Surgical treatment for periacetabular metastatic lesions

Advancements in Surgical Management of Periacetabular Metastases: Emphasizing Minimally Invasive Techniques

This review aims to summarize the evolution of surgical techniques for periacetabular metastatic cancer, assess their strengths and limitations, and clarify the corresponding indications. We conducted a comprehensive literature review on periacetabular metastatic cancer, summarizing surgical techniques involving both open and minimally invasive approaches. Additionally, we evaluated the indications for different minimally invasive techniques and proposed potential combinations of these techniques. Our review underscores the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, including reduced surgical trauma, improved patient mobility, lower complication rates, and expedited recovery times, facilitating earlier initiation of systemic cancer therapies. These techniques show substantial potential for broader application in the future. Despite the historical reliance on open surgery as the standard treatment, minimally invasive approaches are emerging as a promising alternative, particularly for managing osteolytic metastases around the acetabulum. This review provides insights into the optimal integration of these techniques, aiming to support evidence-based clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Peri-operative outcomes of IlluminOss fixation for pelvic metastatic bone disease

Background

Pelvic metastatic bone disease (MBD) leads to significant pain and functional impairment. Managing these lesions through an open approach involves invasive procedures linked to potential morbidity and complications. The IlluminOss system, a UV light-activated polymer implant, has shown efficacy and safety in managing various fractures. This study evaluates the effectiveness of IlluminOss photodynamic bone stabilization system (PBSS) in pelvic MBD.

Methods

A retrospective cohort review was conducted, including all patients treated with the PBSS system for MBD of the pelvis and acetabulum.

Results

Fifteen patients were included with a mean follow-up of 4.97 months (SD 3.05). In the thirteen patients treated with the IlluminOss without concurrent total hip arthroplasty, the mean operative time was 170.4 min (SD 90.6). The mean estimated blood loss was 52.3 mL (SD 73.7). No patients required transfusions. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at the latest follow-up was 2.29, significantly lower than the preoperative score of 9.07 (p < 0.001). Thirteen patients (92.9 %) had improved functional status at the latest follow-up.

Conclusion

PBSS offers similar operative times, reduced blood loss, and decreased need for transfusions compared to open pelvic fixation methods. It also demonstrates significant pain reduction and improved functional outcomes without increased complications.

Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Local Cancer Control and Skeletal Stabilization of Periacetabular Osteolytic Metastases Under C-Arm Imaging Guidance

Cancers are chronic manageable diseases in the era of the second phase of the Cancer Moonshot program by the US government. Patients with cancer suffer from various forms of orthopaedic morbidities, namely locomotive syndrome in cancer patients ( Cancer Locomo ). Type I encompasses orthopaedic conditions directly caused by cancers such as pathological fractures. Type II includes conditions caused by cancer treatments in cases of osteopenia, bone necrosis, insufficiency fractures, nonunions, and postsurgical complications. Type III defines coexisting conditions such as arthritis. The fundamental philosophy is that orthopaedic surgeons facilitate lifesaving ambulatory anticancer drug therapies by preventing and improving Cancer Locomo . Skeletal metastasis-specific procedures are evolving currently. Recently emerging percutaneous ambulatory minimally invasive procedures address skeletal reinforcement and local cancer control while avoiding many complications and drawbacks from extensive open surgical reconstructive procedures. Three-dimensional imaging techniques are useful but are not always available for acetabular procedures in all healthcare facilities. In this review, the techniques of percutaneous guidewire and antegrade cannulated screw placement under standard C-arm fluoroscopy are described in detail. In addition, cancer-induced bone loss, biomechanical data of percutaneous skeletal reinforcement, and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive procedures were reviewed.

Mini-open periacetabular cementoplasty for periacetabular bone metastasis: a report of two cases

Bone metastasis in the periacetabular region usually causes severe pain and functional disability. Some surgical procedures, such as the Harrington surgery and percutaneous cementoplasty, have been reported as treatment options for periacetabular bone metastases with limited efficacy. The former is highly invasive, while the latter may not allow the injection of a sufficient amount of cement. Here we report two surgical cases using a new modified surgical method (mini-open periacetabular cementoplasty: MO-PAC) consisting of tumor curettage and cementoplasty through a small incision.

