Pure flat epithelial atypia identified on core needle biopsy does not require excision

Upgrade Rates and Breast Cancer Development Among Germline Pathogenic Variant Carriers with High-Risk Breast Lesions

BACKGROUND

High-risk lesions (HRL) of the breast are risk factors for future breast cancer development and may be associated with a concurrent underlying malignancy when identified on needle biopsy; however, there are few data evaluating HRLs in carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in breast cancer predisposition genes.

METHODS

We identified patients from two institutions with germline PVs in high- and moderate-penetrance breast cancer predisposition genes and an HRL in an intact breast, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), and lobular neoplasia (LN). We calculated upgrade rates at surgical excision and used Kaplan-Meier methods to characterize 3-year breast cancer risk in patients without upgrade.

RESULTS

Of 117 lesions in 105 patients, 65 (55.6%) were ADH, 48 (41.0%) were LN, and 4 (3.4%) were FEA. Most PVs (83.8%) were in the BRCA1/2, CHEK2 and ATM genes. ADH and FEA were excised in most cases (87.1%), with upgrade rates of 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-23.4%) and 0%, respectively. LN was selectively excised (53.8%); upgrade rate in the excision group was 4.8% (95% CI 0.8-22.7%), and with 20 months of median follow-up, no same-site cancers developed in the observation group. Among those not upgraded, the 3-year risk of breast cancer development was 13.1% (95% CI 6.3-26.3%), mostly estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) disease (89.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrade rates for HRLs in patients with PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes appear similar to non-carriers. HRLs may be associated with increased short-term ER+ breast cancer risk in PV carriers, warranting strong consideration of surgical or chemoprevention therapies in this population.

Increased risk of upstage when combinations of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential are found on core needle biopsy: The need for surgical excision

BACKGROUND

Management of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential diagnosed at core needle biopsy (CNB) is controversial due to variable upstage rate (UR) with surgical excision (SE).

METHODS

We performed an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of adult women who underwent CNB demonstrating atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia, radial scar, or intraductal papilloma then SE between 2010 and 2022. We evaluated CNB pathology for combination diagnoses (CD), defined as multiple primary lesions or primary with lobular neoplasia (LN), and surgical pathology for upstage.

RESULTS

719 patients were included. UR was 12.2% (88/719). CD experienced higher UR than pure (17.7% (45/254) vs. 9.2% (43/465), p ​= ​0.001). ADH/LN had the highest UR of all CD (34.6% (9/26), p ​= ​0.001). Increased size (15.6 vs. 10.5 ​mm, p ​< ​0.001), distance from nipple (79 vs. 66 ​mm, p ​< ​0.001), and personal history of breast cancer (p ​= ​0.04) were associated with UR.

CONCLUSIONS

CD was associated with increased UR. ADH/LN had the highest UR.

Imaging Characteristics of and Multidisciplinary Management Considerations for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Flat Epithelial Atypia: Review of Current Literature

High-risk lesions of the breast are frequently encountered in percutaneous biopsy specimens. While benign, these lesions have historically undergone surgical excision due to their potential to be upgraded to malignancy. However, there is emerging evidence that a tailored management approach should be considered to reduce overtreatment of these lesions. Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) are two of the most commonly encountered high-risk lesions. FEA has been shown to have a relatively low rate of progression to malignancy, and some guidelines are now recommending observation over routine excision in select cases. Selective observation may be reasonable in cases where the target lesion is small and completely removed at biopsy and when there are no underlying risk factors, such as a history of breast cancer or genetic mutation or concurrent ADH. ADH has the highest potential upgrade rate to malignancy of all the high-risk lesions. Most society guidelines continue to recommend surgical excision of this lesion. More recently, some literature suggests that ADH lesions that appear completely removed at biopsy, involve limited foci (less than two or three) with no necrosis or significant atypia, manifest as a small group of mammographic calcifications, or demonstrate no enhancement at MRI may be reasonable for observation. Ultimately, management of all high-risk lesions must be based on a multidisciplinary approach that considers all patient, radiologic, clinical, and histopathologic factors. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Prevalence, Impact, and Diagnostic Challenges of Benign Breast Disease: A Narrative Review

Benign breast diseases, which are commonly seen in clinical practice, have various clinical presentations and implications, as well as management strategies. This article describes common benign breast lesions, presentations of these lesions, and typical radiographic and histologic findings. Also included in this review are the most recent data and guideline-based recommendations for the management of benign breast diseases at diagnosis, including surgical referral, medical management, and ongoing surveillance.

Are Columnar Cell Lesions the Earliest Non-Obligate Precursor in the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway?

