Transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction and minimal residual disease in axillary sentinel nodes of breast cancer

Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in peritoneal lavage by the transcription-reverse transcription concerted method indicates poor prognosis in patients with stage II and III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dissemination and positive peritoneal lavage cytology are associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) messenger RNA (mRNA) is often used as a marker to detect micrometastases. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of CEA mRNA in the peritoneal lavage of colon cancer patients.

METHODS

Colon cancer patients (n = 201) who underwent curative operative resection between August 2009 and February 2013 were enrolled. CEA mRNA in peritoneal lavage was measured using the transcription-reverse transcription concerted method, a quantitative RNA amplification method. The correlation between CEA mRNA and overall and peritoneal recurrence-free survival was evaluated.

RESULTS

Positive CEA mRNA in peritoneal lavage was an independent risk factor for overall recurrence-free survival in colon cancer (P < .0001). Positive CEA mRNA was a risk factor for poorer overall recurrence in stage II and III patients (P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). Moreover, among stage III patients with positive CEA mRNA, the postoperative chemotherapy group had significantly lower overall and peritoneal recurrence rates than the no postoperative chemotherapy group (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Positive CEA mRNA in peritoneal lavage was associated with high overall recurrence rates in stage II and III colon cancer. Further study is necessary to determinate the efficacy of aggressive postoperative chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer patients with positive CEA mRNA.

Usefulness of transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction method for detecting circulating tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The CellSearch system (Veridex, LLC) is useful for detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in various carcinomas, including colorectal cancer (CRC); however, there are some problems associated with its clinical use. A transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction (TRC) method, which is a PCR-based technique producing more stable and reliable results, because it is a more simplified process compared with the conventional techniques, has been introduced for detecting micrometastasis in some carcinomas. We aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of TRC method in the CTC detection.

METHODS

We compared the two methods for the sensitivity for CTC detection using the colon cancer cell line and 42 whole-blood samples from patients with advanced or metastatic CRC. Furthermore, 25 patients with metastatic CRC were enrolled to investigate the correlation between CTC detection and prognosis in both methods.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the TRC method was similar to that of the CellSearch system. The overall survival rate was significantly worse in the patients diagnosed as CTC-positive by the TRC method than in those diagnosed as CTC-negative; this finding was similar to the prognosis indicated by the CellSearch system. However, clinically, the TRC method could detect CTCs more rapidly and at a reduced cost compared with the CellSearch system.

CONCLUSIONS

The TRC method seems to be a useful alternative to the CellSearch system for clinically detecting CTCs in patients with metastatic CRC.

Clinical significance of sentinel lymph node isolated tumour cells in breast cancer

The advent of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and improvements in histopathological and molecular analysis have increased the rate at which isolated tumour cells (ITC) are identified. However, their biological and clinical significance has been the subject of much debate. In this article we review the literature concerning SLNB with particular reference to ITC. The controversies regarding histopathological assessment, clinical relevance and management implications are explored. The literature review was facilitated by Medline, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Published studies have reported divergent results regarding the biological significance and clinical implications of ITC in general and SLN ITC in particular. Some studies demonstrate no associations, whilst others have found these to be indicators of poor prognosis, associated with non-SLN involvement, in addition to local recurrence and distant disease. Absolute consensus regarding the optimal analytical technique for SLN has yet to be reached, particularly concerning immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques targeting cytokeratins and contemporary molecular analysis. The clinical relevance of ITC within the SLN should be primarily determined by the magnitude of their impact on patient management and outcome measures. The modest up-staging within current classification systems is justified and reflects the marginally poorer prognosis for women with SLN ITC. Management need not be altered where further axillary treatment with surgical clearance or radiotherapy and systemic adjuvant treatment are already indicated. However, in the absence of level-1 guidance, each case requires discussion with regard to other tumour and patient related factors in the context of the multidisciplinary team. The identification of ITC remains highly dependent on the analytical technique employed and there exists potential for stage migration and impact on management decisions. Evidence supporting the routine analysis of deeper tissue sections by IHC is lacking and molecular technologies should be restricted to research purposes at present.

The clinical significance of sentinel lymph node micrometastasis in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The advent of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and improvements in histopathological and molecular analysis have increased the rate at which micrometastases (MM) are identified. However, their significance has been the subject of much debate. In this article we review the literature concerning axillary lymph node (ALN) MM, with particular reference to SLNB. The controversies regarding histopathological assessment, clinical relevance and management implications are discussed.

METHODS

Literature review facilitated by Medline and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

Published studies have reported divergent results regarding the significance and implications of ALN MM in general and sentinel lymph node (SLN) MM in particular. Some studies demonstrate no associations, whilst others have found these to be indicators of poor prognosis, associated with non-SLN involvement, in addition to local and distant failure. Absolute consensus regarding the optimal analytical technique for SLNs has yet to be reached, particularly concerning immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques targeting cytokeratins and the utility of contemporary molecular analysis.

CONCLUSION

SLN MM are likely to represent an incremental detriment to prognosis and increased risk of non-SLN involvement, despite only modest up-staging within current classification systems. In the absence of level-1 guidance concerning the management of women with SLN MM, each case requires discussion with regard to other tumour and patient related factors in the context of the multidisciplinary team. Randomized studies are required to evaluate the prognostic significance and optimal management of each category of tumour burden within the SLN. The identification of MM remains highly dependent on the analytical technique employed and there exists potential for stage migration and impact on management decisions.