Quantitative chemical-shift MR imaging cutoff value: Benign versus malignant vertebral compression – Initial experience

Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI

Background

To assess whether the fat signal intensity and fat fraction (FF) of the lumbar vertebrae as measured on the Dixon chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique can be correlated with the lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Methods

Forty-five patients were retrospectively collected, and 180 lumbar vertebral bodies (L1-L4) were included. All patients underwent DXA and MRI examinations of the lumbar spine. Taking the T value of DXA as the gold standard and using the diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization: T score ≥ −1.0SD as normal, −1.0 ~ −2.5SD as osteopenia, and ≤ −2.5SD as osteoporosis. Meanwhile, the signal intensity on T2WI was measured, and FF of L1-L4 vertebral bodies was calculated on MRI images. Bone marrow fat FF calculation formula: FF = [Mfat/(Mfat + Mwater)] × 100% (Mwater and Mfat refer to the total pixel signal intensity value of the region of interest in water image and lipid image, respectively). Finally, the association of signal intensity and FF with DXA was evaluated.

Results

Totally 180 vertebral bodies in 45 patients were enrolled. According to the T value, they were divided into the normal group (n = 70), osteopenia group (n = 40), and osteoporosis group (n = 70). The fat signal intensity of the normal group, osteopenia group, and osteoporosis group were 96.6 ± 21.8, 154.5 ± 48.7, 216.3 ± 92.6, and the FF were 30.1 ± 6.2%, 52.6 ± 7.6%, 77.5 ± 7.9%, respectively. Among the three groups, the lumbar T2 fat signal intensity and FF had statistical differences (P < 0.01). Besides, the lumbar fat signal intensity and FF were negatively related to DXA (r =−0.65 and −0.93, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The fat content calculated using the Dixon chemical shift MRI had an inverse relation with BMD. Moreover, the Dixon chemical shift MRI might provide complementary information to osteoporosis-related research fields.

Osteoporotic hip and vertebral fractures in the Arab region: a systematic review

Asia is projected to account for the largest proportion of the rising burden of osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Data from the Middle East is scarce. We performed a systematic review on the epidemiology of vertebral and hip osteoporotic fractures in 22 Arab League countries, using Scopus, PubMed, and Embase. We identified 67 relevant publications, 28 on hip and 39 on vertebral fractures. The mean age of patients was 70-74 years, female to male ratio 1.2:2.1. Age-standardized incidence rates, to the UN 2010 population, were 236 to 290/100,000 for women from Kuwait and Lebanon, lower in Morocco. Risk factors for hip fractures included lower BMD or BMI, taller stature, anxiolytics, and sleeping pills. Most patients were not tested nor treated. Mortality derived from retrospective studies ranged between 10 and 20% at 1 year, and between 25 and 30% at 2-3 years. Among 39 studies on vertebral fractures, 18 described prevalence of morphometric fractures. Excluding grade 1 fractures, 13.3-20.2% of women, mean age 58-74 years, had prevalent vertebral fractures, as did 10-14% of men, mean age 62-74 years. Risk factors included age, gender, smoking, multiparity, years since menopause, low BMD, bone markers, high sclerostin, low IgF1, hypovitaminosis D, abdominal aortic calcification score, and VDR polymorphisms. Vertebral fracture incidence in women from Saudi Arabia, mean age 61, was 6.2% at 5 years, including grade 1 fractures. Prospective population-based fracture registries, prevalence studies, predictive models, fracture outcomes, and fracture liaison services from Arab countries are still lacking today. They are the pillars to closing the care gap of this morbid disease.

Reliability and Validity of Different MRI Sequences in Improving the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE. We aimed to systematically examine the reliability and validity of different MRI sequences in differentiating benign and malignant vertebral fractures, appropriately select the best MRI sequence to improve the diagnostic accuracy, and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI sequences in the context of different study designs or publication date. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Computer and manual retrieval were conducted on studies published between January 1, 2000, and September 31, 2016. Studies relevant to the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral fractures by MRI and reference standard (histopathologic diagnosis or clinical follow-up examination) were analyzed. RESULTS. Eighteen articles were included. Neither threshold (p = 0.86) nor nonthreshold (p = 0.06) effects were present. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 89% (95% CI, 86-92%), 88% (95% CI, 85-91%), 6.54 (95% CI, 4.44-9.65), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09-0.21), and 55.76 (95% CI, 37.06-83.89), respectively. The AUC was 0.95. The risk of publication bias was negligible (p = 0.33). CONCLUSION. MRI sequences could provide appreciable diagnostic performance in differentiating benign and malignant vertebral fractures. However, our pooled estimates do not support the superiority of one set of sequences over another, and there is not sufficient evidence to show that prospective or recent studies are obviously better than retrospective or older studies.