Columnar cell lesions (CCLs) of the breast comprise a spectrum of morphologic alterations of the terminal duct lobular unit involving variably dilated and enlarged acini lined by columnar epithelial cells. The World Health Organization currently classifies CCLs without atypia as columnar cell change (CCC) and columnar cell hyperplasia (CCH), whereas flat epithelial atypia (FEA) is a unifying term encompassing both CCC and CCH with cytologic atypia. CCLs have been increasingly recognized in stereotactic core needle biopsies (CNBs) performed for the assessment of calcifications. CCLs are believed to represent the earliest non-obligate precursor of low-grade invasive breast carcinomas as they share molecular alterations and often coexist with entities in the low-grade breast neoplasia pathway. Despite this association, however, the risk of progression of CCLs to invasive breast carcinoma appears low and may not exceed that of concurrent proliferative lesions. As the reported upgrade rates of pure CCL/FEA when identified as the most advanced high-risk lesion on CNB vary widely, the management of FEA diagnosed on CNB remains controversial. This review will include a historical overview of CCLs and will examine histologic diagnostic criteria, molecular alterations, prognosis and issues related to upgrade rates and clinical management.

Upgrade rate of percutaneously diagnosed pure flat epithelial atypia: systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,924 lesions

CONTEXT

Management remains controversial due to the risk of upgrade for malignancy from flat epithelial atypia (FEA). Data about the frequency and malignancy upgrade rates are scant. Namely, observational follow-up is advised by many studies in cases of pure FEA on core biopsy and in the absence of an additional surgical excision. For cases of pure FEA, the American College of Surgeons no longer recommends surgical excision but rather recommends observation with clinical and imaging follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to calculate the pooled upgrade of pure FEA following core needle biopsies.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and Embase databases were conducted in December 2020. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A fixed- or random-effects model was utilized. Heterogeneity among studies was estimated by utilizing the I2 statistic and considered high if the I2 was greater than 50%. The random-effects model with the DerSimonian and Laird method was utilized to calculate the pooled upgrade rate and its 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

A total of 1924 pure FEA were analyzed among 59 included studies. The overall pooled upgrade rate to malignancy was 8.8%. The pooled upgrade rate for mammography only was 8.9%. The pooled upgrade rate for ultrasound was 14%. The pooled upgrade rate for mammography and ultrasound combined was 8.8%. The pooled upgrade rate for MRI-only cases was 27.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the guidelines for the management of pure FEA are variable, our data support that pure FEA diagnosed at core needle biopsy should undergo surgical excision since the upgrade rate >2%.

The effect of delay of excisional biopsy on upstage rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, and radial scar

PURPOSE

When Core Needle Biopsy (CNB) demonstrates Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH), Flat Epithelial Atypia (FEA), Intraductal Papilloma (IDP), or Radial Scar/Complex Sclerosing Lesion (RS), excisional biopsy (EB) is often performed to rule out underlying malignancy with upstage rates (UR) ranging between 1 and 20%. The COVID-19 pandemic led to delayed EB for many patients. We sought to evaluate whether this delay was associated with higher UR.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of women who underwent CNB and then EB for ADH, FEA, IDP, or RS between 2017 and 2021 using an IRB-approved repository. UR was evaluated by days between CNB and EB.

RESULTS

473 patients met inclusion. 55 were upstaged to cancer (11.6%). 178 patients had pure ADH on CNB and 37 were upstaged (20.8%). 50 patients had pure FEA and 3 were upstaged (6%). 132 had pure IDP and 7 were upstaged (5.3%). 98 had pure RS and 1 was upstaged (1%). 7/15 (46.7%) had a combination of diagnoses or diagnosis with palpable mass and were upstaged. Days between CNB and EB were < 60 for 275 patients (58.1%), 60-90 for 108 (22.8%), 91-120 for 43 (9.1%), and > 120 for 47 (9.9%). There was no significant difference in UR (10.9% for < 60, 14.8% for 60-90, 7% for 90-120, and 12.8% for > 120, p = 0.54). UR for ADH was clinically increased after 60 days (27.8 vs. 17.5%), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Surgical delay was not associated with an increased UR.

Managing patients with high-risk breast lesions, precursors on the breast neoplasia pathway

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women. Imaging abnormalities may be noted on routine breast cancer screenings and require biopsy for further evaluation. Atypia and carcinoma in situ are nonmalignant lesions identified via breast biopsy and are associated with an increased risk of invasive carcinoma. Because of the lack of specialized breast cancer prevention and risk reduction programs, patients may not be able to access optimal management of the various subtypes of atypia and carcinoma in situ. By understanding the pathology of high-risk breast lesions and the resulting elevated cancer risk, healthcare providers, specifically primary care providers, can better counsel, manage, and treat patients to provide comprehensive quality care.

Upgrade Rate of Pure Flat Epithelial Atypia Diagnosed at Core Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to calculate the pooled upgrade rate of pure flat epithelial atypia (FEA) diagnosed at core needle biopsy (CNB).

Materials and Methods

A PubMed and Embase database search was performed in December 2019. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Study quality and publication bias were assessed. The upgrade rate of pure FEA to cancer, invasive carcinoma, and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), as well as the co-occurrence rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), with 95% CIs were calculated. A random effect model was used to integrate the proportions and their corresponding 95% CI. Study heterogeneity was calculated using τ² and I ² .

