1
|
Neveu J, Tremblay E, Mercier F, Garneau S, Cormier B. Developing a hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) gynecologic oncology program: a Canadian experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1957-1965. [PMID: 38011988 PMCID: PMC10803971 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment option for epithelial ovarian cancer following cytoreductive surgery. The intraperitoneal spread of the disease makes the peritoneal cavity an ideal target for drug delivery. HIPEC has shown promising results in improving overall survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients when performed during interval cytoreductive surgery. Recent studies have provided level 1 evidence supporting increased overall survival in stage III ovarian cancer patients treated with HIPEC during interval cytoreduction. Meta-analyses have further confirmed the survival improvement in women receiving HIPEC. Despite its inclusion in guidelines, many centers have been hesitant to implement HIPEC programs due to perceived obstacles, such as increased morbidity, cost, and resource requirements. Studies have shown that morbidity rates are acceptable in selected patients, and the addition of HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery is cost effective. Therefore, the main barrier to implementing HIPEC programs is related to resource requirements and logistics, but with proper preparation, these challenges can be overcome. Establishing a successful HIPEC program requires institutional support, a knowledgeable and dedicated team, adequate resources and equipment, and proper training and audit. This review aims to provide evidence based information to guide the development of successful HIPEC programs, including preoperative, anesthetic, and surgical considerations. It also reviews the different equipment and protocols for the perfusion and common postoperative events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joannie Neveu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- H Bliss Murphy Cancer Center, Health Sciences Center General Hospital, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Tremblay
- Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Frederic Mercier
- Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département de chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sébastien Garneau
- Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département d'anesthésie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Beatrice Cormier
- Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim MH, Yoo YC, Bai SJ, Lee KY, Kim N, Lee KY. Physiologic and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing open abdominal cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:300060520983263. [PMID: 33445991 PMCID: PMC7812408 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520983263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We aimed to determine the physiological and hemodynamic changes in patients who were undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) cytoreductive surgeries. Methods This prospective, observational study enrolled 21 patients who were undergoing elective cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC at our hospital over 2 years. We collected vital signs, hemodynamic parameters including global end-diastolic volume index (GEVI) and extravascular lung water index (ELWI) using the VolumeView™ system, and arterial blood gas analysis from all patients. Data were recorded before skin incision (T1); 30 minutes before HIPEC initiation (T2); 30 (T3), 60 (T4), and 90 (T5) minutes after HIPEC initiation; 30 minutes after HIPEC completion (T6); and 10 minutes before surgery completion (T7). Results Patients showed an increase in body temperature and cardiac index and a decrease in the systemic vascular resistance index. GEDI was 715.4 (T1) to 809.7 (T6), and ELWI was 6.9 (T1) to 7.3 (T5). Conclusions HIPEC increased patients’ body temperature and cardiac output and decreased systemic vascular resistance. Although parameters that were extracted from the VolumeView™ system were within their normal ranges, transpulmonary thermodilution approach is helpful in intraoperative hemodynamic management during open abdominal cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. Trial registry name: ClinicalTrials.gov Trial registration number: NCT02325648 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=NCT02325648&term
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myoung Hwa Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Chul Yoo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Joon Bai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kang-Young Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nayeon Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Young Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Kooten JP, de Boer NL, Diepeveen M, Verhoef C, Burger JWA, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Madsen EVE. Nasogastric- vs. percutaneous gastrostomy tube for prophylactic gastric decompression after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Pleura Peritoneum 2021; 6:57-65. [PMID: 34179339 PMCID: PMC8216841 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2021-0107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with postoperative gastroparesis and ileus. In 2015, our practice shifted from using percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (PGT), to nasogastric tubes (NGT) for prophylactic gastric decompression after CRS-HIPEC. This study aimed to compare these methods for length of stay (LOS) and associated complications. Methods Patients that underwent CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer between 2014 and 2019 were included. Cases were grouped based on receiving NGT or PGT postoperatively. Multivariable linear regression determined the independent effect of decompression method on LOS, thereby adjusting for confounders. Results In total, 179 patients were included in the analyses. Median age was 64 years [IQR:54–71]. Altogether, 135 (75.4%) received a NGT and 44 (24.6%) received a PGT. Gastroparesis occurred significantly more often in the PGT group (18.2 vs. 7.4%, p=0.039). Median LOS was significantly shorter for patients with a NGT (15 [IQR:12–19] vs. 18.5 [IQR:17–25.5], p<0.001). PGT was independently associated with longer LOS in multivariable analysis (Beta=4.224 [95%CI 1.243–7.204]). There was no difference regarding aspiration, pneumonia and postoperative mortality between groups. Conclusions NGT should be preferred over PGT for gastric decompression after CRS-HIPEC as it is associated with fewer gastroparesis and shorter LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Job P van Kooten
