Breast cancer surgery without suction drainage: the impact of adopting a 'no drains' policy on symptomatic seroma formation rates

Drain-free mastectomy and flap fixation: The interim analysis of a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

Flap fixation after mastectomy has proven to be one of the most promising solutions to reduce seroma formation. Drain placement remains standard practice in many clinics, even though this may be redundant after flap fixation.

METHODS

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing mastectomy and wound closure using flap fixation with or without drain placement. The primary outcome measure was clinically significant seroma (CSS) incidence. The aim of this interim analysis was to assess the assumptions for the sample size calculation and to provide preliminary results.

RESULTS

Between July 2020 and January 2023, 112 patients were included. CSS incidence was 9.1% in the drain group and 21% in the no-drain group. In total, 10 patients were lost to follow-up. These numbers are similar to the ones used for the sample size calculation. In the drain group, three patients required interventions for wound complications compared to nine in the no-drain group (odds ratio: 3.612 [95% confidence interval: 0.898-14.537]).

CONCLUSION

The sample size calculation seems to be correct and no protocol amendments are necessary. Current preliminary results show no significant differences in CSS incidence. Complete results should be awaited to draw a well-powered conclusion regarding drain policy after mastectomy.

Current use of drains and management of seroma following mastectomy and axillary surgery: results of a United Kingdom national practice survey

PURPOSE

Up to 40% of the 56,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer each year in the UK undergo mastectomy. Seroma formation following surgery is common, may delay wound healing, and be uncomfortable or delay the start of adjuvant treatment. Multiple strategies to reduce seroma formation include surgical drains, flap fixation and external compression exist but evidence to support best practice is lacking. We aimed to survey UK breast surgeons to determine current practice to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future trial.

METHODS

An online survey was developed and circulated to UK breast surgeons via professional and trainee associations and social media to explore current attitudes to drain use and management of post-operative seroma. Simple descriptive statistics were used to summarise the results.

RESULTS

The majority of surgeons (82/97, 85%) reported using drains either routinely (38, 39%) or in certain circumstances (44, 45%). Other methods for reducing seroma such as flap fixation were less commonly used. Wide variation was reported in the assessment and management of post-operative seromas. Over half (47/91, 52%) of respondents felt there was some uncertainty about drain use after mastectomy and axillary surgery and two-thirds (59/91, 65%) felt that a trial evaluating the use of drains vs no drains after simple breast cancer surgery was needed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for a large-scale UK-based RCT to determine if, when and in whom drains are necessary following mastectomy and axillary surgery. This work will inform the design and conduct of a future trial.

Suction Drain Volume following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma-When to Remove Drains? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Postoperative complications such as seroma formation and wound-site infection occur following completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for melanoma. We analyzed the impact of time-to-drain removal and drainage volume on seroma formation after ALND. We retrospectively analyzed data from 118 patients after completion ALND for melanoma. Primary endpoints were daily amount of drainage volume, seroma formation and time-to-drain removal. Secondary endpoints included patient-related, disease-specific and perioperative parameters as well as the number of histologically analyzed lymph nodes and surgical complications graded by the Clavien−Dindo classification (CDCL). Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression models. Drain removal around the 8th postoperative day was statistically associated with a lower risk for the occurrence of seroma formation (p < 0.001). Patients with an increased drainage volume during the early postoperative days were more prone to develop seroma after drain removal. With 49% (CDCL I and II), most complications were managed conservatively, while only 5.9% (CDCL III) required revision surgery (CDCL overall: 55.9%). ALND is a safe procedure with a low rate of severe CDCL III type of complications. To decrease seroma evacuation, our results imply that drains should be removed around the 8th postoperative day to reduce the risk of infection, readmission or prolonged hospitalization.

Comparison of Flap Fixation to Its Bed and Conventional Wound Closure with Drainage in Preventing Seroma Formation Following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Seroma formation is a common complication following mastectomy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of flap fixation techniques that omit drainage versus conventional closed drainage on seroma formation and related complications after mastectomy.

METHODS

Clinical studies of flap fixation techniques versus the conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Papers were eligible for inclusion if the outcome was described in terms of seroma formation. Studies older than 20 years, animal studies and studies involving patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction were excluded.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies were included in our examination. Compared with the conventional drainage group, the flap fixation group had a similar incidence of seroma formation (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.30-1.93, p = 0.57).

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence, mechanical flap fixation can replace conventional drainage without increasing seroma formation after mastectomy. Further well-designed RCTs are warranted to evaluate the effects of flap fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Breast Surgery: Management of Postoperative Complications Following Operations for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer surgery is associated with low rates of surgical morbidity. Postoperative complications related to breast surgery include seroma, infection, hematoma, mastectomy flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, persistent postsurgical pain, Mondor disease, fat necrosis, reduced tactile sensation after mastectomy, and venous thromboembolism. Postoperative complications related to axillary surgery include seroma, infection, lymphedema, nerve injury, and reduced shoulder/arm mobility. The overall rate of complication related to axilla surgery may be confounded by the type of breast surgery performed. The management of postoperative complications related to oncologic breast and axillary surgery independent of reconstruction is reviewed here.

