Role of diffusion tensor imaging in carpal tunnel syndrome: A case control comparative study to electrophysiological tests and clinical assessment

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Median neuropathy at the wrist, commonly referred to as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), is the most common entrapment neuropathy. It is caused by chronic compression of the median nerve at the wrist within the space-limited carpal tunnel. Risk factors that contribute to the etiology of compression include female gender, obesity, work-related factors, and underlying medical conditions, such as hypothyroidism, pregnancy, and amyloidosis. The diagnosis is made on clinical grounds, although these can be confounded by anatomical variations. Electrodiagnostic studies, which are specific and sensitive in diagnosing CTS, support the diagnosis; however, a subgroup may present with normal results. The advent of imaging techniques, including ultrasound and MRI, further assists the diagnostic process. The management of CTS is divided into the nonsurgical approaches that include hand therapy, splinting and corticosteroid injection, and surgical decompression of the carpal tunnel. Although several surgical techniques have been developed, no one method is more effective than the other. Each of these management approaches are effective at providing symptom relief and are utilized at different severities of the condition. There is, however, a lack of consensus on standardized diagnostic criteria, as well as when and to whom to refer patients for surgery.

The Impact of Reference Standard on Diagnostic Testing Characteristics for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Lack of a reliable reference standard for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis could impact the diagnostic test characteristics. This systematic review sought to evaluate differences in the accuracy of CTS diagnostic modalities based on the reference standard used.

Methods

A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines to investigate diagnostic modalities used in CTS. A literature search of Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Reviews was conducted for the years of 2010-2021 for primary data, and 113 studies met final inclusion criteria. Studies were stratified based on the reference standard utilized and diagnostic modality assessed, and the weighted means of the sensitivities and specificities were calculated.

Results

Thirty-five studies used clinical diagnosis alone as a reference standard, and 78 studies used electrodiagnostic study (EDS). The specificity for MRI and ultrasound (US) were substantially lower when EDS was used as the reference standard. MRI was the test most affected by the reference standard used, showing increased sensitivity when using EDS as the reference compared to clinical diagnosis (77.1% versus 60.9%) and decreased specificity (87.6% versus 99.2%). Regardless of the reference standard used, all tests had anticipated false-positive and/or false-negative rates of at least 10%.

Conclusions

Testing characteristics vary greatly based on the choice of reference standard, with the sensitivity of MRI most affected. Regardless of reference standard used, EDS, US, and MRI each had false-positive and/or false-negative rates too great to be appropriate for use as a screening examination.

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in evaluation of median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome

Background

The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is based on a combination of clinical history, clinical examination and frequent use of electrodiagnostics as nerve conduction study and electromyography which often do not provide the spatial and anatomical localizing information, especially with small nerves of the extremities. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging can reveal morphological changes in carpal tunnel syndrome patients.

Aim

The purpose of our study was to assess the efficacy of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging as a functional imaging in evaluation of median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Patients and methods

This prospective study included a group of 33 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed by both clinical examination and electromyography; 40 writs were examined. A control group of 20 subjects of matched age group were also included. All the participants were subjected to conventional and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Results

Median nerve apparent diffusion coefficient values of patients are lower than those of controls. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of diffusion conventional magnetic resonance imaging were 95% and 97.5%, respectively, versus 25% and 62.5% of conventional magnetic resonance imaging. A cut-off apparent diffusion coefficient value ≤ 0.99 obtained at distal radio-ulnar joint level and > 1.07 at pisiform level as well as apparent diffusion coefficient ratio at a cut-off ≤ 0.2 was significantly valid for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome.

Conclusions

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging provides functional evaluation of median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Can Diffusion Tensor Imaging Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Diagnose Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microstructural changes in peripheral nerves. Studies have reported that the median nerve apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a quantification of water molecule diffusion direction, is sensitive in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Five databases were searched for studies using ADC to investigate CTS. Apparent diffusion coefficient (measured in mm2/s) were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Twenty-two studies met criteria yielding 592 patients with CTS and 414 controls. Median nerve ADC were measured at the level of the distal radioulnar joint (CTS ADC: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15, I2 = 54%; control ADC: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, I2 = 57%), pisiform (CTS ADC: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.37-1.42, I2 = 0%; control ADC: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.23-1.31, I2 = 59%), hamate (CTS ADC: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.36-1.43, I2 = 58%; control ADC: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25-1.28, I2 = 47%), and as an combination of several measurements (CTS ADC: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.37-1.47, I2 = 100%; control ADC: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.53, I2 = 100%). Median nerve ADC is decreased in individuals with CTS compared to controls at the levels of the hamate and pisiform. ADC cut-offs to diagnose CTS should be established according to these anatomic levels and can be improved through additional studies that include use of a wrist coil.