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine L de Boer
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Diepeveen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balakrishnan K, Srinivasaraghavan N, Venketeswaran MV, Ramasamy T, Seshadri RA, Raj EH. Perioperative factors predicting delayed enteral resumption and hospital length of stay in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Retrospective cohort analysis from a single centre in India. Indian J Anaesth 2020; 64:1025-1031. [PMID: 33542565 PMCID: PMC7852446 DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_480_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an extensive procedure associated with significant morbidity, delay in return of gastrointestinal function and discharge from hospital. Our aim was to assess perioperative factors influencing enteral resumption (ER) and length of stay in the hospital (LOS) in CRS-HIPEC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in a major tertiary cancer centre. Sixty-five patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC between July 2014 and March 2019 were included in the study. The perioperative data were collected from patient records. The primary outcome measure was day of oral resumption of 500 ml of clear fluids and secondary outcome was the LOS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was done for the various continuous and categorical perioperative variables for both ER and LOS to elicit the magnitude of risk for both outcomes. Results: Univariate logistic regression revealed that peritoneal carcinomatosis index score (PCI), duration of surgery, blood loss and postoperative ventilation influenced both ER and LOS. Serum albumin, plasma usage and total peritonectomy affected only the LOS but not ER. Multivariate analysis showed that duration of surgery (P = 0.006) and quantum of intravenous fluid infused (P = 0.043) were statistically associated with ER, while serum albumin level (P = 0.025) and postoperative ventilation (P = 0.045) were independently predictive of LOS. Conclusion: CRS-HIPEC is an extensive surgery and multiple factors are associated with ER; of these, duration of surgery and intraoperative fluid therapy are significant factors. Low serum albumin and prolonged postoperative ventilation are associated with increased LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalpana Balakrishnan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | | | - Thendral Ramasamy
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - E Hemanth Raj
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bezu L, Raineau M, Deloménie M, Cholley B, Pirracchio R. Haemodynamic management during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A systematic review. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39:531-542. [PMID: 32320757 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2019] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a surgical technique for peritoneal carcinomatosis combining cytoreduction surgery and peritoneal irrigation of cytotoxic agents responsible for haemodynamics and fluid homeostasis alterations. To this day, no guidelines exist concerning intraoperative management. OBJECTIVES To review data on haemodynamic monitoring and management of patients undergoing HIPEC and to help design a standardised anaesthetic protocol. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library were searched using the following. STUDY SELECTION Original articles and case-reports. Letters to editors and reviews were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data on haemodynamic management, morbidity and mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS Haemodynamic management during HIPEC is highly variable and depends on local protocols. Only one randomised controlled trial evaluated the benefit of goal-directed fluid administration (GDFA). GDFA guided by advanced haemodynamic monitoring resulted in significantly less complication, shorter length of stay and less mortality compared to standard fluid administration. Renal protection protocol did not decrease the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). CONCLUSION Our review reveals that fluid administration guided by advanced monitoring seems to be associated with less postoperative morbidity and mortality after HIPEC. Nevertheless, the literature review shows that intraoperative haemodynamic management is highly variable for this surgery. The use of renal protection strategy does not decrease the prevalence of AKI. Further prospective trials comparing different fluid management and haemodynamic monitoring strategies are urgently needed (PROSPERO registration CRD42018115720).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucillia Bezu
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Mégane Raineau
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Myriam Deloménie
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Bernard Cholley
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Inserm UMR S1140, Paris, France
| | - Romain Pirracchio