Reduction of seroma and improvement of quality of life after early drain removal in immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander. Preliminary report from a randomized controlled study

Seroma is the most common complication of breast reconstruction with tissue expander (incidence 0.2-20%) with increased risk of infection and implant loss by 4-6 fold. About 90% of plastic surgeons routinely placed drains for its prevention. We theorized that early drain removal is a safe procedure that improves postoperative quality of life (QoL), reducing pain, length of hospital stay, and limitations on daily activities. We divided 49 patients operated on between September 2016 and March 2018 (follow-up: 9-26 months) into two groups: Group1 (output-based; drains removed when <30 ml/day); and Group2 (early-removal; at 3-4 days postop.). A study-specific questionnaire about the patient's QoL was conducted 3 weeks after surgery. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. A comparison was performed using a Fisher test and a Mann-Whitney U test with p = 0.05. We observed lower production of wound fluid (641±49 ml vs 231±20 ml; p = 0.004), and a shorter time until wound healing (31.3±4.2 days vs 22±3.9 days; p = 0.031) for Group 2. The difference for infection (p = 0.36), impaired wound healing (p = 0.22), and the seroma formation period (p = 0.11) was not significant. Group 2 experienced less breast pain (8% vs 87.5%; p = 0.001), fewer limitations in daily activities (16% vs 50%; p = 0.002), in mobility (20% vs 83.3%; p = 0.001), and in social life (8% vs 91.7%; p < 0.001), and a better quality of sleep than Group 1 (36% vs 75%; p = 0.002). Group 2 did not require home care after hospital discharge (p < 0.001). The limitations of study are: its small sample size, the wound healing assessment, and the use of a non-validated questionnaire.

Lysine-urethane-based tissue adhesion for mastectomy-an approach to reducing the seroma rate?

Purpose

Postoperative seromas are a problem in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the lysine-urethane-based tissue adhesive TissuGlu^® without drainage is equal/ non-inferior to standard mastecomy with drainage.

Methods

The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, multicentre non-inferiority study comparing the use of TissuGlu^® without drainage with standard wound care with a drain insertion in ablative breast procedures. The number of clinical interventions, quality of life and wound complications were followed-up for 90 days in both groups.

Results

Although the statistical power was not reached, twice as many clinical interventions were performed in the TissuGlu^® group than in the drainage group, especially aspirations of clinically relevant seromas (p = 0.014). The TissuGlu^® group produced overall less wound fluid, but developed a clinically relevant seroma (100% vs. 63%) which made an intervention necessary. Less hospitalisation time was observed in the TissuGlu^® group, but the complication rate was higher. There was no significant difference in regards to postoperative pain. In summary the non-inferiority of TissuGlu^® compared to standard drainage couldn’t be reached.

Discussion

The present evaluation shows no advantage of the tissue adhesive TissuGlu^® in terms of seroma formation and frequency of intervention compared to a standard drainage for mastectomies, but the shorter inpatient stay certainly has a positive effect on the quality of life.

A systematic review of seroma formation following drain-free mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Seroma is a common complication after mastectomy. The aim of this review is to elucidate whether closed suction drainage can safely be omitted in patients undergoing mastectomy when assessing seroma formation and its complications. The second aim is to assess the influence of flap fixation on seroma related complications, as there is existing evidence showing that combining mastectomy with flap fixation may make the use of drainage systems obsolete.

SEARCH & SELECTION

A review of the literature was performed and articles that compared mastectomy with drainage and mastectomy without drainage were selected. Due to the small number of eligible studies, no selection based on whether flap fixation was performed was possible. If outcome was described in terms of seroma formation or seroma related complications, papers were eligible for inclusion. Studies older than 20 years, animal studies, studies not written in English and studies with male patients were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of eight articles were eligible for inclusion. Four prospective studies and four retrospective studies were included. In four studies, flap fixation was performed. Frequency of seroma formation as well as seroma that required intervention was reported. The included studies demonstrated that omitting closed suction drainage does not lead to a higher incidence of seroma formation in patients undergoing mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

Despite substantial heterogeneity, there is evidence that drainage can safely be omitted without exacerbating seroma formation and its complications. A well-powered, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of drainage omission on seroma formation, with or without flap fixation, is needed.

