Resection of liver metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib era: A nationwide retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:1407-1413. [PMID: 27038995 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.257]

MELANOMAS, SARCOMAS, AND RENAL METASTASES IN THE LIVER: HOW TO TREAT?

Liver metastases from melanomas, sarcomas, and renal tumors are less frequent. Treatment and prognosis will depend on whether they are isolated or multiple, size and location, the presence or absence of extrahepatic neoplastic disease, age, stage of the initial disease, initial treatments instituted, time of evolution, and clinical condition of the patient. Recently, a high number of oncological therapies including monotherapy or in combination, neoadjuvants or adjuvants, and immuno-oncological treatments have been developed and tested, increasing disease-free time and survival.

A successful complete resection for multidrug-resistant giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor invading the transverse colon with multiple liver metastases in a young female: a case report

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare in young people and are often detected after becoming symptomatic or at an advanced stage. Herein, we report a case of complete reduction surgery for a substantially large malignant gastric GIST with multiple liver metastases in a young woman who successfully resulted in R0 surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 18-year-old woman presented to our hospital with anorexia and vomiting, and was diagnosed with a 17 cm gastric GIST with transverse colon invasion and multiple liver metastases. Due to being considered unresectable, tyrosine and multi-kinase inhibitor therapy were administered up to the fourth line yielding no response. After careful discussion at a multidisciplinary team conference, pancreatoduodenectomy or distal gastrectomy, transverse colectomy, and resection of the liver metastases were planned. Consequently, distal gastrectomy, transverse colectomy, resection of the liver metastases, and incidental peritoneal metastases were performed. Although the primary goal of the surgery was to reduce the volume of the tumor as much as possible, the results revealed that the complete removal of all detectable tumors was achieved. No recurrence was observed after surgery for 27 months with long-term adjuvant imatinib therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Even for highly advanced GISTs, aggressive surgery followed by adjuvant drug therapy may prolong survival in young patients.

A nomogram for predicting liver metastasis in patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BACKGROUND

Liver metastasis (LIM) is an important factor in the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and prognosis of patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). There is no simple tool to assess the risk of LIM in patients with gastric GIST. Our aim was to develop and validate a nomogram to identify patients with gastric GIST at high risk of LIM.

METHODS

Patient data diagnosed as having gastric GIST between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into training cohort and internal validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. For external validation, retrospective data collection was performed on patients diagnosed as having gastric GIST at Yunnan Cancer Center (YNCC) between January 2015 and May 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors associated with LIM in patients with gastric GIST. An individualized LIM nomogram specific for gastric GIST was formulated based on the multivariate logistic model; its discriminative performance, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the SEER database, a cohort of 2341 patients with gastric GIST was analyzed, of which 173 cases (7.39%) were found to have LIM; 239 patients with gastric GIST from the YNCC database were included, of which 25 (10.46%) had LIM. Multivariate analysis showed tumor size, tumor site, and sex were independent risk factors for LIM (P < .05). The nomogram based on the basic clinical characteristics of tumor size, tumor site, sex, and age demonstrated significant discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.753 (95% CI, 0.692-0.814) and 0.836 (95% CI, 0.743-0.930) in the internal and external validation cohort, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the nomogram was well calibrated, whereas the decision curve analysis and the clinical impact plot demonstrated its clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size, tumor subsite, and sex were significantly correlated with the risk of LIM in gastric GIST. The nomogram for patients with GIST can effectively predict the individualized risk of LIM and contribute to the planning and decision making related to metastasis management in clinical practice.

Radiofrequency ablation vs. hepatectomy for liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors

For patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and liver metastases, there is still debate about whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or hepatectomy is preferable. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of RFA with hepatectomy in patients with GISTs and liver metastases. The present retrospective study consisted of a cohort of 43 patients who had been diagnosed with liver metastases from GISTs between January 2010 and December 2022. The study included 18 patients who received RFA combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (RFA group) and 25 patients who underwent hepatectomy combined with TKI therapy (hepatectomy group). For the patients with liver metastases, the progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 66.5, 38.2 and 33.9%, respectively. Notably, patients in the hepatectomy group exhibited significantly improved PFS times compared with those in the RFA group (median PFS, 42.7 months vs. 14.3 months; P=0.034). Furthermore, the time to imatinib treatment failure (TTF) was notably improved in the hepatectomy group compared with that in the RFA group, and this difference was statistically significant (median TTF, 71.1 vs. 38.0 months; P=0.041). However, the overall survival (OS) times of patients who received RFA and those who had hepatectomy did not differ significantly (median OS, not reached vs. not reached, P=0.120). There was no statistically significant distinction in PFS and TTF between patients who underwent hepatectomy combined with postoperative TKI and those who underwent hepatectomy combined with perioperative TKI (median PFS, 29.5 vs. not reached; P=0.520; median TTF, 66.4 months vs. 71.1 months; P=0.430). The univariate and multivariate analyses consistently identified the sole prognostic factor affecting PFS as hepatectomy combined with TKI therapy (hazard ratio, 0.379; 95% CI, 0.159-0.899; P=0.028). In conclusion, hepatectomy combined with TKI therapy improved prognosis for patients with liver metastases to a greater extent than RFA combined with TKI therapy. For this type of patient, hepatectomy may be a preferable option.

