Sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: trust the radiolabeled colloid method and avoid unnecessary procedures

The impact of intraoperative frozen section in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer (cN0/ycN0) who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy

BACKGROUND

When surgical axillary staging reveals residual metastatic deposits in breast cancer (BC) patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), axillary lymphonodectomy is indicated. In this study, we investigate whether it is reasonable to perform intraoperative frozen section (FS) of the removed sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in cases where NACT had been administered in patients who had a clinically negative nodal status at the time of diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from 101 BCE patients with 103 carcinomas who were diagnosed between 2014 and 2021 and met the above-mentioned criteria.

RESULTS

In three cases (2.8% of the study group), histologically active tumor tissue was detected in the removed axillary LNs. Discontinuation of therapy/the use of a low-dose NACT regimen was a significant factor for positive LNs (p = 0.02) at the subsequent surgical procedure; tumor progression during therapy approached borderline significance (p = 0.058). Among patients who had completed NACT with the planned standard dose regimen, and in which the primary tumors showed a response to therapy (n = 94), only one case had histologically detected residual metastases in the SLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Certified breast centers aim to improve the outcome of the patients. However, these specialized centers should also focus on economic aspects. This means that diagnostic and therapeutic procedures should be continuously critically reviewed in order to avoid unnecessary expenses. In BC patients with clinically node negative disease who completed NACT as planned and in which the tumor showed a good response to therapy, time consuming and costly FS of the SLNs removed should be omitted.

The role of general nuclear medicine in breast cancer

The rising incidence of breast cancer worldwide has prompted many improvements to current care. Routine nuclear medicine is a major contributor to a full gamut of clinical studies such as early lesion detection and stratification; guiding, monitoring, and predicting response to therapy; and monitoring progression, recurrence or metastases. Developments in instrumentation such as the high-resolution dedicated breast device coupled with the diagnostic versatility of conventional cameras have reinserted nuclear medicine as a valuable tool in the broader clinical setting. This review outlines the role of general nuclear medicine, concluding that targeted radiopharmaceuticals and versatile instrumentation position nuclear medicine as a powerful modality for patients with breast cancer.

Added value of blue dye injection in sentinel node biopsy of breast cancer patients: do all patients need blue dye?

BACKGROUND

In the current study, we evaluated the incremental value of blue dye injection in sentinel node mapping of early breast cancer patients. We specially considered the experience of the surgeons and lymphoscintigraphy results in this regard.

METHODS

605 patients with early stage breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated in the study. Patients underwent sentinel node mapping using combined radiotracer and blue dye techniques. Lymphoscintiraphy was also performed for 590 patients. Blue dye, radioisotope, and overall success rates in identifying the sentinel lymph node were evaluated in different patient groups. The benefit of blue dye and radioisotope in identifying the sentinel lymph nodes was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Marginal benefits of both blue dye and isotope for overall sentinel node detection as well as pathologically involved sentinel nodes were statistically higher in inexperienced surgeons and in patients with sentinel node visualization failure. In the patients with sentinel node visualization on lymphoscintigraphy, 6 sentinel nodes were detected by blue dye only. All these six nodes were harvested by inexperienced surgeons. On the other hand 8 sentinel nodes were detected by dye only in the patients with sentinel node non-visualization. All these nodes were harvested by experienced surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of blue dye should be reserved for inexperienced surgeons during their learning phase and for those patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy failed to show any uptake in the axilla.