Selective continuous vascular occlusion and perioperative fluid restriction in partial hepatectomy. Outcomes in 101 consecutive patients

Effect of inferior vena cava respiratory variability-guided fluid therapy after laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

After major liver resection, the volume status of patients is still undetermined. However, few concerns have been raised about postoperative fluid management. We aimed to compare gut function recovery and short-term prognosis of the patients after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) with or without inferior vena cava (IVC) respiratory variability-directed fluid therapy in the anesthesia intensive care unit (AICU).

METHODS

This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled 70 patients undergoing LLR. The IVC respiratory variability was used to optimize fluid management of the intervention group in AICU, while the standard practice of fluid management was used for the control group. The primary outcome was the time to flatus after surgery. The secondary outcomes included other indicators of gut function recovery after surgery, postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS), liver and kidney function, the severity of oxidative stress, and the incidence of severe complications associated with hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Compared with patients receiving standard fluid management, patients in the intervention group had a shorter time to anal exhaust after surgery (1.5 ± 0.6 days vs. 2.0 ± 0.8 days) and lower C-reactive protein activity (21.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.9-36.7] mg/L vs. 44.8 [95%CI: 26.9-63.1] mg/L) 24 h after surgery. There were no significant differences in the time to defecation, serum concentrations of D-lactic acid, malondialdehyde, renal function, and frequency of severe postoperative complications as well as the LOS between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative IVC respiratory variability-directed fluid therapy in AICU was facilitated in bowel movement but elicited a negligible beneficial effect on the short-term prognosis of patients undergoing LLR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-INR-17013093.

Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A liver resection under low central venous pressure (CVP) has become standard practice; however, the benefits beyond a reduction in blood loss are not well reported. Moreover, the precise method to achieve CVP reduction has not been established. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs) was performed to assess the effects of CVP on clinical outcome and to identify the optimum method of CVP reduction.

METHODS

EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane database were searched for trials comparing low CVP surgery with controls. The primary outcome was post-operative complications within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion rates and length of stay (LOS). Sub-group analysis was performed to assess the CVP reduction method on the outcome.

RESULTS

Eight trials were identified. No difference was observed in the morbidity rate between the high CVP and control groups [odds ratio (OR) = 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66, 1.40) P = 0.84, I(2) = 0%]. EBL [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -308.63 ml (95% CI -474.67, -142.58) P = < 0.001, I(2) = 73%] and blood transfusion rates [OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.44, 0.97) P = 0.040, I(2) = 37%] were significantly lower in the low CVP groups. Neither anaesthetic nor surgical methods of CVP reduction were associated with a reduced post-operative morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Low CVP surgery is associated with a reduction in EBL; however, this does not translate into an improvement in post-operative morbidity. The optimum method of CVP reduction has not been identified.

Haemodynamic Optimization by Oesophageal Doppler and Pulse Power Wave Analysis in Liver Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Liver surgery is still associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare different haemodynamic treatments in liver surgery. In a prospective, blinded, randomised, controlled pilot trial patients undergoing liver resection were randomised to receive haemodynamic management guided by conventional haemodynamic parameters or by oesophageal Doppler monitor (ODM, CardioQ-ODM) or by pulse power wave analysis (PPA, LiDCOrapid) within a goal-directed algorithm adapted for liver surgery. The primary endpoint was stroke volume index before intra-operative start of liver resection. Secondary endpoints were the haemodynamic course during surgery and postoperative pain levels. Due to an unbalance in the extension of the surgical procedures with a high rate of only minor procedures the conventional group was dropped from the analysis. Eleven patients in the ODM group and 10 patients in the PPA group were eligible for statistical analysis. Stroke volume index before start of liver resection was 49 (37; 53) ml/m² and 48 (41; 56) ml/m² in the ODM and PPA group, respectively (p=0.397). The ODM guided group was haemodynamically stable as shown by ODM and PPA measurements. However, the PPA guided group showed a significant increase of pulse-pressure-variability (p=0.002) that was not accompanied by a decline of stroke volume index displayed by the PPA (p=0.556) but indicated by a decline of stroke volume index by the ODM (p<0.001). The PPA group had significantly higher postoperative pain levels than the ODM group (p=0.036). In conclusion, goal-directed optimization by ODM and PPA showed differences in intraoperative cardiovascular parameters indicating that haemodynamic optimization is not consistent between the two monitors.