A single-center, randomized, non-inferiority study evaluating seroma formation after mastectomy combined with flap fixation with or without suction drainage: protocol for the Seroma reduction and drAin fRee mAstectomy (SARA) trial

BACKGROUND

Seroma formation is a common complication after breast cancer surgery and can lead to delayed wound healing, infection, patient discomfort and repeated visits to the outpatient clinic. Mastectomy combined with flap fixation is becoming standard practice and is currently combined with closed-suction drainage. There is evidence showing that closed-suction drainage may be insufficient in preventing seroma formation. There is reasonable doubt whether there is still place for closed-suction drainage after mastectomy when flap fixation is performed. We hypothesize that mastectomy combined with flap fixation and closed suction drainage does not cause a significant lower incidence of seroma aspirations, when compared to mastectomy and flap fixation alone. Furthermore, we expect that patients without drainage will experience significantly less discomfort and comparable rates of surgical site infections.

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled trial in female breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and flap fixation using sutures with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Patients will be eligible for inclusion if they are older than 18 years, have an indication for mastectomy with or without sentinel procedure. Exclusion criteria are modified radical mastectomy, direct breast reconstruction, previous history of radiation therapy of the unilateral breast, breast conserving therapy and inability to give informed consent. A total of 250 patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: mastectomy combined with flap fixation and closed-suction drainage or mastectomy combined with flap fixation without drainage. Follow-up will be conducted up to six months postoperatively. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients undergoing one or more seroma aspirations. Secondary outcome measures consist of the number of invasive interventions, surgical site infection, quality of life measured using the SF-12 Health Survey, cosmesis, pain and number of additional outpatient department visits.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted comparing flap fixation with and without closed-suction drainage with seroma aspiration as the primary outcome. This study could result in finding evidence that supports performing mastectomy without closed-suction drainage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was approved by the medical ethical committee of Zuyderland Medical Center METC-Z on 20 March 2019 (METCZ20190023). The SARA Trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as per July 2019, Identifier: NCT04035590 .

Increasing the incidence of drain-free day-case mastectomies with the use of a fibrin tissue sealant; data from a single surgical center in the United Kingdom

Day-case mastectomy surgery provides benefits to both patients and hospitals. Key barriers are the use of a drain and the risk of postoperative seroma formation. We introduced the use of a tissue sealant (Artiss) into the surgical site (post-mastectomy without immediate reconstruction and postaxillary clearance) and evaluated its effect on our practice, particularly day-case rates. A prospective audit of 177 patients who underwent a simple mastectomy with or without axillary surgery, or axillary node clearance with or without breast-conserving surgery was conducted at a single surgical center in the UK between November 2015 and November 2016. Artiss was used in all operations and, where appropriate, the drain was omitted to facilitate day-case surgery. The clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing different operations and duration of hospital stay. There was no statistically significant difference between day-case patients and inpatients in seroma aspiration rates (24.5% and 21.7%, respectively; P = 0.381) or other complications (22.4% and 16.1%, respectively; P = 0.106). The day-case mastectomy rate increased from 3.9% in the first quarter to 45.5% in the final quarter, which was a significant increase reaching well beyond the national target. The use of Artiss enabled us to increase the drain-free day-case surgery rates over a 1-year period, exceeding the 30% target recommended by the British Association of Day Surgery. We did not observe any increase in patient morbidity, and the change was cost-effective. We have now implemented the routine use of Artiss in women undergoing simple mastectomy with or without axillary surgery and stand-alone axillary node clearances as part of enhanced recovery clinical pathways.

Mastectomy Without Drains Reduces Cost with No Detriment to Patient Outcome

Introduction 

Use of drains after mastectomy remains highly variable. This study aimed to establish whether simple mastectomy managed without a drain would cost less than the same procedure managed with a drain and whether there would be any difference in complications.

Methods 

Prospective data were collected on all patients undergoing simple mastectomy ± sentinel lymph node biopsy over sixteen months. Surgeons decided intra-operatively whether to place a drain. Data included operative details, mastectomy weight, length of stay and postoperative complications. Costing data were identified by combining hospital finance costs for admission and follow-up appointments along with the cost of consumables.

Results 

One hundred and thirty mastectomies were performed on 119 patients. There was a significant difference in mastectomy weight between drain group patients (n=80, median: 730g) and no drain group patients (n=50, median: 424g) (p=<0.001). The mean cost for drain group patients was £639.77 whilst for the no drain group was £365.46, indicating a potential unit saving of £21944.93 over sixteen months. Length of stay was shorter in the no drain group (range: 1-2 days) than the drain group (range: 1-4 days). The presence or absence of drains did not influence complication rates, with no change in seroma interventions (p=0.803).

Conclusions 

Managing simple mastectomy patients without a drain resulted in no increase in complications or subsequent interventions for seroma. Significant cost savings to both the hospital and to the patient can be achieved by omitting drain use. Routine use of drains in patients undergoing simple mastectomy ± SNB may be unnecessary and costly.

