Audit of a series of 40 gastrointestinal stromal tumour cases

Local recurrence in primary localized resected gastro-intestinal stromal tumors A registry observational national cohort study including 912 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Previous literature showed a high risk of recurrence following surgical treatment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). However, little is known about the patient- and treatment characteristics of local recurrences (LRs) in GIST patients. Therefore, this study aimed to better understand patterns of LR in surgically treated localised GIST and to describe treatment options based on our Dutch GIST Registry (DGR).

METHODS

Data of primary surgically treated localised GIST between January 2009 until July 2021 were retrospectively retrieved from the DGR.

RESULTS

Of 1452 patients registered in the DGR, 912 patients were included in this study. Only 3.8% (35/912) of patients developed LR, including 20 patients with LR only and 15 patients with simultaneous LR and distant metastases (DM). Median time to LR was 30 (interquartile range 8-53) months from date of surgery. Eleven percent (100/912) of patients developed only DM. A total of 2.3% (6/259) of patients treated with adjuvant treatment developed an LR during adjuvant therapy. Seventy percent of patients with LR only (14/20) were treated with surgery (85.7% R0), which was mostly combined with systemic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with primary surgically treated localised GIST have a limited risk of developing recurrence. Fifteen percent developed recurrence, of which one quarter developed an LR. Therefore, less intensified follow-up schedules could be considered, especially during treatment with adjuvant imatinib. In patients with LR only, potentially curative treatment strategies, including surgical (re-)resection, are often possible as treatment for LR.

Comparison of Prognosis Between Microscopically Positive and Negative Surgical Margins for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of microscopically positive margins (R1) on primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies up to 23 November 2020. The pooled disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between R1 and negative margins (R0) were estimated using a random-effects model.

Results

Twenty studies with 6,465 patients were included. Compared with R0 resection, R1 was associated with poor DFS in patients who did not receive adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.26-2.09; P = 0.48, I² = 0%; reference: R0). This negative impact of R1 disappeared with the use of adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.95-1.60; P = 0.38, I2 = 6%; reference: R0). R1 was related to poor DFS in gastric GISTs (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.15-5.02, I² = 0%; reference: R0), which was attenuated in the subgroup of adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.32-15.60; P = 0.84, I² = 0%; reference: R0). Rectal GIST with R1 margin who even received adjuvant Imatinib still had poor DFS (HR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.27-11.31; P = 0.54, I² = 0%; reference: R0). Patients who underwent R1 resection had similar OS compared with those underwent R0 resection regardless of the use of adjuvant Imatinib.

Conclusion

R1 was associated with poor DFS for primary GISTs, which was attenuated by adjuvant therapy with Imatinib. Similar result was observed in the gastric GISTs subgroup. Rectal GIST patients with R1 resection had poor DFS even when they received adjuvant Imatinib. The R1 margin did not influence the OS of GISTs.

Quality of Surgery and Outcome in Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated Within an International Intergroup Randomized Clinical Trial of Adjuvant Imatinib

Importance

The association between quality of surgery and overall survival in patients affected by localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is not completely understood.

Objective

To assess the risk of death with and without imatinib according to microscopic margins status (R0/R1) using data from a randomized study on adjuvant imatinib.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a post hoc observational study on patients included in the randomized, open-label, phase III trial, performed between December 2004 and October 2008. Median follow-up was 9.1 years (IQR, 8-10 years). The study was performed at 112 hospitals in 12 countries. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of primary GIST, with intermediate or high risk of relapse; no evidence of residual disease after surgery; older than 18 years; and no prior malignancies or concurrent severe/uncontrolled medical conditions. Data were analyzed between July 17, 2017, and March 1, 2020.

Interventions

Patients were randomized after surgery to either receive imatinib (400 mg/d) for 2 years or no adjuvant treatment. Randomization was stratified by center, risk category (high vs intermediate), tumor site (gastric vs other), and quality of surgery (R0 vs R1). Tumor rupture was included in the R1 category but also analyzed separately.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point of this substudy was overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between R0/R1 using Cox models adjusted for treatment and stratification factors.

Results

A total of 908 patients were included; 51.4% were men (465) and 48.6% were women (440), and the median age was 59 years (range, 18-89 years). One hundred sixty-two (17.8%) had an R1 resection, and 97 of 162 (59.9%) had tumor rupture. There was a significant difference in OS for patients undergoing an R1 vs R0 resection, overall (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05; 95% CI, 1.45-2.89) and by treatment arm (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.37-3.75 with adjuvant imatinib and HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.16-2.99 without adjuvant imatinib). When tumor rupture was excluded, this difference in OS between R1 and R0 resections disappeared (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.54-2.01).

Conclusions and Relevance

The difference in OS by quality of surgery with or without imatinib was associated with the presence of tumor rupture. When the latter was excluded, the presence of R1 margins was not associated with worse OS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00103168.

Surgical treatment of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): Management and prognostic role of R1 resections

BACKGROUND

Surgery represents the best treatment for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The aim of this study is to analyse outcomes of surgical management in order to evaluate the influence of microscopically R1 margins on survival and recurrence in patients affected by GISTs.