Effects of surgical management for gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients with liver metastasis on survival outcomes

Purpose

To investigate the effect of surgical resection on survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumors synchronous liver metastasis (GIST-SLM) and to develop clinically usable predictive models for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients.

Methods

We identified patients in the SEER database diagnosed with GISTs from 2010 to 2019. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the bias between the Surgery and No surgery groups. Kaplan-Meier(K-M) analysis was used to detect differences in OS and CSS between the two groups. The nomogram to predict 1, 3, and 5-year OS and CSS were developed and evaluated.

Results

After PSM, 228 patients were included in this study. There were significant differences in 1, 3, and 5-year OS and CSS between the two groups (OS: 93.5% vs. 84.4%, 73.2% vs. 55.3%, 60.9% vs. 36.9%, P=0.014; CSS: 3.5% vs.86.2%,75.3% vs.57.9%, 62.6% vs. 42.9%, P=0.02). We also found that patients who received surgery combined with targeted therapy had better OS and CSS at 1, 3, and 5 years than those who received surgery only (OS: 96.6% vs.90.9%, 74.9% vs. 56.8%, 61.7% vs. 35.5%, P=0.022; CSS: 96.6% vs. 92.1%, 77.4% vs.59.2%,63.8% vs. 42.0%, P=0.023). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.774, 0.737, and 0.741 for 1, 3, and 5-year OS, respectively, with 0.782 and 0.742 for 1, 3, and 5-year CSS. In the model, C-index was 0.703 for OS and 0.705 for CSS and showed good consistency.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment can improve the OS and CSS of patients with GIST-SLM. In addition, the combination with chemotherapy may be more favorable for the long-term survival of patients. Meanwhile, we constructed the nomograms for predicting OS and CSS at 1, 3, and 5-year, and validated them internally. Our model can contribute to clinical management and treatment strategy optimization.

Salvage Hepatectomy for Giant GIST Liver Metastases Unresponsive to Systemic Therapy-Case Report

Therapeutic decision-making for advanced GIST liver metastases is challenging due to limited clinical evidence. This case study aims to demonstrate the survival benefit of resection in non-responsive cases. A 40-year-old male presented with abdominal pain, weight loss, altered general status, massive hepatomegaly, and intermittent melaena. He was diagnosed with stage IV GIST with the primary tumor in the ileal loop and multiple gigantic synchronous bilobar liver metastases. Despite 31 months of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy post-primary tumor resection, the disease remained unresponsive. The patient was admitted to our tertiary center with significant hepatomegaly. A two-stage debulking liver resection was performed after a multidisciplinary team decision. The first operation debulked the left hemiliver through a non-anatomical ultrasound-guided resection of segments 2, 3, and 4. The second operation (7 weeks later) debulked the right hemiliver through a right posterior sectionectomy involving segments 5 and 8. Despite receiving a second line of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy after surgery, the disease progressed both within and outside the liver. However, the patient survived for 55 months, with a postoperative survival benefit of 25 months. In conclusion, this case emphasizes the significant survival benefit achieved through a complex two-stage debulking liver resection for giant liver metastases, even in cases where systemic therapy fails.

Ablative Techniques for Sarcoma Metastatic Disease: Current Role and Clinical Applications

Sarcomas are heterogenous mesenchymal neoplasms with more than 80 different histologic subtypes. Lung followed by liver and bone are the most common sites of sarcoma metastatic disease. Ablative techniques have been recently added as an additional alternative curative or palliative therapeutic tool in sarcoma metastatic disease. When compared to surgery, ablative techniques are less invasive therapies which can be performed even in non-surgical candidates and are related to decreased recovery time as well as preservation of the treated organ's long-term function. Literature data upon ablative techniques for sarcoma metastatic disease are quite heterogeneous and variable regarding the size and the number of the treated lesions and the different histologic subtypes of the original soft tissue or bone sarcoma. The present study focuses upon the current role of minimal invasive thermal ablative techniques for the management of metastatic sarcoma disease. The purpose of this review is to present the current minimally invasive ablative techniques in the treatment of metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcoma, including local control and survival rates.