Effect of topical microporous polysaccharide hemospheres on the duration and amount of fluid drainage following mastectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Background

Seroma formation is the most common complication after mastectomy and places patients at risk of associated morbidities. Microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) consists of hydrophilic, plant based, polysaccharide particles and is currently used as an absorbable hemostatic agent. An animal model evaluating MPH and seroma formation after mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection showed a significant decrease in seroma volume. Study aim was to evaluate topical MPH on the risk of post-mastectomy seroma formation as measured by total drain output and total drain days.

Methods

Prospective randomized single-blinded clinical trial of patients undergoing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. MPH was applied to the surgical site in the study group and no application in the control group.

Results

Fifty patients were enrolled; eight were excluded due to missing data. Forty-two patients were evaluated, control (n = 21) vs. MPH (n = 21). No difference was identified between the two groups regarding demographics, tumor stage, total drain days, total drain output, number of clinic visits, or complication rates. On a subset analysis, body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 was identified as an independent risk factor for high drain output. Post hoc analyses of MPH controlling for BMI also revealed no statistical difference.

Conclusions

Unlike the data presented in an animal model, no difference was demonstrated in the duration and quantity of serosanguinous drainage related to the use of MPH in patients undergoing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. BMI greater than 30 was identified as an independent risk factor for high drain output and this risk was not affected by MPH use. NCT03647930, retrospectively registered 08/2018.

The Use of TissuGlu® Surgical Adhesive for Mastectomy With or Without Lymphonodectomy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Using drains after breast surgery is a preventive, but invasive measure to reduce seroma formation. A polyurethane-based tissue adhesive (TissuGlu®) might facilitate drainage-free wound healing after mastectomy in a non-invasive manner.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, data from 84 patients (42 receiving TissuGlu®, 42 receiving a drainage) who underwent mastectomy, were collected (90 days postoperative follow-up). Study endpoints were defined as the number of fluid-related postoperative clinical interventions, cumulative volume of postoperative wound fluid, duration of hospitalization and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In the entirety of postoperative interventions, no significant difference could be demonstrated (p=0.298). The drainage arm showed significantly less seroma aspirations (p=0.024) and complications (p=0.012). A significantly reduced length of hospitalization (p<0.001) and less cumulative wound secretion volume (p<0.001) appeared in the TissuGlu® group.

CONCLUSION

The polyurethane-based tissue adhesive is a less invasive alternative to drain use in mastectomy.

Seroma in breast surgery: all the surgeons fault?

BACKGROUND

Despite a trend for less radical surgical approaches in breast cancer due to better understanding of tumour biology and new treatment options such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT), seroma production remains one of the main surgical side effects that can result in prolonged recovery, delay of radiotherapy and patient discomfort. The aim of this study is to provide an update on risk factors for seroma production after breast cancer surgery considering the latest treatment options.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of seroma production in primary breast cancer patients treated between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2014 at the Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital Ulm, was performed. Patients with previous breast/axillary surgery or more than one intervention were excluded. Seroma formation was measured using wound drains placed in breast and axilla.

RESULTS

In total, 581 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years, and median BMI 25.6 kg/m². 60 (10.3%) patients had a mastectomy, 175 (30.1%) patients received IORT, and 72 (12.4%) patients received NAC. Median amount of seroma production was 82.5 ml (range 0-3012.5 ml). Multivariate analysis revealed that most of the observed variation in seroma production was due to type of surgery (mastectomy vs. breast conserving), length of surgery and number of removed lymph nodes. Both NAC and IORT explained a significant but very small amount of the observed variation in seroma production.

CONCLUSION

The most important factors for seroma production are extent and duration of breast surgery.

The association of surgical drains with surgical site infections - A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Surgical drains are widely used despite limited evidence in their favor. This study describes the associations between drains and surgical site infections (SSI).

METHODS

This prospective observational double center study was performed in Switzerland between February 2013 and August 2015.

RESULTS

The odds of SSI in the presence of drains were increased in general (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.32-4.30, p = 0.004), but less in vascular and not in orthopedic trauma surgery. In addition to the surgical division, the association between drains and SSI depended significantly on the duration of surgery (p = 0.01) and wound class (p = 0.034). Furthermore, the duration of drainage (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.15-1.35, p < 0.001), the number (OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.09-2.74, p = 0.019) and type of drains (open versus closed: OR 3.68, 95%CI 1.88, 6.89, p < 0.001) as well as their location (overall p = 0.002) were significantly associated with SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

The general use of drains is discouraged. However, drains may be beneficial in specific surgical procedures.

