Resection of small bowel adenocarcinoma metastases: Results of the ARCAD-NADEGE cohort study

Non‑synchronous bilateral metastatic ovarian cancer originating from small bowel adenocarcinoma with multidisciplinary treatment: A case report

Primary small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare gastrointestinal cancer with a low incidence of ovarian metastasis. Differential diagnosis of metastatic and primary ovarian cancer is often challenging. The present study reported the case of a 45-year-old woman with jejunal adenocarcinoma who presented with right ovarian, left ovarian, abdominopelvic implant and local recurrent bowel wall metastases successively after primary tumor resection. The ovarian masses of the patient originated from SBA, which was confirmed by immunohistochemical results. Following four comprehensive evaluations by an experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT) during the disease period, the patient underwent four operations, 28 cycles of chemotherapy, 24 cycles of targeted therapy and maintenance therapy for 8 months. As of February 2023, the patient has survived for 73 months and has a high quality of life. It is suggested that when a patient with SBA presents with an ovarian mass, the differential diagnosis between metastatic ovarian cancer and primary ovarian cancer mainly relies on immunohistochemistry. After a comprehensive evaluation by an experienced MDT, surgical resection is the primary treatment for advanced SBA, thus demonstrating some benefits for patients.

Robotic low anterior resection of rectal metastasis from small bowel adenocarcinoma: A case report

A 69-year-old female underwent laparoscopic ileal partial resection for ileal adenocarcinoma. Pathological diagnosis was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (UICC 8th; T4N0M0 StageIIB). The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin. Fourteen months after surgery, computed tomography revealed a mass in the upper rectum. Colonoscopy detected a submucosal protruding mass and a biopsy specimen showed moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Robotic low anterior resection was performed. The tumor was located in the upper rectum and there was no macroscopic invasion or peritoneal dissemination. Pathologically, the tumor was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma located within the rectal wall with little evidence of a carcinoma component in the mucosal lining. Immunohistochemistry showed the same pattern as the previous ileal adenocarcinoma: negativity for cytokeratin 7 and positivity for cytokeratin 20 and caudal-type homeobox 2. In combination with the rectum showing no abnormalities in colonoscopy performed 15 mo previously, the mass was considered hematogenous metastasis from small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Survival effects of primary and metastatic surgical treatment in metastatic small intestinal tumors: A propensity score–matching study

Objective

To analyze the effects of primary tumor resection and metastatic lesion resection on the survival of metastatic small intestinal tumors.

Methods

The research subjects were patients with metastatic small bowel tumors identified from 2004 to 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to analyze the effect of surgery on the prognosis.

Results

A total of 4,034 patients from the SEER database were analyzed. Both before and after the propensity score–matching analysis, the prognosis of patients who underwent primary tumor surgery and metastatic surgery was better than that of patients who did not undergo surgery; all were patients with metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (mSIA) or metastatic small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (mSI-NETs) (all p < .005). Patients with mSIA and adequate lymph node dissection had a longer prognosis than mSIA patients with inadequate lymph node dissection, but this survival benefit was not present in mSI-NET patients. It made no difference in the prognosis of mSIA and mSI-NETs whether localized surgery or intestine-ectomy was performed. Patients with mSIA who underwent primary and metastatic excision plus chemotherapy had the best overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates, whereas mSI-NET patients who underwent primary and metastatic excision had the best overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates (all p < .001).

Conclusion

In these carefully selected patients, primary tumor resection and/or metastatic lesion resection significantly improved the survival rates for patients with mSIA and mSI-NETs. The mSIA patients with resectable primary tumors seemed to require a sufficient number of lymph node dissections more than the patients with well-differentiated mSI-NETs.

Outcomes of Patients with Small Intestine Adenocarcinoma in a Canadian Province: A Retrospective Multi-Center Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Small intestine adenocarcinoma is a rare cancer. The current study aims to determine the outcomes of patients with small intestine adenocarcinoma in a Canadian province. Methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study assessed patients with small intestine adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 in Saskatchewan. A Cox proportional multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between survival and exploratory factors. Results: 112 eligible patients with a median age of 73 years and M:F of 47:53 were identified. Overall, 75% had a comorbid illness, and 45% had a WHO performance status >1. Of the 112 patients, 51 (46%) had early-stage disease and 61 (54%) had advanced-stage disease. The median overall survival (mOS) was as follows: stage one, 59 months; stage two, 30 months; stage three, 20 months; and stage four, 3 months (p < 0.001). The median disease-free survival of patients with stage three disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy was 26 months (95% CI:23.1−28.9) vs. 4 months (0.0−9.1) with observation (p = 0.04). Patients who received chemotherapy for advanced disease had a mOS of 10 months (3.5−16.5) vs. 2 months (0.45−3.6) without chemotherapy (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, stage four disease, hazard ratio (HR), 3.20 (1.84−5.40); WHO performance status >1, HR, 2.22 (1.42−3.45); lack of surgery, HR, 2.10 (1.25−3.50); and a neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio of >4.5, HR, 1.72 (1.10−2.71) were significantly correlated with inferior survival. Conclusions: Most patients with small intestine adenocarcinoma were diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Advanced-stage disease, poor performance status, lack of surgery and a baseline neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio >4.5 were correlated with inferior survival.