Non-colorectal liver metastases: A review of interventional and surgical treatment modalities

Liver metastases (LM) occur in up to 90% either simultaneously with the diagnosis of the primary tumor or at a later time-point. While resection of colorectal LM and resection or transplantation of neuroendocrine LM is part of a standard therapy with a 5-year patient survival of up to 80%, resection of non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine LM is still discussed controversially. The reason for it is the significantly lower survival benefit of all different tumor entities depending on the biological aggressiveness of the tumor. Randomized controlled trials are lacking. However, reviews of case series with ≥100 liver resections are available. They show a 5-year patient survival of up to 42% compared to only <5% in patients without treatment. Risk factors for poor survival include the type of primary tumor, a short interval between resection of the primary tumor and liver resection, extrahepatic manifestation of the tumor, number and size of the LM, and extent of liver resection. Overall, it has recently been shown that a good patient selection, the technical advances in surgical therapy and the use of a risk score to predict the prognosis lead to a significantly better outcome so that it is no longer justified not to offer liver resection to patients with non-colorectal, non- endocrine LM. Since modern therapy of LM is multimodal, the optimal therapeutic approach is decided individually by a multidisciplinary team consisting of visceral surgeons, oncologists, interventional radiologists and radiologists as part of a tumor board.

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with metachronous liver metastasis demonstrated no relapse after multidisciplinary team discussion and comprehensive treatment: a case report

Background

This study sought to explore the role and significance of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion and comprehensive treatment in the diagnosis and treatment of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with liver metastasis. For GIST patients with liver metastasis, MDT can evaluate whether the liver metastasis is resectable, so as to formulate accurate treatment goals and the best diagnosis and treatment plan.

Case Description

A 53-year-old male patient with localized rectal GIST with metachronous liver metastasis (MLM) was admitted to Yunnan Cancer Hospital in October 2014. At the 1st visit, he was diagnosed with locally advanced rectal GIST, and a MDT discussion was held by departments of colorectal surgery, imaging, pathology and oncology. The tumor shrank after neoadjuvant targeted treatment with imatinib. A local resection of the rectal GIST was successfully performed via the anal approach. R0 resection was achieved and the function of the anal sphincter was preserved. Following the operation, oral imatinib treatment was discontinued after 2 years. The patient developed isolated liver metastasis 6 months later. After the MDT discussion by departments of colorectal surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, imaging, pathology, and oncology, R0 resection of the liver metastasis was achieved. After the operation, sunitinib was administered for 4.5 years. The patient's overall survival (OS) has reached 7.5 years. No tumor recurrence or metastasis was found in the re-examinations. The follow-up is ongoing.

Conclusions

Targeted therapy combined with surgery is the most suitable way to cure GIST patients with liver metastasis. More importantly, the multi-disciplinary management and the standardized diagnosis and treatment of GIST patients with liver metastasis through MDT discussion can improve the quality of life and prolong the survival of patients.

Impact of surgical resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients with initially diagnosed synchronous hepatic metastases on long-term survival outcomes

BACKGROUND

The effect of surgical resection on the long-term outcome of GIST patients with initially diagnosed synchronous hepatic metastases in the targeted therapy era is still uncertain. The main aims of this study were to investigate the role of surgery in the treatment of these patients and establish clinical predictive models for assessing prognosis.

METHODS

We identified these patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2018. The selection bias in comparisons was minimized by performing propensity score matching (PSM). The risk factors associated with long-term survival outcomes were identified by a Cox proportional hazards model and thus used to establish the nomograms. Nomograms were validated by concordance indexes (C-indexes), time-dependent receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analyses (DCA).

RESULTS

Of these 523 eligible patients, there were 187 (35.8%) and 336 (64.2%) patients in the surgical and nonsurgical groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical resection was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.88, p = 0.0068) and CSS (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33 - 0.77, p = 0.0016). After PSM, it was found that surgical resection still showed significantly improved OS (5-year 54.9% vs 38.8%, p = 0.028) and CSS (5-year 65.8% vs 50.3%, p = 0.077). In addition, the C-indexes of the nomograms for OS and CSS prediction were 0.692 and 0.705, respectively, and the nomograms showed good consistency.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that surgical resection has a favorable impact on the long-term outcome of patients with synchronous GIST liver metastases, and the nomograms showed remarkable prediction performance for OS and CSS.

