1
|
Grange R, Rousset P, Williet N, Guesnon M, Milot L, Passot G, Phelip JM, Le Roy B, Glehen O, Kepenekian V. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Combined Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Predictive Factors for Early Recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2378-2390. [PMID: 38170409 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14840-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selection of colorectal cancer patients with concomitant peritoneal (PM) and liver metastases (LM) for radical treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), including liver resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), needs improvement. This retrospective, monocentric study was designed to evaluate the predictive factors for early recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in such patients treated in a referral center. METHODS Consecutive colorectal cancer patients with concomitant LM and PM treated with curative intent with perioperative systemic chemotherapy, simultaneous complete CRS, liver resection, and HIPEC in 2011-2022 were included. Clinical, radiological (before and after preoperative chemotherapy), surgical, and pathological data were investigated, along with long-term oncologic outcomes. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors associated with early recurrence (diagnosed <6 months after surgery), DFS, and OS. RESULTS Of more than 61 patients included, 31 (47.1%) had pT4 and 27 (40.9%) had pN2 primary tumors. Before preoperative chemotherapy, the median number of LM was 2 (1-4). The median surgical PCI (peritoneal carcinomatosis index) was 3 (5-8.5). The median DFS and OS were 8.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-10.1) and 34.1 months (95% CI 28.1-53.5), respectively. In multivariate analysis, pT4 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.14 [1.2-16.78], p = 0.032]) and pN2 (OR = 3.7 [1.08-13.86], p = 0.042) status were independently associated with an early recurrence, whereas retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 39 [8.67-175.44], p < 0.001) was independently associated with poor OS. CONCLUSIONS In colorectal cancer patients with concomitant PM and LM, an advanced primary tumor (pT4 and/or pN2) was associated with a higher risk of early recurrence following a radical multimodal treatment, whereas RLN metastases was strongly detrimental for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémi Grange
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CICLY EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Nicolas Williet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Mathias Guesnon
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Milot
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Vahan Kepenekian
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France.
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang J, Hu Y, Xiong H, Song T, Wang S, Xu H, Xiong B. CT-based deep learning model: a novel approach to the preoperative staging in patients with peritoneal metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 2023; 40:493-504. [PMID: 37798391 PMCID: PMC10618318 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10235-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a frequent manifestation of advanced abdominal malignancies. Accurately assessing the extent of PM before surgery is essential for patients to receive optimal treatment. Therefore, we propose to construct a deep learning (DL) model based on enhanced computed tomography (CT) images to stage PM preoperatively in patients. All 168 patients with PM underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT before either open surgery or laparoscopic exploration, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was used to evaluate patients during the surgical procedure. DL features were extracted from portal venous-phase abdominal CT scans and subjected to feature selection using the Spearman correlation coefficient and LASSO. The performance of models for preoperative staging was assessed in the validation cohort and compared against models based on clinical and radiomics (Rad) signature. The DenseNet121-SVM model demonstrated strong patient discrimination in both the training and validation cohorts, achieving AUC was 0.996 in training and 0.951 validation cohort, which were both higher than those of the Clinic model and Rad model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that patients could potentially benefit more from treatment using the DL-SVM model, and calibration curves demonstrated good agreement with actual outcomes. The DL model based on portal venous-phase abdominal CT accurately predicts the extent of PM in patients before surgery, which can help maximize the benefits of treatment and optimize the patient's treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jipeng Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Yuannan Hu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Hao Xiong
- Department of information Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Tiantian Song
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Shuyi Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| | - Haibo Xu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| | - Bin Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morales-Soriano R, Pineño-Flores C, Morón-Canis JM, Molina-Romero FJ, Rodriguez-Pino JC, Loyola-Miró J, Gonzalez-Argente FX, Palma-Zamora E, Guillot-Morales M, Giménez S, Alvarez-Mon M, Ortega MA, Segura-Sampedro JJ. Simultaneous Surgical Approach with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Patients with Concurrent Peritoneal and Liver Metastases of Colon Cancer Origin. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113860. [PMID: 37298054 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Simultaneous liver resection and peritoneal cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial today. The aim of the study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes and survival of patients with advanced metastatic colon cancer (peritoneal and/or liver metastases). Methods: Retrospective observational study from a prospective maintained data base. Patients who underwent a simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and liver resection plus HIPEC were studied. Postoperative outcomes and overall and disease free survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: From January 2010 to October 2022, 22 patients operated with peritoneal and liver metastasis (LR+) were compared with 87 patients operated with peritoneal metastasis alone (LR-). LR+ group presented higher serious morbidity (36.4 vs. 14.9%; p: 0.034). Postoperative mortality did not reach statistical difference. Median overall and disease free survival was similar. Peritoneal carcinomatosis index was the only predictive factor of survival. Conclusions: Simultaneous peritoneal and liver resection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and hospital stay, but with similar postoperative mortality and OS and disease free survival. These results reflect the evolution of these patients, considered inoperable until recently, and justify the trend to incorporate this surgical strategy within a multimodal therapeutic plan in highly selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Morales-Soriano
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Royal Academy of Medicine of the Balearic Islands, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Cristina Pineño-Flores
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - José Miguel Morón-Canis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Molina-Romero
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Julia Loyola-Miró
