Differences in short-term outcomes between open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy in frail malnourished patients

Radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients previously treated for prostate cancer: Insights from a large European multicentric series

INTRODUCTION

Previous radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) might impair feasibility of radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). The current study addressed morbidity, operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS) of RC, within the largest available series of patients with history of previous RP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients previously submitted to RP for PCa and subsequently submitted to RC for BCa, at six high-volume European institutions between 2010 and 2019, were identified. Presence of either PCa or BCa metastases, RT as primary treatment for PCa, and palliative RC represented exclusion criteria. The quality criteria for accurate and comprehensive reporting of intra- and post-operative surgical outcomes, recommended by the European Association of Urology guidelines, were fulfilled. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 140 RC patients with history of RP were identified. After RP, 69 (49%) patients received radiotherapy (RT) for PCa, either in adjuvant (n = 50, 36%) or salvage setting (n = 19, 13%). Median age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (IQR 5, 7). Median OT, estimated blood loss and LOS were, respectively, 300 min, 500 ml, and 16 days. Intra-operative transfusions rate was 47% (n = 65). One intra-operative complication occurred (EAUiaiC grade 2, perforation of the rectum managed with immediate repair). Eighty-two (59%) patients experienced a total of 107 post-operative complications during the hospital stay, and seven (5%) patients required hospital readmission. In multivariable regression analyses, RT for PCa was associated with higher risk of post-operative complications (odds ratio 1.82, p = 0.039), longer OT (incidence rate ratio 1.09, p < 0.001), and longer LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.24, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RC in patients with history of RP is feasible, albeit burdened by remarkable morbidity, even in centers of excellence. RT after RP for PCa portends worse surgical outcomes.

A comprehensive assessment of frailty status on surgical, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy-A large, retrospective, single-center study

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is a challenging procedure, which can be associated with severe complications. In consequence, the search for accurate and independent indicators of unfavorable surgical outcomes appears warranted. We aimed at evaluating the impact of frailty status on surgical, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing PN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study including 1,282 patients treated with PN for clinically localized cT1 RCC was performed. The modified Frailty Index (mFI) was used to assess preoperative frailty. Multivariable logistic, Poisson and linear regression analyses(MVA) tested the effect of frailty on complications, acute kidney injury(AKI), renal function decline after PN. Cumulative incidence and competing-risk analyses investigated survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1,282 patients, 220 (17%) were frail. Overall, 982 (76%) vs. 123 (9.6%) vs. 171 (13%) patients underwent open vs. laparoscopic vs. robot-assisted PN. Median follow-up was 66 (IQR: 35-107) months. At MVA, frailty status predicted increased risk of complications [Odds ratio (OR): 1.46, 95%CI 1.17-1.84; P < 0.001]. Moreover, frail patients were at higher risk of postoperative AKI (OR: 1.95, 95%CI 1.13-3.35; P = 0.01). In frail patients, renal function permanently decreased over time (P = 0.01) without any renal function plateau or improvement during the follow-up, which were instead observed in the nonfrail cohort. At competing-risks analyses, frailty status predicted higher risk of other-cause mortality [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.67, 95%CI 1.05-2.66; P = 0.02], but not of cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty status predicts higher risk of adverse surgical outcomes after PN. Moreover, greater renal function decline was observed in frail patients, compared with nonfrail patients. Finally, the risk of OCM significantly overcomes the risk of dying due to RCC in frail patients.

Learning Curve of a Novel Three-Port Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Urinary Diversion: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Objective: Three-port laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) is a novel method of radical cystectomy, which is being spread by our team in primary hospitals in our country. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of urologists using this technique for bladder cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from patients with bladder cancer who received three-port LRC with urinary diversion at our medical center between January 2018 and December 2021. Consecutive cases were grouped according to different surgical years, and perioperative parameters among groups were assessed as variables for the learning curve, including operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph nodes (LN) yield, and postoperative hospital stay. Results: We assessed 154 patients who were divided into three groups, all of which were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics. With the increase in surgical experience, the operation time of urologists is obviously reduced (P < .05), especially after 100 surgeries, whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in terms of EBL, LN yield, and postoperative hospital stay in the different surgical experience groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Our early learning curve experience indicates that the three-port LRC with urinary diversion is a safe and feasible technique that can be mastered by urologists after learning from a large sample. Given its advantages in cost and significantly improved learning curve, we recommend this technique to surgeons with extensive laparoscopic experience.

The effect of frailty on post-operative outcomes and health care expenditures in patients treated with partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of frailty on short-term post-operative outcomes and total hospital charges (THCs) in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma, treated with partial nephrectomy (PN).

METHODS

Within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database we identified 25,545 patients treated with PN from 2000 to 2015. We used the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) frailty-defining indicator and we examined the rates of frailty over time, as well as its effect on overall complications, major complications, blood transfusions, non-home-based discharge, length of stay (LOS) and THCs. Time trends and multivariable logistic, Poisson and linear regression models were applied.