Quantitative parameters of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome

BACKGROUND

To explore the value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived metrics in quantitative evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study included 39 wrists from 24 symptomatic CTS patients, who underwent clinical, electrophysiological, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations. In addition, 10 wrists of 6 healthy participants were included as controls. Clinical and nerve conduction study (NCS) findings were evaluated and graded according to the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM), respectively. We performed MRI using a 1.5 Tesla scanner. Mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) of the median nerve at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) (d), the inlet of the carpal tunnel (CT) at the pisiform level (i), the middle of the CT (m) and the outlet of the CT at the level of the hook of hamate (o), cross-sectional area at the inlet of the CT (iCSA), and the difference between MD and FA of the DRUJ and the outlet of CT (Delta MD and Delta FA) were measured.

RESULTS

The CTS patients had significantly lower FA [for example, oFA: mean difference 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05 to 0.12] and significantly higher MD than healthy participants (for example, iMD: mean difference 0.3, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.57). There was a negative correlation between iCSA with iFA and between mFA and oFA (-0.5

CONCLUSIONS

The DTI-derived quantitative metrics add potential value to the evaluation of CTS. Alterations in the FA of the median nerve along the CT are the most significant features of CTS and reflect the degree of median nerve compression and clinical deficit. With a cutoff value of 0.45, FA at the carpal outlet has a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 85.7% in the diagnosis of CTS, respectively.

Collapse

Key Words

• Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
• Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)
• apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
• diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
• fraction anisotropy
• magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
• nerve conduction study (NCS)

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Nhu Quynh Vo Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
Ngoc Thanh Hoang Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
Duy Duan Nguyen Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
Thi Hieu Dung Nguyen Department of Physiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
Trong Binh Le Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
Nghi Thanh Nhan Le Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
Thanh Thao Nguyen Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Meta-analysis of the normal diffusion tensor imaging values of the median nerve and how they change in carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) leads to distortion of axonal architecture, demyelination and fibrosis within the median nerve. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) characterises tissue microstructure and generates reproducible proxy measures of nerve 'health' which are sensitive to myelination, axon diameter, fiber density and organisation. This meta-analysis summarises the normal DTI values of the median nerve, and how they change in CTS. This systematic review included studies reporting DTI of the median nerve at the level of the wrist in adults. The primary outcome was to determine the normal fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) of the median nerve. Secondarily, we show how the FA and MD differ between asymptomatic adults and patients with CTS, and how these differences are independent of the acquisition methods. We included 32 studies of 2643 wrists, belonging to 1575 asymptomatic adults and 1068 patients with CTS. The normal FA was 0.58 (95% CI 0.56, 0.59) and the normal MD was 1.138 × 10^-3 mm²/s (95% CI 1.101, 1.174). Patients with CTS had a significantly lower FA than controls (mean difference 0.12 [95% CI 0.09, 0.16]). Similarly, the median nerve of patients with CTS had a significantly higher mean diffusivity (mean difference 0.16 × 10^-3 mm²/s [95% CI 0.05, 0.27]). The differences were independent of experimental factors. We provide summary estimates of the normal FA and MD of the median nerve in asymptomatic adults. Furthermore, we show that diffusion throughout the length of the median nerve becomes more isotropic in patients with CTS.

Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by the entrapment of a bifid Lanz IIIA Type anatomical variant of median nerve: A case report and systematic literature review

Background:

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment peripheral neuropathy. Median nerve may present several anatomical variations such as a high division or bifid median nerve (BMN). A thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy and variations of the median nerve at the wrist are fundamental to reduce complications during carpal tunnel release.

Case Description:

A 63-year-old man with CTS underwent preoperative ultrasound that showed the entrapment of the median nerve and disclosed a BMN Lanz IIIA Type anatomical variation at the carpal tunnel. During the surgery, the anatomical variant of a BMN at the wrist has been visualized. Both nervous rami entirely occupied the carpal canal and this may have predisposed to the development of the entrapment syndrome. Nor persistent median artery, or other associated abnormalities, have been identified. At the 6 months follow-up control, the patient referred a good surgical recovery with complete resolution of the preoperative symptoms of the median nerve entrapment.

Conclusion:

A rare case of Lanz IIIA BMN Type at the wrist has been encountered in a patient with a CTS and a systematic review and practical considerations have been presented with the aim of raising awareness to the neurosurgical community of a such rare variant that could be encountered during carpal tunnel release procedures. CTS may be caused by the entrapment of a BMN Lanz IIIA Type anatomical variant of median nerve. Preoperative US would help to identify such patients to reduce risk of iatrogenic injuries.