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Francisco Xavier Gonzalez-Argente
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Elías Palma-Zamora
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Mónica Guillot-Morales
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Sandra Giménez
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Melchor Alvarez-Mon
- Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (IRYCIS), University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Miguel A Ortega
- Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (IRYCIS), University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Juan José Segura-Sampedro
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Carlo S, Cavallaro G, La Rovere F, Usai V, Siragusa L, Izzo P, Izzo L, Fassari A, Izzo S, Franceschilli M, Rossi P, Dhimolea S, Fiori E, Sibio S. Synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: Is cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with liver resection a feasible option? Front Surg 2022; 9:1006591. [PMID: 36589624 PMCID: PMC9797824 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1006591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally, synchronous liver resection (LR), cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases have been contraindicated. Nowadays, clinical practice has promoted this aggressive treatment in selected cases. This study aimed to review surgical and survival results of an extensive surgical approach including CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and LR. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were matched to find the available literature on this topic. The search period was limited to 10 years (January 2010-January 2021). A threshold of case series of 10 patients or more was applied. Results In the search period, out of 114 studies found about liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer, we found 18 papers matching the inclusion criteria. Higher morbidity and mortality were reported for patients who underwent such an extensive surgical approach when compared with patients who underwent only cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Also, survival rates seem worse in the former than in the latter. Conclusion The role of combined surgical strategy in patients with synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer remains controversial. Survival rates and morbidity and mortality seem not in favor of this option. A more accurate selection of patients and more restrictive surgical indications could perhaps help improve results in this subgroup of patients with limited curative options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Di Carlo
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cavallaro
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca La Rovere
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Usai
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luciano Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Fassari
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marzia Franceschilli
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Piero Rossi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Sirvjo Dhimolea
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Fiori
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Sibio
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy,Correspondence: Simone Sibio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beal EW, Chen JC, Kim A, Johnston FM, Abbott DE, Raoof M, Grotz TE, Fournier K, Dineen S, Veerapong J, Clarke C, Staley C, Patel SH, Lambert L, Cloyd JM. Is CRS-HIPEC Still Indicated in Patients With Extraperitoneal Disease? J Surg Res 2022; 277:269-278. [PMID: 35525209 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with extraperitoneal disease (EPD) is controversial. METHODS Among patients with peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer (AC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent CRS-HIPEC, those with EPD (liver, lung, or retroperitoneal lymph nodes [RP LN]) were retrospectively compared to those without EPD. Overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) analyses were performed before/after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS Among 1341 patients with AC (64%) or CRC (36%) who underwent CRS ± HIPEC, 134 (10%) had EPD whereas 1207 (90%) did not. EPD was located in the lungs (47%), RP LN (28%), liver (18%), or multiple (6%). Patients with EPD experienced worse median OS (34 versus 63 mo; P = 0.002) and RFS (12 versus 19 mo; P < 0.001). On a multivariable analysis, EPD was associated with worse RFS (P = 0.003), but not OS (P = 0.071). After PSM, the association of EPD with OS (P = 0.204) and RFS (P = 0.056) was no longer significant. In the multivariable analysis of the PSM cohort, EPD was not associated with OS (P = 0.157) or RFS (P = 0.110). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this large retrospective multi-institutional study suggest that EPD alone, while a negative prognostic indicator, should not be considered an absolute contraindication to CRS ± HIPEC for otherwise well-selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Further research is needed to delineate whether location of EPD influences OS and RFS following CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza W Beal
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - J C Chen
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Alex Kim
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jula Veerapong
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | | | | | - Laura Lambert
- University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dumont F, Guénolé S, Loaec C, Bourgin C, Raimbourg J, Senellart H, Hiret S, Doucet L, Raoul JL, Thibaudeau E. Survival after cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer patients: Does a history of resected liver metastases worsen the prognosis? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:803-809. [PMID: 34955316 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nowadays, resection of two (liver and peritoneum) concomitant colorectal cancer metastatic sites is no longer contraindicated. However, the oncologic outcomes of resecting peritoneal metastases (PM) occurring more than six months after resection of liver metastases (LM) are unknown. AIM The aim of this study was to compare patients with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without a history of previous liver resection (LR). METHODS Analysis from a prospective database of 74 patients with metachronous PM treated with CRS between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS All patients had PM metachronous to primary, 64 patients underwent CRS alone (CRSa) and 10 CRS more than six months after LR (LR-CRS). There was no statistical difference between the groups for clinical or therapeutic characteristics. There were more signet ring cell/mucinous adenocarcinomas in the CRSa group than in the LR-CRS group (19% vs. 0%, p = 0.049). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 4 and 6 (p = 0.749) in the LR-CRS and CRSa groups, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not statistically different between the two groups with 43.6 and 13 months for the CRSa group and 31.1 months and 9.4 months for LR-CRS. Advanced age was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and high PCI was limit significant. No prognostic factor for DFS was found. CONCLUSIONS LR before CRS has no major prognostic impact. Resection of iterative liver and peritoneum metastases can achieve long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Dumont
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France.
