Balloon catheter hypoxic abdominal and pelvic perfusion with tumour necrosis factor-alpha, Melphalan and Mitomycin C: a pharmacokinetic study in pigs

Surgical versus percutaneous isolated pelvic perfusion (IPP) for advanced melanoma: comparison in terms of melphalan pharmacokinetic pelvic bio-availability

Background

Isolated pelvic perfusion (IPP) can be used to treat unresectable melanoma metastases of the pelvis. IPP can be performed either by surgical or percutaneous approaches, using different balloon catheters. The aim of this study was to examine whether the surgical and percutaneous approaches were comparable with respect to tumor drug exposure in the pelvis.

Methods

A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 5 melanoma patients treated with surgical IPP and five with percutaneous IPP. Both groups received melphalan at the dose of 30 mg/m². Melphalan pharmacokinetic analyses were performed and the main parameter used to evaluate pelvic tumor drug-exposure was the ratio of areas under the melphalan plasma concentration curves in the pelvis and the systemic compartment, during the perfusion time (AUC_{0 to 20}). Non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests were employed for statistical comparisons.

Results

The median and interquartile range (IQR) values of the ratios between melphalan AUC_{0 to 20} in pelvic and systemic compartments were 7.9 (IQR 7.2 to 9.9) and 5 (IQR 4 to 7.9) for surgical and percutaneous IPPs, respectively (p = 0.209).

Conclusions

Tumor exposure to drug using these two methods did not statistically differ and both methods, therefore, can be adopted interchangeably, utilizing a perfusion blood flow rate of approximately 120 ml/min. The small sample size is a limitation of this study but our preliminary results can be used to calculate the effect size of a larger trial.

Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT01920516; date of trial registration: August 6, 2013

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2738-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Laboratory models of regional chemotherapy

Development of new treatment strategies and agents is a difficult and costly matter in oncology. Routinely drugs are tested in vitro on tumor cells which, however, may have limited predictive value for their activity in patients. Also, the pharmacokinetic behavior, intratumoral distribution, as well as toxic side effects, binding to other compounds and stability of an agent are very important in determining activity in the patient. More so, development and evaluation of surgical delivery methods, i.e. regional treatment strategies, cannot be tested in cell systems. Therefore animal models are crucial for the development of regional chemotherapy methodologies. To allow translation of the animal data to patients it is important that the animal model closely mimics the clinical setting as for instance is achieved with isolated limb perfusion. However, animal models remain limited in their use, as eventually the efficacy of the approach may be different in animals compared to patients. Here we describe the use of animal models for regional treatment of solid tumors.

Pressure-suit combined with pelvic stop-flow: A feasibility study in a bovine model

BACKGROUND

Isolated pelvic perfusion exposes tissue to high drug doses and may benefit patients with advanced malignancy. However, leakage is a limit to this technique.

AIMS

The aim of the study is to increase the perfusion ratio between local and systemic compartments on isolated pelvic perfusion. We hypothesised that an inflated pressure-suit placed above the level of aortic and caval stop flow could decrease leakage from the regional to the systemic blood compartment in a bovine model.

METHOD

As the size of the pressure-suit was adapted for use in humans, we performed our experimental study on 6 calves which are big enough to fit into the suit. We used an inflated pressure-suit placed at low (40mmHg) and high pressures (125mmHg) above the level of aortic and caval stop-flow. A pharmacokinetic study with cisplatinum was performed in both compartments.

RESULTS

After injection of the drug, the mean ratio of drug concentration in the locoregional/systemic compartment was 43.1. After 30min, this mean ratio was 4 and 9.7 for a pressure-suit pressure of 40mmHg and 125mmHg, respectively. At pressure-suit pressures of 40mmHg and 125mmHg, pelvic perfusion achieved pelvic/systemic exposure ratios of 5.9 and 14.9 at 30min, respectively. Leakage at 30min was higher when the pressure-suit was inflated at low pressure (40mmHg, mean 18%). When the pressure-suit was inflated at high pressure, leakage was lower (125mmHg, mean 7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The pressure-suit increased the perfusion ratio between pelvic and systemic compartments in a bovine model.

Bio-chemotherapeutic strategies and the (dis) utility of hypoxic perfusion of liver, abdomen and pelvis using balloon catheter techniques

AIMS

To review the development and current status of balloon catheter mediated hypoxic perfusion of abdomen, pelvis and liver for treatment of locally advanced malignancies. Within this context we focus on the addition of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) to these minimal invasive perfusion procedures.

METHODS

A literature search on these topics was carried out in PubMed for indexed articles and in all issues of Regional Cancer Treatment. The findings were related to our own experiences.

RESULTS

Hypoxic abdominal (HAP) and hypoxic pelvic perfusion (HPP) using balloon catheters, are currently applied modalities for treatment of a wide variety of abdominal and pelvic tumours, yet scientific validation of these procedures is poor. Following the results of several Phase I-II trials, both treatments are associated with severe systemic toxicity, significant morbidity and even mortality. The degree of systemic leakage associated with these procedures prohibits addition of TNF. For leakage free liver perfusion surgery is still required, as with current balloon catheter techniques it is not possible to perform leakage free isolated hypoxic hepatic perfusion (IHHP), using either orthograde or retrograde hepatic flow. Experimental and clinical observations suggest that within any perfusion setting, the utilization of TNF is only indicated for treatment of highly vascularised tumours and not for treatment of colorectal tumours.

CONCLUSION

Balloon catheter technology in its present form does not provide adequate leakage control in any of these settings and is therefore associated with considerable toxicity. It is associated with poor response rates and cannot be considered in any setting as a standard of care.

Balloon catheter hypoxic pelvic perfusion with mitomycin C and melphalan for locally advanced tumours in the pelvic region: A phase I—II trial

AIMS

To investigate the feasibility of hypoxic pelvic perfusion (HPP), using balloon catheter techniques as treatment modality for locally advanced pelvic malignancies.

METHODS

In a phase I--II study, 16 patients with various non-resectable pelvic tumours were treated with two HPP with MMC and melphalan, followed by radiotherapy (25 Gy) and surgical resection if feasible. Toxicity and procedure related complications were documented. Tumour responses were assessed by MRI or CT. Pain reductive effects were assessed by evaluation of pain registration forms.

RESULTS

HPP resulted in augmented regional drug concentrations with relatively low systemic levels. Some severe systemic toxicity was observed. One procedure related death occurred. Pain reduction effects were short-lived. Ten patients had radiological NC, two PD and one PR. In 11 patients surgical resection was performed, which was microscopically radical in six cases. Mean survival was 26.8 months (range 1--86).

CONCLUSION

The seemingly favorable pharmacokinetic profiles observed with HPP in this and other studies can still lead to severe systemic toxicity. In terms of survival, local (re-)recurrence and pain reduction there seems no benefit of addition of HPP to pre-operative radiotherapy. HPP with MMC and melphalan, does not seem a therapeutic option in patients with locally advanced pelvic tumours.