Can Gentamicin-collagen Sponges Prevent Seroma Formation Following Mastectomy?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate whether gentamicin-collagen (GC) sponges can lower the incidence of seroma and surgical site infections following breast cancer surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed. Two consecutive cohorts of patients who underwent a mastectomy with or without an axillary lymph node dissection were compared. The first cohort was treated conventionally (n = 38), the second cohort received GC sponges (n = 39). Endpoints were the incidence of clinical significant seroma (CSS) and surgical site infections (SSI), the mean number of aspirations, and the mean aspirated volume.

RESULTS

GC sponges lowered the CSS incidence from 73.7% to 38.5% (P = .002). The mean number of aspirations and the mean aspirated volume were not affected. SSI incidence was 15.8% in the conventional cohort compared with 7.7% in the GC cohort (P = .23).

CONCLUSION

Application of GC sponges significantly lowered the incidence of CSS. The incidence of SSI was halved, although this was not significant.

A systematic review of flap fixation techniques in reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Seroma formation is a common complication after mastectomy. This review aims to elucidate which surgical techniques are most effective in reducing the dead space and therefore seroma formation in patients undergoing mastectomy.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify clinical studies comparing any form of flap fixation to conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance. Studies were eligible for inclusion if outcome was described in terms of seroma formation and/or complications of seroma formation. Studies on animal research or breast reconstruction with tissue expanders or flap harvesting (latissimus dorsi) were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of nine articles were eligible for inclusion. Five were retrospective studies and four were prospective. Retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated the higher incidence of seroma formation in patients not undergoing mechanical flap fixation. The incidence of seroma-related complications in these studies vary. Four out of the nine studies demonstrate that patients undergoing flap fixation, need significantly fewer seroma aspirations. There are very few studies on the use of tissue glues preventing seroma formation.

CONCLUSION

The scientific body of evidence favoring flap fixation after mastectomy is convincing. Mechanical flap fixation seems to reduce seroma formation and seroma aspiration after mastectomy. There are, however, no well-powered randomized controlled trials evaluating all aspects of seroma formation and its sequelae. Further research should elucidate whether flap fixation using sutures or tissue glue is superior.

The Characteristics and Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Adolescent Gynecomastia

BACKGROUND

Most adolescent gynecomastia is resolved spontaneously in 3 years. But, persistent gynecomastia could have a negative influence on psychoemotional development on adolescence. The purpose of this study is to report the characteristics of adolescent gynecomastia patients who received the surgeries, and discuss the short-term surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Of the 1454 patients who underwent gynecomastia surgery at Damsoyu hospital from January 2014 to May 2016, 71 were adolescents. Subcutaneous mastectomy with liposuction was performed for adolescent patients who had gynecomastia for more than 3 years and showed psychosocial distress. Demographic and outcome variables were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 17.5 ± 0.77 years old. All gynecomastia cases were bilateral. Simon's grade IIa (35 patients, 49.3%) was the most common, and grade III was not observed. Fifty-one patients (71.8%) were classified as having a glandular-type breast component. Fourteen patients (19.7%) had complications, but only 3 cases (4.2%) required revision. Most of the patients (70 patients, 98.6%) were satisfied with the esthetic results, and the average 5-point Likert score was 4.85 ± 0.40. Recurrence was not observed. As the Simon's grade increased from I to IIA, a higher BMI, larger amounts of breast tissue, and longer operation times were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Gynecomastia that did not regress spontaneously was mostly the glandular type, so not only liposuction but also surgical removal of glandular tissue is necessary. Surgical treatment, selectively performed in patients who have had gynecomastia for 3 years, and have experienced psychosocial distress, could be an acceptable treatment for adolescent gynecomastia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the table of contents or the online instructions to authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Quantity-guided drain management reduces seroma formation and wound infections after radical lymph node dissection: results of a comparative observational study of 374 melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic fistulas are common complications after lymph node dissections in melanoma patients. We investigated whether drain management could improve the patient's outcome.

METHODS

Patients who underwent axillary or inguinal lymph node dissection (RALND or RILND) for malignant melanoma were recorded in a prospective database. Two different methods of drain management were compared. Either the drain was removed no later than the eighth postoperative day (period I, 2003-2007) or it was left in place until fluid flow was below 50 ml in 24 h for two consecutive days (period II, 2008-2011). The main outcome criterion was the incidence of seroma punctures after drain removal.

RESULTS

374 patients were analysed. The incidence of seroma punctures significantly decreased in period II. The number of patients with elevated lymphatic secretions rose by 41.3% (RALND) and 38.1% (RILND). With the exception of lymphatic fistulas, we observed significantly more local complications with need for treatment in period I (n = 104, 52%) than in period II (n = 31, 18%). In period II, the hospital stays after both procedures were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that quantity-guided drain management leads to a prolonged interval of drainage but is associated with a lower incidence of seroma formation and shorter hospital stay.