- Service d'anesthésie, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Ouest, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang X, Li T. Postoperative pain pathophysiology and treatment strategies after CRS + HIPEC for peritoneal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:62. [PMID: 32234062 PMCID: PMC7110707 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01842-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment choice for peritoneal cancer. However, patients commonly suffer from severe postoperative pain. The pathophysiology of postoperative pain is considered to be from both nociceptive and neuropathic origins. Main body The recent advances on the etiology of postoperative pain after CRS + HIPEC treatment were described, and the treatment strategy and outcomes were summarized. Conclusion Conventional analgesics could provide short-term symptomatic relief. Thoracic epidural analgesia combined with opioids administration could be an effective treatment choice. In addition, a transversus abdominis plane block could also be an alternative option, although further studies should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China
| | - Tianzuo Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li D, Henker R, Zhang F. Perianesthesia Measurement During Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Procedure: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Perianesth Nurs 2019; 34:198-205. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2017.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
8
|
Plas M, Hemmer PH, Been LB, van Ginkel RJ, de Bock GH, van Leeuwen BL. Incidence and predictors of postoperative delirium after cytoreduction surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:260-268. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs Plas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Patrick H.J. Hemmer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Lukas B. Been
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Robert J. van Ginkel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H. de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Barbara L. van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Verwaal VJ, Rau B, Jamali F, Gilly FN, de Hingh I, Takala H, Syk I, Pelz J, Mulsow J, van der Speeten K, Shigeki K, Iversen LH, Mohamed F, Glehen O, Younan R, Yarema R, Gonzalez-Moreno S, O’Dwyer S, Yonemura Y, Sugarbaker P. Registries on peritoneal surface malignancies throughout the world, their use and their options. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 33:528-533. [PMID: 28540833 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1315178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Beate Rau
- Charite Campus Mitte, Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Faek Jamali
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Ignace de Hingh
- Catharina Ziekenhuis, Surgical Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ingvar Syk
- Lunds Universitet Institutionen for kliniska vetenskaper Malmo, Sweden
| | - Jorg Pelz
- Zentrum fur Operative Medizin, Wurtzburg, Germany
| | - Jurgen Mulsow
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Lene H. Iversen
- Aarhus Universitet Hospital, Department of Surgery, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Faheez Mohamed
- Department of Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yukata Yonemura
- NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment, Osaka, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leo Swenne C, Jangland E, Arakelian E. Patients' experiences of their everyday life 14 months after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy - a qualitative follow-up study. Scand J Caring Sci 2017; 31:904-913. [PMID: 28124449 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have a long recovery process. AIM To describe patients' experiences of their everyday lives after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. METHOD A follow-up study with a qualitative, descriptive design. Data were collected by individual, in-depth telephone interviews with 16 patients who had been treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis 14 months earlier at a university hospital in Sweden. The interviews were performed between May and June 2013 and analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS Five themes were identified: (i) finding one's new self and relating to the new situation; (ii) the disease making its presence felt through bodily complications or mental fatigue; (iii) worrying about the return of the disease and passing it on to one's children; (iv) experiencing difficulties contacting various care facilities, not having a clear plan for ongoing rehabilitation; and (v) the need for online support through the Internet and counselling for both patients and their family members. CONCLUSIONS Despite bodily complications, mental fatigue and worries about the return of the disease, the patient's everyday life was focused on finding his/her new self and adapting to the new circumstances. Difficulties in contacting care facilities and the lack of an ongoing medical and nursing rehabilitation plan called for a need for network support for patients and their families. CLINICAL RELEVANCE After advanced surgery, patients require a continuous medical and nursing rehabilitation plan, and a platform of support such as meetings via social media and Internet which would connect former patients and their families with future patients and their family members. A contact nurse with specific expertise should design an individual rehabilitation plan and continuously identify the individual needs for long-term support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Leo Swenne
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eva Jangland
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Erebouni Arakelian