Development and validation of prognostic nomograms for patients with metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

We aimed to explore factors associated with prognosis in patients with metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) as well as to develop and validate nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Relevant information of patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Nomograms for predicting 1- and 3-year OS and CSS were established with potential risk factors screened from multivariate cox regression analysis. The discrimination and accuracy of the nomograms were assessed by concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). In total, 373 SBA patients with M1 category were enrolled. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, size and grade of primary tumor, primary tumor surgery, and chemotherapy were significant variables associated with OS and CSS. The C-index values of the nomogram for OS were 0.715 and 0.687 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. For CSS, it was 0.711 and 0.690, respectively. Through AUC, decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration plots, the nomograms displayed satisfactory prognostic predicted ability and clinical application both in the OS and CSS. Our models could be served as a reliable tool for prognostic evaluation of patients with metastatic SBA, which are favorable in facilitating individualized survival predictions and clinical decision-making.

Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Advanced Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Current Knowledge and Perspectives

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is diagnosed at an advanced (unresectable or metastatic) tumor stage in approximately one-third of cases. This is partly due to the non-specific symptomatology and limitations in endoscopic and radiologic detection methods. In this context, the prognosis remains poor and systemic chemotherapy appears to benefit patients when compared to best supportive care alone, despite the absence of randomized controlled trials. The results of a recent large prospective cohort (ARCAD-NADEGE) reported that the absence of chemotherapy was a predictive factor for a lower overall survival (OS) even though poor differentiation and SBA associated with Crohn's disease correlate with poor prognosis. In retrospective series, the median OS ranges from approximately 9 to 18 months with current treatment approaches. A combination of a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX or CAPOX) appears to be the most utilized and effective first-line chemotherapy regimen. Other front-line alternatives are the combination of 5-FU and cisplatin or fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). In second-line, FOLFIRI is an effective option after progression on platinum-based therapy. Taxane-based therapy appears to be an alternative option, but further evaluation in larger series is needed. To a limited extent, the role of surgical resection for metastatic disease appears to be a valid option, though this approach has not been evaluated in prospective clinical studies. Due to the rareness of the disease, inclusion in clinical trials should be prioritized, and there is hope that targeted therapies and immunotherapy may enter the therapeutic arsenal for these patients.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: From Molecular Insights to Clinical Management

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy, with a rising incidence in recent decades, and accounts for roughly 40% of all cancers of the small bowel. The majority of SBAs arise in the duodenum and are associated with a dismal prognosis. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for localized disease, while systemic treatments parallel those used in colorectal cancer (CRC), both in the adjuvant and palliative setting. In fact, owing to the lack of prospective data supporting its optimal management, SBA has historically been treated in the same way as CRC. However, recent genetic and molecular data suggest a distinct profile from other gastrointestinal malignancies and support a more nuanced approach to its management. Herein, we briefly review the state-of-the-art in the clinical management of early-stage and advanced disease and recent discoveries of potentially actionable genetic alterations or pathways along with the most promising ongoing clinical trials, which will hopefully revolutionize the treatment landscape of this orphan disease in the foreseeable future.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal obstruction (a case report and literature review)

INTRODUCTION

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare but increasing disease. It poses both a diagnostic and therapeutic challange. Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare cause of small bowel obstruction. We present the case of a patient admitted to our emergency department for a bowel obstruction due to a mass of the jejunum and whose anatomopathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma.

PATIENT AND METHOD

It is a 62-year-old woman with unparticular history, admitted to the emergency of visceral surgery of Ibn Rochd University Hospital for subocclusive syndrome evolving for one year, with early postprandial vomiting becoming stenosing two months ago. The abdominal CT scan showed thickening jejunal wall of 46 mm with upstream distension. She underwent a segmental bowel resection of 50 cm of small bowel with 3 cm stenotic mass located at 40 cm from the duodenojejunal angle. The pathophysiology revealed an invasive liberkhunian adenocarcinoma. The postoperative follow-up was simple, feeding allowed at D4 with discharge allowed at D6 and functional improvement at the time of the control performed three months after the intervention.