Results

A total of 2482 cases of pure FEA across 42 studies (mean age range, 46-59 years) met inclusion criteria to be analyzed. Significant study heterogeneity was identified (τ² = 0.001, I ² = 67%). The pooled upgrade rates reported for pure FEA were 5% (95% CI: 3%, 6%) for breast cancer, 1% (95% CI: 0%, 2%) for invasive carcinoma, and 2% (95% CI: 1%, 3%) for DCIS. When more than 90% of calcifications were removed at CNB, the pooled upgrade rate was 0% (95% CI: 0%, 2%). The pooled co-occurrence rate of ADH at surgical excision was 17% (95% CI: 12%, 21%). Study quality was medium to high with a risk of publication bias (P < .01).

Conclusion

Pure FEA diagnosed at CNB should be surgically excised due to the pooled upgrade rate of 5% for breast cancer. If more than 90% of the targeted calcifications are removed by CNB for pure FEA, close imaging follow-up is recommended.Keywords: Biopsy/Needle Aspiration, Breast, MammographySupplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2021.

Management of High-Risk Breast Lesions

High-risk breast lesions (HRLs) are a group of heterogeneous lesions that can be associated with a synchronous or adjacent breast cancer and that confer an elevated lifetime risk of breast cancer. Management of HRLs after core needle biopsy may include close imaging and clinical follow-up or excisional biopsy to evaluate for cancer. This article reviews histologic features and clinical presentation of each of the HRLs, current evidence with regard to management, and guidelines from the American Society of Breast Surgeons and National Comprehensive Cancer Network. In addition, imaging surveillance and risk-reduction strategies for women with HRLs are discussed.

B3 lesion upgrade rates in a tertiary Australian breast centre: a 8-year experience (2012-2019)

BACKGROUND

B3 breast lesions identified on core needle biopsy have uncertain malignant potential. Traditional management of these lesions has been surgical excision, but there is growing interest in less invasive and more cost-effective alternatives such as vacuum-assisted excisional biopsy (VAEB). Determining the rate of malignant upgrade for B3 lesions is important as it may identify low-risk lesions where VAEB could be considered.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of women undergoing an elective excisional biopsy for a B3 lesion identified on core needle biopsy at a tertiary Australian breast centre. The pre-operative biopsy diagnosis and subsequent excisional biopsy diagnosis were used to calculate the proportion of cases where the diagnosis was upgraded to malignancy.

RESULTS

A total of 299 eligible patients were identified. Pre-operative diagnosis of papillary lesion with atypia was associated with the highest upgrade rate (50%, n = 12). The next highest upgrade rates occurred in those with flat epithelial atypia (37.50%, n = 8); atypical ductal hyperplasia (24.71%, n = 85); lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)/atypical lobular hyperplasia with calcification (17.65%, n = 17); and papillary lesion without atypia (4.72%, n = 106). Patients with radial scar (n = 51), classical LCIS without calcification (n = 7) and mucocoele-like lesion (n = 8) had a 0% upgrade rate.

CONCLUSION

VAEB may be appropriate for low malignant risk lesions such as papillary lesion without atypia, mucocoele-like lesion and radial scar lesion without atypia. Open-surgical-excisional biopsy remains appropriate for high upgrade lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, papillary lesion with atypia, flat epithelial atypia and classical LCIS with calcification. Long-term prospective randomized multicentre studies and continuing multidisciplinary approach is recommended for future clinical implementation.

Upgrade Rate of Flat Epithelial Atypia Diagnosed at Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy of Microcalcifications: Is Excisional Biopsy Indicated?

OBJECTIVE

Whether the optimal management of pure flat epithelial atypia (FEA) found on core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens is surgical excision or imaging follow-up remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the upgrade rate to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive carcinoma or a high-risk lesion (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, or lobular carcinoma in situ), and it explored the relationship between a family history of breast cancer and the risk of upgrade.

METHODS

Cases with pure FEA found on stereotactic CNB of microcalcifications between March 2011 to December 2017 were followed by excisional biopsy or periodic imaging. The proportion of cases upgraded to a high-risk lesion and the odds of upgrade as related to a family history of breast cancer were determined with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We identified 622 cases of pure FEA; 101 (16.2%) underwent surgical excision and 269 (43.2%) had imaging follow-up of ≥ 24 months. There were no upgrades to DCIS or invasive cancer in any of these 370 individuals (0%), and 4.6% (17/370; 95% CI: 2.9%-7.2%) were upgraded to a high-risk lesion. There was a nonstatistically significant trend between family history and upgrade to high-risk lesion (odds ratio 1.72 [95% CI: 0.65%-4.57%]).

CONCLUSION

In our study, the upgrade rate of pure FEA to malignancy was 0%. We suggest that regular imaging follow-up is an appropriate alternative to surgery. Because of potential differences in biopsy techniques and pathologist interpretation of the primary biopsy, individual institutions should audit their own results prior to altering their management of FEA.