Pre-tracheal lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

Significance of Surgery for Resectable M1 Lymph Node Metastases Without Organ Metastasis in Esophageal Carcinoma in the Era of Neoadjuvant Treatment

BACKGROUND

M1 esophageal carcinoma goes beyond localized disease and requires treatment with systemic therapy. M1 status is primarily divided into two categories: M1 lymph node metastasis and distant organ metastasis. Oligometastasis is defined as a state of limited metastatic disease, and surgery for oligometastasis of distant organs is reported to be beneficial in limited conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate resected cases of M1 lymph node metastases as the only metastatic site in stage IVB esophageal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy with curative intent between April 2017 and December 2021 were examined. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was our standard therapy and administered in almost all cases. We hypothesized that four sites of metastatic M1LN (supraclavicular (no. 104), pretracheal (no. 106pre), posterior thoracic para-aortic (no. 112aoP), and abdominal para-aortic (no. 16a2lat) LNs) were potentially resectable M1LN (rM1LN) metastases with curative intent and compared the prognosis of patients with and without rM1LN metastasis.

RESULTS

Six hundred eight-two patients were included in the study. Among these patients, 80 had rM1LN metastasis and received surgery for curative intent. Short-term safety outcomes were equivalent between patients with and without rM1LN metastases. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in overall survival between patients with and without rM1LN metastasis. Multivariate analyses revealed that the only independent prognostic factor was ypN status.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests the feasibility and favorable OS in the patients with resection of rM1LN metastasis.

Significance of dissection in each regional lymph-node station of esophageal cancer based on efficacy index and recurrence patterns after curative esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of lymph-node (LN) dissection in esophageal cancer has not been established. Although the frequency and patterns of recurrence in each regional LN station after radical dissection are important in determining the regional LNs of thoracic esophageal cancer to be routinely dissected, this information has not been investigated sufficiently. We studied the significance of dissection at each LN station based on their recurrence patterns.

METHODS

Six hundred and twelve patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative esophagectomy were studied. The incidence and pattern of recurrence (systemic or non-systemic) at each regional LN station were analyzed. To compare the significance of dissection among regional LNs, the efficacy index (EI) was also calculated.

RESULTS

Regional LN recurrence was diagnosed in 101 (16.5%) patients. Among the regional LNs, recurrent laryngeal nerve, paraesophageal, and perigastric LNs showed higher EIs (3.1-6.7). Pretracheal and posterior thoracic para-aortic LNs showed low EIs (0-0.2). Supraclavicular LNs had moderate EIs (1.7-2.0). The recurrence rate was highest in the pretracheal LN, followed by the supraclavicular LNs. The majority (81.8%) of the pretracheal LN had a systemic recurrence, while about half (right: 60.0%, left: 43.8%) of the supraclavicular LNs had a systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Due to the high incidence of systemic recurrence or low EI for pretracheal and posterior thoracic para-aortic LNs, we suggest that these LN stations be regarded as non-regional LNs and be excluded from routine dissection. Supraclavicular LNs may also be excluded from routinely dissected stations.

Pattern of subcarinal lymph node metastasis and dissection strategy for thoracic esophageal cancer

Background

This study aimed to assess the role of subcarinal lymph nodes in lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and to investigate the adequate range of lymph node dissection during esophagectomy.

Methods

This study included 782 thoracic ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy between July 2008 and December 2010. The metastatic rate of subcarinal lymph nodes and their influencing factors were investigated. The outcome of subcarinal lymph node dissection was assessed using the efficacy index (the incidence of metastasis to a lymph node station (%) multiplied by the 5-year survival rate (%) of patients with metastasis to that lymph node station and divided by 100). Additionally, postoperative complications were compared between the subcarinal lymph node resection and reservation groups.

Results

The metastatic rates of subcarinal lymph nodes in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic ESCC were 8.3% (4/48), 19.1% (79/414), and 16.2% (23/142), respectively (χ²=3.669, P>0.05) and in T1, T2, T3, and T4 tumors were 0% (0/71), 4% (4/100), 22.2% (85/383), and 34% (17/50), respectively (χ²=42.859, P<0.05). Tumor invasion and size were significantly correlated with metastasis. For upper thoracic ESCC with positive subcarinal lymph nodes, metastasis tendency was mainly to the lower mediastinum. In middle third esophageal cancer, after subcarinal lymph nodes were involved, metastasis to the lower mediastinal lymph nodes increased by nearly 50%, and bidirectional metastasis increased by nearly three times compared with that before involvement. For lower third cancer with positive subcarinal lymph nodes, metastasis tendency was mainly to the upper mediastinum. The postoperative complication rates in the resection and reservation groups were as follows: overall, 19% and 14.6%, respectively (P>0.05), and pulmonary, 10.3% and 7.3%, respectively (P>0.05). The efficacy indexes of lymph node dissection at the upper, middle, and lower third esophagus were 0%, 7.6%, and 27.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

Dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes, which does not increase postoperative complications, should be performed routinely in lower thoracic ESCC after submucosal invasion of tumor; meanwhile, tumors larger than 3cm should also result in subcarinal lymph node dissection in patients with a tumor located in the upper esophagus and T1-T2 ESCC.