Patient-Derived Organoid Facilitating Personalized Medicine in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Liver Metastasis: A Case Report

The gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are a rare gastrointestinal tract malignancy. The two primary mutation sites are found in KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFR-α) genes. The current study reports on a point mutation within the exon 11 of KIT, named KIT p.V560E. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are potential 3D in vitro models of tissues that can be used to identify sensitivity toward specific targets in patients with tumors and allow for personalized medicine when drugs specific for newly identified genetic locus mutations are not yet available. This study describes a 68-year-old patient who complained of diffused abdominal pain and intermittent melena lasting more than 10 days. He has no other gastrointestinal abnormalities, prior abdominal surgery, or related family history. Surgery was conducted first to remove the lesions and ascertain the disease through histology and immunohistochemical stains of the mass. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the tumor was positive for CD117 and Dog-1. Based on the above findings, he was diagnosed with GISTs. Gene detection analysis and organoid culture were then performed to verify clinical decisions. KIT p.V560E and the reduced number of RB1 copies were identified as two obvious mutations, so the patient was administrated first-line treatment of imatinib 400 mg/d. However, progressive disease prompted us to switch to sunitinib, and his condition gradually improved. Meanwhile, organoid culture showed sensitivity to sunitinib and tolerance to imatinib with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 0.89 and >20, respectively. In summary, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the established organoid culture indicated that the GISTs organoid could identify the sensitivity to target therapies and facilitate individual-based treatment.

Role of Surgery in the Management of Liver Metastases From Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Background

The clinical benefit of hepatectomy in patients with liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has not been well defined in this era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Our study aims to demonstrate the survival advantage of adding hepatectomy in patients with GIST liver metastases.

Methods

Information on patients with metastatic GIST treated or consulted between January 2006 and December 2018 was retrieved. Patients without extrahepatic metastases were included and classified into the surgical (S group) and non-surgical (NS group). Clinicopathological features were compared and their association with survival was assessed.

Results

A total of 119 patients were included in this retrospective analysis, 62 in the S group and 59 in the NS group. Comparison of clinicopathological features showed that a markedly higher proportion of patients in the S group had ≤3 hepatic lesions (79.0% vs. 29.8%, p<0.001). After a median follow-up duration of 56 months, patients in the S group had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and marginally improved overall survival (OS) than those in the NS group (3y PFS:86.2% vs. 64.6%, p=0.002; 5y OS: 91.5% vs. 78.3%, p=0.083). After propensity score matching, multivariate analysis identified hepatectomy as the only significant prognostic factor for PFS while age, hepatectomy and max tumor diameter were significant predictor for OS.

Conclusions

Addition of hepatectomy provided longer disease control in patients with metastatic GIST confined to the liver. Upfront hepatectomy followed by imatinib therapy is worthwhile trying in patients with single and easily removable lesions.

Hepatic metastases in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: oncologic outcomes with curative-intent hepatectomy, resection of treatment-resistant disease, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection for metastatic GIST (mGIST) is often performed with either curative-intent or for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant lesions. The efficacy of hepatectomy for treatment-resistant lesions (TRL) is uncertain.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with liver-mGIST treated from 2003 to 2018. Oncologic outcomes including overall (OS), post-operative progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

We identified n = 91 patients; 31 (34%) underwent curative-intent hepatectomy, 60 (66%) were initially managed with TKI alone, and 17 (19%) had resection of a TRL. The median follow-up for resected patients was 102 months (range 5-209 months) with 23 (25%) managed with a major hepatectomy. Patients having curative-intent hepatectomy had 72% 10-year OS following diagnosis of liver-mGIST, compared with 58% (P = 0.50) for TRL resection and 41% (P = 0.01) for non-resected patients. Curative-intent hepatectomy (HR 0.39, P = 0.03) and age (HR 1.04, P = 0.004) were independently associated with 10-year OS, but not TRL resection. TRL resection was not associated with improved post-progression OS compared to second-line TKI therapy (HR 0.61, P = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative-intent hepatectomy is associated with improved OS in liver-mGIST. The oncologic benefit of resecting treatment-resistant liver-mGIST compared to second-line TKI therapy alone remains unclear in the era of multi-line TKI therapy.

Combined model based on enhanced CT texture features in liver metastasis prediction of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE

To investigate the use of the combined model based on clinical and enhanced CT texture features for predicting the liver metastasis of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted including 204 patients with pathologically confirmed high-risk GISTs from the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to June 2021, and 76 cases of them were diagnosed with simultaneous liver metastasis. We randomly divided the cohort into a training cohort (n = 142) and a validation cohort (n = 62) with a ratio of 7:3. All volumes of interest (VOIs) of the high-risk GISTs were manually segmented on the portal venous phase CT images using the ITK-SNAP software. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) algorithm was performed to determine the most valuable features from a total of 110 texture features extracted by the A-K software to reflect the texture information of the given VOIs. Texture-based predictive model was built from the selected texture features. Independent clinical risk factors were identified through univariate logistic analysis. Then, the texture-based model incorporated the clinical predictors to develop a combined model by multivariate logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were utilized to analyze the discrimination capacity and clinical application value of the predictive models.