METHODS

The study reviewed retrospective data from 74 patients surgically treated for primary GISTs without metastasis at diagnosis. Clinical and pathological findings, surgical procedures, information about follow up and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Recurrence rate was low and no patients died in the R1 group during the follow up period. The difference in recurrence free survival for patients undergoing an R0 (n = 54) versus an R1 (n = 20) resections was not statistically significant (76% versus 85% at 3 years, logrank test p-value = 0,14; 63% versus 86% at 5 years, logrank test p-value = 0,48) CONCLUSIONS: Microscopically positive margin has no influence on overall and relapse-free survival in GIST patients. Thus, when R0 surgery implies major functional sequelae, it may be decided to accept possible R1 margins, especially for low risk tumors.

Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact and management of microscopically positive margins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remain unclear. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of surgical margins for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GISTs. Twelve studies with 1985 GIST patients were included. The overall recurrence rate in R1 resection and R0 resection group was 0.364 (95% CI 0.299-0.429) and 0.296 (95% CI 0.161-0.430), respectively. Meta-analysis confirmed that a microscopically positive margin could significantly impact the disease-free survival (HR 1.596, 95% CI 1.128-2.258; I(2) = 37.5%, P value = 0.091), but had no influence on overall survival (HR 1.430, 95% CI 0.608-3.363; I(2) = 60.8%, P value = 0.013). Importantly, subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant imatinib treatment could attenuate the risk of recurrence for primary GIST patients who received R1 resection. (HR 1.308, 95% CI 0.583-2.935; I(2) = 53.2%, P value = 0.074). The level of evidence achieved in this study was "moderate" for DFS and "low" for OS. In conclusion, this study revealed that a microscopically positive margin is an unfavorable prognostic factor for GIST patients with R1 resection, and adjuvant imatinib treatment is proved to be effective.

Microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of risk factors and tumor recurrence

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the outcomes of patients with microscopically positive (R1) resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) because existing retrospective series contain small numbers of patients. The objective of this study was to analyze factors associated with R1 resection and assess the risk of recurrence with and without imatinib.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed operative and pathology reports for 819 patients undergoing resection of primary GIST from the North American branch of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z9000 and Z9001 clinical trials at 230 institutions testing adjuvant imatinib after resection of primary GIST. Patient, tumor, operative characteristics, factors associated with R1 resections, and disease status were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-two (8.8%) patients had an R1 resection and were followed for a median of 49 months. Factors associated with R1 resection included tumor size (≥ 10 cm), location (rectum), and tumor rupture. The risk of disease recurrence in R1 patients was driven largely by the presence of tumor rupture. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival for patients undergoing an R1 vs R0 resection of GIST with (hazard ratio [HR] 1.095, 95% CI 0.66, 1.82, p = 0.73) or without (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.76, 2.99, p = 0.24) adjuvant imatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 9% of 819 GIST patients had an R1 resection. Significant factors associated with R1 resection include tumor size ≥ 10 cm, location, and rupture. The difference in recurrence-free survival with or without imatinib therapy in those undergoing an R1 vs R0 resection was not statistically significant at a median follow-up of 4 years.

[Controversies in the surgical treatment of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST)]

It is estimated that 50% of GIST are located at the time of their diagnosis. A complete surgical resection can be performed in up to 95% of these cases, making this the most important prognostic factor. This surgery must fulfil a series of technical requirements so as to be really effective, as it has to be R0, with no tumour rupture, with preservation of the pseudo-capsule, etc. Although the majority of GIST are gastric, their location in other anatomical areas, such as the oesophagus, duodenum or rectum, require the surgeon to use more complex techniques. Laparoscopy is increasingly used; however, we must avoid its use, due to there being few experienced groups or if there are large tumours. The use of neoadjuvant therapy has revived great interest by allowing to resection tumours that were once non-resectable or in very compromised anatomical locations, with less aggressive surgery. The use of pre-surgical biopsy is not exempt from serious risks, thus it should only be used for establishing a neoadjuvant treatment or if there are diagnostic doubts with other diseases in high risk patients.

Surgical therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the upper gastrointestinal tract

AIM

This study aimed to examine clinicopathological features and outcomes after primary resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) of the upper gastrointestinal tract

METHOD

Fifty consecutive patients were identified as having a mesenchymal tumour of the upper gastrointestinal tract resected at our institution, of which 47 were GISTs. The influence of clinicopathological variables on disease-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox hazard model.

RESULTS

The median age was 62.8 (21.3-94.7). The commonest presenting symptoms were anaemia (43%) and pain (34%). Tumours were located in the stomach (64%), small bowel (34%) and oesophagus (2%). Median follow-up was 20.4 (2-106) months. Fletcher low/intermediate-risk tumours had a significantly better (p = 0.0008) 2- and 5-year actuarial survival of 100% compared with 88% and 58% for high-risk group. Recurrence-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 100% for low/intermediate-risk group compared with 68% and 45% for the high-risk group (p = 0.0008). Univariate analysis of predictors of recurrence identified male sex, high mitotic rate and tumour size as significant. Multivariate analysis showed high mitotic rate as the only poor prognosticator (Hazard ratio = 16.7, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Surgical excision of low- and intermediate-grade GIST has an excellent prognosis. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatments, and high-grade tumours carry a significantly worse prognosis. High mitotic rates are an independent poor prognosticator.

Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of outcome with respect to surgical margins and technique

This report reviews the methods and goals of treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs express CD117, which serves as an immunohistochemical diagnostic marker. Surgical excision is the definitive treatment for all primary GISTs greater than 2 cm without evidence of peritoneal seeding or metastasis. Preoperative or intraoperative biopsy is not indicated except when the differential diagnosis includes another type of malignancy. Resection may be performed by traditional open surgery or by laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted procedures. Regardless of the approach, oncological precautions must be strictly observed. Tumor disruption is to be avoided at all costs; tumor enucleation leaves a tumor-seeded pseudocapsule behind and is considered insufficient. Because GISTs rarely metastasize through the lymphatics, routine lymphadenectomy is not indicated. The importance of achieving negative microscopic margins is controversial, although patients who undergo incomplete microscopic resection may be at greater risk of locoregional recurrence. Other factors, such as tumor grade and size, may play a more significant role in predicting recurrence. Cases of advanced disease or involvement of adjacent structures should be evaluated on an individual basis by a multidisciplinary team.

Segmental resection of the duodenum for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The biological appearance of these tumors reaches from small lesions with benign appearance to aggressive sarcomas. Only 3-5% of GISTs are localized in the duodenum. There is a controversy, if duodenal GISTs should be treated by a duodenopancreatectomy or by a limited resection of the duodenum.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 29-year-old man presented with an acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a submucosal tumor located in the proximal part III of the duodenum, 3 cm distal of the papilla of Vater. After an emergency laparotomy with ligation of tumor-feeding vessels in a primary hospital, definitive surgical therapy was performed by partial resection of the duodenum with a duodenojejunostomy. Histology revealed a GIST with a diameter of 2.5 cm and <5 mitoses/50 high power fields, indicating a low risk of malignancy. Therefore no adjuvant therapy with Imatinib was initiated.

CONCLUSION

GISTs of the duodenum are a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Partial resection of the duodenum is a warranted alternative to a duodenopancreatectomy, as this procedure has a lower operative morbidity, while providing comparable oncological results.

Tumor estromal gastrointestinal: análise de fatores relacionados ao prognóstico

OBJETIVO: estudar os critérios morfológicos e imunoistoquímicos relacionados ao prognóstico dos tumores estromais gastrointestinais. MÉTODOS: o estudo foi retrospectivo de 42 casos de tumor estromal gastrointestinal (GIST). Vinte e cinco casos foram obtidos no arquivo do Serviço de Anatomia Patológica do Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle e os outros dezessete, do Serviço de Anatomia Patológica do Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho. RESULTADOS: de acordo com a análise univariada os tumores maiores que 5 cm, com número de mitoses maior que 5/50 CGA, presença de necrose, de alto risco, revelaram significância em relação a redução da sobrevida (p= 0,017, 0,010, 0,001 e 0,016, respectivamente). Os outros fatores analisados (subtipo histológico, topografia e imunofenótipo) não mostraram significância. CONCLUSÃO: os resultados confirmam a utilidade do grau de risco, do tamanho tumoral, do índice mitótico e da necrose como fatores preditores do comportamento biológico dos tumores estromais gastrointestinais.

Risk Criteria and Prognostic Factors for Predicting Recurrences After Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

BACKGROUND

The introduction of adjuvant imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) raised debate over the accuracy of National Institutes of Health risk criteria and the significance of other prognostic factors in GIST.

METHODS

Tumor aggressiveness and other clinicopathological factors influencing disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed in 335 patients with primary resectable CD117-immunopositive GISTs (median follow-up, 31 months after primary tumor resection) from a prospectively collected tumor registry.

RESULTS

Overall median DFS was 37 months, and estimated 5-year DFS was 37.8 %. In univariate analysis, high or intermediate risk group (P < .000001), mitotic index >5/50 high-power field (P < .00001), primary tumor size >5 cm (P < .00001), nongastric primary location (P = .0001), male sex (P = .01), R1 resection/tumor rupture (P = .0003), and epithelioid cell or mixed cell pathological subtype (P = .05) negatively affected DFS. In multivariate analysis, statistically significant factors negatively influencing DFS for model 1 were mitotic index >5/50 high-power field (P = .004), primary tumor size >5 cm (P = .001), male sex (P = .003), R1 resection/tumor rupture (P = .04), and nongastric primary tumor location (P = .02), and for model 2 were high/intermediate risk primary tumor (P < .0001 and P = .008, respectively), male sex (P = .007), resection R1/tumor rupture (P = .01), and nongastric primary tumor location (P = .02). Five-year DFS for high, intermediate, and low/very low risk group was 20%, 54%, and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk criteria for assessing the natural course of primary GISTs were validated, but additional independent prognostic factors-primary tumor location and sex--were also identified.