Independence and health related quality of life in 200 onco-geriatric surgical patients within 6 months of follow-up: Who is at risk to lose?

Validation of the Self-Reported Edmonton Frail Scale - Acute Care in Patients ≥ 65 Years Undergoing Surgery

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common in geriatric emergency surgery and associated with increased risk for poor postoperative outcomes. Frailty screening is challenging in emergency settings. The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) is a valid tool to screen for patients at high risk for poor postoperative outcomes. Recently, the EFS was modified to decrease dependence on staff to perform physical measures. This modification, the EFS-Acute Care (EFS-AC), has not been validated. We wish to assess the agreement between the EFS and the EFS-AC.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a prospective cohort study from 10/2021 - 10/2022 screening 688 patients ≥ 65 years with both the EFS and EFS-AC preoperatively. We assessed the ability of the EFS-AC to discriminate frailty identified by the EFS and compared the association of both scales with loss of independence (LOI), hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU admissions, and ICU LOS. Receiver Operator Curves were used to estimate the discriminatory thresholds for LOI.

RESULTS

688 patients with a median age 73 (IQR 68, 77) were enrolled. The EFS-AC was able to discriminate individuals' frailty status by the EFS with excellent agreement (AUC 0.971 [0.958, 0.983]). An EFS-AC threshold score of ≥ 6 points lead to 93.60% of individuals being correctly identified (77.87% sensitivity and 97.00% specificity). Both EFS and EFS-AC ≥ 6 were similarly associated with a higher risk for all clinical outcomes assessed and demonstrated similar ability to predict LOI.

CONCLUSIONS

The EFS-AC is a valid preoperative frailty screen, and due to its self-reported nature, can be administered in the acute care setting, during virtual visits, or through digital health apps. Real-time screening can assist with better understanding patient needs and lead to interventions to prevent poor hospital outcomes.

Quantifying Physical Resilience in Ageing Using Measurement Instruments: A Scoping Review

Purpose: The capacity to recover motor function with pathology or age-related decline is termed physical resilience. It is unknown what outcome domains are captured with existing measurement instruments. Thus, this scoping review aimed to identify measurement instruments for physical resilience, identify research gaps, and make recommendations for future research. Methods: Articles were included from the search when their subject matter included the term resilience in relation to the physical health of older adults. Data on physical resilience measurement instruments were extracted using the outcome domains: body function or structure, activity and participation, and societal impact. Results: The majority of the 33 included articles involved older adults with fractures, cardiac conditions, and cancer. Many measurement instruments quantified body function or structure, and some instruments captured activity and participation, and societal impact of physical resilience. Measurement instruments were pooled into 4 categories: psychological, physiological, motor function, and psychosocial scales. No studies combined all areas of measurement. Conclusions: A potential gap of a measurement instrument capturing social aspects of physical resilience was identified. Comprehensive measurement could identify which outcome domains could be targeted to foster resilience. This knowledge might be useful across many health disciplines and contribute to therapeutic decision-making and rehabilitation strategies.

Implicações da avaliação geriátrica ampla na qualidade de vida em pessoas idosas com câncer: uma revisão integrativa

Resumo A avaliação geriátrica ampla (AGA) melhora a qualidade do cuidado das pessoas idosas com câncer, pois permite a identificação de problemas geriátricos e fragilidades que tenham implicações na saúde do indivíduo. Apesar dos benefícios da AGA, dificuldades relacionadas ao tempo e gastos com essa ferramenta limitam sua implantação na prática. O objetivo desta revisão é avaliar a relação entre a AGA e a qualidade de vida (QV) de pessoas idosas com câncer, através de uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Foi realizada uma busca por artigos nas bases de dados PubMed, MEDLINE, IBECS e LILACS, publicados entre 2015 e 2020, que abordassem as implicações da AGA na QV de pessoas idosas com câncer e, dos 298 estudos encontrados, 21 foram selecionados para análise. Esses demonstraram que a AGA desempenha função importante ao identificar pessoas idosas com maior risco de comprometimento da QV durante a evolução da neoplasia e do tratamento oncológico, bem como ao orientar a indicação de intervenções geriátricas específicas que previnam a deterioração da QV. Assim, a presente revisão destaca a importância da avaliação integral das pessoas idosas com câncer que, através de diferentes âmbitos, sejam prognósticos ou intervencionistas, desenvolve um papel fundamental na preservação da QV dessa população. Compreende-se a necessidade de desenvolver estratégias para incorporação da AGA no cuidado das pessoas idosas com câncer.