| | - Simon Guénolé
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Cécile Loaec
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Charlotte Bourgin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Judith Raimbourg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Hélène Senellart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Sandrine Hiret
- Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Ludovic Doucet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Jean-Luc Raoul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Emilie Thibaudeau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Polderdijk MCE, Brouwer M, Haverkamp L, Ziesemer KA, Tenhagen M, Boerma D, Kok NFM, Versteeg KS, Sommeijer DW, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. Outcomes of Combined Peritoneal and Local Treatment for Patients with Peritoneal and Limited Liver Metastases of Colorectal Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1952-1962. [PMID: 34686925 PMCID: PMC8810452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10925-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Almost half of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients will experience metastases at some point, and in the majority of cases, multiple organs will be involved. If the peritoneum is involved in addition to the liver, the current guideline-driven treatment options are limited. The reported overall survival ranges from 6 to 13 months for the current standard of care (systemic treatment). This study aimed to evaluate morbidity and clinical long-term outcomes from a combined local treatment of hepatic metastases with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) used to treat peritoneal metastases. Methods A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase.com, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Studies evaluating the clinicopathologic data of patients who had both peritoneal and hepatic metastases treated with CRS-HIPEC were included provided sufficient data on the primary outcomes (overall and disease-free survival) were presented. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Results Patients treated for peritoneal and liver metastases (PMLM group) had a pooled mean survival of 26.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.4–30.4 months), with a 3-year survival rate of 34% (95% CI 26.7–42.0%) and a 5-year survival rate of 25% (95% CI 17.3–33.8%). Surgical complications occurred more frequently for these patients than for those with peritoneal metastasis only (40% vs 22%; p = 0.0014), but the mortality and reoperation rates did not differ significantly. Conclusion This systematic review showed that CRS and HIPEC combined with local treatment of limited liver metastasis for selected patients is feasible, although with increased morbidity and an association with a long-term survival rate of 25%, which is unlikely to be achievable with systemic treatment only.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10925-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot C E Polderdijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max Brouwer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Haverkamp
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark Tenhagen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kathelijn S Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bacalbasa N, Balescu I, Cretoiu D, Halmaciu I, Dimitriu M, Socea B, Diaconu C, Iliescu L, Savu C, Savu C, Filipescu A, Stoica C, Stiru O. Determination of whether HIPEC is beneficial in patients with synchronous peritoneal and liver metastases from colorectal cancer (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021; 22:1267. [PMID: 34594404 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis, as well as the presence of liver metastases from colorectal cancer, has been long considered as the sign of a systemic disease, transforming the patient into a candidate for palliation and best supportive care. However, in recent decades, progress in the field of medical and surgical oncology has allowed scientists worldwide to produce curative therapeutic strategies for these cases such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or extended liver resection. In addition, the association of these two therapies has also been performed with encouraging results. The aim of the current study was to review articles published thus far in regard to the association of these two therapeutic strategies, in order to identify which cases can benefit the most, which is the most efficient agent or combination of agents, and whether these types of therapy should be performed as monotherapy or as a two-stage procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolae Bacalbasa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'I. Cantacuzino' Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Balescu
- Department of Visceral Surgery, 'Ponderas' Academic Hospital, 021188 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dragos Cretoiu
- Department of Cellular, Molecular and Histology Biology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Histology Scientific Researcher, 'Alessandrescu-Rusescu' National Institute of Mother and Child Health, Fetal Medicine Excellence Research Center, 020395 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Halmaciu
- Department of Anatomy, 'George Emil Palade' University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Mihai Dimitriu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Sf. Pantelimon' Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan Socea
- Department of Surgery, 'Sf. Pantelimon' Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Camelia Diaconu
- Department of Internal Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 105402 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laura Iliescu
- Department of Internal Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Internal Medicine, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cornel Savu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, 'Marius Nasta' Institute of Pneumonology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carmen Savu
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru Filipescu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Elias' Emergency Hospital, 125100 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Claudia Stoica
- Department of Visceral Surgery, County Emergency Hospital Ilfov, 022104 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ovidiu Stiru
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 'Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu' Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, 022322 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