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raspé C, Flöther L, Schneider R, Bucher M, Piso P. Best practice for perioperative management of patients with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 43:1013-1027. [PMID: 27727026 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Revised: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the significantly improved outcome and quality of life of patients with different tumor entities after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC, there is an increasing number of centers performing CRS and HIPEC procedures. As this procedure is technically challenging with potential high morbidity and mortality, respectively, institutional experience also in the anesthetic and intensive care departments is essential for optimal treatment and prevention of adverse events. Clinical pathways have to be developed to achieve also good results in more comorbid patients with border line indications and extensive surgical procedures. The anesthesiologist has deal with relevant fluid, blood and protein losses, increased intraabdominal pressure, systemic hypo-/hyperthermia, and increased metabolic rate in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. It is of utmost importance to maintain or restore an adequate volume by aggressive substitution of intravenous fluids, which counteracts the increased fluid loss and venous capacitance during this procedure. Supplementary thoracic epidural analgesia, non-invasive ventilation, and physiotherapy are recommended to guarantee adequate pain therapy and postoperative extubation as well as fast-track concepts. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring is essential to help the anesthesiologist picking up information about the real-time fluid status of the patient. Preoperative preconditioning is mandatory in patients scheduled for HIPEC surgery and will result in improved outcome. Postoperatively, volume status optimization, early nutritional support, sufficient anticoagulation, and point of care coagulation management are essential. This is an extensive update on all relevant topics for anesthetists and intensivists dealing with CRS and HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Raspé
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Halle-Wittenberg University, Germany.
| | - L Flöther
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Halle-Wittenberg University, Germany
| | - R Schneider
- Department of General- and Visceral Surgery, Halle-Wittenberg University, Germany
| | - M Bucher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Halle-Wittenberg University, Germany
| | - P Piso
- Department for General- and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sheshadri DB, Chakravarthy MR. Anaesthetic Considerations in the Perioperative Management of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016; 7:236-43. [PMID: 27065715 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0508-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has emerged as one of the primary modalities of treatment of diffuse peritoneal malignancies. It is a complex surgical procedure with the patients facing major and potentially life threatening alterations of haemodynamic, respiratory, metabolic and thermal balance with significant fluid losses and the perioperative management is challenging for anaesthesiologists and intensive care physicians. Though the alterations are short lived, these patients require advanced organ function monitoring and support perioperatively. The anaesthesiologist is involved in the management of haemodynamics, respiratory function, coagulation, haematologic parameters, fluid balance, thermal variations, and metabolic and nutritional support perioperatively. The chemotherapy instillate used are known to cause nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, dyselectrolytemia and lactic acidosis. The preoperative polypharmacy for pain control, previous surgery and/or chemotherapy, malnourished status secondary to feeding problems and tumour wasting syndrome make the task all the more challenging. The anaesthesiologist also needs to consider the perioperative care from a quality of life perspective and proper preoperative counselling is important. The present overview summarizes the challenges faced by the anaesthesiologist regarding the pathophysiological alterations during the Cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak B Sheshadri
- Fortis Hospital, 154/9, Opp. IIM (B), Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore, India 560076
| | - Murali R Chakravarthy
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Relief, Fortis Hospital, 154/9, Opp. IIM (B), Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore, India 560076
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Intensive Care Management of Patient After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC - A Concise Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016. [PMID: 27065716 DOI: 10.1007/s13193- 016-0511-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in combination with cytoreductive surgery is a targeted treatment approach in which tumors that have spread through the lining of the abdomen are removed and then heated chemotherapy is perfused throughout the abdomen, with the intent of killing any remaining cancer cells that may be present after all the visible disease has been removed surgically. The chemotherapy is administered in high dosages to the targeted area and washed out, thereby limiting the systemic toxicity. The procedure usually takes 8 to 18 h and is most commonly used to treat appendiceal, colorectal or mesothelioma tumors including those that have failed standard chemotherapy and/or prior surgeries. Patients face major and life threatening derangements of their hemodynamic, respiratory and metabolic physiologic balance during the surgery and in the immediate postoperative period. Intensive monitoring and timely detection of possible complications and appropriate remedial action is crucial for better surgical results.
