1
|
Hwang D, Kim HJ, Kim HK, Huh S, Yun WS. Right Gastroepiploic Artery Transposition for a Common Hepatic Artery and Proper Hepatic Artery Aneurysm Repair. Vasc Specialist Int 2023; 39:5. [PMID: 36997194 PMCID: PMC10063399 DOI: 10.5758/vsi.230011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Although hepatic artery aneurysms (HAAs) are uncommon, they are associated with risk of rupture. HAAs >2 cm in diameter require endovascular or open surgical repairs. For HAAs involving the proper hepatic artery or gastroduodenal artery, which is a collateral artery from the superior mesenteric artery, hepatic arterial reconstruction is especially important to avoid ischemic liver injury. In this study, right gastroepiploic artery transposition was performed in a 53-year-old man after a 4 cm common hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery aneurysm was identified. The patient was discharged without any complications on postoperative day 8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deokbi Hwang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyeon Ju Kim
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyung-Kee Kim
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seung Huh
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Woo-Sung Yun
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cutolo C, Fusco R, Simonetti I, De Muzio F, Grassi F, Trovato P, Palumbo P, Bruno F, Maggialetti N, Borgheresi A, Bruno A, Chiti G, Bicci E, Brunese MC, Giovagnoni A, Miele V, Barile A, Izzo F, Granata V. Imaging Features of Main Hepatic Resections: The Radiologist Challenging. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13010134. [PMID: 36675795 PMCID: PMC9862253 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is still the most effective treatment of primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and of metastatic disease, such as colorectal liver metastases. The type of liver resection (anatomic versus non anatomic resection) depends on different features, mainly on the type of malignancy (primary liver neoplasm versus metastatic lesion), size of tumor, its relation with blood and biliary vessels, and the volume of future liver remnant (FLT). Imaging plays a critical role in postoperative assessment, offering the possibility to recognize normal postoperative findings and potential complications. Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line diagnostic tool to use in post-surgical phase. However, computed tomography (CT), due to its comprehensive assessment, allows for a more accurate evaluation and more normal findings than the possible postoperative complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or hepatospecific contrast agents remains the best tool for bile duct injuries diagnosis and for ischemic cholangitis evaluation. Consequently, radiologists should be familiar with the surgical approaches for a better comprehension of normal postoperative findings and of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Trovato
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiti
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alva-Ruiz R, Abdelrahman AM, Starlinger PP, Yonkus JA, Moravec DN, Busch JJ, Fleming CJ, Andrews JC, Mendes BC, Colglazier JJ, Smoot RL, Cleary SP, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ. Patency rates of hepatic arterial resection and revascularization in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1957-1966. [PMID: 35780039 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arterial resection (AR) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increasingly considered at specialized centers. We aimed to examine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of hepatic artery (HA) occlusion after revascularization. METHODS We included patients undergoing HA resection with interposition graft (IG) or primary end-to-end anastomoses (EE). Complete arterial occlusion (CAO) was defined as "early" (EO) or "late" (LO) before/after 90 days respectively. Kaplan-Meier and change-point analysis for CAO was performed. RESULTS HA resection was performed in 108 patients, IG in 61% (66/108) and EE in 39% (42/108). An equal proportion (50%) underwent HA resection alone or in combination with celiac and/or superior mesenteric artery. CAO was identified in 18% of patients (19/108) with arterial IG least likely to occlude (p=0.019). Hepatic complications occurred in 42% (45/108) and correlated with CAO, symptomatic patients, venous resection, and postoperative portal venous patency. CAO-related operative mortality was 4.6% and significantly higher in EO vs LO (p = 0.046). Median CAO occlusion was 126 days. With change-point analysis, CAO was minimal beyond postoperative day 158. CONCLUSION CAO can occur in up to 18% of patients and the first 5-month post-operative period is critical for surveillance. LO is associated with better outcomes compared to EO unless there is inadequate portal venous inflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Alva-Ruiz
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amro M Abdelrahman
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Patrick P Starlinger
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer A Yonkus
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David N Moravec
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joel J Busch
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chad J Fleming
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James C Andrews
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN, USA
| | - Jill J Colglazier
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN, USA
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David M Nagorney
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael L Kendrick
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mark J Truty
