Ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography of the cervical spine without dose penalty employing a cadmium-telluride photon-counting detector

Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Microstructural Imaging of Bone and Joints

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has been introduced in clinical research and diagnostics. This review describes the technological advances and provides an overview of recent applications with a focus on imaging of bone.

RECENT FINDINGS

PCCT is a full-body scanner with short scanning times that provides better spatial and spectral resolution than conventional energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT), along with an up to 50% reduced radiation dose. It can be used to quantify bone mineral density, to perform bone microstructural analyses and to assess cartilage quality with adequate precision and accuracy. Using a virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction, metal artefacts can be greatly reduced when imaging bone-implant interfaces. Current PCCT systems do not allow spectral imaging in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mode. Given its improved resolution, reduced noise and spectral imaging capabilities PCCT has diagnostic capacities in both qualitative and quantitative imaging that outperform those of conventional CT. Clinical use in monitoring bone health has already been demonstrated. The full potential of PCCT systems will be unlocked when UHR spectral imaging becomes available.

Photon-counting detector CT - first experiences in the field of musculoskeletal radiology

The introduction of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) marks a remarkable leap in innovation in CT imaging. The new detector technology allows X-rays to be converted directly into an electrical signal without an intermediate step via a scintillation layer and allows the energy of individual photons to be measured. Initial data show high spatial resolution, complete elimination of electronic noise, and steady availability of spectral image data sets. In particular, the new technology shows promise with respect to the imaging of osseous structures. Recently, PCD-CT was implemented in the clinical routine. The aim of this review was to summarize recent studies and to show our first experiences with photon-counting detector technology in the field of musculoskeletal radiology.We performed a literature search using Medline and included a total of 90 articles and reviews that covered recent experimental and clinical experiences with the new technology.In this review, we focus on (1) spatial resolution and delineation of fine anatomic structures, (2) reduction of radiation dose, (3) electronic noise, (4) techniques for metal artifact reduction, and (5) possibilities of spectral imaging. This article provides insight into our first experiences with photon-counting detector technology and shows results and images from experimental and clinical studies. · This review summarizes recent experimental and clinical studies in the field of photon-counting detector CT and musculoskeletal radiology.. · The potential of photon-counting detector technology in the field of musculoskeletal radiology includes improved spatial resolution, reduction in radiation dose, metal artifact reduction, and spectral imaging.. · PCD-CT enables imaging at lower radiation doses while maintaining or even enhancing spatial resolution, crucial for reducing patient exposure, especially in repeated or prolonged imaging scenarios.. · It offers promising results in reducing metal artifacts commonly encountered in orthopedic or dental implants, enhancing the interpretability of adjacent structures in postoperative and follow-up imaging.. · With its ability to routinely acquire spectral data, PCD-CT scans allow for material classification, such as detecting urate crystals in suspected gout or visualizing bone marrow edema, potentially reducing reliance on MRI in certain cases.. Bette S, Risch F, Becker J et al. Photon-counting detector CT - first experiences in the field of musculoskeletal radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2312-6914.

Influence of helical pitch and gantry rotation time on image quality and file size in ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT

The goal of this experimental study was to quantify the influence of helical pitch and gantry rotation time on image quality and file size in ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting CT (UHR-PCCT). Cervical and lumbar spine, pelvis, and upper legs of two fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were subjected to nine dose-matched UHR-PCCT scan protocols employing a collimation of 120 × 0.2 mm with varying pitch (0.3/1.0/1.2) and rotation time (0.25/0.5/1.0 s). Image quality was analyzed independently by five radiologists and further substantiated by placing normed regions of interest to record mean signal attenuation and noise. Effective mAs, CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), scan duration, and raw data file size were compared. Regardless of anatomical region, no significant difference was ascertained for CTDIvol (p ≥ 0.204) and SSDE (p ≥ 0.240) among protocols. While exam duration differed substantially (all p ≤ 0.016), the lowest scan time was recorded for high-pitch protocols (4.3 ± 1.0 s) and the highest for low-pitch protocols (43.6 ± 15.4 s). The combination of high helical pitch and short gantry rotation times produced the lowest perceived image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.866; 95% confidence interval 0.807-0.910; p < 0.001) and highest noise. Raw data size increased with acquisition time (15.4 ± 5.0 to 235.0 ± 83.5 GByte; p ≤ 0.013). Rotation time and pitch factor have considerable influence on image quality in UHR-PCCT and must therefore be chosen deliberately for different musculoskeletal imaging tasks. In examinations with long acquisition times, raw data size increases considerably, consequently limiting clinical applicability for larger scan volumes.

A comparative study of image quality and diagnostic confidence in diagnosis and follow-up of scaphoid fractures using photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT

PURPOSE

Scaphoid fractures in patients and assessment of healing using PCD-CT have, as far as we know, not yet been studied. Therefore, the aim was to compare photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) with energy integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in terms of fracture visibility and evaluation of fracture healing.