Collapse
|
14
|
Intensive Care Management of Patient After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC - A Concise Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016; 7:244-8. [PMID: 27065716 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0511-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in combination with cytoreductive surgery is a targeted treatment approach in which tumors that have spread through the lining of the abdomen are removed and then heated chemotherapy is perfused throughout the abdomen, with the intent of killing any remaining cancer cells that may be present after all the visible disease has been removed surgically. The chemotherapy is administered in high dosages to the targeted area and washed out, thereby limiting the systemic toxicity. The procedure usually takes 8 to 18 h and is most commonly used to treat appendiceal, colorectal or mesothelioma tumors including those that have failed standard chemotherapy and/or prior surgeries. Patients face major and life threatening derangements of their hemodynamic, respiratory and metabolic physiologic balance during the surgery and in the immediate postoperative period. Intensive monitoring and timely detection of possible complications and appropriate remedial action is crucial for better surgical results.
Collapse
|
15
|
Romanzini AE, Carvalho ECD, Galvão CM. Recuperação cirúrgica retardada: análise do conceito. Rev Bras Enferm 2015. [DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167.2015680526i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
RESUMOObjetivo:analisar o conceito de recuperação cirúrgica retardada.Método:o modelo de análise de conceito de Rodgers guiou os mecanismos processuais do estudo. Revisão integrativa foi conduzida para alcançar a segunda atividade do modelo adotado. As bases de dados PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE e LILACS foram selecionadas para a busca dos estudos primários.Resultados:Foram incluídos 66 estudos primários e sua a análise permitiu identificar seis atributos, os quais se inter-relacionam e subsidiam a definição do conceito investigado. Experiência prévia (relacionada à cirurgia, fatores fisiológicos, psíquicos ou ambientais), foi o antecedente identificado. Os consequentes foram expressos por manifestações clínicas, reintervenções, dependência de cuidados e redução na qualidade de vida.Conclusão:a definição do conceito foi construída e identificados os antecedentes e consequentes. O uso e significado do conceito recuperação cirúrgica retardada apontam para o uso do qualificador "prejudicada" em substituição ao termo "retardada".
Collapse
|
16
|
Leo Swenne C, Cederholm K, Gustafsson M, Arakelian E. Postoperative health and patients' experiences of efficiency and quality of care after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, two to six months after surgery. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2015; 19:191-7. [PMID: 25667124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 05/11/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study post-discharge health after Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC), and to analyse patients' experiences of in-hospital efficiency and quality of care. METHODS In-depth individual telephone interviews using an interview guide with open-ended questions were performed with 19 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis between April and October, 2012. Data were analysed with systematic text condensation. RESULTS Four themes were identified: 1) Coming home was an essential step in the recovery process and the focus was on getting well physically despite mental stress, uncertainty about the medical rehabilitation plan and the future. 2) Health was affected negatively by postoperative chemotherapy and its side effects. 3) Stoma - a necessary evil affecting the patient's social life. 4) Quality of care and efficiency were defined in patient-centred terms and inter-personal care from the patient's perspectives on micro level. Despite all, 32% of the patients described being fully recovered and had started to study or work two months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The study gives insights into some real-life experiences described by patients. The study results can be used to prepare written information, to design a postoperative rehabilitation plan for future patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC) and to create a home-page through which patients can receive support from both health care professionals and other fellow patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Leo Swenne
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Karin Cederholm
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 70, 1st Floor, Sweden.
| | - Maria Gustafsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 70, 1st Floor, Sweden.