RESULTS

The nine optimal texture features were remained after the reduction of dimension using Lasso method. Another four clinical parameters (BMI, location, gastrointestinal bleeding, and CA125 level) were included in the clinical-based predictive model. Finally, with the combination of remaining texture and clinical features, a multivariate logistic regression classifier was built to predict the liver metastasis potential of high-risk GISTs. The remarkable classification performance of the combined model for the prediction of liver metastasis in the subjects with high-risk GISTs was obtained with area under curve (AUC) = 0.919, sensitivity = 83.9%, specificity = 89.7%, and accuracy = 84.9% in our validation group.

CONCLUSION

The texture-based radiomic signature derived from the portal venous phase CT images could predict liver metastasis of high-risk GISTs in a non-invasive way. Integrating additional clinical variables into the model further leads to an improvement of liver metastasis risk prediction.

Interventionelle und chirurgische Therapie non-kolorektaler Lebermetastasen

In der Vergangenheit wurden Resektionen oder Transplantationen wegen non-kolorektaler Lebermetastasen durch die Abwägung von geringem Überlebensvorteil und Komplikationsrate eher zurückhaltend indiziert. Mittlerweile zählt die Leberchirurgie jedoch zu den komplikationsarmen Standardverfahren in der Tumortherapie, die unter Einbettung in multimodale Therapiekonzepte zu einer deutlichen Steigerung des Patientenüberlebens führen.

Recurrence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor 12 years after repeat hepatectomies for liver metastases: report of a case

No consensus has been reached on the postoperative treatment and follow-up duration for high-risk malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We herein report a case of recurrent liver metastasis from gastric GIST in a patient who had been receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate for 10 years. A 78-year-old woman underwent local gastrectomy for a 20-cm gastric GIST with a mitotic index of 25/50 high-power fields (HPF) 17 years before. Partial hepatectomy for recurrent liver metastases was repeatedly performed 14 and 12 years before. After the second hepatectomy, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate was given for 10 years, during which no recurrence was observed. Two years after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, computed tomography revealed a 2-cm hepatic tumor; thus, laparoscopic partial hepatectomy was performed. Histopathological findings revealed a liver metastasis of gastric GIST with a mitotic count of 20/50 HPF and MIB-1 labeling index of 20%. Mutation analysis of the KIT gene revealed an exon 11 mutation. The patient is currently undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate. The combination of surgery and long-term adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk malignant GIST and liver metastases may be effective to achieve a good prognosis.

Liver metastases

Liver metastases are commonly detected in a range of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer, melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer, although CRC is the most common primary cancer that metastasizes to the liver. Interactions between tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment play an important part in the engraftment, survival and progression of the metastases. Various cells including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, dendritic cells, resident natural killer cells as well as other immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils are implicated in promoting and sustaining metastases in the liver. Four key phases (microvascular, pre-angiogenic, angiogenic and growth phases) have been identified in the process of liver metastasis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, CT, MRI and PET scans are typically used for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the main potentially curative treatment among patients with resectable liver metastases. The role of liver transplantation in the management of liver metastasis remains controversial. Systemic therapies, newer biologic agents (for example, bevacizumab and cetuximab) and immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized the treatment options for liver metastases. Moving forward, incorporation of genetic tests can provide more accurate information to guide clinical decision-making and predict prognosis among patients with liver metastases.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors.

METHODS

Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.

Resection Combined with TKI Therapy for Resectable Liver Metastases of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Results from Three National Centres in China

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences in the efficacy of hepatic resection combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI therapy alone and the timing of the TKI therapy and hepatic resection for resectable liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 43 patients confirmed to have resectable liver metastases from GISTs who received TKI treatment alone or the therapy model of hepatic resection combined with TKIs and were admitted to one of 3 institutions between January 2006 and December 2017.

RESULTS

For all liver metastases patients, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 97.67%, 88.98% and 66.46%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 85 months. Patients who underwent hepatic resection combined with TKI therapy had a significantly better OS and a trend towards improved progression-free survival (PFS) than patients who received TKIs alone (P = 0.001, mOS 102 months versus 51 months; P = 0.077, mPFS 42 months versus 30 months). Hepatic resection combined with TKI therapy was the only prognostic factor for long-term survival in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.198, 95% CI 0.048-0.813, P = 0.025). Compared with patients who underwent hepatic resection combined with postoperative TKIs only, patients who underwent hepatic resection combined with perioperative TKIs had a significantly better PFS (P = 0.032, mPFS 29 months versus 19 months) but did not have a significantly better OS (P = 0.662, mOS 92 months versus 102 months). Resection combined with perioperative TKI therapy was the only prognostic factor for PFS in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.295, 95% CI 0.101-0.862, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with resectable liver metastases, hepatic resection combined with TKI therapy was more beneficial in terms of improving prognosis than TKIs alone. In terms of the timing of TKI therapy and hepatic resection, resection combined with perioperative TKIs may prolong PFS more than resection combined with postoperative TKIs only.

