Endoscopic criteria to evaluate tumor response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using magnifying chromoendoscopy

The role of combining interim and final analysis by using endoscopic and radiologic methods in total neoadjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

We aim to compare the relative performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their combinations during interim (i) and final (f) analysis to evaluate concordance with complete response (CR) following total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) in rectal cancer.

METHOD

Patients who opted TNT and underwent restaging with FS and MRI between 2015 and 2022 were evaluated. Concordance between the assessment methods and CR was analyzed using the weighted-κ test.

RESULTS

A cohort comprising 208 patients revealed CR rate of 42.3 ​%. When evaluating individual methods, fFS alone demonstrated the most heightened sensitivity (68.2 ​%) for CR detection, with a moderate level of concordance (κ ​= ​0.46). Only the combinations of iFS-fFS and fFS-fMRI reached a comparable level of concordance to that achievable by fFS alone.

CONCLUSION

Among the available diagnostic tools, the combination of final MRI and FS still appears to offer the highest concordance with CR, with relatively higher sensitivity. Additionally, interim MRI may not add significant clinical value and could be omitted.

Nonoperative management of rectal cancer

The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has changed drastically in the last few decades due to improved surgical techniques, development of multimodal treatment approaches and the introduction of a watch and wait (WW) strategy. For patients with a complete response to neoadjuvant treatment, WW offers an opportunity to avoid the morbidity associated with total mesorectal excision in favor of organ preservation. Despite growing interest in WW, prospective data on the safety and efficacy of nonoperative management are limited. Challenges remain in optimizing multimodal treatment regimens to maximize tumor regression and in improving the accuracy of patient selection for WW. This review summarizes the history of treatment for rectal cancer and the development of a WW strategy. It also provides an overview of clinical considerations for patients interested in nonoperative management, including restaging strategies, WW selection criteria, surveillance protocols and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Assessing Endoscopic Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: Development and Validation of a Highly Accurate Convolutional Neural Network

BACKGROUND

Rectal tumors display varying degrees of response to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). We evaluated the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in interpreting endoscopic images of either a non-complete response to TNT or local regrowth during watch-and-wait surveillance.

METHODS

Endoscopic images from stage II/III rectal cancers treated with TNT from 2012 to 2020 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Images were labelled as Tumor or No Tumor based on endoscopy timing (before, during, or after treatment) and the tumor's endoluminal response. A CNN was trained using ResNet-50 architecture. The area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed during training and for two test sets. The main test set included images of tumors treated with TNT. The other contained images of local regrowth. The model's performance was compared to sixteen surgeons and surgical trainees who evaluated 119 images for evidence of tumor. Fleiss' kappa was calculated by respondent experience level.

RESULTS

A total of 2717 images from 288 patients were included; 1407 (51.8%) contained tumor. The AUC was 0.99, 0.98, and 0.92 for training, main test, and local regrowth test sets. The model performed on par with surgeons of all experience levels for the main test set. Interobserver agreement was good ( k = 0.71-0.81). All groups outperformed the model in identifying tumor from images of local regrowth. Interobserver agreement was fair to moderate ( k = 0.24-0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

A highly accurate CNN matched the performance of colorectal surgeons in identifying a noncomplete response to TNT. However, the model demonstrated suboptimal accuracy when analyzing images of local regrowth.

Interdisciplinary Spanish consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer

Watch-and-wait has emerged as a new strategy for the management of rectal cancer when a complete clinical response is achieved after neoadjuvant therapy. In an attempt to standardize this new clinical approach, initiated by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD), and with the participation of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP), the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (SEED), the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), we present herein a consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for the management of rectal cancer. We have focused on patient selection, the treatment schemes evaluated, the optimal timing for evaluating the clinical complete response, the oncologic outcomes after the implementation of this strategy, and a protocol for surveillance of these patients.

Limits of Clinical Restaging in Detecting Responders After Neoadjuvant Therapies for Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate clinical restaging is required to select patients who respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer and who may benefit from an organ preservation strategy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review our experience with the clinical restaging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy to assess its accuracy in detecting major and pathological complete response to treatment.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at 2 high-volume Italian centers for Colorectal Surgery.

PATIENTS

Data were included from all consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer from January 2012 to July 2020. Criteria to define clinical response were no palpable mass, a superficial ulcer <2 cm (major response), or no mucosal abnormality (complete response) at endoscopy and no metastatic nodes at MRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of clinical restaging in detecting pathological complete response (ypT0) or major pathological response (ypT0-1) after neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 333 patients were included; 81 (24.3%) had a complete response whereas 115 (34.5%) had a pathological major response. Accuracy for clinical complete response was 80.8% and for major clinical response was 72.9%. Sensitivity was low for both clinical complete response (37.5%) in detecting ypT0 and clinical major response (59.3%) in detecting ypT0-1. Positive predictive value was 68.2% for ypT0 and 60.4% for ypT0-1.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation of the study its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSION

Accuracy of actual clinical criteria to define pathological complete response or pathological major response is poor. Failure to achieve good sensitivity and precision is a major limiting factor in the clinical setting. Current clinical assessments need to be revised to account for indications for rectal preservation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C63 .