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumano K, Hashimoto S, Shimomura O, Miyazaki Y, Doi M, Takahashi K, Oda T. Splenic artery transposition for reconstruction of a large hepatic artery aneurysm: A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2022; 95:107209. [PMID: 35598338 PMCID: PMC9127166 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and importance Hepatic artery aneurysms (HAAs) are rare. Typical treatment options for HAAs are surgical resection and endovascular treatment but treatment choices remain controversial. Case presentation A 65-year-old woman was rushed to our hospital suspected to have hemorrhage. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a large 12 cm aneurysm of the common hepatic artery (CHA). We diagnosed duodenal hemorrhage due to imminent rupture of the HAA. Angiography was first performed. The inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery was embolized with a coil under interventional radiology technique for arterial bleeding control. Next, we performed resection of the aneurysm and total pancreatectomy with splenic artery reservation. We reconstructed via splenic artery transposition because of the reconstruction distance, vascular system, and stability of the anastomosis. The patient was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 21 without any complications. Clinical discussion There are two key points in this report. Firstly, the choice of splenic artery transposition is optimal for caliber difference and reconstruction distance. The choice of splenic artery should be considered a reliable option. Secondly, total pancreatectomy avoids exposure to pancreatic juice at the anastomosis site due to pancreatic fistula. Conclusion Splenic artery transposition for HAA is advantageous in adjustability of the caliber difference and securing of sufficient distance. In addition, total pancreatectomy may be acceptable in patients with a normal pancreas to avoid fatal complications such as disruption of the anastomosis and reconstructed artery due to pancreatic juice exposure. Visceral artery aneurysms are rare and often involve the hepatic and splenic arteries. Typical treatment for HAAs are surgical resection and endovascular treatment but treatment choices remain controversial. The reconstruction via splenic artery transposition is an option for reconstruction after resection of HAAs. Splenic artery transposition is advantageous in adjustability of the caliber difference, securing of sufficient distance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichiro Kumano
- University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterological and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 1-1-1 Tennnodai, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki-Ken 305-8575, Japan
| | - Shinji Hashimoto
- University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterological and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 1-1-1 Tennnodai, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki-Ken 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Osamu Shimomura
- University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterological and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 1-1-1 Tennnodai, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki-Ken 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiro Miyazaki
- University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterological and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 1-1-1 Tennnodai, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki-Ken 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Manami Doi
- University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterological and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 1-1-1 Tennnodai, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki-Ken 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Kazuhiro Takahashi
- University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterological and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 1-1-1 Tennnodai, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki-Ken 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Oda
- University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterological and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 1-1-1 Tennnodai, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki-Ken 305-8575, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Imaging Features of Main Posthepatectomy Complications: A Radiologist’s Challenge. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061323. [PMID: 35741133 PMCID: PMC9221607 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In the recent years, the number of liver resections has seen an impressive growth. Usually, hepatic resections remain the treatment of various liver diseases, such as malignant tumors, benign tumors, hydatid disease, and abscesses. Despite technical advancements and tremendous experience in the field of liver resection of specialized centers, there are moderately high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in high-risk and older patient populations. Although ultrasonography is usually the first-line imaging examination for postoperative complications, Computed Tomography (CT) is the imaging tool of choice in emergency settings due to its capability to assess the whole body in a few seconds and detect all possible complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice for delineating early postoperative bile duct injuries and ischemic cholangitis that may arise in the late postoperative phase. Moreover, both MDCT and MRCP can precisely detect tumor recurrence. Consequently, radiologists should have knowledge of these surgical procedures for better comprehension of postoperative changes and recognition of the radiological features of various postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
6
|
Majlesara A, Ghamarnejad O, Khajeh E, Golriz M, Gharabaghi N, Hoffmann K, Chang DH, Büchler MW, Mehrabi A. Portal vein arterialization as a salvage procedure in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a systematic review. Can J Surg 2021; 64:E173-E182. [PMID: 33739801 PMCID: PMC8064267 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.012419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Portal vein arterialization (PVA) is a possible option when hepatic artery reconstruction is impossible during liver resection. The aim of this study was to review the literature on the clinical application of PVA in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery. Methods We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases until December 2019. Experimental (animal) studies, review articles and letters were excluded. Results Twenty studies involving 57 patients were included. Cholangiocarcinoma was the most common indication for surgery (40 patients [74%]). An end-to-side anastomosis between a celiac trunk branch and the portal vein was the main PVA technique (35 patients [59%]). Portal hypertension was the most common long-term complication (12 patients [21%] after a mean of 4.1 mo). The median follow-up period was 12 (range 1–87) months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 64%, 27% and 20%, respectively. Conclusion Portal vein arterialization can be considered as a rescue option to improve the outcome in patients with acute liver de-arterialization when arterial reconstruction is not possible. To prevent portal hypertension and liver injuries due to thrombosis or overarterialization, vessel calibre adjustment and timely closure of the anastomosis should be considered. Further prospective experimental and clinical studies are needed to investigate the potential of this procedure in patients whose liver is suddenly de-arterialized during HPB procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Majlesara