Major hepatectomy is safe for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Because of an increasing aging population worldwide, a greater number of elderly patients are being considered for hepatic resection. The objective of this retrospective pair-matched study was to assess the influence of age on postoperative outcomes after major hepatectomy (resection of three or more Couinaud segments) in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patient demographics, diagnoses, surgical treatments, and early postoperative outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 208 HCC patients with cirrhosis underwent major hepatectomy between 2007 and 2012. The mortality rate was 3.57% in patients aged 70 years or more (group E) compared with 1.32% in those aged below 70 years (group Y; P=0.630). The overall complication rates were 53.57% in group E and 47.37% in group Y (P=0.427). Increasing age was independently associated with postoperative pneumonia (P<0.001), bacteremia (P=0.026), and respiratory failure requiring reintubation (P=0.028). A total of 25.00% of patients had a Clavien-Dindo classification grade of 3a or more in group E compared with 13.16% in group Y (P=0.040). In multivariate analysis, intraoperative red blood cell transfusion of 5 U or more (P=0.016; hazard ratio 4.812; 95% confidence interval 1.332-17.384) was a predictor of higher morbidity in the elderly.

CONCLUSION

With rigorous screening of patients and improvement of perioperative management and operative techniques, major hepatectomy can be safely performed on HCC patients aged 70 years or more with liver cirrhosis. Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion of 5 U or more was predictive of higher morbidity in the elderly. Surgeons should take care to minimize the likelihood of intraoperative blood transfusion in elderly patients.

Right hepatectomy with extra-hepatic vascular division prior to transection: intention-to-treat analysis of a standardized policy

BACKGROUND

Right hepatectomy (RH) is the most common type of major hepatectomy and can be achieved without portal triad clamping (PTC) in non-cirrhotic liver. The present study reviews our standardized policy of performing RH without systematic PTC.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one consecutive RH were performed in non-cirrhotic patients, with division of the right afferent and efferent blood vessels prior to transection, without systematically using PTC. Prospectively collected data were analysed, focusing on the following endpoints: need for salvage PTC, ischaemic time, blood loss and post-operative outcome.

RESULTS

Extra-hepatic division of the right hepatic vessels was feasible in all patients, but was ineffective in 48 patients (26.5%) who required salvage PTC during transection. In those patients, the median ischaemic time was 20 min. The median blood loss was 500 ml (50-3000). Six patients (3.3%) experienced post-operative liver failure. Overall morbidity, severe morbidity and mortality were 42%, 12.1% and 1.6%, respectively, with peri-operative transfusion rate (16.6%) being the only factor associated with morbidity.

DISCUSSION

By performing RH with extra-hepatic vascular division prior to transection, PTC can be safely avoided in the majority of patients.

Anesthetic Considerations in Hepatectomies under Hepatic Vascular Control

Background. Hazards of liver surgery have been attenuated by the evolution in methods of hepatic vascular control and the anesthetic management. In this paper, the anesthetic considerations during hepatic vascular occlusion techniques were reviewed. Methods. A Medline literature search using the terms "anesthetic," "anesthesia," "liver," "hepatectomy," "inflow," "outflow occlusion," "Pringle," "hemodynamic," "air embolism," "blood loss," "transfusion," "ischemia-reperfusion," "preconditioning," was performed. Results. Task-orientated anesthetic management, according to the performed method of hepatic vascular occlusion, ameliorates the surgical outcome and improves the morbidity and mortality rates, following liver surgery. Conclusions. Hepatic vascular occlusion techniques share common anesthetic considerations in terms of preoperative assessment, monitoring, induction, and maintenance of anesthesia. On the other hand, the hemodynamic management, the prevention of vascular air embolism, blood transfusion, and liver injury are plausible when the anesthetic plan is scheduled according to the method of hepatic vascular occlusion performed.

Individualized peri-operative fluid therapy facilitating early-phase recovery after liver transplantation

AIM: To investigate the correlation between peri-operative fluid therapy and early-phase recovery after liver transplantation (LT) by retrospectively reviewing 102 consecutive recipients.