García-Fadrique A, Estevan Estevan R, Sabater Ortí L. Quality Standards for Surgery of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:188-202. [PMID: 34435297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standardization of surgical outcomes throughout surgical procedures is mandatory. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) should provide proficient oncological and surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant quality indicators and their quality standard, and to determine their acceptable quality limit. A systematic review on cytoreductive results from 2000 to 2018 was performed focusing on clinical guidelines, consensus conferences, and publications. After the selection of quality indicators, a systematic review of indexed references was performed in order to calculate the quality standard for each indicator. STUDY SELECTION Unicentric/multicentric series, comparative studies, and clinical trials. Studies were to include outcomes after cytoreduction of colorectal origin and series with more than 50 patients. Quality indicators with at least 10 series were mandatory and objective measurements were also mandatory for inclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Quality indicators selected were 1- to 5-year survival, overall disease-free survival, 1- to 5-year disease-free survival, complete surgical resection, duration of surgery, length of stay, overall morbimortality, major morbidity, re-intervention, postoperative hemorrhage, intestinal fistula, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, postoperative medical complications, overall recurrence, and failure to rescue. RESULTS The most relevant quality indicators and critical quality limits were overall disease-free survival and 5-year overall disease-free survival (14 months and <10 months, and 14% and <4%, respectively), completeness of surgical resection (89% and <80%, respectively), overall mortality (3% and >8%, respectively), overall morbidity (47% and >63%, respectively), failure to rescue (12% and <30%, respectively), reintervention (13 and <22%, respectively), anastomotic leakage (6% and <13%, respectively), and overall recurrence (60% and <74%, respectively). CONCLUSION This is the first study to assess quality standards in CRS + HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The current data are of particular relevance for future studies to control the variability of this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luis Sabater Ortí
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Flood MP, Das AA, Soucisse ML, Kong J, Ramsay RG, Michael M, Loveday BPT, Warrier SK, Heriot AG. Synchronous Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver and Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:754-64. [PMID: 33742615 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases have traditionally been contraindicated. More recent clinical practice has begun to promote this aggressive treatment in select patients. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, with and without liver resection, in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to July 2020. STUDY SELECTION Cohort studies comparing outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with and without liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer were reviewed. No randomized controlled trials were available. INTERVENTION Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without synchronous liver resection were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were perioperative mortality and major morbidity. Secondary outcomes included 3- and 5-year overall survival and 1- and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS Fourteen studies fitted the inclusion criteria, with 8 studies included in the meta-analysis. On pooled analysis, there was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. Patients that underwent concomitant liver resection had worse 1- and 3-year disease-free survival and 3- and 5-year overall survival. LIMITATIONS Only a limited number of studies were available, with a moderate degree of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS The addition of synchronous liver resection to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable metastatic colorectal cancer was not associated with increased perioperative major morbidity and mortality in comparison with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone. However, the presence of liver metastases was associated with inferior disease-free and overall survival. These data support the continued practice of liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of select patients with such stage IV disease.
Collapse
|
11
|
Flood MP, Waters PS, Kelly ME, Shields C, Conneely J, Ramsay R, Michael M, Loveday B, Warrier SK, Mulsow J, Heriot AG. Outcomes following synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases: A bi-institutional study. Surg Oncol 2021; 37:101553. [PMID: 33839444 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal liver (CRLM) and peritoneal metastases (CRPM) has traditionally been contraindicated. However, latest practice promotes specialist, multidisciplinary-led consideration for select patients. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of synchronous resection in the management of CRLM and CRPM from two tertiary referral centres. METHOD This bi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study included patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection, CRS and HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020. Patients treated with ablative liver techniques, staged operative approaches and extra abdominal disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with survival and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV). RESULTS Twenty-three patients were included. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 9 (range 0-22). There were two major liver resections and 21 minor resections. CC-0 resections were achieved in all patients. Major morbidity occurred in 7 patients. There were no deaths at 90 days. PCI was independently associated with morbidity (p = 0.04). PCI >10 (p = 0.069), major morbidity (p = 0.083) and presence of KRAS mutation (p = 0.052) approached significance for poor OS. Median follow up was 21 months (4-54 months). Median OS was 37 months, 3-year survival 54%, and median DFS 18 months. CONCLUSION Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with low-volume CRPM and CRLM. Increasing PCI is associated with postoperative major morbidity, and should be considered during operative planning.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhou S, Feng Q, Zhang J, Zhou H, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Zheng Z, Chen H, Wang Z, Liang J, Pei W, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Wang X. High-grade postoperative complications affect survival outcomes of patients with colorectal Cancer peritoneal metastases treated with Cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:41. [PMID: 33413223 PMCID: PMC7791857 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07756-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) arising from colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Methods Patients with PM arising from CRC treated with CRS and HIPEC were systematically reviewed at the China National Cancer Center and Huanxing Cancer Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. High-grade complications that occurred within 30 days were defined as grade 3 to 4 events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models for overall survival were created. Predictors of high-grade postoperative complications were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results In all, 86 consecutive cases were included in this study. Forty-one patients (47.7%) developed postoperative complications, while 22 patients (25.6%) experienced high-grade complications. No mortality occurred during the postoperative period. The median survival of all patients was 25 months, and the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 35.0%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, a high peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score (HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 1.01–1.14; P=0.015) and grade 3–4 postoperative complications (HR, 1.86, 95% CI, 1.22–3.51; P=0.044) correlated with worse overall survival. High estimated blood loss (OR, 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.02; P< 0.001) was identified as an independent risk factor for developing high-grade complications. Conclusion Careful patient selection, high levels of technical skill and improved perioperative management are crucial to ensure patient survival benefits after CRS+HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qiang Feng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Huanxing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, 100122, China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhaoxu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Haipeng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brind'Amour