Preoperative imatinib treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A single-center analysis

The advent of imatinib mesylate (IM) has dramatically revolutionized the prognosis of advanced and metastatic/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The objective of this retrospective study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of combination of surgery following IM treatment in the management of advanced and metastatic/recurrent GISTs. We further explore the long-term clinical outcomes in these who underwent therapy of preoperative IM.Eligible patients with GISTs before the onset of the IM therapy and were periodically followed up in the outpatient clinic were included in this study. Detailed clinical and pathologic characteristics were obtained from the medical records of our institution. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to use for the evaluation of potential prognostic factors.A total of 51 patients were included in the study, of these patients, 36 patients underwent surgery and median duration of preoperative IM is 8.2months (range 3.5-85 months). Significant median tumor shrinkage rate was 29.27% (95% confidence interval 21.00%-34.00%) observed in these patients who responded to IM, and partial response and stable disease were achieved in 24 patients (47.06%) and 23 patients (45.10%), respectively, in light of the RECIST guideline (version 1.1). After the median follow-up of 43.70 months (range 14.2-131.1 months), 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) were estimated to be 96.1% and 94.0%, respectively, and there was a significant improvement in OS for patients who received surgical intervention versus those who did not.Our study consolidates that patients were received preoperative IM therapy could shrink the size of tumors and facilitate organ-function preservation. The long-term analysis on this study supports that surgical intervention following IM therapy benefits for patients with primary advanced and recurrent or metastatic GISTs on long-term prognosis.

Predictive model for survival after liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases in the modern era: a Japanese multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Survival benefit of liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases (NCRLM) remains to be defined.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis included consecutive patients with NCRLM whose primary tumor and all metastases were treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2013. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival. Clinicopathological factors that affected prognoses were identified using multivariate Cox regression analyses and were included in a predictive model.

RESULTS

Data for 205 patients were analyzed. The three most common primary tumor sites were stomach (39%), pancreas (13%), and urinary tract (10%), with adenocarcinomas the main pathology (52%). R0 resection was achieved in 85%, and the overall survival at 5 years was 41%. In the multivariate analysis, synchronous liver metastases, R1/2 resection, and adenocarcinomas and other carcinomas (with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, neuroendocrine tumors G1/G2, and sarcomas set as the reference group) were independent negative indicators of overall survival. A predictive model effectively stratified the NCRLM patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with overall 5-year survival rates of 63%, 38%, and 21%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent curative resection for metachronous disease and favorable tumor pathology are expected to have better survival in the NCRLM cohort.

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging Reveals Mutation Status-independent Lack of Imatinib in Liver Metastases of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is an enabling technology for label-free drug disposition studies at high spatial resolution in life science- and pharmaceutical research. We present the first extensive clinical matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (qMSI) study of drug uptake and distribution in clinical specimen, analyzing 56 specimens of tumor and corresponding non-tumor tissues from 27 imatinib-treated patients with the biopsy-proven rare disease gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). For validation, we compared MALDI-TOF-qMSI with conventional UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS-based quantification from tissue extracts and with ultra-high resolution MALDI-FTICR-qMSI. We introduced a novel generalized nonlinear calibration model of drug quantities based on computational evaluation of drug-containing areas that enabled better data fitting and assessment of the inherent method nonlinearities. Imatinib tissue spatial maps revealed striking inefficiency in drug penetration into GIST liver metastases even though the corresponding healthy liver tissues in the vicinity showed abundant imatinib levels beyond the limit of quantification (LOQ), thus providing evidence for secondary drug resistance independent of mutation status. Taken together, these findings underscore the important application of MALDI-qMSI in studying the spatial distribution of molecularly targeted therapeutics in oncology, namely to serve as orthogonal post-surgical approach to evaluate the contribution of anticancer drug disposition to resistance against treatment.

Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable liver metastases of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Results from three national centres in China

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes after curative intent radiofrequency ablation and resection in patients with resectable liver metastases of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) after pre-operative tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from 25 patients diagnosed with resectable liver metastases from GISTs who received pre-operative TKI treatment, who received radiofrequency ablation or resection and post-operative TKI treatment, and who were admitted to 3 institutions from January 2009 to December 2017.