RESULTS

Overall, 3574 (14.0%) patients were frail, 2677 (10.5%) were older than 75 years and 2888 (11.3%) had Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 2. However, the vast majority of frail patients were neither elderly nor comorbid (83%). Rates of frail patients treated with PN increased over time, from 8.3 in 2000 to 18.1% in 2015 (all p < 0.001). Frail patients showed higher rates of overall complications (43.5 vs. 30.3%), major complications (16.6 vs. 9.8%), blood transfusions (11.6 vs 8.3%) and non-home-based discharge (9.9 vs. 5.4%). longer LOS [4 (IQR: 3-6) vs. 4 (IQR: 2-5) days] and higher THCs ($43,906 vs. $38,447 - all p < 0.001). Moreover, frailty status independently predicted overall complications (OR: 1.73), major complications (OR: 1.63), longer LOS (RR: 1.07) and higher THCs (RR: +$7506). Finally, a dose-response on the risk of suboptimal surgical outcomes was shown in patients with multiple risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of seven patients is frail at time of surgery and this rate is on the rise. Moreover, frailty is associated with adverse outcomes after PN. In consequence, preoperative assessment of frailty status should be implemented, to identify patients who may benefit from pre- or postoperative measures aimed at improving surgical outcomes in this patient population.

The Impact of Previous Prostate Surgery on Surgical Outcomes for Patients Treated with Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) may be undermined by unfavorable preoperative surgical characteristics such as previous prostate surgery (PPS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing RARC with versus without a history of PPS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 220 consecutive patients treated with RARC and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer at a single European tertiary centre. Of these, 43 had previously undergone PPS, defined as transurethral resection of the prostate/holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (n=21) or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (n=22).

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

RARC in patients with a history of PPS.

MEASUREMENTS

Data on postoperative complications were collected according to the quality criteria for accurate and comprehensive reporting of surgical outcomes recommended by the European Association of Urology guidelines. Multivariable logistic, linear, and Poisson regression analyses were performed to test the effect of PPS on surgical outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 43 patients (20%) were treated with RARC after PPS. Operative time (OT) was longer in the PPS group (360 vs 330min; p<0.001). Patients with PPS experienced higher rates of intraoperative complications (19% vs 6.8%) and higher rates of 30-d (67% vs 39%), and Clavien-Dindo >3 (33% vs 16%) postoperative complications (all p<0.05). Moreover, the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate after RARC was higher in the PPS group (14% vs 4%; p=0.03). On multivariable analyses, PPS at RARC independently predicted higher risk of intraoperative (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-6.21; p=0.01) and 30-d complications (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.05-5.22; p=0.02), as well as longer OT (relative risk [RR] 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p=0.02) and length of stay (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26; p=0.02). Lack of randomization represents the main limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

RARC in patients with a history of PPS is feasible, but it is associated with a higher risk of complications and longer OT and length of stay. Moreover, higher PSM rates have been reported for these patients. Thus, measures aimed at improving surgical outcomes appear to be warranted.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We investigated the effect of previous prostate surgery (PPS) on surgical outcomes after robot-assisted removal of the bladder. We found that patients with PPS have a higher risk of complications and longer hospitalization after bladder removal. These patients deserve closer evaluation before this type of bladder operation.

Frailty impact on postoperative complications and early mortality rates in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review

Objective: To assess the prevalence of frailty, a status of vulnerability to stressors leading to adverse health events, in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), and test the impact of frailty measurements on postoperative adverse outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles published up to April 2020 was performed. Electronic databases were searched to quantify the frailty prevalence in RC patients and assess the predictive ability of frailty indexes on RC-related outcomes as postoperative complications, early mortality, hospitalization length (LOS), costs, discharge dispositions, readmission rate.

Results: Eleven studies were selected. Patients’ frailty was identified by Johns Hopkins indicator (JHI) in two studies, 11-item modified Frailty Index (mFI) in four, 5-item simplified FI (sFI) in three, 15-point mFI in one, Fried Frailty Criteria in one. Considering all the frailty measurements applied, 8% and 31% of patients were frail or pre-frail, respectively. Frail (43%) and pre-frail patients (35%) were more at risk of major complications compared to non-frail (27%) using sFI; with JHI the percentages of frail and non-frail were 53% versus 19%. According to JHI and mFI frailty was related to longer LOS and higher costs. JHI identified that 3% of frail patients experience in-hospital mortality versus 1.5% of non-frail. Finally, using sFI, frail (28%), and pre-frail (19%) were more likely to be discharged non-home compared to non-frail patients (8%) and had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (4% and 2% versus 1%).

Conclusions: Almost half of RC patients were frail or pre-frail, conditions significantly related to an increased risk of postoperative adverse events with higher rates of major complications and early mortality. The most-used frailty index was mFI, while JHI and sFI resulted the most reliable to predict early postoperative RC-related adverse outcomes and should be routinely included in clinical practice after better standardization throughout prospective comparative studies.

Abbreviations: ACG: Adjusted Clinical Groups; ACS: American College Surgeons; AUC: area under the curve; BCa: bladder cancer; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; CSHA-FI: Canadian Study of Health and Aging Frailty Index; CCS: Clavien-Dindo Classification Score; ERAS: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; FFC: Fried Frailty Criteria; (e)(m)(s)FI: (extended) (modified) (simplified) Frailty Index; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; (p)LOS: (prolonged) length of hospital stay; NSQIP: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; OR: odds ratio; (O)PN: (open) partial nephrectomy; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses; (O)(RA)RC: (open)(robot-assisted) radical cystectomy; (O)RN: (open) radical nephrectomy; ROC: receiver operating characteristic; RNU: radical nephroureterectomy; (R)RP: (retropubic) radical prostatectomy; RR: relative risk; THCs: total hospital charges; nephrectomy; UD: urinary diversion