Artificial intelligence assisted preoperative planning and 3D-printing guiding frame for percutaneous screw reconstruction in periacetabular metastatic cancer patients

Background

The percutaneous screw reconstruction technique, known as the "Tripod Technique," has demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes in the management of metastatic periacetabular lesions, as evidenced by our prior investigations and corroborated by independent studies. Nevertheless, there is a steep learning curve in handling this technique, with possible complications such as intraarticular screw placement.

Methods

Preoperative pelvic CT scans were acquired before surgery and utilized for the guiding frame design. A convolutional neural network model was trained with annotated data to identify the starting point and trajectory of each potential screw. A model boundary intersection detection technology was used to determine the optimal diameter and length of each screw. A non-rigid registration technology was matched with a prefabricated model of the body surface to design personalized anchoring skin pads. Finally, a polylactic acid-based guiding frame for intraoperative was custom-made with a 3D printer.

Results

12 patients underwent a guiding frame-assisted Tripod procedure for treatment of periacetabular metastatic lesions. An intraoperative CT scan was performed in all cases to confirm screw trajectories. Among 36 screws that were implanted, 26 screws were implanted as designed. The remaining ten screws drifted, but all remained within the intra-osseous conduit without any complications. The mean surgical time was 1.22 h with the guiding frame compared with 2.3 h without the guiding frame. Following the surgical procedure, a noteworthy enhancement in pain management, as evidenced by a reduction in scores on the visual analog scale (p < 0.01), and an improvement in functional status, as assessed through the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (p < 0.01), were observed when compared to the patient's pre-operative condition.

Conclusion

This proof-of-concept investigation demonstrates that the amalgamation of AI-assisted surgical planning and additive manufacturing can improve surgical accuracy and shorten surgical duration. While access to this technology is currently constrained during its early stages of development, it is anticipated that these limitations will diminish as the potential of AI and additive manufacturing in facilitating complex orthopedic procedures becomes more evident, leading to a surge in interest and adoption of this approach.

Percutaneous Cementation for Improvement of Pain and Function for Osteolytic Pelvic Metastasis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic metastasis is a common presentation among patients presenting with skeletal metastasis. Image-guided percutaneous cementation of these lesions is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of these lesions. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review that investigates clinical outcomes after percutaneous cementation for pelvic metastasis.

METHODS

A systematic review was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews and performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed, SCOPUS, and Ovid MEDLINE databases. All level I to IV clinical studies published in the English language investigating the clinical outcomes after percutaneous cementation for pelvic metastasis were included.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 579 patients (278 men, 301 women) and 631 metastatic pelvic lesions were included in the study. The mean follow-up range was 0.7 to 26.4 months. Percutaneous cementation alone was performed in 441 patients (76.2%). Supplemental ablative procedures were performed in 77 patients (13.3%), and supplemental internal fixation using cannulated screws was performed in 107 patients (18.5%). Twelve studies with 430 patients (74.2%) reported pain-related and/or functional outcome scores, of which all studies reported overall clinically notable improvement at short-term follow-up. All studies reported periprocedural complications. Local cement leakage was the most common complication (162/631 lesions, 25.7%) followed by transient local pain (25/579 patients, 4.3%). There were no reported cases of major complications. Seven patients (1.2%) underwent re-intervention for persistent symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous cementation may be an effective method for treating pain and function related to pelvic metastasis. The most common complication was cement leakage surrounding the lesion. The rates of major complications were low, and most complications appeared minor and transient. Additional prospective studies are needed to further assess the efficacy of this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level I to IV therapeutic studies.

Quality of life issues in patients with bone metastases: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Bones are frequent sites of metastatic disease, observed in 30-75% of advanced cancer patients. Quality of life (QoL) is an important endpoint in studies evaluating the treatments of bone metastases (BM), and many patient-reported outcome tools are available. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compile a list of QoL issues relevant to BM and its interventions. The secondary objective was to identify common tools used to assess QoL in patients with BM, and the QoL issues they fail to address.

METHODS

A search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1946 and 27 January 2023 with the keywords "bone metastases", "quality of life", and "patient reported outcomes". Specific QoL issues in original research studies and the QoL tools used were extracted.

