Thermal ablation of hepatic hemangioma: A multi-center experience with long-term outcomes

A novel and effective strategy for the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma: combining preoperative embolization with laparoscopic-assisted and ultrasound-guided ablation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hemangioma is the most common benign liver tumor. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Trans-arterial embolization (TAE) combined with thermal ablation in the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma (> 5 cm).

METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2021, 82 patients and 112 large HH with a maximum mean diameter of 8.24 ± 0.26 cm (range: 4.3-16.0 cm) and a cumulative diameter of 9.45 ± 0.45 cm (range:5.0-29.6 cm) were treated with laparoscopic-assisted and ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) during a single general anesthesia episode following TAE. After surgery, therapeutic efficacy was assessed by contrast-enhanced imagings during follow-up. Median follow-up time was 14 months (range: 2-48 months).

RESULTS

All patients have a mean operating time of 79.10 ± 2.59 min. The plain CT revealed that 112 treated lesions were totally covered (100%). Hemoglobinuria was detected in 28 patients (34.1%), and there were no cases of acute renal failure. Abdominal pain occurred in 40 patients (48.8%), while peritoneal effusion in six (7.3%). Acute cholecystitis developed in 11 patients (13.4%), constipation in five (6.1%), and nausea and vomiting in 14 (17.1%). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 54 patients (65.9%) had minor complications, while none had severe complications. The follow-up, no Hepatic hemangioma growth was observed.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative TAE combined with thermal ablation is a novel therapeutic strategy for large HH. This strategy is simple, less risky, and feasible.

Laparoscopic microwave ablation for giant cavernous hemangioma coexistent with diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hemangioma represents the most common benign primary hepatic neoplasm. Although most such tumors are small and asymptomatic, giant cavernous hemangioma (GCH) is frequently symptomatic, and needs intervention. Moreover, diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis (DHH) is not rare in the liver parenchyma adjacent to a GCH. The management strategy for hepatic hemangiomas can differ depending on the presence of associated hemangiomatosis and the amount and distribution of the residual hepatic parenchyma.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we report two patients with GCH coexistent with DHH successfully treated by laparoscopic microwave ablation. The two GCHs were ablated completely and the ablated zone atrophied obviously in imaging follow-ups after ablation. Surprisingly, there was a trend toward gradual reduction and diminishment of DHH.

CONCLUSION

Thermal ablation treatment might be an effective and less invasive treatment for GCH coexistent with DHH around the hemangioma.

Reconsideration of the clinical management of hepatic hemangioma

In this letter, we comment on the article by Zhou et al that was published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. This article proposes a new clinical grading system based on a multidisciplinary team, which prompts us to rethink the clinical management of hepatic hemangioma. Hepatic hemangioma is the most common benign solid liver tumor. In general, follow-up and observation for the vast majority of hepatic hemangioma is reasonable. For those patients with symptoms and severe complications, surgical intervention is necessary. Specific surgical indications, however, are still not clear. An effective grading system is helpful in further guiding the clinical management of hepatic hemangioma. In this article, we review the recent literature, summarize the surgical indications and treatment of hepatic hemangioma, and evaluate the potential of this new clinical grading system.

Clinical impact and role of major vessels involvement in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma

BACKGROUND

Severe bleeding remains a significant concern in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma. It is rarely reported that how the degree of major vessels involvement impacts on severe bleeding. The present study primarily aimed to analyze the impacts of the number of involved major vessels (NIMV) during laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma and evaluate the risk factors associated with increased bleeding.

METHODS

A database search was carried out for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for liver hemangiomas at our department from January 2018 to December 2023. The collected data included demographics, characteristics of the hemangiomas, laboratory data, operation method, surgical and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study. 42 patients were categorized into the group with NIMV < 2, while 30 patients were divided into the group with NIMV ≥ 2. The group with NIMV ≥ 2 demonstrated a significant correlation with special segments, involved multiple segments and diameter of the hemangiomas (P < 0.01). And the perioperative variables including the extent of resection, operative time, blood loss, Pringle maneuver times, postoperative stay, drainage tube duration, and postoperative liver function (ALT, AST) also showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). Notably, NIMV ≥ 2 was identified as the most important independent risk factor for intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 ml in laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma (P = 0.011). For NIMV ≥ 2, the independent risk factor was special segments in multivariate analysis (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The involvement of multiple major vessels (NIMV ≥ 2) was significantly associated with special segments, resulting in increased intraoperative blood loss, operation difficulty, and delayed postoperative recovery. Moreover, it was identified as the single independent risk factor with a considerable risk for increased blood loss during laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma.

Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation vs. transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatic hemangiomas

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of large hepatic hemangiomas (LHH) (5-9.9 cm in diameter).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study retrospectively collected data from 82 patients with LHH treated at Chaoyang Central Hospital. The study analyzed the differences in postoperative efficacy, operative time, blood routine, liver and kidney function on the first day after surgery, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in indicators such as white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin on the first day after surgery between the RFA group (39 cases) and the TACE group (43 cases) ( P  < 0.001). Compared to RFA, LHH patients treated with TACE had a general complication rate of 39.5% (vs. 43.6%; P  = 0.7), a procedure-related complication rate of 30.2% (vs. 59.0%; P  = 0.009), an effective rate at 6-12 months postoperatively of 55.8% (vs. 82.1%; P  = 0.01), an operating-time of 41.2 ± 14.9 min (vs. 100.8 ± 35.5 min; P  < 0.001) and hospitalization costs of 17052.7 ± 1364.8 yuan (vs. 30952.1 ± 4327.6 yuan; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the efficacy of RFA in treating LHH is significantly superior to TACE. Microwave ablation and RFA appear to be safe treatments for LHH. The TACE group exhibited shorter operating-time, lower hospitalization costs and lower demands on cardiopulmonary function.