A, Dubé P, Tremblay JF, Soucisse ML, Mack L, Bouchard-Fortier A, McCart JA, Govindarajan A, Bischof D, Haase E, Giacomantonio C, Hebbard P, Younan R, MacNeill A, Boulanger-Gobeil C, Sidéris L. Canadian guidelines on the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e621-e631. [PMID: 33380878 PMCID: PMC7755452 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern management of colorectal cancer (crc) with peritoneal metastasis (pm) is based on a combination of cytoreductive surgery (crs), systemic chemotherapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec). Although the role of hipec has recently been questioned with respect to results from the prodige 7 trial, the role and benefit of a complete crs were confirmed, as observed with a 41-month gain in median survival in that study, and 15% of patients remaining disease-free at 5 years. Still, crc with pm is associated with a poor prognosis, and good patient selection is essential. Many questions about the optimal management approach for such patients remain, but all patients with pm from crc should be referred to, or discussed with, a pm surgical oncologist, because cure is possible. The objective of the present guideline is to offer a practical approach to the management of pm from crc and to reflect on the new practice standards set by recent publications on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Brind'Amour
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, chu de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City
| | - P Dubé
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - J F Tremblay
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - M L Soucisse
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - L Mack
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - J A McCart
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - A Govindarajan
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - D Bischof
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - E Haase
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | | | - P Hebbard
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - R Younan
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - A MacNeill
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | | - L Sidéris
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lo Dico R, Faron M, Yonemura Y, Glehen O, Pocard M, Sardi A, Hübner M, Baratti D, Liberale G, Kartheuser A, de Hingh I, Sugarbaker P, Ceelen W, Moran B, Robella M, Quenet F, Sideris L, Goere D, Limbert M, Sammartino P, Morris D; PSOGI Working Group, BIG RENAPE Working Group. Combined liver resection and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of a worldwide analysis of 565 patients from the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:89-100. [PMID: 32943276 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
|
15
|
Zou Y, Chen X, Zhang X, Shen Z, Cai J, Tan Y, Weng J, Rong Y, Lin X. Clinical outcomes of curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases combined with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 37:944-954. [PMID: 32787474 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1803424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and liver metastases (LM) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM who had undergone curative surgery, including resections at both metastatic sites and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies. Studies focusing on the clinical effects of curative surgery and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM were included. Meta-analysis results were recorded as hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences. RESULTS We included 9 of 998 identified studies in the meta-analysis, involving 746 patients (221 patients with PC + LM, 525 patients with PC). Overall survival (pooled HR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.13, p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (pooled HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.51-2.20, p < 0.01) were both lower in patients with PC + LM. A higher recurrence rate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, p = 0.02) and major postoperative morbidity (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19-1.82, p < 0.01) were also observed in patients with PC + LM. CONCLUSION Liver resection in combination with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases may be associated with worse survival and higher morbidity compared with patients with isolated PC. More restricted patient inclusion criteria should be established to facilitate an optimal prognosis for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifeng Zou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinzhi Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhihong Shen
- Department of General surgery, Jieyang City Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jieyang, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiawei Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yingxin Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - JingRong Weng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuming Rong
- Department of VIP Region, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xutao Lin
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Imaizumi K, Nishizawa Y, Ikeda K, Tsukada Y, Sasaki T, Ito M. Prognostic Impact of Curative Resection for Peritoneal Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2487-2497. [PMID: 32052301 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08242-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal recurrence (PR) of colorectal cancer is a poor prognostic factor but may be treatable by curative resection. We investigated the efficacy of this treatment and identified risk factors for postoperative recurrence. METHODS The subjects were patients who underwent radical surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2006 and March 2014. Those with PR were retrospectively reviewed. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and risk factors for postoperative recurrence were identified. RESULTS Among 2256 patients, 66 had PR (2.9%). Surgical resection of PR was performed in 41 patients. Curative resection was achieved macroscopically in 38 cases without diffuse metastases in the peritoneum distant from the primary tumor and with a peritoneal cancer index < 10. In multivariate analysis, curative resection was a significant prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) 0.198] for better 5-year OS compared with cases without curative resection (68.7% vs. 6.3%, P < 0.001). In 28 cases with concurrent metastasis, curative resection significantly improved 5-year OS compared with no curative resection (78.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.008). In the 38 patients with curative resection, the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 21.4%. In multivariate analysis, concurrent metastasis was a significant risk factor [HR 3.394] for postoperative recurrence, and cases with concurrent metastasis more frequently had recurrence within 2 years after curative resection. CONCLUSIONS Curative resection improved the prognosis in patients with limited and resectable PR of colorectal cancer with or without concurrent metastasis. However, recurrence after curative resection was common and concurrent metastasis was a risk factor for this recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Imaizumi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuji Nishizawa
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Koji Ikeda
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tsukada
