Prognostic influence of the liver hanging maneuver for patients with hepatobiliary malignancies who underwent hepatic resections

The pediatric surgeon's perspective on the liver hanging maneuver: a case report and literature review

Introduction

The liver hanging maneuver (HM) is a well-established technique in hepatic surgery, primarily employed to optimize exposure and simplify parenchymal transection during liver resections. While its efficacy and safety have been extensively documented in adult populations, reports on its application in pediatric surgery are limited. This may be related to peculiarities of the liver anatomy and texture in children and to some specific issues of pediatric liver tumors, especially hepatoblastoma (HB).

Methods

This study reviews the technical adaptations, feasibility, and outcomes of the HM in children, focusing on its role in both routine liver resections and complex cases, such as the separation of conjoined twins. Data of patients treated with and without HM at our center were retrospectively analyzed and a review of recent literature on this topic was performed.

Results

A total of 16 pediatric patients (7 females) underwent HM during hepatic resections with a median age at surgery of 16 months (IQR: 8-22.5). No complications or mortality related to surgery were observed.

Discussion

Results demonstrate that with appropriate modifications, the HM is a safe and effective technique in children, offering advantages in minimizing bleeding while improving surgical efficiency.

Right anatomical hepatectomy using extrahepatic glissonean pedicle approach combined liver hanging for hepatocellular carcinoma: surgical approach in a developing country

Backgrounds/aims

To evaluate the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent right anatomical hepatectomy using the combination of the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach (Takasaki's technique) and liver hanging maneuver (LHM) (Belghiti's technique).

Patients and methods

A retrospective analysis of 30 cases of HCC treated with right hepatectomy using extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach and LHM by only one surgeon at our department from March 2020 to August 2023. Clinical characteristics, pathological results, postoperative outcomes, and survival rate were analyzed.

Results

Among the 30 HCC patients analyzed, males accounted for 96.7% of patients. The mean age was 54.9±11 years. 96.7% had normal preoperative liver function (Child-Pugh A). LHM with an extrahepatic Glissonean approach was feasible in 100% of cases with minor blood loss, no blood transfusion, intraoperative complications, or perioperative mortality. The mean operative time was 123.8±29.0 min. The mean hospital stay was 9.37±4.02 days. Postoperative liver failure accounted for 6.7%. Pathological results: 63.3% moderately differentiated HCC; 36.7% poorly differentiated HCC. 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 86.1, 73.8, and 59.0%, respectively. Recurrence was witnessed in 13 (43.3%) cases, with 6 (20%) cases in remnant liver. 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year disease-free survival were 69.3, 42.0, and 28.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

Right anatomical hepatectomy using extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach combined LHM for HCC was feasible and safe at our high-volume oncology center in a developing country.

Liver hanging maneuver versus conventional approach for open hepatectomy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the liver hanging maneuver (LHM) versus conventional approach for open hepatectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive medical literature search was performed. Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival outcomes were reported. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to surgical approaches, modification of LHM, geographical region and indications for liver resection.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies including 1109 patients were enrolled. The LHM was performed on 471 (37%) patients. The pooled outcomes showed hepatectomy with the LHM was associated with less estimated blood loss [standard mean difference (SMD): -0.77, P < 0.001], lower intraoperative transfusion rate [odds ratio (OR): 0.28, P = 0.003], less transection time (SMD: -0.68, P = 0.01), shorter duration of hospitalization (SMD:-0.19, P = 0.004), lower total complication rate (OR: 0.63, P = 0.008) and longer overall survival [hazard ration (HR): 0.70, P = 0.002] compared to conventional open hepatectomy. Subgroup analyses showed similar outcomes to overall analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis suggested that the LHM was a safe and feasible alternative to conventional open hepatectomy with better perioperative and long-term outcomes. It was unnecessary to combine the LHM with anterior approach (AA) in consideration of perioperative outcomes.

Liver parenchyma transection-first approach in hemihepatectomy with en bloc caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A safe technique to secure favorable surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although hemihepatectomy with total caudate lobectomy (hemiHx-tc) is essential for the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, the advantage of an anterior approach for hemiHx-tc has not been fully discussed technically; the significance of an anterior approach without liver mobilization for preventing infectious complications also remains unknown.

METHODS

The liver parenchyma transection-first approach (Hp-first) technique is an early transection of the hepatic parenchyma without mobilization of the liver that utilizes a modified liver-hanging maneuver to avoid damaging the future remnant liver.

RESULTS

Between May 2010 and August 2016, a total of 40 consecutive patients underwent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Of these, 19 patients underwent a conventional hemihepatectomy with total caudate lobectomy (cHx), while 21 patients received a Hp-first. The patients in the Hp-first group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001) and blood transfusion (P < 0.001), a lower incidence of postoperative hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.023), a lower incidence of liver failure (p = 0.038), a lower hospital death rate (p = 0.042), and a better 2-year disease-free survival rate (p = 0.010) than those in the cHx group.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver parenchyma transection-first approach is the preferred technique for hemiHx-tc in hilar cholangiocarcinoma because it resulted in improved surgical outcomes as compared with the conventional approach.

Development and clinical usefulness of the liver hanging maneuver in various anatomical hepatectomy procedures

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical application and usefulness of the liver hanging maneuver (LHM), proposed by Belghiti, for major hepatectomy, including its (1) historical development, (2) usefulness and application and (3) advantages and disadvantages, by reviewing the English literature published during the period 2001-2014.

RESULTS

In major hepatic transection via the anterior approach, the deep area of transection around the vena cava is critical with regard to bleeding during right hemi-hepatectomy. Belghiti and other investigators identified avascular spaces that are devoid of short hepatic veins at the front of the vena cava and behind the liver. Forceps can be inserted into this space easily and then maneuvered to lift the liver using hanging tape. This procedure, termed LHM significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and the transection time during right hemi-hepatectomy. LHM has been used in various anatomical hepatectomy procedures worldwide, including laparoscopic hepatectomy. The use of LHM markedly improves the amount of intraoperative blood loss, operative time and postoperative outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the application of LHM is an important development in the field of liver surgery, although a further evaluation of its true impact on clinical outcomes is necessary.