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - Elias Khajeh
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - Negin Gharabaghi
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - Katrin Hoffmann
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - De-Hua Chang
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - Markus W Büchler
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- From the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary pancreas surgery with arterial resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:903-919. [PMID: 32894339 PMCID: PMC7541389 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01972-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objective Advances in multimodality treatment paralleled increasing numbers of complex pancreatic procedures with major vascular resections. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the current outcomes of arterial resection (AR) in pancreatic surgery. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out from January 2011 until January 2020. MOOSE guidelines were followed. Predefined outcomes were morbidity, pancreatic fistula, postoperative bleeding and delayed gastric emptying, reoperation rate, mortality, hospital stay, R0 resection rate, and lymph node positivity. Duration of surgery, blood loss, and survival were also analyzed. Results Eight hundred and forty-one AR patients were identified in a cohort of 7111 patients. Morbidity and mortality rates in these patients were 66.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Seven studies (579 AR patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall morbidity (48% vs 39%, p = 0.1) and mortality (3.2% vs 1.5%, p = 0.27) were not significantly different in the groups with or without AR. R0 was less frequent in the AR group, both in patients without (69% vs 89%, p < 0.001) and with neoadjuvant treatment (50% vs 86%, p < 0.001). Weighted median survival was shorter in the AR group (18.6 vs 32 months, range 14.8–43.1 months, p = 0.037). Conclusions Arterial resections increase the complexity of pancreatic surgery, as demonstrated by relevant morbidity and mortality rates. Careful patient selection and multidisciplinary planning remain important. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00423-020-01972-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
8
|
Resection of Replaced Common Hepatic Artery in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Report and Analysis of Technical and Oncological Implications. Pancreas 2020; 49:e31-e33. [PMID: 32282777 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
|
9
|
Hicks CW, Burkhart RA, Weiss MJ, Wolfgang CL, Cameron AM, Pawlik TM. Management of Type 9 Hepatic Arterial Anatomy at the time of Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Considerations for Preservation and Reconstruction of a Completely Replaced Common Hepatic Artery. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20:1400-4. [PMID: 27138326 PMCID: PMC5142815 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3154-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Recognition and management of aberrant hepatic arterial anatomy for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are critical to ensure safe completion of the operation. When the common hepatic artery (CHA) is noted to emanate from the superior mesenteric artery (Michels' type 9 variant), it is vulnerable to injury during the dissection required for PD. While this anatomy does not preclude an operation, care must be taken to avoid injury, often by identifying the CHA throughout its entire course before beginning the dissection of the portal venous structures. The oncologic principle that cautions against resection of a pancreatic cancer when it involves the CHA in its standard position may not universally apply to tumors that focally involve the CHA in the type 9 anatomic variant. In highly selected patients, surgical resection may be entertained as disease biology may be analogous to local involvement of the gastroduodenal artery in a patient with standard anatomy. Here, we review the indications, techniques, and outcomes associated with arterial resection and reconstruction during pancreatectomy among patients with a pancreatic tumor involving a common hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin W Hicks
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 688, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 688, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 688, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Andrew M Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 688, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mulé S, Colosio A, Cazejust J, Kianmanesh R, Soyer P, Hoeffel C. Imaging of the postoperative liver: review of normal appearances and common complications. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 40:2761-76. [PMID: 26023007 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0459-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Several benign and malignant liver diseases may require surgical treatment for cure, including anatomical resections based on the segmental anatomy of the liver, non-anatomical (wedge) resections, and surgical management of biliary cysts. The type of surgery depends not only on the location and the nature of the disease, but also on the expertise of the surgeon. Whereas ultrasonography is often the first-line imaging examination in case of suspected postoperative complication, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is of greater value for identifying normal findings after surgery, early postoperative pathologic fluid collections and vascular thromboses, and tumor recurrence in patients who have undergone hepatic surgery. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice for depicting early postoperative bile duct injuries and ischemic cholangitis that may occur in the late postoperative phase. Both MDCT and MRCP can accurately depict tumor recurrence. Radiologists should become familiar with these surgical procedures to better understand postoperative changes, and with the normal imaging appearances of various postoperative complications to better differentiate between complications and normal findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mulé
- Department of Radiology, Reims University Hospital, 45, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092, Reims Cedex, France.