METHODS: Based on whether or not the patients had pulmonary complications, the patients were categorized into non-pulmonary and pulmonary groups. Twenty-eight peri-operative variables were analyzed in both groups to screen for the factors related to the occurrence of early pulmonary complications.

RESULTS: The starting hemoglobin (Hb) value, an intra-operative transfusion > 100 mL/kg, and a fluid balance ≤ -14 mL/kg on the first day and the second or third day post-operatively were significant factors for early pulmonary complications. The extubation time, time to initial passage of flatus, or intensive care unit length of stay were significantly prolonged in patients who had not received an intra-operative transfusion ≤ 100 mL/kg or a fluid balance ≤ -14 mL/kg on the first day and the second or the third day post-operatively. Moreover, these patients had poorer results in arterial blood gas analysis.

CONCLUSION: It is important to offer a precise and individualized fluid therapy during the peri-operative period to the patients undergoing LT for cirrhosis-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Primary Liver Tumors as Predictive Factors for Postoperative Mortality after Liver Resection: A Meta-Analysis of More than 35,000 Hepatic Resections

Liver resection is considered the therapeutic gold standard for primary and metastatic liver neoplasms. The reduction of postoperative complications and mortality has resulted in a more aggressive approach to hepatic malignancies. For the most part, results of liver surgery have been published by highly experienced institutions, but the observations of highly specialized units results may not reflect the current status of hepatic surgery, underestimating mortality and complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate morbidity and mortality as a result of liver resection for primary and metastatic lesions, analyzing a large number of studies with a meta-analytic process taking into account the overdispersion of data. An extensive literature search has been conducted, and 148 papers published between January 2000 and April 2008, including a total of 36,629 patients from both high-volume and low volume institutions, were included in the meta-analysis. A beta binomial model was used to provide a robust estimate of the summary event rate by pooling overdispersion binomial data from different studies. Overall morbidity and mortality after liver surgery were 29.32 per cent and 3.15 per cent, respectively. Significantly higher postoperative mortality was observed after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinomas and primary hepatic tumors. The application of a beta binomial model to correct for overdispersion of liver surgery data showed significantly higher postoperative mortality rates in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas or primary hepatic tumors after liver resection.

Application of hepatic blood blocker to control bleeding during hepatectomy

AIM: To compare a new tool named hepatic blood blocker versus the Pringle maneuver and hemihepatic vascular exclusion in controlling bleeding during hepatectomy for liver cancer.

METHODS: The clinical data for 117 patients who underwent hepatectomy for liver cancer from 2004 to 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Of these patients, 42 underwent local hepatic blood occlusion with hepatic blood blocker (group A), 35 underwent hemihepatic vascular exclusion (group B), and 40 underwent the Pringle maneuver (group C). The blood loss, operative time, postoperative hepatic function and complications were compared among each group.

RESULTS: The average blood loss and operative time were significantly less in group A than in groups B (P < 0.05, 0.001) and C (both P < 0.001). Significant differences were seen between group A and group C in serum total bilirubin (TB) and alanine transaminase (ALT) on postoperative days 3 and day 7, and group A showed better hepatic function (TB: P = 0.014, 0.009; ALT: both P < 0.001). The Pringle maneuver significantly increased the rate of postoperative abdominal dropsy when compared to group A (P < 0.001). In group C, two patients suffered from liver failure, one suffered from alimentary tract hemorrhage and one died.

CONCLUSION: Using hepatic blood blocker during hepatectomy could effectively control bleeding, reduce operative time and preserve hepatic function, representing a safe and feasible technique.

Intraoperative management of liver transplant patients

Liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease results in excellent outcomes. Patient and graft outcome is closely monitored on a national level, and 1-year survival is between 80% and 95%. Liver transplantation relies on a multidisciplinary approach, with close involvement of anesthesiologists and intensivists. However, intraoperative care of these patients remains inconsistent and is highly institution dependent. This brief-review article will focus on controversial topics of intraoperative care. Existing evidence on intraoperative monitoring, intraoperative fluid and transfusion management, electrolyte and glucose management, postoperative patient disposition, and, lastly, anesthesia team management will be reviewed.