DISCUSSION

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is rare and represents only 1-3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. The incidence of SBA is 24 to 66 times lower than that of colorectal cancer (CRC). Due to its non-specific clinical manifestation and less accessible location, SBA is diagnosed at an advanced stage, and often at specimen analysis. The treatment is resection and the overall survival is increased when diagnostic is early made.

CONCLUSION

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare but increasing cause of gastrointestinal malignancy, being both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In front of the occlusive syndrome of small bowel appearance, adenocarcinoma must be ruled out.

Metastasis Pattern and Survival Analysis in Primary Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A SEER-Based Study

Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare gastrointestinal tumor with high malignancy. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the distant metastasis pattern and establish nomograms predicting survival for SBA. Methods: From 2010 to 2015, patients diagnosed with SBA were identified based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to compare survival differences between metastasis patterns. Then, univariate and multivariate cox analyses were applied to screened out independent prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), and identify the risk factors for metastasis of SBA. To assess the discrimination and calibration of nomograms, the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were calculated. Results: Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that metastasis patterns were significantly correlated with CSS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). Then, the metastasis pattern was showed to be an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS in patients with SBA, as well as age, grade, T stage, N stage, surgery, retrieval of regional lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. Combining these factors, we constructed prognostic nomograms, which suggested that the metastasis pattern made the greatest contribution to the survival of patients with SBA. Nomograms for OS and CSS had a C-index of 0.787 and 0.793, respectively. Calibration curves showed an excellent agreement between probability and actual observation in the training and validation cohort. Decision curve analysis also exhibited its clinical value with an improved net benefit. In addition, the models we constructed had better prognostic accuracy and clinical utility than traditional TNM staging based on C-index and ROC. Further, Cox regression analysis showed that old age, poor differentiation, N2, and not receiving chemotherapy were the risk factors for prognosis in patients with metastatic SBA. Conclusion: As an independent prognostic factor, the metastasis pattern exhibited the greatest predictive effect on OS and CSS for patients with SBA. Adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive effect on the survival of patients with SBA. Nomograms for predicting 3-and 5-year OS and CSS of patients with SBA were constructed, which could identify patients with higher risk and might be superior in predicting the survival of patients with SBA than TNM staging.

Metachronous small bowel adenocarcinoma after rectal adenocarcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), an uncommon gastrointestinal malignant tumor, is difficult to diagnose at an early stage because of its non-specific disease presentation. Metachronous SBA is a special type of SBA that is rarely reported. We herein report a case of metachronous primary SBA following resection of rectal adenocarcinoma.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 65-year-old man presented to our hospital after having experienced recurrent bowel obstruction for 6 months. He had undergone a Dixon operation 30 months previously followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin.

DIAGNOSIS

Abdominal computed tomography showed thickened bowel walls in the right lower abdomen, and the patient was initially misdiagnosed with intestinal adhesion. After the operation, he was diagnosed with primary SBA (T3N0M0, stage IIA).

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with a transnasal ileus tube was ineffective. Therefore, we performed small intestinal segmental resection and side-to-side anastomosis through open surgery.

OUTCOMES

The patient completed all postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and posttreatment surveillance revealed no further abnormalities.

LESSONS

This case suggests that patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma may have an increased risk of metachronous SBA. Corresponding symptoms in high-risk patients should raise clinicians' suspicion for SBA, and further detailed examinations are imperative. Early screening for SBA may help to improve the patients' prognosis.

Solitary seminal vesicle metastasis from ileal adenocarcinoma presenting with hematospermia: A case report

BACKGROUND

Although metastatic adenocarcinoma of the ileum is not uncommon, solitary metastasis to the seminal vesicle has not been reported. We report a patient with recurrent hematospermia diagnosed with metastasis to the seminal vesicle following ileal adenocarcinoma resection, his subsequent management and outcome.