Nutritional status according to the mini nutritional assessment (MNA)® as potential prognostic factor for health and treatment outcomes in patients with cancer - a systematic review

Background

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of malnutrition which is associated with poor outcome. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA®) is often used in older patients with cancer but its relation to outcome is not known.

Methods

Four databases were systematically searched for studies relating MNA-results with any reported outcome. Two reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full-texts, extracted data and rated the risk of bias (RoB) independently.

Results

We included 56 studies which varied widely in patient and study characteristics. In multivariable analyses, (risk of) malnutrition assessed by MNA significantly predicts a higher chance for mortality/poor overall survival (22/27 studies), shorter progression-free survival/time to progression (3/5 studies), treatment maintenance (5/8 studies) and (health-related) quality of life (2/2 studies), but not treatment toxicity/complications (1/7 studies) or functional status/decline in (1/3 studies). For other outcomes – length of hospital stay (2 studies), falls, fatigue and unplanned (hospital) admissions (1 study each) – no adjusted results were reported. RoB was rated as moderate to high.

Conclusions

MNA®-result predicts mortality/survival, cancer progression, treatment maintenance and (health-related) quality of life and did not predict adverse treatment outcomes and functional status/ decline in patients with cancer. For other outcomes results are less clear. The moderate to high RoB calls for studies with better control of potential confounders.

Long-Term Survival and Risk of Institutionalization in Onco-Geriatric Surgical Patients: Long-Term Results of the PREOP Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate long-term survival and institutionalization in onco-geriatric surgical patients, and to analyze the association between these outcomes and a preoperative risk score.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.

SETTING

International and multicenter locations.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 70 years or older undergoing elective surgery for a malignant solid tumor at five centers (n = 229).

MEASUREMENTS

We assessed long-term survival and institutionalization using the Preoperative Risk Estimation for Onco-geriatric Patients (PREOP) score, developed to predict the 30-day risk of major complications. The PREOP score collected data about sex, type of surgery, and the American Society for Anesthesiologists classification, as well as the Timed Up & Go test and the Nutritional Risk Screening results. An overall score higher than 8 was considered abnormal.

RESULTS

We included 149 women and 80 men (median age = 76 y; interquartile range = 8). Survival at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively was 84%, 77%, and 56%, respectively. Moreover, survival at 1 year was worse for patients with a PREOP risk score higher than 8 (70%) compared with 8 or lower (91%). Of those alive at 1 year, 43 (26%) were institutionalized, and by 2 years, almost half of the entire cohort (46%) were institutionalized or had died. A PREOP risk score higher than 8 was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-4.0), irrespective of stage and age, but not with being institutionalized (odds ratios = 1 y, 1.6 [95% CI = .7-3.8]; 2 y, 2.2 [95% CI = .9-5.5]).

CONCLUSION

A high PREOP score is associated with mortality but not with remaining independent. Despite acceptable survival rates, physical function may deteriorate after surgery. It is imperative to discuss treatment goals and expectations preoperatively to determine if they are feasible. Using the PREOP risk score can provide an objective measure on which to base decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1235-1241, 2020.

Predictive value of each geriatric assessment domain for older patients with cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

A geriatric assessment (GA) is increasingly used to help guide treatment decisions in older patients with cancer. However, there is no consensus regarding which domains should be included in the GA. In addition, the field of geriatric oncology moves very fast and as a result many new studies have been published since the last review in 2015. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to evaluate which domains of the GA could predict patient-related treatment outcomes of older patients with cancer and thereby should be included in a GA.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for publications in English or Dutch between September 2006 and July 2017 addressing the association between individual domains of the GA and mortality, postoperative complications, or systemic treatment-related outcomes in older patients with cancer.

RESULTS

Eight different domains were evaluated in 46 publications, namely functional status, nutritional status, cognition, mood, physical function, fatigue, social support, and falls. All eight domains were predictive for at least one of the investigated outcomes but the results were quite variable across studies. Physical function and nutritional status were the domains most often associated with mortality and systemic treatment-related outcomes, and the domain physical function was most often associated with postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this review demonstrates that the GA should minimally consist of physical function and nutritional status, when the aim is to predict patients-related outcomes of older patients with cancer, although the results are quite heterogeneous. For the other domains, the findings are too inconsistent to draw conclusions about their overall predictive ability.

Regeneration of older patients after oncologic surgery. A temporal trajectory of geriatric assessment and quality of life parameters

AIMS

The effectiveness of surgery depends on it being carried out safely, which allows patients to return to independent lives. Because gastrointestinal cancers are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older people, we examined the dynamics of recuperation after elective, curative surgery. As disease parameters alone may not suffice to address geriatric patients' issues after onco-surgical interventions, Comprehensive Geriatric and QOL Assessments (CGA/QOL) were performed at four time points to gain information on clinical, functional, and cognitive aspects.