Drainage after Modified Radical Mastectomy - A Methodological Mini-Review

Breast cancer is a socially relevant group of malignant conditions of the mammary gland, affecting both males and females. Most commonly the surgical approach of choice is a modified radical mastectomy (MRM), due to it allowing for both the removal of the main tumor mass and adjacent glandular tissue, which are suspected of infiltration and multifocality of the process, and a sentinel axillary lymph node removal. Most common post-surgical complications following MRM are the formation of a hematoma, the infection of the surgical wound and the formation of a seroma. These post-surgical complications can, at least in part, be attributed to the drainage of the surgical wound. However, the lack of modern and official guidelines provides an ample scope for innovation, but also leads to a need for a randomized comparison of the results. We compared different approaches to wound drainage after MRM, reviewed based on the armamentarium, number of drains, location, type of drainage system, timing of drain removal and no drainage alternatives. Currently, based on the general results, scientific and comparative discussions, seemingly the most affordable methodology with the best patient outcome, with regards to hospital stay and post-operative complications, is the placement of one medial to lateral (pectoro-axillary) drain with low negative pressure. Ideally, the drain should be removed on the second or third postoperative day or when the amount of drained fluid in the last 24 hours reaches below 50 milliliters.

Complete axillary dissection without drainage for the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE:

This randomized clinical trial evaluated the possibility of not draining the axilla following axillary dissection.

METHODS:

The study included 240 breast cancer patients who underwent axillary dissection as part of conservative treatment. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether or not they were subjected to axillary drainage. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01267552.

RESULTS:

The median volume of fluid aspirated was significantly lower in the axillary drainage group (0.00 ml; 0.00 - 270.00) compared to the no drain group (522.50 ml; 130.00 - 1148.75). The median number of aspirations performed during conservative breast cancer treatment was significantly lower in the drainage group (0.5; 0.0 - 4.0) compared to the no drain group (5.0; 3.0 - 7.0). The total volume of serous fluid produced (the volume of fluid obtained from drainage added to the volume of aspirated fluid) was similar in the two groups. Regarding complications, two cases (2.4%) of wound dehiscence occurred in the drainage group compared to 13 cases (13.5%) in the group in which drainage was not performed, with this difference being statistically significant. Rates of infection, necrosis and hematoma were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

Safety rates were similar in both study groups; hence, axillary dissection can feasibly be performed without drainage. However, more needle aspirations could be required, and there could be more cases of wound dehiscence in patients who do not undergo auxiliary drainage.

Use of Low-Thrombin Fibrin Sealant Glue After Axillary Lymphadenectomy for Breast Cancer to Reduce Hospital Length and Seroma

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymphadenectomy for primary breast cancer produces a non-negligible rate of postoperative lymphorrhea, prolonged hospital stays, and multiple seroma punctures. We evaluated the impact of low-thrombin fibrin sealant glue on surgical wounds in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of 149 patients who underwent axillary lymphadenectomy for primary breast cancer between January 2014 and December 2015. Data were obtained from 2 successive prospective studies. The hospital stay length and morbidity (seromas, punctures) were compared between 2 groups: patients who had padding sutures and low-thrombin fibrin sealant glue without drainage (n = 49) and patients with drainage alone (n = 100). Hospital costs were assessed from the hospital perspective.

RESULTS

The mean hospital stay length was shorter in the fibrin sealant group (2.6 vs. 4.7 days; P < .001). Seroma magnitude and punctures were similar in patients treated with fibrin sealant compared with patients with drainage alone. The rate of needle aspiration for seroma was similar irrespective of whether or not a drain or fibrin sealant was used (30.6% vs. 33.0%, P = .77).

CONCLUSION

Low-thrombin fibrin sealant glue does not significantly reduce the amount of fluid produced in the axilla after breast surgery; however, its systematic use may help reduce hospital stays and costs.

Comparison of seroma production in breast conserving surgery with or without intraoperative radiotherapy as tumour bed boost

INTRODUCTION

One of the most common complications in breast conserving surgery is seroma formation. The origin of seroma formation remains unclear. While intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been shown to be an alternative to whole breast irradiation, the influence on seroma production is unclear. Therefore, this analysis compares seroma production in patients with breast conserving surgery with or without IORT as tumour bed boost during breast conserving surgery.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of seroma production in patients with nodal-negative (pN0sn) pT1/2 primary breast cancer treated between September 2010 and October 2013 at the Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital Ulm was performed. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous breast/axillary surgery or more than one intervention were excluded. IORT was applied as a tumour bed boost with 50-kV X-rays (Intra beam(®)) delivering 9 Gy at the applicator surface. Seroma formation was measured using wound drains placed in breast and in axilla.