RESULTS

The review identified the QoL issues most prevalent to BM in the literature. Physical and functional issues observed in patients included pain, interference with ambulation and daily activities, and fatigue. Psychological symptoms, such as helplessness, depression, and anxiety were also common. These issues interfered with patients' relationships and social activities. Items not mentioned in existing QoL tools were related to newer treatments of BM, such as pain flare, flu-like symptoms, and jaw pain due to osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights that QoL issues for patients with BM have expanded over time due to advances in BM-directed treatments. If they are relevant, additional treatment-related QoL issues identified need to be validated prospectively by patients and added to current assessment tools.

Emerging Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Procedures for Periacetabular Osteolytic Metastases

➤

Periacetabular osteolytic skeletal metastases are frequently associated with pain and impaired ambulatory function. Minimally invasive techniques allow for the restoration of ambulation without interrupting critical systemic cancer therapy.

➤

The open surgical management of massive periacetabular osteolytic lesions, such as by curettage, internal fixation, or complex total hip reconstruction, is associated with blood loss, hospitalization, rehabilitation, and complications such as infection or delayed wound-healing.

➤

Minimally invasive percutaneous procedures have become increasingly popular for the management of periacetabular osteolytic metastases by interventional oncologists and orthopaedic surgeons before complex open surgical procedures are considered.

➤

Minimally invasive procedures may include various methods of cancer ablation and reinforcement techniques. Minimally invasive procedures may entail cancer ablation, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement reinforcement, balloon osteoplasty, percutaneous screw fixation, or combinations of the aforementioned techniques (e.g., ablation-osteoplasty-reinforcement-internal fixation [AORIF]).

Percutaneous Ablation, Osteoplasty, Reinforcement, and Internal Fixation for Pain and Ambulatory Function in Periacetabular Osteolytic Malignancies

Background Osteolytic neoplasms to periacetabular bone frequently cause pain and fractures. Immediate recovery is integral to lifesaving ambulatory oncologic care and maintaining quality of life. Yet, open acetabular reconstructive surgeries are associated with numerous complications that delay cancer treatments. Purpose To determine the effectiveness for short- and long-term pain and ambulatory function following percutaneous ablation, osteoplasty, reinforcement, and internal fixation (AORIF) for periacetabular osteolytic neoplasm. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated clinical data from 50 patients (mean age, 65 years ± 14 [SD]; 25 men, 25 women) with osteolytic periacetabular metastases or myeloma. The primary outcome of combined pain and ambulatory function index score (range, 1 [bedbound] through 10 [normal ambulation]) was assessed before and after AORIF at 2 weeks and then every 3 months up to 40 months (overall median follow-up, 11 months [IQR, 4-14 months]). Secondary outcomes included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, infection, transfusion, 30-day readmission, mortality, and conversion hip arthroplasty. Serial radiographs and CT images were obtained to assess the hip joint integrity. The paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to analyze data. Results Mean combined pain and ambulatory function index scores improved from 4.5 ± 2.4 to 7.8 ± 2.1 (P < .001) and median ECOG scores from 3 (IQR, 2-4) to 1 (IQR, 1-2) (P < .001) at the first 2 weeks after AORIF. Of 22 nonambulatory patients, 19 became ambulatory on their first post-AORIF visit. Pain and functional improvement were retained beyond 1 year, up to 40 months after AORIF in surviving patients. No hardware failures, surgical site infections, readmissions, or delays in care were identified following AORIF. Of 12 patients with protrusio acetabuli, one patient required a conversion hemiarthroplasty at 24 months. Conclusion The ablation, osteoplasty, reinforcement, and internal fixation, or AORIF, technique was effective for short- and long-term improvement of pain and ambulatory function in patients with periacetabular osteolytic neoplasm. © RSNA, 2023.

Operative management of metastatic disease of the acetabulum: review of the literature and prevailing concepts

Metastatic disease of the periacetabular region is a common problem in orthopaedic oncology, associated with severe pain, decreased mobility, and substantial decline of the quality of life. Conservative management includes optimisation of pain management, activity modification, and radiation therapy. However, patients with destructive lesions affecting the weight-bearing portion of the acetabulum often require reconstructive surgery to decrease pain and restore mobility. The goal of surgery is to provide an immediately stable and durable construct, allowing immediate postoperative weight-bearing and maintaining functional independence for the remaining lifetime of the patient. A variety of surgical techniques have been reported, most of which are based upon cemented total hip arthroplasty, but also include porous tantalum implants and percutaneous cementoplasty. This review discusses the various reconstructive concepts and options, including their respective indications and outcome. A reconstructive algorithm incorporating different techniques and strategies based upon location and quality of remaining bone is also presented.