RESULTS

Ten patients (10/25, 40.00%) underwent RFA combined with post-operative TKI treatment, and 15 (15/25, 60.00%) patients were treated with hepatic resection combined with post-operative TKI treatment. There were fewer post-operative complications (10.00% vs. 53.33%, P = 0.04) and shorter length of stay (4 vs. 9 days, P = 0.00) in the RFA group. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 100.00%, 75.00%, 55.00%, respectively. The RFA group had a lower median PFS (P = 0.007, mPFS: 9 months versus 29 months), but overall survival was not influenced by the treatment modality compared with the resection group (P = 0.413, mOS: 47 months versus not reached).Hepatic resection combined with post-operative TKI treatment was the only prognostic factor for PFS in univariate analysis (HR = 0.071, 95% CI: 0.007-0.759, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with resectable liver metastases from GISTs after receiving pre-operative TKI treatment, compared with resection, ablation seemed to be associated with shorter progression-free survival, but RFA offered comparable overall survival, and the post- procedure morbidity and lengths of stay were significantly lower. With complete ablation of the targeted tumours, our results suggest that RFA is an acceptable option in selected patients.

Liver surgery prolongs the survival of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor liver metastasis: a retrospective study from a single center

Objectives

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) liver metastasis (GLM) is a special subset of advanced GIST, because its lesions are easier to define and assess. We aim to determine the role of liver metastasectomy for patients with GLM in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.

Methods

We reviewed patients with metastatic GIST who received surgery or other treatments in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 1991 and December 2017. Patients with metastases confined to the liver and with no previous metastasis to other locations were included into the study and were classified into surgical and non-surgical groups. All patients received 400 mg/d imatinib after the operation. We compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups.

Results

A total of 102 patients were included into the study. Of them, 21 (20.1%) underwent surgery for liver metastases and 81 (79.9%) received TKI therapy alone. During the operation, six patients received radiofrequency ablation for suspicious or unresectable lesions. Three-year PFS rate was 77.5% in the surgical group and 65.5% in the non-surgical group (P=0.027); 5-year OS rate was 85.7% and 59.6%, respectively (P=0.008). About 22.1% of patients had metastases of less than three in the surgical group, while the rate was 42.9% in the non-surgical group (P=0.011). Patients with metastases of less than three had longer PFS than those with three or more, with a 3-year PFS rate of 72.8% and 65.8%, respectively (P=0.019). But their difference in 5-year OS rate was not significant (91.7% vs 55.3%, P=0.08).

Conclusion

Followed by continuous TKI therapy, R0 surgery significantly prolongs the survival of patients with GLM, regardless of the extent of disease or the phase of metastasis.

Surgical and medical management of small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A report of the Dutch GIST registry

BACKGROUND

A cohort of 201 patients with small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated between January 1st, 2009 and December 31st, 2016 in five GIST expertise centers in the Netherlands was analyzed. Goal of this study was to describe the clinical, surgical and pathological characteristics of this rare subpopulation of GIST patients, registered in the Dutch GIST registry.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes and risk factors of patients with small bowel GIST who underwent surgery or treated with systemic therapy were analyzed. A classification was made based on disease status at diagnosis (localized vs. metastasized).

RESULTS

201 patients with small bowel GIST were registered of which 138 patients (69%) were diagnosed with localized disease and 63 patients (31%) with metastatic disease. Approximately 19% of the patients had emergency surgery, and in 22% GIST was an accidental finding. In patients with high risk localized disease, recurrence occurred less often in patients who received adjuvant treatment (4/32) compared to patients who did not (20/31, p < 0.01). Disease progression during palliative imatinib treatment occurred in 23 patients (28%) after a median of 20.7 (range 1.8-47.1) months. Ongoing response was established in 52/82 patients on first line palliative treatment with imatinib after a median treatment time of 30.6 (range 2.5-155.3) months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with small-bowel GIST more frequently present with metastatic disease when compared to patients with gastric GIST in literature. We advocate for Prospective registration of these patients and investigate the use of surgery in patients with limited metastatic disease.

Liver resection for non-colorectal metastases

Whereas liver resection for colorectal metastasis has become standard of care, hepatectomy in patients with non-colorectal metastases remains controversial, mainly due to a heterogeneous tumor biology and missing data from prospective trials. This review aims at giving an overview about the indications and limits of liver surgery in patients with an advanced disease of a non-colorectal malignancy. Even though prospective trials are largely missing, results from retrospective studies indicate a survival benefit for liver resection in selected patients. Thus, in metastasized patients, treatment strategies should be developed in a multidisciplinary tumor board including an experienced liver surgeon.

Incidence and predictors of synchronous liver metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most common metastatic site in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence and predictive factors associated with synchronous liver metastases among patients with GISTs.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 2757 patients were identified, of which 276 (10%) had synchronous liver metastases. The two-year survival of patients with synchronous liver metastases was 31.9% overall and 37.1% after undergoing surgery with curative intent. Primary tumor size >5 cm (5-10 cm: OR 2.97, 95% CI: 1.03-8.55, p = 0.044, >10 cm: OR 5.59, 95% CI: 1.95-16.07, p = 0.001), presence of nodal metastases (OR 4.09, 95% CI: 2.01-8.33, p < 0.001) and mitotic count >5/50 HPF (OR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.01-2.47, p = 0.044) were associated with the presence of liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of ten patients with GISTs presents with hepatic metastases. Primary tumor size >5 cm, presence of nodal metastases and mitotic count >5/50 HPF are associated with a higher risk of synchronous hepatic metastases.

Nationwide trends in the incidence and outcome of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the imatinib era

Background

The incidence, treatment and outcome of patients with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) were studied in an era known for advances in diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

Nationwide population‐based data were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All patients with GIST diagnosed between 2001 and 2012 were included. Primary treatment, defined as any treatment within the first 6–9 months after diagnosis, was studied. Age‐standardized incidence was calculated according to the European standard population. Changes in incidence were evaluated by calculating the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Relative survival was used for survival calculations with follow‐up available to January 2017.

Results

A total of 1749 patients (54·0 per cent male and median age 66 years) were diagnosed with a GIST. The incidence of non‐metastatic GIST increased from 3·1 per million person‐years in 2001 to 7·0 per million person‐years in 2012; the EAPC was 7·1 (95 per cent c.i. 4·1 to 10·2) per cent (P < 0·001). The incidence of primary metastatic GIST was 1·3 per million person‐years, in both 2001 and 2012. The 5‐year relative survival rate increased from 71·0 per cent in 2001–2004 to 81·4 per cent in 2009–2012. Women had a better outcome than men. Overall, patients with primary metastatic GIST had a 5‐year relative survival rate of 48·2 (95 per cent c.i. 42·0 to 54·2) per cent compared with 88·8 (86·0 to 91·4) per cent in those with non‐metastatic GIST.

Conclusion

This population‐based nationwide study found an incidence of GIST in the Netherlands of approximately 8 per million person‐years. One in five patients presented with metastatic disease, but relative survival improved significantly over time for all patients with GIST in the imatinib era.

Surgery improves survival

Incidence and origin of histologically confirmed liver metastases: an explorative case-study of 23,154 patients

Background

The liver is a common metastatic site for a large variety of primary tumors. For both patients with known and unknown primary tumors it is important to understand metastatic patterns to provide tailored therapies.

Objective

To perform a nationwide exploration of the origins of histological confirmed liver metastases.

Results

A total of 23,154 patients were identified. The majority of liver metastases were carcinomas (n=21,400; 92%) of which adenocarcinoma was the most frequent subtype (n=17,349; 75%). Most common primary tumors in patients with adenocarcinoma were from colorectal (n=8,004), pancreatic (n=1,755) or breast origin (n=1,415). In women of 50 years and younger, metastatic adenocarcinoma originated more frequently from breast cancer, while in women older than 70 years liver metastases originated more frequently from gastrointestinal tumors. Liver metastases in men older than 70 years originated often from squamous cell lung carcinoma. An unknown primary tumor was detected in 4,209 (18%) patients, although tumor type could be determined in 3,855 (92%) of them.

Methods

Data were collected using the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). All histological confirmed liver metastases between January 2001 and December 2010 were evaluated for tumor type, origin of the primary tumor and were correlated with patient characteristics (age, gender).

Conclusion

The current study provides an overview of the origins of liver metastases in a series of 23,154 patients.

Management of liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors: where do we stand?

The recommended management of liver metastases (LM) from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) disease consists of perioperative administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and surgical resection. The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy of this therapeutic approach. Studies reporting outcomes for patients underwent liver resection from metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were overviewed. Eleven studies were included, which enrolled 240 patients with liver metastasis from GISTs. A median overall survival (OS) interval of 41.8 months was calculated while a median disease free interval of 17.9 [17-43] months following resection was also measured. Recurrences were recorded in 63 patients. Prognostic factors identified by the studies included surgical resection, R0 resection, age <55 years, clinical response to TKIs, pre- and postoperative administration of TKIs. The included studies highlight the importance of complete resection and the timing of resection, as well underline the importance of pre- and post-operative administration of TKIs.

Role of surgical resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases

It is widely accepted that the indications for hepatectomy in colorectal cancer liver metastases and liver metastases of neuro-endocrine tumors result in relatively better prognoses, whereas, the indications and prognoses of hepatectomy for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM) remain controversial owing to the limited number of cases and the heterogeneity of the primary diseases. There have been many publications on NCNNLM; however, its background heterogeneity makes it difficult to reach a specific conclusion. This heterogeneous disease group should be discussed in the order from its general to specific aspect. The present review paper describes the general prognosis and risk factors associated with NCNNLM while specifically focusing on the liver metastases of each primary disease. A multidisciplinary approach that takes into consideration appropriate timing for hepatectomy combined with chemotherapy may prolong survival and/or contribute to the improvement of the quality of life while giving respite from systemic chemotherapy.