1
|
Ramírez-Giraldo C, Avendaño-Morales V, Van-Londoño I, Melo-Leal D, Camargo-Areyanes MI, Venegas-Sanabria LC, Vargas JPV, Aguirre-Salamanca EJ, Isaza-Restrepo A. Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:7678. [PMID: 39768601 PMCID: PMC11678213 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2024] [Revised: 10/27/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (≥65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72-1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62-1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74-2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75-4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá 111411, Colombia; (V.A.-M.); (L.C.V.-S.); (E.J.A.-S.); (A.I.-R.)
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111221, Colombia; (I.V.-L.); (D.M.-L.); (M.I.C.-A.); (J.P.V.V.)
| | - Violeta Avendaño-Morales
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá 111411, Colombia; (V.A.-M.); (L.C.V.-S.); (E.J.A.-S.); (A.I.-R.)
| | - Isabella Van-Londoño
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111221, Colombia; (I.V.-L.); (D.M.-L.); (M.I.C.-A.); (J.P.V.V.)
| | - Daniela Melo-Leal
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111221, Colombia; (I.V.-L.); (D.M.-L.); (M.I.C.-A.); (J.P.V.V.)
| | | | - Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá 111411, Colombia; (V.A.-M.); (L.C.V.-S.); (E.J.A.-S.); (A.I.-R.)
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111221, Colombia; (I.V.-L.); (D.M.-L.); (M.I.C.-A.); (J.P.V.V.)
| | | | | | - Andrés Isaza-Restrepo
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá 111411, Colombia; (V.A.-M.); (L.C.V.-S.); (E.J.A.-S.); (A.I.-R.)
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111221, Colombia; (I.V.-L.); (D.M.-L.); (M.I.C.-A.); (J.P.V.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Monrabal Lezama M, Murdoch Duncan NS, Bertona S, Schlottmann F. Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1751-1758. [PMID: 37358724 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01576-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains the 5th most common cancer and the 3rd most common cause of cancer mortality. Most patients diagnosed with gastric cancer still have a poor prognosis due to its advanced presentation at diagnosis, even in countries with developed screening programs. Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment for gastric cancer, often combined with perioperative chemotherapy. Lymph node dissection is a crucial component of the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. D1 lymphadenectomy is currently recommended for early stage tumors. The extent of lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric cancer, however, is still a matter of debate between Eastern and Western surgeons. Although a D2 dissection is the current standard recommended by most guidelines, there might be a place for more limited dissections such as D1 + in selected cases. This evidence-based review will help defining the optimal lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sofia Bertona
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xiang L, Jin S, Zheng P, Maswikiti EP, Yu Y, Gao L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Chen H. Risk Assessment and Preventive Treatment for Peritoneal Recurrence Following Radical Resection for Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 11:778152. [PMID: 35047394 PMCID: PMC8763009 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.778152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
As the most common recurrence pattern after radical gastric cancer resection, peritoneal recurrence is a major cause of mortality, which affects the prognosis of patients to a very large extent. Peritoneal status and risk of peritoneal recurrence can be evaluated by peritoneal lavage cytology, photodynamic diagnosis, imaging examination, and pathologic analysis. Presently, there is no standard approach for preventing peritoneal recurrence after radical surgery; furthermore, controversies exist regarding the effects of some preventive methods. Among the preventive methods, there are high expectations about the potential of preoperative therapy, surgical skill improvement, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and postoperative treatment to reduce the incidence of peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy. This study aimed to analyze the results of previous studies on the risk assessment and preventive methods of peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy in recent years. We hope to provide references for better approach to clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies for peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Xiang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Pathology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shuai Jin
- Department of Technology, Beijing Weitai’an Pharmaceutical Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zheng
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | | | - Yang Yu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lei Gao
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Chen
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- The Key Laboratory of the Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|