RESULTS

Data of 152 patients (99 -IORT; 53 +IORT) were available for analysis. No significant differences between patients with or without IORT with regard to seroma production and number of days until drain removal were found (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with IORT encountered no increased seroma production and removal of the drains was not delayed compared to patients with breast conserving surgery only. Our results indicate that IORT does not increase the seroma production compared to surgery alone.

The introduction of early patient rehabilitation in surgery of soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on post-operative outcome

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are implemented in multiple fields of surgery, but not yet in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. We wondered whether its introduction into STS surgery might have impacted postoperative outcome.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty seven adult patients with primary limb or trunk wall STS received ERAS from 2008 to 2012 as a part of the intra-operative management. We evaluated, in retrospect, the intra-operative management, post-operative outcomes, functional and oncological results of these patients and compared them with 459 prior patients treated under a standard recovery after surgery (SRAS) program from 1989 to 2007.

RESULTS

The most visible change from SRAS to ERAS in the perioperative management was decrease of wound drainage (72% vs. 15%, p < 0.001) and increase of wound bandaging (16% vs. 66%; p < 0.001), underlining the appliance of the ERAS protocol. Post-operatively, hospital stay dropped from nine (0-74) to three (0-22) days (p < 0.001) without affecting major morbidity (8% vs. 5%, NS) or readmission to the hospital (5% vs. 4%, NS). Functional outcome improved (p = 0.009) but whether this change was due to ERAS remains to be proved because complementary treatments changed over time. Tumour control remained unaffected, with an estimated risk of local recurrence at 5 years of 12% in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Introducing a rapid recovery program was associated with a shorter hospitalization stay without compromising surgical or oncological outcomes. The program appears to be safe and reliable to use in patients undergoing STS surgery.

Techniques in the prevention and management of seromas after breast surgery

Seromas are the most frequent complications following breast surgery, resulting in significant discomfort and morbidity with possible delays in commencing adjuvant therapies. Varied clinical practices exist in the techniques employed to prevent and manage seromata. This article assesses published literature on the techniques employed in prevention of seroma formation following breast surgery, evaluating the different methodologies used. Although prevention is the best strategy, seromata remain problematic and we consider their management. The principle findings were that prevention is key to the management of seromata. Methods employed to prevent seromata include suction drainage, shoulder immobilization, quilting sutures, fibrin sealants and innovative measures of managing the axilla, among others. The evidence demonstrated that a combination of quilting and drains significantly reduces the incidence and volumes of seromata. These effects are sustained by minimizing use of electrocautery, alongside increasing frequencies of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsies and node sampling. The efficacy data on fibrin sealants is inconclusive and consequently should not be routinely used alone or accompanied by quilting sutures. Clinically significant seromas deemed 'symptomatic' by patients and complicating infected seromas should be aspirated. There are limited data on the recommended treatment of established seromas with a paucity of high-quality studies and further research involving randomized trials are indicated.

Breast cancer surgery without drains: no influence on seroma formation

It is not clear whether drains are necessary after breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare seroma formation in patients that had postoperative drainage for 24 h with patients that had no drain after breast cancer surgery. In this retrospective cohort study 96 patients with a primary breast cancer were included. Between January 2009 and April 2011 44 patients had breast cancer surgery followed by postoperative drainage. Between May 2011 and February 2013 52 patients underwent breast cancer surgery without drainage. The operative procedures that were included were: axillary lymph node dissection, modified radical mastectomy or simple mastectomy±sentinel lymph node biopsy. There was no difference between both groups regarding frequency of seroma (84.6% versus 90.9%; p=0.290) and amount of seroma (540 ml versus 590 ml; p=0.446). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients without drainage (2 versus 2.5 days; p=0.003). There was no difference between both groups in other secondary outcome measures. Modified radical mastectomy was an independent predictor of the amount of postoperative seroma (HR 0.039 [0.007-0.235]; p<0.001). These results suggest that there is no difference in seroma after breast cancer surgery between patients that had postoperative drainage and patients that had no postoperative drainage.

Should a drain be placed in early breast cancer surgery?

BACKGROUND

The current surgical debate has led to a reduction in the extent of surgery performed and thereby to a reduced occurrence of surgical trauma and, over the recent years, reduced seroma formation. This reduction in surgical procedures calls the need for a drain into question.

METHOD

Using Google Scholar and the National Library of Medicine (PubMed), a literature review was performed on systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding breast cancer surgery ± axillary dissection. Additionally, randomized trials for the time period after the last systematic review were included and evaluated according to the Jadad score.