METHOD

Eight patients with scaphoid fracture were examined with EID-CT and PCD-CT within the first week post-trauma, and with additional scans at 4, 6 and 8 weeks. Our clinical protocol for wrist examination with EID-CT was used (CTDIvol 3.1 ± 0.1 mGy, UHR kernel Ur77). For PCD-CT matched radiation dose, reconstruction kernel Br89. Quantitative analyses of noise, CNR, trabecular and cortical sharpness, and bone volume fraction were conducted. Five radiologists evaluated the images for fracture visibility, fracture gap consolidation and image quality, and rated their confidence in the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The trabecular and cortical sharpness were superior in images obtained with PCD-CT compared with EID-CT. A successive reduction in trabecular bone volume fraction during the immobilized periods was found with both systems. Despite higher noise and lower CNR with PCD-CT, radiologists rated the image quality of PCD-CT as superior. The visibility of the fracture line within 1-week post-trauma was rated higher with PCD-CT as was diagnostic confidence, but the subsequent assessments of fracture gap consolidation during healing process and the confidence in diagnosis were found equivalent between both systems.

CONCLUSION

PCD-CT offers superior visibility of bone microstructure compared with EID-CT. The evaluation of fracture healing and confidence in diagnosis were rated equally with both systems, but the radiologists found primary fracture visibility and overall image quality superior with PCD-CT.

The Small Pixel Effect in Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT of the Lumbar Spine

OBJECTIVES

Image acquisition in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan mode does not impose a dose penalty in photon-counting CT (PCCT). This study aims to investigate the dose saving potential of using UHR instead of standard-resolution PCCT for lumbar spine imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight cadaveric specimens were examined with 7 dose levels (5-35 mGy) each in UHR (120 × 0.2 mm) and standard-resolution acquisition mode (144 × 0.4 mm) on a first-generation PCCT scanner. The UHR images were reconstructed with 3 dedicated bone kernels (Br68 [spatial frequency at 10% of the modulation transfer function 14.5 line pairs/cm], Br76 [21.0], and Br84 [27.9]), standard-resolution images with Br68 and Br76. Using automatic segmentation, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were established for lumbar vertebrae and psoas muscle tissue. In addition, image quality was assessed subjectively by 19 independent readers (15 radiologists, 4 surgeons) using a browser-based forced choice comparison tool totaling 16,974 performed pairwise tests. Pearson's correlation coefficient ( r ) was used to analyze the relationship between CNR and subjective image quality rankings, and Kendall W was calculated to assess interrater agreement.

RESULTS

Irrespective of radiation exposure level, CNR was higher in UHR datasets than in standard-resolution images postprocessed with the same reconstruction parameters. The use of sharper convolution kernels entailed lower CNR but higher subjective image quality depending on radiation dose. Subjective assessment revealed high interrater agreement ( W = 0.86; P < 0.001) with UHR images being preferred by readers in the majority of comparisons on each dose level. Substantial correlation was ascertained between CNR and the subjective image quality ranking (all r 's ≥ 0.95; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In PCCT of the lumbar spine, UHR mode's smaller pixel size facilitates a considerable CNR increase over standard-resolution imaging, which can either be used for dose reduction or higher spatial resolution depending on the selected convolution kernel.

Photon-Counting Detector CT With Denoising for Imaging of the Osseous Pelvis at Low Radiation Doses: A Phantom Study

BACKGROUND. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT may allow lower radiation doses than used for conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, with preserved image quality. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare PCD CT and EID CT, reconstructed with and without a denoising tool, in terms of image quality of the osseous pelvis in a phantom, with attention to low radiation doses. METHODS. A pelvic phantom comprising human bones in acrylic material mimicking soft tissue underwent PCD CT and EID CT at various tube potentials and radiation doses ranging from 0.05 to 5.00 mGy. Additional denoised reconstructions were generated using a commercial tool. Noise was measured in the acrylic material. Two readers performed independent qualitative assessments that entailed determining the denoised EID CT reconstruction with the lowest acceptable dose and then comparing this reference reconstruction with PCD CT reconstructions without and with denoising, using subjective Likert scales. RESULTS. Noise was lower for PCD CT than for EID CT. For instance, at 0.05 mGy and 100 kV with tin filter, noise was 38.4 HU for PCD CT versus 48.8 HU for EID CT. Denoising further reduced noise; for example, for PCD CT at 100 kV with tin filter at 0.25 mGy, noise was 19.9 HU without denoising versus 9.7 HU with denoising. For both readers, lowest acceptable dose for EID CT was 0.10 mGy (total score, 11 of 15 for both readers). Both readers somewhat agreed that PCD CT without denoising at 0.10 mGy (reflecting reference reconstruction dose) was relatively better than the reference reconstruction in terms of osseous structures, artifacts, and image quality. Both readers also somewhat agreed that denoised PCD CT reconstructions at 0.10 mGy and 0.05 mGy (reflecting matched and lower doses, respectively, with respect to reference reconstruction dose) were relatively better than the reference reconstruction for the image quality measures. CONCLUSION. PCD CT showed better-quality images than EID CT when performed at the lowest acceptable radiation dose for EID CT. PCD CT with denoising yielded better-quality images at a dose lower than lowest acceptable dose for EID CT. CLINICAL IMPACT. PCD CT with denoising could facilitate lower radiation doses for pelvic imaging.