LMITES DE LA REESTADIFICACIN CLNICA EN LA DETECCIN DE RESPONDEDORES DESPUS DE TERAPIAS NEOADYUVANTES PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO

ANTECEDENTES:Se requiere una nueva reestadificación clínica precisa para seleccionar pacientes que respondan a la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado y que puedan beneficiarse de una estrategia de preservación de órganos.OBJETIVO:El propósito de este estudio fue revisar nuestra experiencia con la reestadificación clínica del cáncer de recto después de la terapia neoadyuvante para evaluar su precisión en la detección de una respuesta patológica importante y completa al tratamiento.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en dos centros italianos de alto volumen para cirugía colorrectal.PACIENTES:Incluimos datos de todos los pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a terapia neoadyuvante y cirugía por cáncer de recto localmente avanzado desde enero de 2012 hasta julio de 2020. Los criterios para definir la respuesta clínica fueron ausencia de masa palpable, úlcera superficial <2 cm (respuesta mayor) o ausencia de anomalías en la mucosa. (respuesta completa) en la endoscopia, y sin ganglios metastásicos en la resonancia magnética.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Exploramos la sensibilidad, la especificidad, los valores predictivos positivos y negativos de la reestadificación clínica para detectar una respuesta patológica completa (ypT0) o mayor (ypT0-1) después de la terapia neoadyuvante.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 333 pacientes; 81 (24,3%) tuvieron una respuesta completa mientras que 115 (34,5%) tuvieron una respuesta patológica mayor. La precisión de la respuesta clínica completa y la respuesta clínica importante fue del 80,8 % y el 72,9 %, respectivamente. La sensibilidad fue baja tanto para la respuesta clínica completa (37,5 %) en la detección de ypT0 como para la respuesta clínica mayor (59,3 %) en la detección de ypT0-1. El valor predictivo positivo fue del 68,2 % para ypT0 y del 60,4 % para ypT0-1.LIMITACIONES:Nuestro estudio tiene como principal limitación su carácter retrospectivo.CONCLUSIÓNES:La precisión de los criterios clínicos reales para definir una respuesta patológica completa o mayor es pobre. El hecho de no lograr una buena sensibilidad y precisión es un factor limitante importante en el entorno clínico. La indicación para la preservación rectal después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante necesita una mejora de la evaluación clínica actual. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C63 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Watch and wait after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: comparison of outcomes in patients with and without a complete response at first reassessment in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD)

BACKGROUND

In rectal cancer, watch and wait for patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant treatment has an established evidence base. However, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and management of a near-cCR. This study aimed to compare outcomes in patients who achieved a cCR at first reassessment versus later reassessment.

METHODS

This registry study included patients from the International Watch & Wait Database. Patients were categorized as having a cCR at first reassessment or at later reassessment (that is near-cCR at first reassessment) based on MRI and endoscopy. Organ preservation, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were calculated. Subgroup analyses were done for near-cCR groups based on the response evaluation according to modality.

RESULTS

A total of 1010 patients were identified. At first reassessment, 608 patients had a cCR; 402 had a cCR at later reassessment. Median follow-up was 2.6 years for patients with a cCR at first reassessment and 2.9 years for those with a cCR at later reassessment. The 2-year organ preservation rate was 77.8 (95 per cent c.i. 74.2 to 81.5) and 79.3 (75.1 to 83.7) per cent respectively (P = 0.499). Similarly, no differences were found between groups in distant metastasis-free survival or overall survival rate. Subgroup analyses showed a higher organ preservation rate in the group with a near-cCR categorized exclusively by MRI.

CONCLUSION

Oncological outcomes for patients with a cCR at later reassessment are no worse than those of patients with a cCR at first reassessment.

Non-operative management after chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation or sandwich (induction with bevacizumab and consolidation) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase II trial (NOMINATE trial)

INTRODUCTION

Total mesorectal excision (TME) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, neoadjuvant CRT has no recognised impact on reducing distant recurrence, and patients suffer from a long-lasting impairment in quality of life (QOL) associated with TME. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an alternative approach that could reduce distant metastases and increase the proportion of patients who could safely undergo non-operative management (NOM). This study is designed to compare two TNT regimens in the context of NOM for selecting a more optimal regimen for patients with LARC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

NOMINATE trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised phase II selection design study. Patients must have clinical stage II or III (T3-T4Nany) LARC with distal location (≤5 cm from the anal verge or for those who are candidates for abdominoperineal resection or intersphincteric resection). Patients will be randomised to either arm A consisting of CRT (50.4 Gy with capecitabine) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (six cycles of CapeOx), or arm B consisting of induction chemotherapy (three cycles of CapeOx plus bevacizumab) followed by CRT and consolidation chemotherapy (three cycles of CapeOx). In the case of clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR, patients will progress to NOM. Response assessment involves a combination of digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving pathological CR or cCR≥2 years, defined as the absence of local regrowth within 2 years after the start of NOM among eligible patients. Secondary endpoints include the cCR rate, near cCR rate, rate of NOM, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, time to disease-related treatment failure, TME-free survival, permanent stoma-free survival, safety of the treatment, completion rate of the treatment and QOL. Allowing for a drop-out rate of 10%, 66 patients (33 per arm) from five institutions will be accrued.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by Wakayama Medical University Certified Review Board in December 2020. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and on the jRCT website.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs051200121.

Diagnostic performance of MRI and endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities and/or endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To summarize existing evidence on the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, T2-weighted MR tumor regression grade, and/or endoscopy for assessing complete tumor response after nCRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive, and positive predictive values were retrieved from included studies.

RESULTS

In total, 81 studies were eligible for inclusion. Evidence suggests that combined use of MRI and endoscopy tends to improve the diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality. The positive predictive value of a complete response varies substantially between studies. There is considerable heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSION

Combined re-staging tends to improve diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality, but the vast majority of studies fail to offer true clinical value due to the study heterogeneity.

The evaluation of follow-up strategies of watch-and-wait patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer

AIM

Many of the current follow-up schedules in a watch-and-wait approach include very frequent MRI and endoscopy examinations to ensure early detection of local regrowth (LR). The aim of this study was to analyse the occurrence and detection of LR in a watch-and-wait cohort and to suggest a more efficient follow-up schedule.

METHOD

Rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy were prospectively and retrospectively included in a multicentre watch-and-wait registry between 2004 and 2018, with the current follow-up schedule with 3-monthly endoscopy and MRI in the first year and 6 monthly thereafter. A theoretical comparison was constructed for the detection of LR in the current follow-up schedule against four other hypothetical schedules.

RESULTS

In all, 50/304 (16%) of patients developed a LR. The majority (98%) were detected at ≤2 years, located in the lumen (94%) and were visible on endoscopy (88%). The theoretical comparison of the different hypothetical schedules suggests that the optimal follow-up schedule should focus on the first 2 years with 3-monthly endoscopy and 3-6 monthly MRI. Longer intervals in the first 2 years will cause delays in diagnosis of LR ranging from 0 to 5 months. After 2 years, increasing the interval from 6 to 12 months did not cause important delays.

CONCLUSION

The optimal follow-up schedule for a watch-and-wait policy in patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer should include frequent endoscopy and to a lesser degree MRI in the first 2 years. Longer intervals, up to 12 months, can be considered after 2 years.

Adding Narrow-Band Imaging to Chromoendoscopy for the Evaluation of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic assessment is crucial in diagnosing clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the benefits of adding narrow-band imaging endoscopy to conventional chromoendoscopy in predicting pathologic complete response in the surgical specimen.

DESIGN

This was a prospective nonrandomized study.

SETTINGS

This was an ad hoc study of a prospective phase II trial at a single comprehensive cancer center that evaluated oncologic outcomes of a neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS

Patients with high-risk stage II to III low rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgery were included.

