Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of perianal fistula

Can Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) Imaging Be Used as a Stand-Alone Sequence To Assess a Perianal Fistulous Tract on MRI? A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing STIR and T1-Post Contrast Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Perianal fistulas demand precise preoperative assessment for optimal surgical outcomes. MRI, using Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) and T1-post contrast sequences, plays a crucial role in this evaluation.This retrospective cohort study compared STIR imaging's diagnostic efficacy with T1-post contrast sequences in identifying perianal fistulous tracts. The study investigated whether STIR imaging could serve as the sole diagnostic sequence, simplifying clinical practice.

METHODS

In a tertiary care hospital, 100 patients underwent pelvic MRI for suspected perianal fistulas. Radiologists independently evaluated STIR and T1-post contrast sequences for internal openings, tract extent, distinction, abscess presence, and tract type. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and Cohen's kappa analysis were used for diagnostic assessment.

RESULTS

STIR imaging showed notable sensitivity (79.8-97.9%) and specificity (100%) for identifying internal openings and tracts. Combined with T1-post contrast, diagnostic accuracy improved significantly, with near-perfect AUC values. Kappa values indicated moderate to substantial agreement between radiological assessments and clinical diagnosis. The combined sequences achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity for tract visualization.

CONCLUSION

STIR imaging presents promise as a singular diagnostic tool for perianal fistulas, especially when combined with T1-post contrast sequences. While offering potential clinical diagnosis simplifications, further studies are warranted to validate its utility and ensure comprehensive diagnostic accuracy.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the workup of patients with perianal fistulas

Background

Perianal sepsis and fistulas are common lesions. Fistula-in-ano is a tedious problem because of high recurrence rates and severe unexpected complications postoperatively. Many imaging modalities are used to evaluate this area. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been considered the gold standard procedure for perianal fistula assessment, i.e., it provides the surgeon with an accurate roadmap to select the best surgical approach, determines the extent of sphincter division, and estimates the risk of postoperative incontinence. We carried out a prospective diagnostic accuracy study involving 50 patients (mean age, 42.44 years) with perianal fistulas who underwent pelvic MRI with a 1.5 Tesla scanner using multiple sequences, including diffusion and post-contrast series that were either local or systemic. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of pelvic MRI/MR fistulogram in perianal fistula assessment, identify perianal fistula-associated findings by MRI, and optimize the MRI technique with maximum technical safety.

Results

Intersphincteric fistulas were the most common type of perianal fistula observed based on Parks’ classification. Intersphincteric, trans-sphincteric, extrasphincteric, and suprasphincteric fistulas were found in 30 (60%), 12 (24%), 4 (8%), and 4 (8%) patients, respectively. According to St. James’ classification, 21 (42%), 9 (18%), 8 (16%), 4 (8%), and 8 (16%) patients had perianal fistula grades I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. The combination of variable MR sequences and MR fistulogram increased the diagnostic validity of MRI examinations. Our results correlated with surgical results (reference standard) with perfect interobserver reliability.

Conclusions

Of all imaging modalities, MRI has become a prerequisite for a successful surgery of a perianal fistula. MRI can identify: (a) fistula morphological details, (b) the relationship between the fistulous tract and the anal sphincter, (c) fistula wound healing, (d) an active versus chronic scarred fistula, (e) postoperative stigmata, and (f) a perianal fistula from its mimics. MRI with variable sequences and MRI fistulogram are successful combinations that increase diagnostic efficiency with technical safety by avoiding both ionizing radiation and systemic gadolinium.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Perianal Fistulas in Clinically Symptomatic Patients and the Correlation Among Plain, Contrast, and Post Jelly MRI Fistulography

Objectives To evaluate different types of perianal fistulas and their complications on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare plain, contrast, and jelly magnetic resonance fistulography findings.

Materials and Methods This prospective study was performed in 30 patients who presented with perianal pus discharge or external fistulous opening. Magnetic resonance imaging of the perianal region before and after giving intravenous contrast and after injecting jelly through a percutaneous opening was performed on a 3T scanner and the results were correlated.

Results The mean age of the patients was 40.13 ± 13.88 years (range 19–75 years). The male to female ratio was 14:1. The most common type of fistula was St. James classification type I, which was seen in 13 patients (43%), followed by type IV in 30%, type III in 16%, type II in 6.66%, and type V in 3.33% of the patients. Using agreement analysis, we compared the number of primary and secondary tracts, internal openings, and horseshoe tracts and found a significant agreement between plain and post Jelly MRI fistulography (kappa statistic close to 1). When comparing plain and contrast MRI, there was significant agreement in the primary and secondary tracts, while statistically insignificant results were obtained (p > 0.05) for the horseshoe tract and internal openings. Contrast injection was helpful in 7 subjects (23.3%) as peripheral enhancement of abscesses were better delineated.

Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging is the one stop diagnostic modality for perianal fistulas. Acquisition of axial (Ax) T2, axial T2 FS, coronal T2 and coronal T2 FS sequences without administering intravenous contrast or jelly is usually sufficient for the diagnosis of fistulas and their complications.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Characterization of Perianal Fistulous Disease in a Rural Based Tertiary Hospital of North India

Background

To diagnose and characterize the perianal fistulous disease using Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a hilly and rural area of North India.

Material/Methods

This prospective hospital based study was conducted for a period of one year from April 2014 to April 2015 in the departments of Radiodiagnosis and Surgery of our institute. A total of 50 consecutive patients presenting with perianal fistulous disease fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study and taken up for MRI. The perianal fistulae were classified according to St James University hospital classification and tracks were assessed with regard to anatomical plane, length, ramifications, abscess formation, enteric communication, external cutaneous opening, enhancement and suprasphincteric extension. Surgical correlation was done in 31 patients who opted for surgical treatment. Rest of the 19 patients preferred alternative medicine for treatment or chose to postpone their surgery.

Results

The disease was much more prevalent in males in comparison to females with male to female ratio of 24:1. Grade 4 was the most common type of fistula (34%) while Grade 5 was the least common type (4%).MRI showed a high sensitivity of 93.7% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.7% when correlated with surgical findings. A substantial number of patients (38%) preferred alternative medicine or non surgical form of treatment.

Conclusions

MRI is a very sensitive modality for the evaluation of perianal fistula. In our study group, the disease predominantly affected middle aged men. Ramifications and abscesses were commonly seen, affecting nearly half of the patients and majority of the patients had active fistulous tracks with posteriorly located enteric opening. Overall, transsphincteric fistulae were most common. Significant number of patients avoided surgery or showed preference for non surgical treatment.