Comparison of ultrahigh and standard resolution photon-counting CT angiography of the femoral arteries in a continuously perfused in vitro model

BACKGROUND

With the emergence of photon-counting CT, ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) imaging can be performed without dose penalty. This study aims to directly compare the image quality of UHR and standard resolution (SR) scan mode in femoral artery angiographies.

METHODS

After establishing continuous extracorporeal perfusion in four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens, photon-counting CT angiographies were performed with a radiation dose of 5 mGy and tube voltage of 120 kV in both SR and UHR mode. Images were reconstructed with dedicated convolution kernels (soft: Body-vascular (Bv)48; sharp: Bv60; ultrasharp: Bv76). Six radiologists evaluated the image quality by means of a pairwise forced-choice comparison tool. Kendall's concordance coefficient (W) was calculated to quantify interrater agreement. Image quality was further assessed by measuring intraluminal attenuation and image noise as well as by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR).

RESULTS

UHR yielded lower noise than SR for identical reconstructions with kernels ≥ Bv60 (p < 0.001). UHR scans exhibited lower intraluminal attenuation compared to SR (Bv60: 406.4 ± 25.1 versus 418.1 ± 30.1 HU; p < 0.001). Irrespective of scan mode, SNR and CNR decreased while noise increased with sharper kernels but UHR scans were objectively superior to SR nonetheless (Bv60: SNR 25.9 ± 6.4 versus 20.9 ± 5.3; CNR 22.7 ± 5.8 versus 18.4 ± 4.8; p < 0.001). Notably, UHR scans were preferred in subjective assessment when images were reconstructed with the ultrasharp Bv76 kernel, whereas SR was rated superior for Bv60. Interrater agreement was high (W = 0.935).

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of UHR scan mode and ultrasharp convolution kernel are able to exploit the full image quality potential in photon-counting CT angiography of the femoral arteries.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The UHR scan mode offers improved image quality and may increase diagnostic accuracy in CT angiography of the peripheral arterial runoff when optimized reconstruction parameters are chosen.

KEY POINTS

• UHR photon-counting CT improves image quality in combination with ultrasharp convolution kernels. • UHR datasets display lower image noise compared with identically reconstructed standard resolution scans. • Scans in UHR mode show decreased intraluminal attenuation compared with standard resolution imaging.

Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography of the lungs: Phantom and clinical assessment of radiation dose and image quality

PURPOSE

Photon-counting-detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced noise reduction, spatial resolution, and image quality in comparison to energy-integrated-detectors CT (EID-CT). These hypothesized improvements were compared using PCD-CT ultra-high (UHR) and standard-resolution (SR) scan-modes.

METHODS

Phantom scans were obtained with both EID-CT and PCD-CT (UHR, SR) on an adult body-phantom. Radiation dose was measured and noise levels were compared at a minimum achievable slice thickness of 0.5 mm for EID-CT, 0.2 mm for PCD-CT-UHR and 0.4 mm for PCD-CT-SR. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for five tissue densities. Additionally, data from 25 patients who had PCD-CT of chest were reconstructed at 1 mm and 0.2 mm (UHR) slice-thickness and compared quantitatively (SNR) and qualitatively (noise, quality, sharpness, bone details).

RESULTS

Phantom PCD-CT-UHR and PCD-CT-SR scans had similar measured radiation dose (16.0mGy vs 15.8 mGy). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) (9.0HU vs 9.6HU). PCD-CT-UHR (0.2 mm) had slightly higher noise level (11.1HU). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had higher SNR in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) while achieving higher resolution (Bone 115 vs 96, Acrylic 14 vs 14, Polyethylene 11 vs 10). SNR was slightly lower across all densities for PCD-CT UHR (0.2 mm). Interestingly, CNR was highest in the 0.2 mm PCD-CT group; PCD-CT CNR was 2.45 and 2.88 times the CNR for 0.5 mm EID-CT for acrylic and poly densities. Clinical comparison of SNR showed predictably higher SNR for 1 mm (30.3 ± 10.7 vs 14.2 ± 7, p = 0.02). Median subjective ratings were higher for 0.2 mm UHR vs 1 mm PCD-CT for nodule contour (4.6 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.1, p = 0.02), bone detail (5 ± 0 vs 4 ± 0.1, p = 0.001), image quality (5 ± 0.1 vs 4.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), and sharpness (5 ± 0.1 vs 4 ± 0.2).

CONCLUSION

Both UHR and SR PCD-CT result in similar radiation dose levels. PCD-CT can achieve higher resolution with lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT.