Colic and rectal tumors with peritoneal metastases treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: One homogeneous condition or two different diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Perioperative management and survival outcomes following cytoreductive surgery in patients with peritoneal metastases from rectal cancer: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patients with rectal cancer and peritoneal metastases (PM) may have a worse prognosis and benefit from a different management than patients with colon cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases was performed to identify all reported patients with rectal cancer and PM treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), to investigate the proper selection criteria for this population, the optimal perioperative management, and highlight its specific oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty studies reporting on 285 patients were identified. Median age varied from 28 to 63 years, and 57.5 % of patients had synchronous disease. The use of neoadjuvant treatment was frequent, but regimens were heterogenous, consisting of radiotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy. Thirty-two percent did not receive any neoadjuvant treatment. Most patients (85.6 %) received HIPEC after CRS, with mitomycin C being the most used drug. Complete cytoreduction was performed in 90.1 % of patients. Data on stoma creation and management were poorly reported. Severe complications occurred in 32.2 % of patients. Median disease-free survival ranged from 6 to 22 months, and median overall survival varied from 7 to 53.2 months.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review highlights the paucity of data available regarding the management of patients with rectal cancer and PM. It also emphasizes different issues and dilemmas regarding this specific population, especially on the use of neoadjuvant treatment, the role of HIPEC after CRS and stoma management.

The prognostic impact of lead times in colorectal cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

Background

National lead time goals have been implemented across Sweden to standardize and improve cancer patient care. However, the prognostic impact of lead times has not yet been studied in patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases scheduled for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC).

Aim

To study the correlation between lead times and overall survival and operability.

Methods

One hundred forty-eight patients with peritoneal metastases originating from colorectal cancer and scheduled for CRS + HIPEC from June 2012 to December 2019 were identified using a HIPEC register at Uppsala University Hospital. Data were collected from medical records concerning operability, overall survival, recurrence and time from diagnosis, and decision to operate to the date of surgery. Patients who had neoadjuvant therapy or no malignant cells in the resected specimens were excluded. Statistical calculations were made with the chi-squared test, Cox regression analysis, and log-rank test.

Results

The median age was 66 years (27–82). Ninety-five were women and 53 were men. One hundred six underwent CRS + HIPEC, 13 CRS only, and 29 were inoperable (open-close). No difference in overall survival was seen when comparing patients with lead times ≤ 34 days and ≥ 35 days from the decision to operate at the multidisciplinary conference to the surgery but there was a higher frequency of open-close (p = 0.023) in the group with longer lead time. Factors that impacted overall survival were open-close (p < 0.001), liver metastases (p = 0.003), and peritoneal cancer index score ≥ 20 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A long lead time from multidisciplinary conference to surgery has no direct impact on overall survival but can result in more cases of inoperability. In a larger cohort, this might translate into decreased survival, and efforts should therefore be made to complete preoperative work up as soon as possible and reduce overall time span. Important factors for survival are related to patient selection and extent of disease.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Management of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Dissemination: 30 Years of Experience at a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is at the forefront of treatment for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis or "carcinomatosis" (CRC-PC). We report outcomes of the operative management of CRC-PC at a single center.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed our database from 1992 through 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Proportional hazards regression and multivariable models were used for assessments.

RESULTS

This study included 345 patients with mean age 53.5 years. Multivariate analysis revealed performance and resection status were associated with overall survival (OS; p < 0.001). Within the R0/R1 group, adverse impact on OS was found with increasing Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score starting at 9 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.98, CI 1.39-2.82, p = 0.0001) with the most significant hazard noted at PCI >14 (HR = 2.35, CI 1.52-3.63, p = 0.0001). Incomplete resection (R2) had significantly worse OS compared with complete CRS 33.4 (n = 206) vs R2: 12.7 months (n = 139; p < 0.0001. When stratified by PCI for the R0/R1 group, median OS for PCI less than 10, 10 to 15, and greater than 15 was 38.2, 19.7, and 22.2 m, respectively (p = 0.0007 comparing PCI less than 10 and greater than 15). Ten-year increments-1991 through 2000, 2001 through 2010, 2011 through 2020-revealed improvement in median OS (13.4 [n = 66], 19.3 [n = 139], and 29.1 months [n = 140]). However, by resection status, median OS remained stable for R0/R1 (32.3 [n = 23], 31.1 [n = 76], and 34.1 months [n = 107]) and improved for R2 (5.2 [n = 43], 14.4 [n = 63], and 14.6 months [n = 33]). Clavien-Dindo complication rate (greater than or equal to grade III) was 29.4%.