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jeon Y, Park EJ, Lim JH, Baik SH. Clinical outcomes of complete cytoreduction with concurrent liver resection followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for synchronous peritoneal and liver metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:214. [PMID: 31829188 PMCID: PMC6907264 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1746-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of concurrent liver resection with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases. Methods Patients with colorectal liver and peritoneal metastasis who underwent complete cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with concurrent liver surgery between September 2014 and July 2018 were included. Perioperative outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival were analyzed retrospectively. Results In total, 22 patients were included. The median peritoneal cancer index was 13 (range, 0–26), and the median number of liver metastases was 3 (range, 1–13). The mean total operative time was 11.4 ± 2.6 h. Minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I–II) were reported in 10 patients (45.5%), and major postoperative complications (grade III–V) were reported in five patients (22.7%), including one mortality patient. The median overall survival since diagnosis with metastasis was 27.4 months. The median overall survival since surgical intervention and the progression-free survival were 16.7 months and 7.1 months, respectively. Conclusions This short-term follow-up study showed that, in an experienced center, combined resection with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases was feasible and safe with acceptable oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngbae Jeon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 20, Eonju-ro 63-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06229, Korea
| | - Eun Jung Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 20, Eonju-ro 63-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06229, Korea
| | - Jin Hong Lim
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Hyuk Baik
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 20, Eonju-ro 63-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06229, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yang SY, Kang JH, Kim HS, Han YD, Min BS, Lee KY. Status of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:1251-1265. [PMID: 31949946 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was previously considered an incurable disease with a poor survival outcome. As our understanding of its biology evolved, the paradigm of the management of PC from colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed, including the combination of macroscopic disease control, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), maximal regional chemotherapy to treat residual microscopic disease, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As with many surgical innovations, CRS with HIPEC has evolved faster than data to support it, leaving many skeptics and critics. This review highlights the recent evidence of current practice and outcome of CRS with HIPEC. Furthermore, it also summarizes the ongoing clinical trials and potential future progress of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yoon Yang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Seung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Dae Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hallam S, Tyler R, Price M, Beggs A, Youssef H. Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BJS Open 2019; 3:585-594. [PMID: 31592510 PMCID: PMC6773657 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 15 per cent of colorectal cancers present with peritoneal metastases (CPM). Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) aims to achieve macroscopic tumour resection combined with HIPEC to destroy microscopic disease. CRS + HIPEC is a major operation with significant morbidity and effects on quality of life (QoL). Improving patient selection is crucial to maximize patient outcomes while minimizing morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for patients with CPM undergoing CRS + HIPEC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases was performed using terms for colorectal cancer, peritoneal metastasis and CRS + HIPEC. Included studies focused on the impact of prognostic factors on overall survival following CRS + HIPEC in patients with CPM. Results Twenty-four studies described 3128 patients. Obstruction or perforation of the primary tumour (hazard ratio (HR) 2·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·5 to 5·65), extent of peritoneal metastasis as described by the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) (per increase of 1 PCI point: HR 1·07, 1·02 to 1·12) and the completeness of cytoreduction (CC score above zero: HR 1·75, 1·18 to 2·59) were associated with reduced overall survival after CRS + HIPEC. Conclusion Primary tumour obstruction or perforation, PCI score and CC score are valuable prognostic factors in the selection of patients with CPM for CRS + HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hallam
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - R Tyler
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - M Price
- Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - A Beggs
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - H Youssef
- Colorectal Surgery, Good Hope Hospital University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pinto A, Hobeika C, Philis A, Kirzin S, Carrère N, Ghouti L. Synchronous liver metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: different strategies for curative treatment? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:477-88. [PMID: 31025165 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01787-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of patients with resectable hepatic metastases (HMs) and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is not currently standardised. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) and hepatic surgery for patients with CRPC with synchronous hepatic metastases (HM), and its impact on survival rates. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed, including patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRPC from 2007 to September 2016 in two groups, with (HM+) and without (HM-) synchronous hepatic metastases. Patients with extra-abdominal metastases were excluded. The hepatic strategy was described. Morbimortality and survival were compared between the two groups. RESULTS One hundred nine patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for CRPC with or without hepatic surgery with curative intent: 33 patients with (HM+) and 76 patients without (HM-) synchronous HM. The median follow-up was 30 months. All patients with HM (HM+) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. 88.1% in the HM- group (p = 0.04) associated with monoclonal antibody in 66.6% of cases in the HM+ group vs. 57% in the HM- group (p = 0.01). In the HM+ group, two steps were implemented to treat peritoneal and hepatic metastases in 15 patients (45%). In this group, planned hepatic resection in two procedures was performed for eight patients, all presenting bilobar HM. Postoperative morbidity did not differ between the two groups. No deaths occurred. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 31 and 65 months (p = 0.188), versus 21 and 24 months (p = 0.119), respectively, in the HM+ versus HM- groups. In multivariate analysis, the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was the only significant prognostic factor whereas synchronous HM was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION Curative surgical treatment for CRPC with synchronous HM seems to be feasible and safe, and could facilitate long survival rates, compared to patients without HM. The hepatic strategy is not standardised. However, a "two-step" surgical strategy could be proposed in order to reduce postoperative morbidity rates.