CASE SUMMARY

A 46-year-old man presented with recurrent episodes of painless hematospermia. This was not associated with any lower urinary tract symptoms. He had a past medical history of ileal tumor at the terminal ileum with solitary mesenteric lymph node metastasis on presentation, and underwent partial ileectomy and lymphadenectomy 4 years ago. Subsequent investigations included positron-emission tomography and computed tomography imaging confirmed the very unusual diagnosis of a solitary tumor at the left seminal vesicle. Laparoscopic left-sided vesiculectomy was carried out. Histological analysis with immunohistochemistry showed that CDX-2 was positive and CK7 was negative, and the appearance was consistent with the diagnosis of recurrent metastatic adenocarcinoma of his previously treated intestine primary. The patient had an uneventful post-operative recovery. He received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy following surgery. He remained asymptomatic until he developed multiple bone and pulmonary metastases one year after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of hematospermia as the first symptom of metastatic recurrence in patients with a history of ileal adenocarcinoma.

Metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma: role of metastasectomy and systemic chemotherapy

Background

Metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) has a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, high-quality data are lacking to guide treatment. This retrospective analysis was conducted to help characterize the treatment options for patients with metastatic SBA while providing clinically meaningful prognostic information.

Patients and methods

In total, 437 patients who initially presented with or developed metastatic SBA between September 1977 and September 2019 were identified from the MD Anderson Tumor Registry. Clinical data were collected from review of the medical record. Overall response rates (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were assessed across various treatments and treatment lines.

Results

The median OS from diagnosis of metastatic disease was 15.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.3-17.9]. Seventy-five patients (17.1%) underwent metastasectomy, which was associated with a median OS of 34.5 versus 17.1 months among patients who received chemotherapy alone (P < 0.001). Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (n = 164) was the most common first-line chemotherapy, associated with an ORR of 59% and TTP of 8.1 months. Irinotecan with 5-FU (n = 101) was the most common second-line therapy associated with an ORR of 31% and TTP of 4.0 months. Twenty-two patients received immunotherapy; 5 of 6 patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) responded, while 0 of 16 with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) responded. Taxane-based chemotherapy was given to 34 patients with an ORR of 21% and a median TTP of 2.4 months. Among 11 patients who received anti-epidermal-growth-factor-receptor (EGFR) monotherapy, the best response was stable disease (SD) in 1 patient.

Conclusions

In well-selected patients with SBA, metastasectomy appears to be associated with improved OS. This improvement was seen across metastasectomy sites, including liver, lung and peritoneal. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) based immunotherapy was active for dMMR SBA but not pMMR SBA. While taxane-based chemotherapy demonstrates therapeutic activity, the activity of anti-EGFR therapy was limited.

•

Metastasectomy for well-selected metastatic SBA patients was associated with improved OS.

•

Anti-PD1-based immunotherapy was active for dMMR SBA but not pMMR SBA.

•

Taxane-based chemotherapy demonstrated clinical activity in refractory SBA.

•

Anti-EGFR therapy demonstrated minimal activity in SBA.

Case Report: Molecular Features and Treatment Options for Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy characterized by poor prognosis. Recent efforts have sought to elucidate the genetic landscape and the molecular drivers behind this disease. Herein, we report the main molecular alterations in two metastatic (stage IV) SBA patients. Interestingly, one of them had gene alterations that affected signaling pathways previously described for SBA. However, a second patient displayed previously unreported alterations in this particular tumor type. Based on these findings we discuss potential treatment options for patients affected by this rare, aggressive disease.

Beyond bevacizumab: a review of targeted agents in metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma

Small bowel cancers are rare tumors with an incidence 50-100-fold less than colorectal cancer. These tumors carry a poor prognosis. Owing to its rarity, treatment of this disease, particularly in its advanced stages, has not been optimized and is derived mainly from treatment regimens for colorectal cancer. Based on recent studies bevacizumab, an antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor and used in the management of metastatic CRC, has been added to treatment guidelines for metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma. We investigate in this review the evidence behind other targeted treatments that may be beneficial in the treatment of metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma. These are agents against EGFR, VEGFR-2, HER2, and NTRK as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors. The last class of drugs appears to hold the greatest promise based on the preponderance of evidence supporting its use. However, overall data remains sparse. Results of studies currently underway will be valuable in shedding more light on the management of this aggressive cancer.

Is There a Role for Locoregional Therapies for Non-colorectal Gastrointestinal Malignancies?

The liver is the most common site of metastases from solid gastrointestinal tract tumors. Over the past few decades, the role of locoregional therapies, resection and thermal ablation, for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases has been widely studied. However, for liver metastases originating from other gastrointestinal organs, the role of locoregional treatment remains unclear. This review summarizes and discusses the available evidence regarding benefits, risks, and indications for locoregional therapies for non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine gastrointestinal liver metastases, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approach and patient selection.