CONCLUSION

CRS improves outcomes for CRC-PC compared with historic outcomes with nonoperative management. This benefit is greatest with complete resection and lower disease burden. Results of CRS (with or without heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy) are improving, and surgery for CRC-PC should be routinely considered.

Effective Strategies to Predict Survival of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Patients Eligible for Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), often combined with systemic therapy, can be offered to selected colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) patients. However, clinical heterogeneity and the lack of high-level evidence challenges determination of the correct treatment strategy. This review aims to provide an overview of current strategies to predict survival of colorectal PM patients treated with CRS and HIPEC, guiding clinicians to select a suitable treatment-strategy and to inform patients about their prognosis. First, the prognostic relevance of several clinicopathological prognostic factors, such as extent of PM, location of primary tumor, histology type, and the presence of lymph node or liver metastases will be discussed. Subsequently, special attention will be given to recent developments in several aspects of tumor biology such as RAF/RAS mutations, circulating tumor DNA, immunoprofiling, and consensus molecular subtypes. Finally, currently available prognostic models to predict survival will be evaluated, concluding these models perform moderate to good, but most of them partly rely on intra-operative data. New insights in tumor biology, as well as the reliable assessment of extent of peritoneal disease by diffusion weighted MRI pose promising opportunities to establish an adequate and clinically meaningful preoperative prognostic model in the near future.

Effect and safety of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy on patients suffering from colorectal cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most commonly diagnosed malignant carcinoma and the third most common cause of carcinoma-related mortality, continues to be a major international health problem. And approximately 33% of patients suffer from recurrence after radical surgery. Free malignant cell implanting in the peritoneum is generally accepted as one of the main reasons of such outcome. We did this present clinical study with the aim of evaluating the effects and safety of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IOC) on patients suffering from colorectal cancer, with hoping to find a novel, effective, and available approach to deal with malignant cell implanting during surgeries.

Methods

In total, 391 patients who went through colorectal radical surgery were considered eligible between June 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. 220 patients were treated with surgery without IOC, while other 171 patients received surgery plus IOC. Clinical characteristics, operative findings, postoperative short-term outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between these above 2 groups in the selected population.

Result

The present research included 391 patients (251 men and 140 women) who underwent surgery without IOC (n = 171) or surgery plus IOC (n = 220), with a mean (SD) age of 60.4 (9.7) years in the surgery without IOC group and 60.6 (8.7) in the surgery plus IOC group (P=.85). No significant differences were witnessed between the two groups in surgery-related information and postoperative complications. It is worth noting that IOC independent of other factors was associated with a favor prognosis in CRC patients with stage II/III (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30–0.82, P=.006). Moreover, for patients with stage II colorectal carcinoma, DFS did not differ between two groups (P=.553, Kaplan-Meier log-rank), and OS was no exception. In stage III CRC patients, the estimated DFS rate for patients receiving IOC was 82.2% and patients without IOC was 66.4% after 3 years, which demonstrated that IOC was associated with a favorable prognosis in stage III patients (P=.012, Kaplan-Meier log-rank). Furthermore, the differences were still remained between the two groups when considering the influence about postoperative chemotherapy (P=.014, Kaplan-Meier log-rank). IOC can also significantly improve patients’ overall survival whether they get treatment with POC (P=.006, Kaplan-Meier log-rank; P=.025, Kaplan-Meier log-rank).