| | - Erebouni Arakelian
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 70, 1st Floor, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ñamendys-Silva SA, Correa-García P, García-Guillén FJ, López-Basave HN, Montalvo-Esquivel G, Texcocano-Becerra J, Herrera-Gómez Á, Meneses-García A. Organ dysfunction in critically ill cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Oncol Lett 2015; 9:1873-1876. [PMID: 25789059 PMCID: PMC4356393 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.2921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2014] [Accepted: 01/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to observe the incidence of organ dysfunction and the intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes of critically ill cancer patients during the cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy post-operative period. The present study included 25 critically ill cancer patients admitted to the ICU of the National Cancer Institute (Mexico City, Mexico) between January 2007 and February 2013. The incidence of organ dysfunction was 68% and patients exhibiting ≤1 organ system dysfunction during ICU admittance remained in hospital for a significantly shorter period compared with patients who exhibited ≥2 organ system dysfunctions (12.4±10.7 vs. 24.1±12.8 days; P=0.025). Therefore, the present study demonstrated that a high incidence of organ dysfunction was associated with a longer ICU hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvio A Ñamendys-Silva
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City 14080, Mexico ; Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14000, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ángel Herrera-Gómez
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Downs-Canner S, Ding Y, Magge DR, Jones H, Ramalingam L, Zureikat A, Holtzman M, Ahrendt S, Pingpank J, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL, Choudry HA. A comparative analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after surgery with and without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 22:1651-7. [PMID: 25348781 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) are potentially morbid complications that often require therapeutic interventions. Distal pancreatectomy performed during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) puts patients at risk for POPF. The authors hypothesized that POPFs are more severe after CRS/HIPEC than after pancreatectomy alone. METHODS Clinicopathologic and perioperative details, including POPF by International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula criteria (ISGPF), and oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy during CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal (n = 31) or colorectal (n = 23) origin (HIPEC group) were compared with those for patients undergoing minimally invasive or open distal pancreatectomy without HIPEC (n = 66) for locally resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (non-HIPEC group). RESULTS The incidence of POPF was similar between the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups (26 %). The severity of POPF according to the ISGPF criteria was significantly worse in the HIPEC group. The HIPEC patients had 13 grade B fistulas and 1 grade C fistula compared with 12 grade A fistulas and 4 grade B fistulas in the non-HIPEC group. The HIPEC patients with POPF did not differ in the extent of their CRS, peritoneal cancer index, length of hospital stay, or other postoperative complications from the the HIPEC patients without POPF. The HIPEC patients with colorectal carcinomatosis who experienced POPF had higher disease recurrence in the first year after CRS/HIPEC than those without POPF. CONCLUSION The findings showed that POPFs are more severe when distal pancreatectomy is combined with CRS/HIPEC. Moreover, selective use of distal pancreatectomy is important during CRS/HIPEC because POPFs may increase early disease recurrence for patients with colorectal carcinomatosis.
Collapse
|
19
|
Owusu-Agyemang P, Soliz J, Hayes-Jordan A, Harun N, Gottumukkala V. Safety of epidural analgesia in the perioperative care of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 21:1487-93. [PMID: 23982249 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3221-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The perioperative coagulopathy, hemodynamic instability, and infectious complications that may occur during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has raised concerns about the safety of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing such procedures. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of the perioperative anesthetic management of 215 adult patients who had undergone CRS with HIPEC with epidural analgesia. We reviewed epidural-related complications and analyzed the effect of early initiation of continuous epidural analgesia on estimated blood loss, intraoperative fluid administration, blood transfusion and vasopressor requirements, time to extubation, and length of stay. RESULTS No epidural hematomas or abscesses were reported. Two patients (0.9 %) had delays in epidural removal because of thrombocytopenia, and two had epidural-site erythema (0.9 %). The majority of postoperative epidural-related hypotensive episodes were successfully treated with fluid boluses. Early initiation of epidural analgesic infusions (before HIPEC) was associated with significantly less surgical blood loss and fluid requirements (P = 0.005 and 0.02, respectively). Pre-HIPEC initiation of epidural infusions was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the following: volume of blood transfused, intraoperative vasopressors use, time to extubation, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS With close hematologic monitoring and particular attention to sterility, epidural analgesia can be safely provided to patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC. Early initiation of continuous epidural infusions during surgery could lead to decreased blood loss and less intraoperative fluid administration. Prospective randomized studies are required to further investigate these potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Owusu-Agyemang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
An overview of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion for the anesthesiologist. Anesth Analg 2013; 116:924-31. [PMID: 23460568 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3182860fff] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Anesthesiologists face several perioperative challenges when patients need cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion. To adequately care for these patients, anesthesiologists must understand the goals and objectives of the operation in addition to having a basic knowledge of the chemotherapeutic drugs that are frequently used. Optimal anesthetic management of patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion requires control of a complex interplay of physiologic mechanisms, including hyperthermia, abdominal hypertension, electrolyte abnormalities, coagulopathies, increased cardiac index, oxygen consumption, and decreased systemic vascular resistance. As this surgery continues to gain popularity among oncologic surgeons, further studies that clearly define the chemistry, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and end points of efficacy need to be performed to elucidate optimal perioperative management.