Collapse
|
21
|
Follette C, Liebscher S, Mouw T, Al-kasspooles M. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) for Colorectal Cancer: Potential for Individualized Care, Review of Current Treatment Trends, Recent Advancements, and a Look into the Future. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 2019; 15:36-44. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-019-00427-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
22
|
Yurttas C, Hoffmann G, Tolios A, Haen SP, Schwab M, Königsrainer I, Königsrainer A, Beckert S, Löffler MW. Systematic Review of Variations in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2018; 7:E567. [PMID: 30572653 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7120567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), combines radical surgery with abdominal heated chemotherapy, constituting a multimodal treatment approach. Since clear standards for HIPEC conduct in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) are lacking, we aimed to provide a comprehensive structured survey. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, with keywords “HIPEC” and “colorectal cancer”, according to established guidelines. Articles were systematically screened, selecting 87 publications complemented by 48 publications identified through extended search for subsequent synthesis and evaluation, extracting inter alia details on used drugs, dosage, temperature, exposure times, and carrier solutions. Results: Compiled publications contained 171 reports on HIPEC conduct foremost with mitomycin C and oxaliplatin, but also other drugs and drug combinations, comprising at least 60 different procedures. We hence provide an overview of interconnections between HIPEC protocols, used drugs and carrier solutions as well as their volumes. In addition, HIPEC temperatures and dosing benchmarks, as well as an estimate of in vivo resulting drug concentrations are demonstrated. Conclusions and implications: Owing to recent developments, HIPEC conduct and practices need to be reassessed. Unfortunately, imprecise and lacking reporting is frequent, which is why minimal information requirements should be established for HIPEC and the introduction of final drug concentrations for comparability reasons seems sensible.
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Cloyd JM, Abdel-Misih S, Hays J, Dillhoff ME, Pawlik TM, Schmidt C. Impact of Synchronous Liver Resection on the Perioperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing CRS-HIPEC. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:1576-84. [PMID: 29713875 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3784-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While liver resection (LR) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are commonly performed for hepatic and peritoneal metastases, respectively, the safety of synchronous LR and CRS-HIPEC has not been established. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) databases from 2005 to 2016 were used to identify patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative outcomes were compared among patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC with and without synchronous LR. RESULTS Among 1168 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC, 100 (8.6%) underwent synchronous LR and 1068 (91.4%) did not. The most common primary diagnosis was unspecified (65.3%) followed by appendix (16.0%) and colorectal (12.5%). Among patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC plus LR, the majority had a partial hepatectomy (96.0%), while a small subset underwent trisegmentectomy (2.0%) or hemihepatectomy (2.0%). Patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC plus LR underwent a greater number of operative procedures (8.3 ± 2.5 vs 6.7 ± 2.5, p < 0.001), had a longer operative time (520.7 ± 155.3 vs 454.6 ± 160.7 min, p = 0.001), had a longer hospital length of stay (16.7 ± 15.6 vs 11.1 ± 11.5 days, p < 0.001), were more likely to require reoperation (13.0 vs 6.9%, p = 0.03), and experienced greater 30-day morbidity (47.0 vs 27.4%, p < 0.001), but not mortality (3.0 vs 1.4%, p = 0.22). On multivariate logistic regression, LR was strongly associated with increased risk of postoperative morbidity even after controlling for potential confounders (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.03-2.64). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous LR and CRS-HIPEC was associated with increased operative time, length of hospital stay, reoperation, and postoperative morbidity compared to CRS-HIPEC alone. For patients with synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases, a staged operative approach should be considered.
Collapse
|
25
|
Baratti D, Kusamura S, Iusco D, Cotsoglou C, Guaglio M, Battaglia L, Virzì S, Mazzaferro V, Deraco M. Should a History of Extraperitoneal Disease Be a Contraindication to Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases? Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61:1026-34. [PMID: 30086051 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival improvements have been reported in selected patients affected by colorectal peritoneal metastases who were undergoing cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Treatment of peritoneal metastases associated with extraperitoneal disease is still controversial. OBJECTIVE We assessed the prognostic impact of a history of extraperitoneal disease that was curatively treated either at the same time as or before the onset of peritoneal metastases. DESIGN We reviewed 2 prospective databases. Peritoneal involvement was scored by Peritoneal Cancer Index. SETTINGS Our study was conducted in 2 high-volume peritoneal malignancy management institutions. PATIENTS A total of 148 patients with peritoneal metastases were included. In 27 patients, extraperitoneal disease involving the liver (n = 23), lung (n = 1), both lung and liver (n = 2), or inguinal lymph nodes and liver (n = 1) was curatively treated either simultaneously with peritoneal metastases (n = 22) or before their onset (n = 5). INTERVENTIONS All of the macroscopic tumors were removed by means of peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections. Microscopic residual disease was treated by mitomycin C/cisplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Overall survival was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 34.6 months (95% CI, 22.6-65.7 mo), 5-year survival of patients treated for both peritoneal and extraperitoneal disease versus peritoneal metastases alone was 16.5% versus 52.0% (p = 0.019). After multivariate analysis, reduced survival correlated with extraperitoneal disease (p = 0.001), Peritoneal Cancer Index >19 (p = 0.004), and peritoneal residual disease >2.5 mm (p = 0.018). Three prognostic groups were defined, and median survival was not reached for group 1 (Peritoneal Cancer Index ≤19 and no extraperitoneal disease), reached in 27.0 months for group 2 (Peritoneal Cancer Index ≤9 and extraperitoneal disease), and reached in 11.6 months for group 3 (Peritoneal Cancer Index >19 and no extraperitoneal disease or Peritoneal Cancer Index >9 and extraperitoneal disease). LIMITATIONS The main study limitation is its observational nature. CONCLUSIONS A history of extraperitoneal disease is associated with poorer prognosis. However, survival benefit may be obtained in selected patients with limited peritoneal involvement. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A655.
