Disparity in the use of adjuvant radioactive iodine ablation among high-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Disease

CONTEXT

There are differences in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for thyroid between racial and ethnic groups that contribute to disparities. Identifying these differences and their causes are the key to understanding and reducing disparities in presentation and outcomes in endocrine disorders.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The present study reviews original studies identifying and exploring differences between benign and malignant thyroid diseases. A PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus search was conducted for English-language studies using the terms "thyroid," "thyroid disease," "thyroid cancer," "race," "ethnicity," and "disparities" from inception to December 31, 2022.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Many racial and ethnic disparities in the diagnosis, presentation, treatment, and outcomes of thyroid disease were found. Non-White patients are more likely to have a later time to referral, to present with more advanced disease, to have more aggressive forms of thyroid cancer, and are less likely to receive the appropriate treatment than White patients. Overall and disease-specific survival rates are lower in Black and Hispanic populations when compared to White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive disparities exist in thyroid disease diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes that may have been overlooked. Further work is needed to identify the causes of these disparities to begin to work toward equity in the care of thyroid disease.

Parathyroidectomy outcomes for Asians in the United States: Implications for resident surgical education

Introduction

Outcomes for Asian patients in the United States are often overlooked in the surgical literature. Surgical education includes little emphasis on reporting outcomes for Asian patients in the United States. Our null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no difference in surgical complications following parathyroid surgery between Asians and all other ethnicities in the United States. Our alternate hypothesis (H1) is that Asians have more incidences of certain complications (possibly due to culture and language barriers).

Methods

Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for parathyroidectomy and patient race. Complications within 30 days of surgery were extracted.

Results

Among, White, Black, Asian, Pacific Islanders, Native Americans, and Hispanic patients of the United States the Asians (p = 0.018) and Blacks (p = 0.003) had increased operative time for parathyroid surgery compared to other groups. Hispanics had the most surgical complications (p = 0.025). Blacks had statistically significant longer hospital stay (p < 0.0001).

Discussion/conclusion

United States Asian patient data is not typically analyzed separately for complications. We found that in the United States Asians have increased operative time for parathyroidectomy. Future studies of healthcare inequities should include analysis of data for Asian surgical data in the United States as this may help prevent future surgical complications.

Disparities in Presentation, Treatment, and Survival in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

Disparities have been previously described in the presentation, management, and outcomes of other thyroid cancer subtypes; however, it is unclear whether such disparities exist in anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC).

METHODS

We identified patients with ATC from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). The primary outcomes were receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The secondary outcome was 1-year survival. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to assess the associations between sex, race/ethnicity, and the outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 5359 patients included, 58% were female, and 80% were non-Hispanic white. Median tumor size was larger in males than females (6.5 vs. 6.0 cm; p < 0.001) and in patients with minority race/ethnicity than in white patients (6.5 vs. 6.0 cm; p < 0.001). After controlling for tumor size and metastatic disease, female patients were more likely to undergo surgical resection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.20; p = 0.016) but less likely to undergo chemotherapy (OR: 0.72; p < 0.001) and radiation (OR: 0.76; p < 0.001) compared with males. Additionally, patients from minority racial/ethnic backgrounds were less likely to undergo chemotherapy (OR: 0.69; p < 0.001) and radiation (OR: 0.71; p < 0.001) than white patients. Overall, unadjusted, 1-year survival was 23%, with differences in treatment receipt accounting for small but significant differences in survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There are disparities in the presentation and treatment of ATC by sex and race/ethnicity that likely reflect differences in access to care as well as patient and provider preferences. While survival is similarly poor across groups, the changing landscape of treatments for ATC warrants efforts to address the potential for exacerbation of disparities.

Thyroid cancer

The past 5-10 years have brought in a new era in the care of patients with thyroid cancer, with the introduction of transformative diagnostic and management options. Several international ultrasound-based thyroid nodule risk stratification systems have been developed with the goal of reducing unnecessary biopsies. Less invasive alternatives to surgery for low-risk thyroid cancer, such as active surveillance and minimally invasive interventions, are being explored. New systemic therapies are now available for patients with advanced thyroid cancer. However, in the setting of these advances, disparities exist in the diagnosis and management of thyroid cancer. As new management options are becoming available for thyroid cancer, it is essential to support population-based studies and randomised clinical trials that will inform evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the management of thyroid cancer, and to include diverse patient populations in research to better understand and subsequently address existing barriers to equitable thyroid cancer care.

Insurance-Based Disparities in Guideline-Concordant Thyroid Cancer Care in the Era of De-Escalation

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies have demonstrated insurance-based disparities in the treatment of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, it remains unclear whether these disparities have persisted in the era of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines. The goal of this study was to assess whether insurance type is associated with the receipt of guideline-concordant and timely thyroid cancer treatment in a modern cohort.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with well-differentiated thyroid cancer between 2016 and 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Appropriateness of surgical and radioactive iodine treatment (RAI) was determined based on the 2015 ATA guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, stratified at age 65, were used to evaluate the associations between insurance type and appropriateness and timeliness of the treatment.