Conclusions

In the present study, we have found that surgery plus IOC generated a favorable prognosis for stage III CRC patients but not stage II without any side-effects when the dosage of lobaplatin was 0.1g/L. As a new, safe, and simple procedure, IOC therapy is easily performed—and does not require any special devices or techniques. Thus, IOC is a promising and exciting therapeutic strategy for patients with CRC.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients at High Risk of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective measure for improving the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). However, the role of HIPEC in CRC patients at high risk of PC remains controversial. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HIPEC in CRC patients at high risk of PC. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other online databases up to July 30, 2020. The clinical data, including overall survival, disease free survival, peritoneal metastasis rate, and postoperative adverse reaction were screened and analyzed after data extraction. Risk ratios (RRs) were applied to analyze these dichotomous outcomes with a random effects model. Results: A total of 6 available clinical studies involving 603 patients were finally included. CRC patients at high risk of PC who proactively underwent HIPEC treatment showed a significantly reduced peritoneal metastasis rate (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21-0.83, P = 0.01; I ² = 58%) compared to the similarly high-risk in CRC patients who did not receive HIPEC treatment. However, in terms of overall survival (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.97-1.33, P = 0.12; I ² = 77%), disease-free survival (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.75-1.59, P = 0.63; I ² = 53%), progression free survival (RR: 1.85, 95% CI: 0.48-7.14, P = 0.37; I ² = 93%), and postoperative adverse reactions (RR: 0.1.07, 95% CI: 0.36-3.15, P = 0.90; I ² = 78%), there was no significant difference between the HIPEC treatment and control groups. Conclusions: Proactive HIPEC treatment did not show the expected clinical efficacy in prolonging the overall survival time, disease-free survival time, and progression-free survival time of CRC patients at high risk of PC. However, the preemptive administration of HIPEC was associated with a reduced peritoneal metastasis rate and did not cause adverse additional postoperative effects.

Clinical outcomes of curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases combined with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and liver metastases (LM) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM who had undergone curative surgery, including resections at both metastatic sites and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies. Studies focusing on the clinical effects of curative surgery and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM were included. Meta-analysis results were recorded as hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences.

RESULTS

We included 9 of 998 identified studies in the meta-analysis, involving 746 patients (221 patients with PC + LM, 525 patients with PC). Overall survival (pooled HR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.13, p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (pooled HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.51-2.20, p < 0.01) were both lower in patients with PC + LM. A higher recurrence rate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, p = 0.02) and major postoperative morbidity (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19-1.82, p < 0.01) were also observed in patients with PC + LM.

CONCLUSION

Liver resection in combination with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases may be associated with worse survival and higher morbidity compared with patients with isolated PC. More restricted patient inclusion criteria should be established to facilitate an optimal prognosis for this patient group.

Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses

Moderate hyperthermia at temperatures between 40 and 44°C is a multifaceted therapeutic modality. It is a potent radiosensitizer, interacts favorably with a host of chemotherapeutic agents, and, in combination with radiotherapy, enforces immunomodulation akin to “in situ tumor vaccination.” By sensitizing hypoxic tumor cells and inhibiting repair of radiotherapy-induced DNA damage, the properties of hyperthermia delivered together with photons might provide a tumor-selective therapeutic advantage analogous to high linear energy transfer (LET) neutrons, but with less normal tissue toxicity. Furthermore, the high LET attributes of hyperthermia thermoradiobiologically are likely to enhance low LET protons; thus, proton thermoradiotherapy would mimic ¹²C ion therapy. Hyperthermia with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy substantially improves therapeutic outcomes without enhancing normal tissue morbidities, yielding level I evidence reported in several randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various tumor sites. Technological advancements in hyperthermia delivery, advancements in hyperthermia treatment planning, online invasive and non-invasive MR-guided thermometry, and adherence to quality assurance guidelines have ensured safe and effective delivery of hyperthermia to the target region. Novel biological modeling permits integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment plans. Further, hyperthermia along with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA damage repair inhibitors could further augment the therapeutic efficacy resulting in synthetic lethality. Additionally, hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles coupled to selective payloads, namely, tumor-specific radiotheranostics (for both tumor imaging and radionuclide therapy), chemotherapeutic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and gene silencing, could provide a comprehensive tumor-specific theranostic modality akin to “magic (nano)bullets.” To get a realistic overview of the strength (S), weakness (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) of hyperthermia, a SWOT analysis has been undertaken. Additionally, a TOWS analysis categorizes future strategies to facilitate further integration of hyperthermia with the current treatment modalities. These could gainfully accomplish a safe, versatile, and cost-effective enhancement of the existing therapeutic armamentarium to improve outcomes in clinical oncology.