Collapse
|
26
|
Lorimier G, Seegers V, Coudert M, Dupoiron D, Thibaudeau E, Pouplin L, Lebrec N, Dubois PY, Dumont F, Guérin-Meyer V, Capitain O, Campone M, Wernert R. Prolonged perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia may improve survival after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1824-1831. [PMID: 30213715 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of prolonged perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (PEA) on long term survival of patients who underwent a complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). BACKGROUND Grade III-IV morbidity affects long term outcomes after CRS and HIPEC. As compared with opioid administered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), PEA reduces morbidity. METHOD From 2005 to 2016, 150 patients underwent CRS plus HIPEC with or without prolonged PEA. Clinical data and outcomes collected from prospective database were analyzed. Survival was assessed in terms of analgesic method using Kaplan-Meier plots and a propensity score. RESULTS Patients 'characteristics of 59 patients in PCA group were comparable to those of 91 patients in PEA group, except for age, ASA score and fluid requirements, significantly more important in PEA group. Grade III-IV morbidity was 62.7% in PCA group compared with 36.3% in PEA group (p = 0.0015). Median overall survival (OS) of PEA group was 54.7 months compared to 39.5 months in PCA group (p = 0.0078). When adjusted on the covariates, using the propensity score, the PEA significantly improves OS [HR 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28-0.56)] (p < 0.0001) and disease free survival (DFS) [HR 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.81] (p < 0.0007) CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of patients who underwent a complete CRS and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases, the perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia prolonged for over 72 h reduced significantly the grade III-IV morbidity and may improve OS and DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gérard Lorimier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Valérie Seegers
- Department of Clinical Research, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France.
| | - Marie Coudert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Denis Dupoiron
- Department of Anesthesiology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Emilie Thibaudeau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Nantes, France
| | - Luc Pouplin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Nantes, France
| | - Nathalie Lebrec
- Department of Anesthesiology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Pierre Yves Dubois
- Department of Anesthesiology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Frédéric Dumont
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Nantes, France
| | | | - Olivier Capitain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Romuald Wernert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Integrated Center of Oncology, Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may significantly improve overall survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer. For good oncological results complete macroscopic cytoreduction is crucial; furthermore, a linear correlation between peritoneal tumor load, as determined by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and overall survival has been demonstrated; therefore, surgical treatment should be initiated as early as possible. Synchronous resection of up to three liver metastases may be performed safely and with good results and no influence on the morbidity. With respect to intraperitoneal chemotherapy, mitomycin C and oxaliplatin are most commonly used and may be regarded as equal; however, for perioperative chemotherapy study results are so far inconclusive with some trials hinting at decreased overall survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy is likely to improve overall survival if at least 6 cycles are applied. Early detection of peritoneal metastases is difficult at present but might be facilitated in the future by the use of liquid biopsies, which may detect circulating free tumor-specific DNA or RNA. In the meantime, planned second-look laparotomy should be considered for patients at high risk of peritoneal recurrence. In addition, several international studies are currently evaluating the concept of adjuvant or prophylactic HIPEC. The CRS and HIPEC may be repeated in cases of recurrence and should be considered in suitable patients, applying the same criteria as for primary CRS and HIPEC. A recurrence-free interval of >2 years is associated with a significantly better prognosis.
Collapse
|
28
|
Frey J, Dorofte L, Sundqvist P. Malignant hydrocele: a rare manifestation of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin as a transcoelomic spread into the scrotum - case report and literature overview. Scand J Urol 2018; 52:232-235. [PMID: 29463171 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1437771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Janusz Frey
- a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health , Örebro University , Örebro , Sweden
| | - Luiza Dorofte
- b Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health , Örebro University , Örebro , Sweden
| | - Pernilla Sundqvist
- a Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health , Örebro University , Örebro , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Simkens GA, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:259-266. [PMID: 28721098 PMCID: PMC5501638 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s119569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a viable option for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal origin, resulting in long-term survival and even cure in some cases. However, adequate patient selection for this treatment is currently one of the major challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of clinically relevant factors associated with overall survival. This may help to guide clinicians through the complex interplay of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics to adequately select patients who benefit the most from this extensive surgical treatment. First, basic principles of colorectal PM and the CRS and HIPEC treatment will be discussed. According to available literature, especially extent of peritoneal disease, completeness of cytoreduction, and signet ring cell histology have great influence on the outcome after CRS and HIPEC. Other factors that seem to have a negative prognostic value are the presence of liver metastases and the absence of treatment with neo-adjuvant systemic therapy. Prognostic models combining the above-mentioned factors, such as the Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score nomogram, may provide clinically relevant tools to use in everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|