METHODS

CGA/QOL including standard geriatric instruments, socio-demographic, clinical data, and the EORTCQLQ-C30 questionnaire were applied pre-operatively (T1), at discharge (T2), after three (T3), and after six months (T4).

RESULTS

200 patients gave their informed consent, 70 patients declined. At T1 n = 195, at T2 n = 155, at T3 n = 130, and at T4 n = 124 patients were actually assessed. Patients experienced a significant decline in most functional capabilities and increased symptoms at T2. While most parameters re-approached baseline results by T4, sophisticated abilities (instrumental ADL, IADL) remained impaired. Fatigue was the most prominent symptom that persisted in many at T4. Risk for malnutrition as well as BMI significantly decreased during regeneration. Global QOL correlated with parameters of independence (ADL, IADL) and low symptom burden. Role and social functions' correlation with global QOL increased from T1 to T4.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal assessments before and after oncologic surgery highlight changes even after six months in QOL and independence that may be ameliorated by focused supportive care. Trial registry number: DRKS: 00000425.

Factors Influencing Global Health Related Quality of Life in Elderly Cancer Patients: Results of a Secondary Data Analysis

Cancer treatment for elderly patients is often complicated by poor physical condition, impaired functioning and comorbidities. Patient reported health related quality of life (HRQOL) can contribute to decisions about treatment goals and supportive therapy. Knowledge about factors influencing HRQOL is therefore needed for the development of supportive measures and care pathways. An exploratory secondary data analysis on 518 assessments of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the elderly module (EORTC QLQ-ELD14) was performed to identify factors predictive for global HRQOL. Preliminary simple and multivariable regression analyses were conducted resulting in a final model comprising sociodemographic and disease specific variables and scales of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-ELD14. Age, sex and disease related variables explained only part of the variance of global HRQOL (adjusted R2 = 0.203). In the final model (adjusted R2 = 0.504) fatigue, social function, burden of illness and joint stiffness showed possible influence on global HRQOL. Fatigue, social function and burden of illness seem to have the largest impact on global HRQOL of elderly cancer patients. Further prospective studies should examine these domains. Actionable symptoms should be given special attention to initiate targeted supportive measures aiming to maximize HRQOL of older cancer patients.

Frailty and quality of life among older people with and without a cancer diagnosis: Findings from TOPICS-MDS

Background

The number of older cancer patients is rising. Especially in older people, treatment considerations should balance the impact of disease and treatment on quality of life (QOL) and survival. How a cancer diagnosis in older people interacts with concomitant frailty to impact on QOL is largely unknown. We aimed to determine the association between frailty and QOL among community-dwelling older people aged 65 years or above with and without a cancer diagnosis cross-sectionally and at 12 months follow-up.

Methods

Data were derived from the TOPICS-MDS database. Frailty was quantified by a frailty index (FI). QOL was measured with the subjective Cantril’s Self Anchoring Ladder (CSAL, range: 0–10) and the health-related EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D, range:-0.33–1.00) at baseline and after 12 months. To determine associations, linear mixed models were used.

Results

7493 older people (78.6±6.4 years, 58.4% female) were included. Dealing with a cancer diagnosis (n = 751) was associated with worse QOL both at baseline (CSAL:-0.25 (95%-CI:-0.36;-0.14), EQ-5D:-0.03 (95%-CI:-0.05;-0.02)) and at follow-up (CSAL:-0.13 (95%-CI:-0.24;-0.02), EQ-5D:-0.02 (95%-CI:-0.03;-0.00)). A ten percent increase in frailty was also associated with a decrease in QOL at baseline (CSAL:-0.35 (95%-CI:-0.38;-0.32), EQ-5D:-0.12 (95%-CI:-0.12;-0.11)) and follow-up (CSAL:-0.27 (95%-CI:-0.30;-0.24), EQ-5D:-0.07 (95%-CI:-0.07;-0.06)). When mutually adjusting for frailty and a cancer diagnosis, associations between a cancer diagnosis and QOL only remained significant for CSAL at baseline (-0.14 (95%-CI:-0.25;-0.03)), whereas associations between frailty and QOL remained significant for all QOL outcomes at baseline and follow-up. No statistical interactions between cancer and frailty in their combined impact on QOL were found.

Conclusions

Cancer diagnosis and frailty were associated with worse health-related and self-perceived QOL both at baseline and at follow-up. Differences in QOL between older people with and without a cancer diagnosis were explained to a large extent by differences in frailty levels. This stresses the importance to take into account frailty in routine oncologic care.