Pelvic lymph node dissection in metastatic melanoma to the groin should not be abandoned yet

Can Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy reduce Wound Complications after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Robotic-Assisted Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Metastatic Melanoma Results in Durable Oncologic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Robotic pelvic lymphadenectomy (rPLND) has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for patients with metastatic melanoma to the iliac nodes. However, the long-term oncologic benefit of this procedure remains poorly defined.

METHODS

A single-institutional study comparing perioperative outcomes and survival [recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS)] between rPLND and open PLND (oPLND) for metastatic melanoma was conducted.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2018, a total of 63 PLND cases were identified: 22 rPLND and 41 oPLND. Evidence of isolated pelvic metastasis was the most common indication for PLND in both groups (rPLND: 64%, oPLND: 85%). There was no difference in median pelvic lymph node yield (11 vs. 9 nodes, p = 0.65). Neither treatment group experienced a Clavien-Dindo complication ≥ 3. rPLND was associated with a shorter length of stay compared with oPLND (2 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 37 months, there was no difference in RFS (14.4 vs. 9.6 months, p = 0.47) and OS (43 vs. 50 months, p = 0.58) between rPLND and oPLND, respectively. In basin recurrence was low with 1 (4.5%) and 3 (7.3%) patients in the rPLND and oPLND cohorts, respectively, experiencing an event (p = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

rPLND for metastatic melanoma is a safe, minimally invasive treatment strategy that appears to result in similar intermediate term recurrence and survival rates as oPLND but shorter hospital stays.

Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy shows promising results in prevention of wound complications following inguinal lymph node dissection for Melanoma: A retrospective case-control series

BACKGROUND

Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) for melanoma is associated with a number of complications including seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), and lymphedema. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) has shown promising results in preventing postoperative morbidity across a wide variety of surgical procedures, but these results are yet to be investigated in patients undergoing ILND for melanoma.

METHODS

In this study, we reviewed the data of 55 melanoma patients treated with ILND between January 2015 and January 2017 at Odense University Hospital. Patients were followed up until April 2018 for the occurrence of seroma, SSI, and lymphedema. We used prophylactic iNPWT after ILND in 14 patients and compared their morbidity outcomes with the 41 patients receiving standard postoperative wound care in the same period.

RESULTS

The iNPWT intervention significantly reduced seroma compared to the control group (28.6% vs. 90.3%, p < 0.001) and had a trending impact on wound infection (42.9% vs. 65.9%, p = 0.13). The effect was not significant for the prevention of lymphedema (35.7% vs. 51.2%, p = 0.33). Because the iNPWT group had relatively fewer incidences of seroma, SSI, and lymphedema, the iNPWT intervention was more cost-effective than conventional wound care (US$911.2 vs. US$2542.7, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of prophylactic iNPWT significantly reduced seroma formation following ILND. These promising results, however, need to be confirmed in a future prospective randomized trial.