RESULTS

125,827 patients were included (private = 71%, Medicare = 19%, Medicaid = 10%). Compared to privately insured patients, patients with Medicaid more frequently presented with tumors >4 cm in size (11% versus 8%, P < 0.001) and regional metastases (29% versus 27%, P < 0.001). However, patients with Medicaid were also less likely to undergo appropriate surgical treatment (odds ratio 0.69, P < 0.001), less likely to undergo surgery within 90 d of diagnosis (hazard ratio 0.80, P < 0.001), and more likely to be undertreated with RAI (odds ratio 1.29, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the likelihood of guideline-concordant surgical or medical treatment by insurance type in patients ≥65 y old.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of the 2015 ATA guidelines, patients with Medicaid remain less likely to receive guideline-concordant, timely surgery and more likely to be undertreated with RAI compared to privately insured patients.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Appropriate Thyroid Cancer Treatment, Before and After the Release of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines reduced the recommended extent of therapy for low-risk thyroid cancers. Little is known about the impact of these changes on overall treatment patterns and on previously described racial/ethnic disparities in guideline-concordant care. This study aimed to assess trends in thyroid cancer care before and after release of the 2015 guidelines, with particular attention to racial/ethnic disparities.

METHODS

Patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2018). An interrupted time series design was used to assess trends in treatment before and after the 2015 guidelines. Appropriateness of surgical and radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment was determined based on the ATA guidelines, and the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant treatment was compared between racial/ethnic groups.

RESULTS

The study identified 309,367 patients (White 74%, Black 8%, Hispanic 9%, Asian 6%). Between 2010 and 2015, the adjusted probability of appropriate surgery was lower for Black (- 2.1%; p < 0.001), Hispanic (- 1.0%; p < 0.001), and Asian (- 2.1%; p < 0.001) patients than for White patients. After 2015, only Hispanic patients had a lower probability of undergoing appropriate surgical therapy (- 2.6%; p = 0.040). Similarly, between 2010 and 2015, the adjusted probability of receiving appropriate RAI therapy was lower for the Hispanic (- 3.6%; p < 0.001) and Asian (- 2.4%; p < 0.001) patients than for White patients. After 2015, the probability of appropriate RAI therapy did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2010 and 2015, patients from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds were less likely than White patients to receive appropriate surgical and RAI therapy for thyroid cancer. After the 2015 guidelines, racial/ethnic disparities in treatment improved.

Disparities in Thyroid Care

Thyroid disease affects an estimated 20 million Americans, with 1 in 8 women developing a thyroid disorder during her lifetime. Although most patients with thyroid cancer have a good prognosis and effective treatments for benign thyroid disease are available, disparities exist in thyroid care and result in worse outcomes for racial and ethnic minorities. Inequities in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid disease are due to the complex interplay of systems-, physician-, and patient-level factors. Thus, innovative strategies that take an ecological approach to addressing racial disparities are needed to achieve equitable care for all patients with thyroid disease.

Comparing surgical thoroughness and recurrence in thyroid cancer patients across race/ethnicity

BACKGROUND

For patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who will receive postoperative radioactive iodine, thyroid remnant uptake can be calculated and may point to the thoroughness of the surgical resection. In the United States, outcome disparities exist among ethnic/racial minorities with differentiated thyroid cancer. Data about surgical thoroughness and recurrence rates across races/ethnicities do not exist. This study compared the amount of thyroid remnant uptake and cancer recurrence rates across race/ethnicity.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who had postoperative radioactive iodine in 2017 and 2018 and were followed to 2020. We collected thyroid bed remnant uptake from postoperative radioactive iodine scans and analyzed it as a ratio of percent of uptake to dose of radioactive iodine received to control for varying radioactive iodine doses. Thyroid remnant, uptake to dose of radioactive iodine received, and recurrence were evaluated across race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Of 218 patients: 61% were White, 21% Black, 11% Asian, and 7% Hispanic; 72% were female. Seventy-one percent of patients had their surgery done by a high-volume surgeon, although volume data were not available for all. In White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients, median uptake was 0.68%, 0.44%, 1.5%, and 0.8%, respectively (P = .13). We did not observe differences in median uptake to dose of radioactive iodine received across groups (P = .41). Recurrence rate was 17.0% among White patients, 16.7% among Black patients, 17.6% among Asian patients, and 16.7% among Hispanic patients (P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

We did not observe differences across race/ethnicity in surgical thoroughness or rate of recurrence. These findings suggest that disparities may be mitigated when ethnic/racial minorities have similar access to quality surgical care.

Association of medicaid expansion of the Affordable Care Act with the stage at diagnosis and treatment of papillary thyroid cancer: A difference-in-differences analysis

BACKGROUND

The Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Medicaid expansion has increased insurance coverage and improved various cancer outcomes. Its impact in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) remains unclear.

METHODS

Non-elderly patients (40-64 years-old) with PTC living in low-income areas either in a 2014 expansion, or a non-expansion state were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2016. Insurance coverage, stage at diagnosis, and RAI administration were analyzed using a difference-in-differences analysis.

RESULTS

10,644 patients were included. Compared with non-expansion states, the percentage of uninsured patients (adjusted-DD -2.6% [95%-CI -4.3to-0.8%],p = 0.004) and patients with private insurance decreased, and those with Medicaid coverage increased (adjusted-DD 9.7% [95%-CI 6.9-12.5%],p < 0.001) in expansion states after ACA implementation. The percentage of patients with pT1 did not differ between expansion and non-expansion states; neither did the use of RAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion has resulted in a smaller uninsured population in PTC patients, but without earlier disease presentation nor change in RAI treatment.

Disparities Research in Thyroid Cancer: Challenges and Strategies for Improvement

Until recently, thyroid cancer was one of the most rapidly increasing cancers in the United States. Disparities exist in many aspects of thyroid cancer care as a result of the multifactorial interplay of systemic, patient, and physician factors. To better understand the management of thyroid cancer in populations at risk for health disparities and subsequently implement changes that will lead to health equity for all patients with thyroid cancer, health services research with innovative approaches is necessary.