RESULTS

The search returned 5 systematic reviews, in which a total of 1,075 patients were included (537 cases and 538 controls). Since the last review, no prospective randomized trial meeting the inclusion criteria has been published. The current reviews conclude that insertion of a drain is associated with a longer hospital stay and reduced seroma formation. The data regarding wound infection and drain insertion is inconclusive. The omission of a drain is associated with early discharge, reduced postsurgical pain, and early mobilization, but also with an increase in outpatient seroma aspirations.

CONCLUSION

The omission of a drain is possible in early breast cancer surgery (wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy) with adequate surgical techniques and instruments.

Does Non-Placement of a Drain in Breast Surgery Increase the Rate of Complications and Revisions?

Purpose: Although surgical therapy for breast cancer has become less radical, intrasurgical placement of drains and the use of compression bandages is still standard practice. However, evidence for the clinical benefit of wound drains is controversial, and use of drains is associated with increased pain and longer hospital stays. This raises the question whether, given the latest surgical techniques, wound drainage is still medically necessary. Material and Method: A retrospective analysis was done of patients with breast cancer treated surgically between January 2009 and April 2012 in the Breast Centre Hohenlohe (n = 573). Complication rates and revision following surgery with and without placement of wound drains were compared for patients who had breast-conserving surgery (n = 425) and patients who underwent mastectomy (n = 148). Results: The baseline characteristics (age, number of resected lymph nodes, numbers of patients who had sentinel lymph node resection, tumour characteristics, receptor status and affected side) were comparable for the investigated patient groups. The overall rate of complications was 4 %. There was no significant difference with regard to complication rates after surgery with and without placement of wound drains between the group of patients with breast-conserving surgery and the group of patients with mastectomy (p = 0.68 and p = 0.54, respectively). Conclusion: Our data indicate that non-placement of a wound drain does not influence complication or revision rates after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy.

Quilting prevents seroma formation following breast cancer surgery: closing the dead space by quilting prevents seroma following axillary lymph node dissection and mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Seroma is a frequent problem after mastectomy (ME) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Seroma is associated with pain, discomfort, impaired mobilisation and repeated aspirations, often resulting in a surgical site infection (SSI). It has already been demonstrated that minimizing dead space through fixation of the skin flaps to the underlying muscles (quilting) lowers the incidence of seroma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of quilting on the incidence of seroma, and SSI.

METHODS

Two consecutive groups with a total of 176 patients following ME and/or ALND were retrospectively compared. Endpoints were the incidence of seroma, and number and volume of aspirations and SSIs. Analysed risk factors were age, ME, lymph node dissection, neoadjuvant therapy, body mass index (BMI) and hypertension.

RESULTS

The quilted group (n = 89) scored significantly better on all endpoints compared with the conventional group (n = 87). The incidence of seroma decreased from 80.5 % to 22.5 % (p < 0.01), the mean number of aspirations from 4.86 to 2.40 (p = 0.015), the volume of aspirations from 1660 ml to 611 ml (p = 0.05) and the SSIs from 31.0 % to 11.2 % (p < 0.01). Increasing age and lymph node dissection were found to be risk factors for seroma; quilting was a protective factor.

CONCLUSION

Quilting is an effective method for preventing seroma and its complications.

Ultrasonic dissection system technology in breast cancer: a case-control study in a large cohort of patients requiring axillary dissection

In the sentinel node era, axillary dissection (ALND) for breast cancer (BC) is required much less frequently than in the past. However, complications, such as prolonged drainage output and seroma formation, are still observed. Harmonic dissection devices (HDDs) are widely used in laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery to reduce collateral damage during tissue dissection, but its usefulness in breast surgery is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HDDs compared to that of conventional dissection in performing ALND. One hundred thirty-nine women (median age 61 years, range 34-71 years) with confirmed pT1-2 primary infiltrating ductal BC undergoing curative surgery were enrolled in the study. The population was prospectively randomized between two age- and stage-matched arms: group A (cases)-68 (48.9 %) patients (HDD technique), versus group B (controls)-71 (51.1 %) patients (conventional technique). In group B, skin flaps were obtained using a scalpel, scissors, and electrocautery which was never used for ALND. In group A, for each operation time, the HDDs were used exclusively. The mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and drainage output were (A vs. B) 95 ± 22 versus 109 ± 25 min, 56 ± 12 versus 86 ± 15 mL, and 412 ± 83 versus 456 ± 69 mL, respectively (p < 0.01). Twenty-nine (20.9 %) patients developed an axillary seroma: 9 (13.2 %) and 20 (28.2 %) for groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.030). Our study confirms that in patients with BC requiring ALND the use of HDDs is more time efficient than conventional surgery, and reduces intraoperative bleeding, the amount of drainage, and the risk of seroma formation. These results may lead to several short- and long-term advantages. Thus, a careful evaluation of the cost-benefits of nontraditional tools, such as HDDs, should be performed in all patients undergoing modified radical or partial mastectomy and ALND for BC.