1
|
Sucandy I, Kang RD, Adorno J, Crespo K, Syblis C, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1022-1029. [PMID: 37217370 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) classification system is one of several widely accepted difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver resections. Nothing is yet known about the applicability of this system for robotic liver resections. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 359 patients undergoing robotic hepatectomies between 2016 and 2022. Resections were classified into low, intermediate, and high difficulty level. Data were analyzed utilizing ANOVA of repeated measures, 3 x 2 contingency tables, and area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). RESULTS Of the 359 patients, 117 were classified as low-difficulty level, 92 as intermediate, and 150 as high. The IMM system correlates well with tumor size (p = 0.002). The IMM system was a strong predictor of intraoperative outcomes including operative duration (p<0.001) and estimated blood loss (EBL) (p<0.001). The IMM system also showed a strong calibration for predicting an open conversion (AUC=0.705) and intraoperative complications (AUC=0.79). In contrast, the IMM system was a poor predictor of postoperative complications, mortality, and readmission. CONCLUSION The IMM system provides a strong correlation with intraoperative, but not postoperative outcomes. A dedicated difficulty scoring system should be developed for robotic hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Richard D Kang
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Cameron Syblis
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sharona Ross
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Linn YL, Wu AG, Han HS, Liu R, Chen KH, Fuks D, Soubrane O, Cherqui D, Geller D, Cheung TT, Edwin B, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M, Troisi RI, Wakabayashi G, Goh BKP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:36-59. [PMID: 35780493 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The ability to stratify the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) allows surgeons at different phases of the learning curve to tackle cases of appropriate difficulty safely. Several difficulty scoring systems (DSS) have been formulated which attempt to accurately stratify this difficulty. The present study aims to review the literature pertaining to the existing DSS for MILR. METHODS We performed a systematic review and metanalysis of the literature reporting on the formulation, supporting data, and comparison of DSS for MILR. RESULTS A total of 11 studies were identified which reported on the formulation of unique DSS for MILR. Five of these (Ban, Iwate, Hasegawa, Institut Mutaliste Montsouris [IMM], and Southampton DSS) were externally validated and shown to predict difficulty of MILR via a range of outcome measures. The Ban DSS was supported by pooled data from 10 studies (9 LLR, 1 RLR), Iwate by 10 studies (8 LLR, 2 RLR), Hasegawa by four studies (all LLR), IMM by eight studies (all LLR), and Southampton by five studies (all LLR). There was no clear superior DSS. CONCLUSION The existing DSS were all effective in predicting difficulty of MILR. Present studies comparing between DSS have not established a clear superior system, and the five main DSS have been found to be predictive of difficulty in LLR and two of these in RLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Le Linn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Andrew G Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Departmet for HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital/ National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore City, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xi C, Zhu M, Ji T, Tan Y, Zhuang L, Yuan Z, Zhang Z, Xu L, Liu Z, Xu X, Xue W, Ding W. A novel difficulty scoring system of laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumor. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1019763. [PMID: 36248965 PMCID: PMC9557292 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1019763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To develop a novel difficulty scoring system (NDSS) to predict the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic hepatectomy. Patients and methods A total of 138 patients with liver tumors performed liver resection (LLR) between March 2017 to June 2022 were selected from Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University and Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University. Patient demographics, laboratory tests, intraoperative variables, pathological characteristics were assessed. We also assessed the Child Pugh score and the DSS-B score. Results Patients were divided into training and testing cohort according to their hospital. Patients in training cohort were divided into high and low difficult groups based on operation time, blood loss and conversion. Higher percentage of patients with malignant liver tumor (87.0% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.003) or history of hepatobiliary surgery (24.1% vs. 7.0%; P = 0.043) in high difficult group than in low difficult group. To improve the difficulty scoring system, we incorporated the history of hepatobiliary surgery and nature of the tumor. A novel difficulty scoring system was established. The results showed that the operation time (P < 0.001), blood loss (P < 0.001), ALT (P < 0.001) and AST (P = 0.001) were associated with the novel difficulty score significantly. Compared with DSS-B, the NDSS has a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) (0.838 vs. 0.814). The nomogram was established according to the NDSS. The AUROCs of the nomogram in training and testing cohort were 0.833 and 0.767. The calibration curves for the probability of adverse event showed optimal agreement between the probability as predicted by the nomogram and the actual probability. Conclusions We developed a nomogram with the NDSS that can predict the difficulty of LLR. This system could more accurately reflect the difficulty of surgery and help liver surgeons to make the surgical plan and ensure the safety of the operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Xi
- Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, The Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Maoqun Zhu
- Department of Hepatological Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Tianhao Ji
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yulin Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, The Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Lin Zhuang
- Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, The Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Zhiping Yuan
- Department of Digestion, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
| | - Zheng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, The Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Litian Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Fifth General Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
| | - Zhilin Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Xuezhong Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, The Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Wenbo Xue
- Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, The Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Wei Ding
- Department of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, The Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, China
- Changzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Cancer Medicine, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Wei Ding,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, Nuytens F, Vanneste G, Libbrecht L, Alaerts H, Parmentier I, Verslype C, D’Hondt M. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: retrospective analysis of prognostic factors and oncological outcomes in a single-center cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2399-2414. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|