INTERVENTION

Tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy was evaluated using conventional white light endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy then followed by using narrow-band imaging based on a predefined diagnostic protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy for predicting pathologic complete response and inter-rater agreement between an expert and trainee endoscopists were compared between the assessments using conventional white light endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy and the assessment adding narrow-band imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients were eligible for the study, and 19 had pathologic complete response (31.1%). Although the addition of narrow-band imaging correctly converted the diagnosis in 3 patients, overall diagnostic improvement in predicting pathologic complete response was limited (conventional chromoendoscopy vs adding narrow-band imaging: accuracy, 70.5% vs 75.4%; sensitivity, 63.2% vs 73.7%; specificity, 73.8% vs 76.2%; positive predictive value, 52.2% vs 58.3%; and negative predictive value, 81.6% vs 86.5%). A κ value for the inter-rater agreement improved from 0.599 to 0.756 by adding narrow-band imaging.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limited improvement in diagnostic accuracy, adding narrow-band imaging to chromoendoscopy improved inter-rater agreement between the expert and nonexpert endoscopists. Narrow-band imaging is a reliable and promising modality for universal standardization of the diagnosis of clinical complete response. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B275. ADICIÓN DE IMÁGENES DE BANDA ESTRECHA A LA CROMOENDOSCOPÍA PARA LA EVALUACIÓN DE LA RESPUESTA TUMORAL A LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE EN EL CÁNCER DE RECTO: La evaluación endoscópica es fundamental para valorar la respuesta clínica completa después de la terapia neoadyuvante en el cáncer de recto.Evaluar los beneficios de agregar endoscopia de imagen de banda estrecha a la cromoendoscopía convencional para predecir la respuesta patológica completa en la muestra quirúrgica.Estudio prospectivo no aleatorizado.Un estudio ad hoc de un ensayo prospectivo de fase II en un solo centro integral de cáncer que evaluó los resultados oncológicos de una terapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer rectal.Pacientes con cáncer rectal bajo de alto riesgo en estadio II-III que recibieron ácido folínico neoadyuvante modificado, fluorouracilo y oxaliplatino más bevacizumab seguido de quimiorradioterapia y cirugía.La respuesta tumoral después de la terapia neoadyuvante se evaluó mediante endoscopia de luz blanca convencional más cromoendoscopía, seguido de imágenes de banda estrecha basadas en un protocolo de diagnóstico predefinido.La precisión diagnóstica para predecir la respuesta patológica completa y el acuerdo entre evaluadores entre un experto y un endoscopista en entrenamiento se compararon entre las evaluaciones utilizando endoscopia de luz blanca convencional más cromoendoscopía y la evaluación agregando imágenes de banda estrecha.En total, 61 pacientes fueron elegibles para el estudio, y 19 tuvieron una respuesta patológica completa (31.1%). Aunque la adición de imágenes de banda estrecha convirtió correctamente el diagnóstico en 3 pacientes, la mejora diagnóstica general en la predicción de la respuesta patológica completa fue limitada (cromoendoscopía convencional versus adición de imágenes de banda estrecha: precisión, 70.5% versus 75.4%; sensibilidad, 63.2% versus 73.7%; especificidad, 73.8% versus 76.2%; valor predictivo positivo, 52.2% versus 58.3%; y valor predictivo negativo, 81.6% versus 86.5%). Un valor de kappa para el acuerdo entre evaluadores mejoró de 0.599 a 0.756 al agregar imágenes de banda estrecha.Un estudio de centro único con un tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño.A pesar de la mejora limitada en la precisión diagnóstica, agregar imágenes de banda estrecha a la cromoendoscopía mejoró el acuerdo entre evaluadores entre los endoscopistas expertos y no expertos. La imagenología de banda estrecha es una modalidad confiable y prometedora para la estandarización universal del diagnóstico de respuesta clínica completa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B275.

Serial circulating tumour DNA analysis for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative therapy: prediction of pathological response and postoperative recurrence

BACKGROUND

The "watch-and-wait" approach is a common treatment option amongst patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, the diagnostic sensitivity of clinical modalities, such as colonoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging to determine pathological response, is not high. We analysed the clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) of patients with LARC to predict response to preoperative therapy and postoperative recurrence.

METHODS

A serial ctDNA analysis of 222 plasma samples from 85 patients with LARC was performed using amplicon-based deep sequencing on a cell-free DNA panel covering 14 genes with over 240 hotspots.

RESULTS

ctDNA was detected in 57.6% and 22.3% of samples at baseline and after preoperative treatment, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.0003). Change in ctDNA was an independent predictor of complete response to preoperative therapy (P = 0.0276). In addition, postoperative ctDNA and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were independent prognostic markers for risk of recurrence after surgery (ctDNA, P = 0.0127 and CEA, P = 0.0105), with a combined analysis having cumulative effects on recurrence-free survival (P = 1.0 × 10^-16).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial ctDNA analysis may offer clinically useful predictive and prognostic markers for response to preoperative therapy and postoperative recurrence in patients with LARC.

"Watch and Wait" for complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

The management of rectal cancer has evolved substantially over recent decades, becoming increasingly complex. This was once a disease associated with high mortality and limited treatment options that typically necessitated a permanent colostomy, has now become a model for multidisciplinary evaluation, treatment and surgical advancement. Despite advances in the rates of total mesorectal excision, decreased local recurrence and increased 5-year survival rates, the multimodal treatment of rectal cancer is associated with a significant impact on long-term functional and quality of life outcomes including risks of bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction, and potential need for a permanent stoma. There is great interest in strategies to decrease the toxicity of treatment, including selective use of radiation, chemotherapy or even surgery. The modern concept of selective use of surgery for patients with rectal cancer are based on the observed pathological complete response in approximately 10-20% of patients following long-course chemoradiation therapy. While definitive surgical resection remains the standard of care for all patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer, a growing number of studies are providing supportive evidence for a watch-and-wait, organ preserving approach in highly selected patients with rectal cancer. However, questions regarding the heterogeneity of patient selection, optimal method for inducing pathological complete response, methods and intervals for assessing treatment response and adequacy of follow-up remain unanswered. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary of the current evidence for the watch-and-wait management of rectal cancer following a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.