Clinical features and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable small bowel adenocarcinoma: a single-center, long-term analysis

Background

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare gastrointestinal malignancy. There is no standard regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy for treating SBA. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable SBA.

Methods

This retrospective study collected data from 148 eligible SBA patients who received radical resection at a single institution. The patients’ clinicopathological characteristics were reviewed and disease-free survival (DFS) time and overall survival time (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The patients had a median age of 57 years at the time of diagnosis. In most cases, the primary tumor was located in the duodenum (75.68%). Of the 55 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 43 received the combined regimen and 12 received single agent chemotherapy. During the follow-up period, 87 patients (58.87%) relapsed. The median DFS and the median OS were 19 and 32 months for all patients, respectively. Stage, N-stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and having more than one symptom at the time of diagnosis were factors associated with DFS and OS. The 43 patients who received combined adjuvant chemotherapy generally exhibited better DFS and OS at 3 and 5 years (DFS: 75.7% and 57.3%, respectively; OS: 75.7% and 62.5%, respectively) than the patients who did not receive the same treatment. The survival time was significantly improved in patients with initial CA19-9 of less than 300 µ/mL or CEA of less than 10 ng/mL. Multivariate analysis revealed N stage and combined adjuvant chemotherapy were independent factors for DFS. However, only combined adjuvant chemotherapy could prolong OS for patients who underwent radical resection.

Conclusions

In our study, both N stage and combined adjuvant chemotherapy are found to influence postoperative recurrence of SBA. Moreover, combined adjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor of DFS and OS.

Efficacy of surgery and chemotherapy for stage IV small bowel adenocarcinoma: A population-based analysis using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program database

BACKGROUND

The role of surgery and chemotherapy for stage IV small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is still confused. The results from previous analyses have been limited by small sample sizes and different treatment regimens.

METHODS

Patients with stage IV SBA were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program (SEER) database. Cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank test. Multiple logistic and Cox regression identified covariates associated with treatment options and survival.

RESULTS

1219 eligible patients were involved in this study. The median age was 67 (range, 20-95) with 655 (53.7%) males and 564 (46.3%) females. Age and primary tumor site were significantly associated with surgery performance, age was also significantly associated with chemotherapy (P < .01). To reduce bias, further six subgroups were divided by age (≤65 and >65) and primary tumor site (duodenum, jejunum and ileum). Chemotherapy and surgery conferred a benefit on survival of the whole cohort (the median CSS of different treatment groups were 17, 9, 4, and 1 month respectively, P < .001) and most subgroups (83.3%, 5/6). In multivariate analysis, surgery (P = .006), and chemotherapy (P = .038) are still independent factors of favorable CSS and OS. For patients with surgery (n = 362), radical surgery was not associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

For stage IV SBA patients, the present study showed that age and primary tumor site were significantly associated with treatment preference. Surgery and chemotherapy were consistently correlated with favorable survival for the whole cohort or most specific subgroups. However, compared with palliative surgery, significant association was not found in patients with radical surgery with better outcome. More prospective well-defined cohorts would add knowledge for this rare disease.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma: Results from a nationwide prospective ARCAD-NADEGE cohort study of 347 patients

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumour. We conducted a prospective cohort to describe the prevalence, survival and prognostic factors in unselected SBA patients. The study enrolled patients with all stages of newly diagnosed or recurrent SBA at 74 French centres between January 2009 and December 2012. In total, 347 patients were analysed; the median age was 63 years (range 23-90). The primary tumour was in the duodenum (60.6%), jejunum (20.7%) and ileum (18.7%). The prevalence of predisposing disease was 8.7%, 6.9%, 1.7%, 1.7% and 0.6% for Crohn disease, Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, celiac disease and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, respectively. At diagnosis, 58.9%, 5.5% and 35.6% of patients had localised and resectable, locally advanced unresectable and metastatic disease, respectively. Crohn disease was significantly associated with younger age, poor differentiation and ileum location, whereas Lynch syndrome with younger age, poor differentiation, early stage and duodenum location. Adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin-based in 89.9%) was performed in 61.5% of patients with locally resected tumours. With a 54-months median follow-up, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 87.9%, 78.2% and 55.5% in Stages I, II and III, respectively. The median OS of patients with Stage IV was 12.7 months. In patients with resected tumours, poor differentiation (p = 0.047) and T4 stage (p = 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of death. In conclusion, our study showed that the prognosis of advanced SBA remains poor. Tumour characteristics differed according to predisposing disease. In SBA-resected tumours, the prognostic factors for OS were grade and T stage.