Randomized trial on peritoneal carcinosis diagnosis in mucinous colorectal cancer by laparoscopic second look at six months from a radical resection

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes: a single-center early experience propensity-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of laparoscopy in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is not well established. Herein, we describe our early experience of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC in patients with low-volume peritoneal disease compared to patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC during the same time period.

METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained database, patients who underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC were compared to a control cohort of patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC, matched for peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction, and tumor histology.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2017, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC and were compared to a matched control cohort of 32 patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC. Clinical and demographic data were similar between the groups. PCI, number of resected organs, and optimal cytoreduction rates were comparable. Patients who underwent laparoscopic experienced a lower estimated blood loss, (median, [IQR 1-3]); 150 mL, [50-300] vs. 100 mL, [50-125], p = 0.04, shorter length of stay (median [IQR 1-3]; 4 days [3-6] vs. 6 days [5-8], p < 0.01, and a lower 30-day complication rate (6.3% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.577) and overall survival (p = 0.472) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study demonstrates that laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC is feasible and safe for curative treatment in selected patients with low tumor volume. Minimally invasive CRS/HIPEC is associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter length of stay. There was no difference in long-term oncological outcomes between the groups.