The Harrington Plus Reconstruction for Pelvic and Acetabular Metastases

•

The Harrington Plus reconstruction is a modification of the original Harrington rod technique for reconstruction of extensive periacetabular metastases. This procedure was developed in our institution.

•

An intrapelvic suprapectineal plate is used, with the aim of reconstructing a disrupted anterior column and reducing the risk of failure in cases where there is extensive medial bone loss.

•

This paper describes the outcomes of patients who have undergone this procedure to date.

Background

Surgical management of periacetabular bone metastases is challenging. The Harrington Plus reconstruction is a modification of the original Harrington rod technique. An intrapelvic suprapectineal plate is used, with the aim of reconstructing a disrupted anterior column and reducing the risk of failure in cases where there is extensive medial bone loss.

Methods

A retrospective review of the 13 patients who have undergone the Harrington Plus procedure to date was performed. Mobility status, EQ5D and Oxford Hip scores were assessed.

Results

There was a significant improvement in mobility status, EQ5D and Oxford Hip Scores at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). Two patients returned to theatre for debridement of infection. There were no postoperative dislocations, cup medialisation or cases of loosening of the prosthesis. No patient required revision arthroplasty surgery.

Conclusion

The Harrington Plus procedure produces a reliable construct that allows patients with extensive periacetabular metastatic defects to fully weight-bear. Careful patient selection and multidisciplinary management is essential.

A modified Harrington technique for periacetabular reconstruction in advanced metastatic bone disease and a discussion of alternative treatment options

Management of periacetabular lesions involves complex clinical decision making. The modified Harrington procedure with total hip arthroplasty can recreate pelvic stability with a cement rebar construct as well as a functional hip. This study analyzes the modified Harrington procedure to assess construct longevity and patient outcomes. We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify all patients at a large academic medical center from 2017 to 2019 with periacetabular metastatic disease treated with a modified Harrington. Medical records were reviewed and complications, patient outcomes, Musculoskeletal Society Tumor (MSTS) scores, and implant survival were recorded. A total of nine patients were treated with the modified Harrington between 2017 and 2019. At maximum follow- up there were zero revisions or longterm complications. The mean preoperative MSTS score was 2.2 (range, 0-18), compared to the mean postoperative MSTS score of 17.7 (range, 9-25) recorded at a mean 4 (range, 1-30) months following surgery (p<0.001). The modified Harrington technique total hip technique for reconstruction in periacetabular metastatic bone disease is a safe procedure with effective symptom relief, improvement in function, and excellent implant survivorship.

Modified Harrington's procedure for periacetabular metastases in 89 cases: a reliable method for cancer patients with good functional outcome, especially with long expected survival

Background and purpose - The pelvis is the 3rd most common site of skeletal metastases. In some cases, periacetabular lesions require palliative surgical management. We investigated functional outcome, complications, and implant and patient survival after a modified Harrington's procedure.Patients and methods - This retrospective cohort study included 89 cases of surgically treated periacetabular metastases. All patients were treated with the modified Harrington's procedure including a restoration ring. Lesions were classified according to Harrington. Functional outcome was assessed by Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Postoperative complications, and implant and patient survival are reported.Results - The overall postoperative functional outcome was good to fair (OHS 37 and HHS 76). Sex, age, survival > 6 and 12 months, and diagnosis of the primary tumor affected functional outcome. Overall implant survival was 96% (95% Cl 88-100) at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years; only 1 acetabular implant required revision. Median patient survival was 8 months (0-125). 10/89 patients had postoperative complications: 6 major complications, leading to revision surgery, and 4 minor complications.Interpretation - Our modified Harrington's procedure with a restoration ring to achieve stable fixation, constrained acetabular cup to prevent dislocation, and antegrade iliac screws to prevent cranial protrusion is a reliable reconstruction for periacetabular metastases and results in a good functional outcome in patients with prolonged survival. A standardized procedure and low complication rate encourage the use of this method for all Harrington class defects.