| | - A Colosio
- Department of Radiology, Reims University Hospital, 45, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092, Reims Cedex, France
| | - J Cazejust
- Department of Radiology, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, 184, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France
| | - R Kianmanesh
- Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Reims University Hospital, 45, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092, Reims Cedex, France
| | - P Soyer
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Lariboisière Hospital, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010, Paris, France.,Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 10 rue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France
| | - C Hoeffel
- Department of Radiology, Reims University Hospital, 45, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092, Reims Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Glebova NO, Hicks CW, Tosoian JJ, Piazza KM, Abularrage CJ, Schulick RD, Wolfgang CL, Black JH. Outcomes of arterial resection during pancreatectomy for tumor. J Vasc Surg 2015; 63:722-9.e1. [PMID: 26610641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Arterial resection (AR) during pancreatic tumor resection is controversial. We examined the safety and efficacy of AR during pancreatectomy. METHODS We used a prospective institutional database that includes 6522 patients who underwent pancreatectomy from 1970 to 2014; 35 had AR. We performed a 2:1 propensity match for patients without and with AR on the basis of preoperative patient and tumor variables. We then compared operative and postoperative outcomes between matched groups. RESULTS AR included 18 hepatic, 8 celiac, 3 splenic, 3 middle colic, 2 superior mesenteric, and 1 left renal artery. There were 20 primary, 4 vein, and 2 graft reconstructions; 11 were emergent and 24 elective. Before matching, patients with AR were younger (58 ± 2 vs 63 ± 0.2 years old; P = .05), more likely to be of black race (26% vs 9%; P = .003), to have received preoperative chemotherapy (17% vs 2%; P < .001), have a later stage and larger tumor (4 ± 0.8 vs 3 ± 0.04 cm; P = .05), more resections that included removal of all macroscopic disease, but microscopic residual tumor remained (31% vs 14%; P = .02), greater blood loss (1285 ± 276 vs 822 ± 16 mL; P = .02), and more frequent cardiac complications (11% vs 4%; P = .03) compared with patients without AR. After propensity matching, baseline patient characteristics were similar between groups. For perioperative outcomes, the groups did not differ in surgical time, blood loss, length of stay, or complications including anastomotic leaks, bleeding, cardiac, infectious complications, or liver infarct or failure (all; P = not significant). Patency was 97% at a mean follow-up of 510 ± 184 days with 1 hepatic artery AR thrombosis. Long-term outcomes were significantly different: patients with AR had a lower rate of local tumor recurrence (20% vs 47%; P = .007) but also lower 1-year (50% vs 87%; P = .002) and median survival (22 ± 18 vs 49 ± 7 months; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AR during pancreatectomy is safe and not associated with increased complications. Although it significantly reduces the risk of local tumor recurrence, AR is associated with worse survival compared with patients who do not undergo AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia O Glebova
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo; Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - Caitlin W Hicks
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - Jeffrey J Tosoian
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - Kristen M Piazza
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - Christopher J Abularrage
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Division of GI, Tumor, and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
| | - James H Black
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Application of a Gastroduodenal Artery Graft for Reconstruction of the Hepatic Artery during Radical Resection of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015:934565. [PMID: 26339239 PMCID: PMC4538971 DOI: 10.1155/2015/934565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2015] [Revised: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper was designed to evaluate a novel surgical procedure of using a gastroduodenal artery graft for reconstruction of the hepatic artery during radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, which is citation-free and self-contained. In this paper we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data, surgical procedure, and follow-up results in nine patients who underwent hepatic artery reconstruction using a gastroduodenal artery graft during their radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and no artery thrombosis or other surgical complications were found after operation with minimum follow-up duration of three months. We recommended that a gastroduodenal artery graft was shown to be a good choice for hepatic artery resection after radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
13
|
Almouradi T, Co P, Riles W, Attar B. Isolated hepatic artery thrombosis leading to multiple liver infarcts in a non-transplant patient. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2014; 15:382-7. [PMID: 25218273 PMCID: PMC4159244 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.890380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Female, 62 Final Diagnosis: Hepatic artery thrombosis Symptoms: Abdominal pain • Nausea • Vomiting Medication: — Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek Almouradi
- Division of Gatsroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chciago, USA
| | - Paul Co
- Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, USA
| | - William Riles
- Division of Gatsroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, USA
| | - Bashar Attar
- Division of Gatsroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Splenic artery use for arterial reconstruction in pancreatic surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399:667-71. [PMID: 24789810 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1200-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended resections in the upper GI tract, especially for pancreatic malignancies, can require resection of the hepatic or superior mesenteric artery. Besides venous or allogenous grafting, the splenic artery can be used for reconstruction in both positions. PURPOSE We hereby describe the different technical possibilities of interposition or transposition to use the splenic artery for restoration of arterial perfusion of the liver or the small bowel following resection of the hepatic or superior mesenteric artery, respectively. CONCLUSION The use of the splenic artery is a convenient and appropriate possibility to reconstruct the hepatic or superior mesenteric artery in pancreatic resection with regard to interposition and especially transposition of this vessel. It should be considered in patients suitable to undergo these procedures to extend resectability in pancreatic cancer surgery.
Collapse
|