A new classification of lymph node metastases according to the lymph node stations for predicting prognosis in surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is one of the major prognostic factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However there is no consensus regarding the prognostic significance of the location of LNM. Therefore, a novel classification was proposed to identify the lymph node (LN) stations which may be useful in predicting prognosis. A total of 260 ESCC patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The prognostic values of LNM in different lymph node (LN) stations were evaluated by random survival forests (RSF). Their prognostic significance was examined by Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The three most frequently involved LN stations were station 16 (24.49%), station 1 (22.22%) and station 2 (21.05%). Stations 1, 2, 8M, 8L and 16 were grouped as dominant LN stations (DLNS) which showed higher values in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than the remaining LN stations, which we define as non-dominant LN stations (N-DLNS). LNM features of DLNS (number of positive LN stations, number of positive LNs and LN ratio), but not those from N-DLNS, served as independent prognostic factors (P<0.05) whenever used alone or when combined with factors from N-DLNS. Furthermore, the area under ROC indicated that DLNS is a more accurate prediction than N-DLNS (P<0.05). This study demonstrated the value of LNM in DLNS in predicting prognosis in surgical ESCC patients, which outperformed those from N-DLNS. Therefore, the method of dominant and non-dominant classification may serve as an additional parameter to improve individualized therapeutic strategies.

Prognostic value of subcarinal lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual for esophageal cancer (EC) categorizes N stage according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), irrespective of the site. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of subcarinal LN metastasis in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 507 consecutive patients with ESCC was conducted. Potential clinicopathological factors that could influence subcarinal LN metastasis were statistically analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed to evaluate the prognostic parameters for survival.

RESULTS

The frequency of subcarinal LN metastasis was 22.9% (116/507). Logistic regression analysis showed that tumor length (>3 cm vs ≤ 3 cm; P=0.027), tumor location (lower vs upper/middle; P=0.009), vessel involvement (Yes vs No; P=0.001) and depth of invasion (T3-4a vs T1-2; P=0.012) were associated with 2.085-, 1.810-, 2.535- and 2.201- fold increases, respectively, for risk of subcarinal LN metastasis. Multivariate analyses showed that differentiation (poor vs well/moderate; P=0.001), subcarinal LN metastasis (yes vs no; P=0.033), depth of invasion (T3-4a vs T1-2; P=0.014) and N staging (N1-3 vs N0; P=0.001) were independent prognostic factors. In addition, patients with subcarinal LN metastasis had a significantly lower 5-year cumulative survival rate than those without (26.7% vs 60.9%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subcarinal LN metastasis is a predictive factor for long-term survival in patients with ESCC.

Management of advanced-stage operable esophageal cancer

The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing in the developed world, with a relative increase in adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma. The distensible nature of the esophagus results in delayed development of symptoms associated with esophageal cancer; hence many patients have locally advanced or metastatic cancer at the time of initial presentation. Although resection remains the treatment of choice for early-stage esophageal cancer, the best treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is debatable and, consequently, varies at different centers. This article discusses the published literature on various available therapeutic options for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Dissection of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer

There has been much recent debate regarding the best surgical procedure to treat esophageal cancer, in particular with regard to the optimum extent of lymphadenectomy to improve survival while minimizing morbidity. No results obtained by prospective, randomized studies on the comparison of radical esophagectomy and extended lymphadenectomy with limited or less invasive resections following neoadjuvant therapy with regard to perioperative morbidity and prognosis are available to date. Until now, there has been no evidence suggesting the usefulness of sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancers, regardless of the cell type. Furthermore, the question as to the benefits and risks of two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer has not yet been conclusively answered. This article will discuss the recent status of lymph node-dissection procedures stage-dependently according to the two different tumor entities and with regard to minimally invasive esophagectomy, including the novel 2010 Tumor, Node, Metastasis-staging system.

New insights in the lymphatic spread of oesophageal cancer and its implications for the extent of surgical resection

In this review new insights in the dissemination pattern of oesophageal tumours and the implications for the (extent of) surgical and endoscopic resection are discussed. Moreover, the sentinel node concept in oesophageal cancer is reconsidered. Three-years survival after a limited resection for cervical-upper thoracic oesophageal cancer was 14-20% after an extended resection. No patients with distant metastases were alive after five years. Therefore, curative surgery for cervical-upper oesophageal cancer with extended lymph node dissection is probably only indicated in patients without distant lymph nodes metastases. Involved coeliac nodes can be found in tumours of the whole oesophagus. Adenocarcinomas of the gastrooesophageal junction do metastasize predominantly to the paracardial and lesser curvature regions. No significant difference was found in a randomized trial comparing two-field transthoracic resection with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastrooesophageal junction.(6) Subgroup analysis for patients with a distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma revealed a 17% survival benefit after transthoracic resection. In several Japanese studies a better five-year survival is claimed after a three-field lymph node dissection than after a conventional two-field lymphadenectomy. In a randomized study, however, no statistically significant difference was found in the short- and long-term survival nor in the recurrence rate. If an early lesion is limited to the mucosa, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) could be considered because of the low chance of lymph node metastases. However, the technique of EMR has not yet been optimized resulting in high numbers of local cancer recurrences and a high need for endoscopic re-resections. Only few studies investigated whether the sentinel node concept is applicable to the oesophagus or gastric cardia. In one study in patients with oesophageal or cardia cancer, the accuracy was 96% and only two false negative sentinel nodes were identified. The sentinel node concept in oesophageal cancers might change future operative strategies.