Collapse
|
21
|
Arakelian E, Torkzad MR, Bergman A, Rubertsson S, Mahteme H. Pulmonary influences on early post-operative recovery in patients after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2012; 10:258. [PMID: 23186148 PMCID: PMC3538602 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2012] [Accepted: 10/31/2012] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a curative treatment option for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). There have been few studies on the pulmonary adverse events (AEs) affecting patient recovery after this treatment, thus this study investigated these factors. METHODS Between January 2005 and December 2006, clinical data on all pulmonary AEs and the recovery progress were reviewed for 76 patients with after CRS and HIPEC. Patients with pulmonary interventions (thoracocenthesis and chest tubes) were compared with the non-intervention patients. Two senior radiologists, blinded to the post-operative clinical course, separately graded the occurrence of pulmonary AEs. RESULTS Of the 76 patients, 6 had needed thoracocentesis and another 6 needed chest tubes. There were no differences in post-operative recovery between the intervention and non-intervention groups. The total number of days on mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, total length of hospital stay, tumor burden, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of greater than 2 were correlated with the occurrence of atelectasis and pleural effusion. Extensive atelectasis (grade 3 or higher) was seen in six patients, major pleural effusion (grade 3) in seven patients, and signs of heart failure (grade 1-2) in nine patients. CONCLUSIONS Clinical and radiological post-operative pulmonary AEs are common after CRS and HIPEC. However, most of the pulmonary AEs did not affect post-operative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erebouni Arakelian
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Michael R Torkzad
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science, Section of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Antonina Bergman
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science, Section of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sten Rubertsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Haile Mahteme
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become an important therapeutic option for selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This aggressive multimodality treatment is complex, not only regarding surgical technique, but also regarding anesthesia. The present review represents our experience in anesthetic care. RECENT FINDINGS Improved prognosis compared with systemic chemotherapy alone has recently been demonstrated for cytoreductive surgery when combined with intraoperative intracavitary hyperthermic chemotherapy. Anesthetic management of HIPEC is further impacted by these developments. In addition to the ambitious, long-lasting surgery, HIPEC causes significant fluid, blood and protein losses, increased intra-abdominal pressure, systemic hyperthermia, and increased metabolic rate, leading to relevant pathophysiological alterations, and therefore represents a challenge for anesthetist and critical care physicians. SUMMARY Anesthetic management importantly contributes to the containment of the perioperative complications of HIPEC. An appreciation of the technical aspects and physiologic disruptions associated with intra-abdominal HIPEC is critical to ensure effective anesthetic management. Although data on this specialized surgical procedure are scarce, some referral centers have accumulated extensive experience. This article reviews the current knowledge about the anesthesiological and intensive care management of patients undergoing HIPEC. It pinpoints strategies for perioperative monitoring as well as illustrates alterations in hemodynamic, hematopoetic, and fluid hemostasis.
Collapse
|