Anesthesia care for liver transplantation

Intraoperative transfusion practices for liver transplantation have evolved dramatically since the first transplants of the 1960s. It is important for today's clinicians to be current in their understanding of how transplant patients should be managed with regard to their coagulation profile, volume status, and general hemodynamic state. The anesthesia team is presented with the unique task of manipulating this tenuous balance in a rapid and precise manner when managing patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although significant progress has been made in reducing blood product administration, it is still common to encounter large volume blood loss in these cases. Increasingly, clinicians are challenged to justify transfusion practices with a stronger evidentiary base. The current state of the literature for transfusion guidelines and blood product management in this particular patient subset will be discussed, as well as a variety of means (both pharmacologic and otherwise) used to reduce the need for transfusion. The aim was to review the latest evidence on these topics, as well as to highlight areas that need further clarification regarding their role in the optimal care of these patients.

Evidence for a synchronous operative approach in the treatment of colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases: a case matched study

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, a staged operative approach has been used for patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases in the U.K. With improved outcomes from hepatic resection the role of a synchronous operative approach needs re-evaluated.

METHODS

32 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic metastases that underwent a synchronous operative approach were individually case matched (according to: age; sex; ASA grade; type of hepatic and colonic resection) with patients that had undergone a staged approach. The following variables were analysed: operative blood loss; in hospital morbidity and mortality; duration of hospital stay; disease free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Operative blood losses were: synchronous group, median 475mL (range 150-850mL) vs median 425mL (range 50-1700mL), (p>0.050). There were no significant differences in morbidity: (34% synchronous group vs 59%, p=0.690) with no recorded mortality. Synchronous group had a shorter hospital stay (median 12 days [range 8-21] vs 20 [range 7-51], p=0.008). There were no statistical differences between synchronous and staged patients for disease free and overall survival: 10 months (95% CI 5.8-13.7) versus 14 (95% CI 12.2-16.3; p=0.487) and 21% versus 24% at 5 years (p=0.838).

CONCLUSION

This present study provides supporting evidence for synchronous operative procedures in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

The development of perioperative practices for liver transplantation: advances and current trends

Transplantation is a young medical specialty that has grown rapidly over the past 50 years. Anesthesiologists, surgeons and hepatologists are all essential partners in the process of determining patient outcome. Each specialty has made landmark improvements in patient outcome. However, there is still variability in practice patterns in each of the 3 major specialties. This review will use a historic perspective to explore the unique forces that shaped specific transplant practices and those that gave rise to differences in perioperative practices. Anesthesiologists and surgeons have made significant improvements in the management of blood loss, and coagulation monitoring and intervention. This has improved operative survival and early patient outcome. Perioperative survival has improved despite a worldwide shortage of donor organs and a trend to transplant sicker patients. A smaller pool of donor organs is required to meet the needs of an expanding waiting list. The innovations to reduce deaths on the transplant wait list are reviewed along with their impact on overall patient outcome. The evolving organ shortage is the pinnacle point in shaping future transplant practices. Currently, institutional-specific practices may be reinforced by the informal "tutorship" that is used to train physicians and by the resources available at each site of practice. However, there is evidence that specific intraoperative practices such as the use of a low central venous pressure, selection of vasopressors and certain surgical techniques can modify patient outcome. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the good or the bad associated with each practice prevails and in what unique circumstance.

Ultrasonically activated device for parenchymal division during open hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The use of new technological devices has gained popularity and has been proposed to improve the safety of liver resection. This study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of the ultrasonically activated device (USAD) during open liver resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Indication for surgery, type of resection, need to perform a Pringle manoeuvre, operation time, blood loss, number of blood transfusions, morbidity and mortality rate were analyzed in 60 patients undergoing a formal open liver resection by means of USAD.

RESULTS

The overall mean operation time was 172 minutes (range 120-255 min); an intermittent warm ischemia was applied in 9 cases (15%). The overall mean blood loss was 410 mL (median 400 mL, range 50-950 ml). A median of one blood transfusion was administered in six patients (10%). The mean hospital stay was 10.2 days (median 11, range 8-16). The overall morbidity rate was 20% (12 out of 60 patients). No in-hospital mortality was recorded. By subdividing the patients according to the presence or absence of cirrhosis no statistical significant differences were found between the two subgroups in all peri-and postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, though there is a lack of data based on well conducted controlled studies and further on a greater number of patients are needed, the utilization of USAD may help to minimize blood loss during liver resection regardless of the condition of the liver, even in case of cirrhosis.