edema tumor were significantly different between HGGs and SBMs (p < 0.05). The optimal single discriminant parameters for each model are NODDI_Viso, MAP-MRI_MSD, DKI_MDk, and DTI_AD. Among these, the AUC of Viso (0.809) exceeds that of MSD (0.733), MDk (0.718), and AD (0.779). The combined model, which incorporates DTI_AD, DKI_RD, and NODDI_Viso, demonstrated superior diagnostic performance (0.897).

Conclusions

Advanced diffusion MRI quantitative parameters derived from NODDI, such as Viso, have the potential to enhance the differentiation between HGGs and SBMs. The integrated utilization of these models is anticipated to enhance diagnostic accuracy and refine MRI protocols for brain tumor assessment.

Differentiation of glioma and solitary brain metastasis: a multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging study using histogram analysis

BACKGROUND

Differentiation of glioma and solitary brain metastasis (SBM), which requires biopsy or multi-disciplinary diagnosis, remains sophisticated clinically. Histogram analysis of MR diffusion or molecular imaging hasn't been fully investigated for the differentiation and may have the potential to improve it.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients with newly diagnosed glioma or metastases were enrolled. All patients underwent DWI, IVIM, and APTW, as well as the T1W, T2W, T2FLAIR, and contrast-enhanced T1W imaging. The histogram features of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, slow diffusion coefficient (Dslow), perfusion fraction (frac), fast diffusion coefficient (Dfast) from IVIM, and MTRasym@3.5ppm from APTWI were extracted from the tumor parenchyma and compared between glioma and SBM. Parameters with significant differences were analyzed with the logistics regression and receiver operator curves to explore the optimal model and compare the differentiation performance.

RESULTS

Higher ADCkurtosis (P = 0.022), frackurtosis (P<0.001),and fracskewness (P<0.001) were found for glioma, while higher (MTRasym@3.5ppm)10 (P = 0.045), frac10 (P<0.001),frac90 (P = 0.001), fracmean (P<0.001), and fracentropy (P<0.001) were observed for SBM. frackurtosis (OR = 0.431, 95%CI 0.256-0.723, P = 0.002) was independent factor for SBM differentiation. The model combining (MTRasym@3.5ppm)10, frac10, and frackurtosis showed an AUC of 0.857 (sensitivity: 0.857, specificity: 0.750), while the model combined with frac10 and frackurtosis had an AUC of 0.824 (sensitivity: 0.952, specificity: 0.591). There was no statistically significant difference between AUCs from the two models. (Z = -1.14, P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

The frac10 and frackurtosis in enhanced tumor region could be used to differentiate glioma and SBM and (MTRasym@3.5ppm)10 helps improving the differentiation specificity.

Radiomics Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: Distinguishing Between Glioblastoma and Single Brain Metastasis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)-based radiomics models in differentiating glioblastoma (GB) from single brain metastasis (SBM) and compare their diagnostic performance with that of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 110 patients who underwent DKI and were pathologically diagnosed with GB (n = 58) or SBM (n = 52) were enrolled in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from the manually delineated region of interest of the lesion. A training set for model development was constructed from the images of 88 random patients, and 22 patients were reserved for independent validation. Seven single-DKI-parametric models and a multi-DKI-parametric model were constructed using six classifiers, whereas four single-routine-sequence models (based on T2 weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, T2-dark-fluid, and contrast-enhanced T1 magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo) and a multisequence routine MRI model were constructed for comparison. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic performance. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of different models were compared using the DeLong test.

RESULTS

The AUCs of the single-DKI-parametric models ranged from 0.800 to 0.933 (mean kurtosis [MK] model). The multi-DKI-parametric model had a slightly higher AUC (0.958) than the MK model; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.688). In comparison, the AUCs of the routine MRI models ranged from 0.633 to 0.733 (multisequence routine MRI model). The AUC of the multi-DKI-parametric model was significantly higher than that of the multisequence routine MRI model (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

The multi-DKI-parametric radiomics model exhibited better performance than that of the single-DKI-parametric models and routine MRI models in distinguishing GB from SBM.

Radiomic texture analysis based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging to differentiate glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

We created discriminative models of different regions of interest (ROIs) using radiomic texture features of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and evaluated the feasibility of each model in differentiating glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) from solitary brain metastasis (SBM).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 204 patients with GBM (n = 146) or SBM (n = 58). Radiomic texture features were extracted from five ROIs based on three metric maps (intracellular volume fraction, orientation dispersion index, and isotropic volume fraction of NODDI), including necrosis, solid tumors, peritumoral edema, tumor bulk volume (TBV), and abnormal bulk volume. Four feature selection methods and eight classifiers were used for the radiomic texture feature selection and model construction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the models. Routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic texture feature models generated in the same manner were used for the horizontal comparison.

RESULTS

NODDI-radiomic texture analysis based on TBV subregions exhibited the highest accuracy (although nonsignificant) in differentiating GBM from SBM, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.918 and 0.882 in the training and test datasets, respectively, compared to necrosis (AUCtraining:0.845, AUCtest:0.714), solid tumor (AUCtraining:0.852, AUCtest:0.821), peritumoral edema (AUCtraining:0.817, AUCtest:0.762), and ABV (AUCtraining:0.834, AUCtest:0.779). The performance of the five ROI radiomic texture models in routine MRI was inferior to that of the NODDI-radiomic texture model.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative NODDI-radiomic texture analysis based on TBV subregions shows great potential for distinguishing GBM from SBM.

Histogram Analysis Based on Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density MR Imaging for Differentiation Between Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Brain Metastasis and Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two ROI Placements

BACKGROUND

Preoperative differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary brain metastasis (SBM) contributes to guide neurosurgical decision-making.

PURPOSE

To explore the value of histogram analysis based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) in differentiating between GBM and SBM and comparison of the diagnostic performance of two region of interest (ROI) placements.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 109 patients with GBM (n = 57) or SBM (n = 52) were enrolled.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T scanners. T₂ -dark-fluid sequence, contrast-enhanced T₁ magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence, and NODDI.

ASSESSMENT

ROIs were placed on the peritumoral edema area (ROI1) and whole tumor area (ROI2, included the cystic, necrotic, and hemorrhagic areas). Histogram parameters of each isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF), intracellular volume fraction (ICVF), and orientation dispersion index (ODI) from NODDI images for two ROIs were calculated, respectively.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test, independent t-test, chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression analysis, DeLong's test.

RESULTS

For the ROI1 and ROI2, the ICVF_min and ODI_mean obtained the highest area under curve (AUC, AUC = 0.741 and 0.750, respectively) compared to other single parameters, and the AUC of the multivariate logistic regression model was 0.851 and 0.942, respectively. DeLong's test revealed significant difference in diagnostic performance between optimal single parameter and multivariate logistic regression model within the same ROI, and the multivariate logistic regression models between two different ROIs.

DATA CONCLUSION

The performance of multivariate logistic regression model is superior to optimal single parameter in both ROIs based on NODDI histogram analysis to distinguish SBM from GBM, and the ROI placed on the whole tumor area exhibited better diagnostic performance.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.