Preoperative frailty assessment with the Robinson Frailty Score, Edmonton Frail Scale, and G8 and adverse postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients with cancer

Combined effect of frailty and sarcopenia on postoperative complications in older adults undergoing curative surgery for hepato-biliary-pancreatic cancer

Aim

Older adults with cancer are often at increased risk for postoperative complications following major surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the combined role of frailty and sarcopenia in predicting postoperative complications in older adults with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery.

Methods

This retrospective study included 107 Japanese patients who underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) at the geriatric oncology service before cancer treatment decisions and subsequent curative surgery for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer. Frailty status was measured using the validated 10-item frailty index based on a CGA (FI-CGA-10) and categorized as fit, prefrail, or frail. Sarcopenia was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis and grip strength. The primary outcome was postoperative complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III, within 1 month of surgery.

Results

The median age of the 107 patients was 79 (range, 75-89) years. Patients were categorized as fit (n = 36, 33.7%), prefrail (n = 57, 53.2%), or frail (n = 14, 13.1%). Of these, 21 patients (20%) were diagnosed with sarcopenia; 16 patients (15%) experienced postoperative complications. Patients classified as prefrail or frail had a higher incidence of postoperative complications compared with those classified as fit (19.7% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.08). Patients with both prefrail or frail and sarcopenia had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications. This association remained significant in the multivariable model (OR 4.74; 95% CI, 1.10-20.29; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

In this study, patients classified as prefrail/frail and sarcopenic were at significantly higher risk for postoperative complications.

Impact of frailty on outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the preferred treatment for complex multi-vessel coronary artery disease, offering substantial long-term benefits. Non-cardiac comorbidities such as frailty may significantly affect the outcomes of this procedure. However, the exact impact of frailty on CABG outcomes remains unclear, particularly given its exclusion from many pivotal revascularization trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate existing data to evaluate the impact of frailty on short- and long-term outcomes following CABG.

METHODS

Searches across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were done to identify studies that were published up to March 31, 2024, had detailed preoperative frailty assessments and compared frail versus non-frail adult patients undergoing CABG. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events within one year. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission rates and length of stay. A random-effects model was used to account for heterogeneity. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis, involving data from 14 studies, revealed a significant increase in both 30-day (OR 2.52; 95% CI: 2.07 to 3.07) and 1-year mortality (OR 2.58; 95% CI: 1.49 to 4.45) among frail patients. The risk of acute cardiac and cerebrovascular complications was comparable in all patients (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.19). However, frailty was associated with a significant increase in the risk of acute kidney injury (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.26 to 4.23). Frail patients were more likely to have longer hospital stays and higher readmission rates compared to their non-frail counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the critical impact of frailty on mortality and morbidity in CABG patients and advocates for the integration of frailty assessments into the preoperative evaluation process. Addressing frailty can lead to more individualized patient care and better outcomes, urging a paradigm shift towards comprehensive, patient-centric management in cardiac surgery.

PROSPERO REGISTER

CRD42024521327.

How can we approach preoperative frailty and related factors in patients with cancer? A scoping review

AIM

To identify factors related to preoperative frailty in patients with cancer and map the tools that measure frailty.

DESIGN

A Scoping review.

METHODS

This scoping review based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Articles from CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases published between January 2011 and April 2021. The searched keywords were concepts related to 'cancer', 'frailty' and 'measurement'.

RESULTS

While 728 records were initially identified, 24 studies were eventually selected. Research on frailty was actively conducted between 2020 and 2021. Factors related to preoperative frailty were age (22.9%), sex (11.4%), body mass index (11.4%) and physical status indicators (54.3%). The most common result of preoperative frailty was postoperative complications (35.0%). 24 instruments were used to measure frailty.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

Selecting an appropriate preoperative frailty screening tool can help improve patient postoperative treatment outcomes.

IMPACT

There are many instruments for assessing preoperative frailty, each evaluating a multi-dimensional feature. We identified the frailty screening tools used today, organized the factors that affect frailty, and explored the impact of frailty. Identifying and organizing frailty measurement tools will enable appropriate evaluation.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA-ScR.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Predictive value of the G8 screening tool for postoperative complications in older adults undergoing cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer who are being considered for cancer surgery are heterogenous, with variation in their physical, mental, and social baselines and risk of postoperative complications. Due in part to the complex nature of this population, the optimal preoperative evaluation method is not clearly defined. In this study we investigated whether geriatric-8 (G8), a screening tool for older patients with cancer that determines the need for a full geriatric assessment, is suitable for assessing the risk of postoperative complications in this population being considered for surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies that enrolled older patients undergoing cancer surgery and compared prevalence of postoperative complications in G8 "high" (≥15) patients and G8 "low" (<15) patients were identified using PubMed and EMBASE. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the risk ratio of postoperative complication rate. Postoperative mortality was systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Eleven studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in our analysis with a total of 2,691 older patients who underwent various types of cancer surgery and were characterized by their G8 scores: 1,255 G8 high (≥15) patients and 1,436 G8 low (<15) patients. G8 low patients had a significantly higher prevalence of postoperative complications than G8 high patients (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.56 [1.18-2.07], p = 0.002, I2 = 79%).

DISCUSSION

G8 can be an effective and efficient preoperative tool to assess risk of postoperative complications in older adults undergoing cancer surgery and identify potential need for further evaluation of an individual's risk with a comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Preoperative frailty screening in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer surgery: an essential step for a good surgical outcome

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a disease commonly diagnosed in the elderly, often in advanced stages. However, elderly patients with lung cancer can benefit from surgery, provided that postoperative risks are assessed appropriately before surgery. Frailty is a measure of age-related impaired functional status and a predictor of mortality and morbidity. However, its importance as a preoperative marker is not well defined.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review discusses the importance of preoperative frailty screening in elderly patients with NSCLC. A literature search was performed on the MEDLINE database in June 2023, and relevant studies on frailty or preoperative assessment of NSCLC which were published between 2000 and 2023 were retained and discussed in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Among the types of existing methods used to assess frailty those on the geriatric assessment seem to be the most appropriate; however, they are unable to fully capture the 'surgical' frailty; thus, other instruments should be developed and validated in NSCLC.

Optimization of Care for the Elderly Surgical Emergency Patient

Geriatric patients undergoing emergency surgery are at significantly higher risk for complications and death when compared with younger patients. Optimizing care for these patients requires a multidisciplinary team, special attention to physiologic changes and medication use, as well as targeted intervention to mitigate complications such as delirium, which can worsen overall outcomes. Frailty can be assessed preoperatively to identify patients at the highest risk for complications. Shared decision-making with both the family and patient during the consent process is integral to defining patient's goals of care in these high-risk situations.

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Japan Frailty Scale

Purpose

Frailty is a difficult-to-measure condition that is susceptible to adverse outcomes. The Japan Frailty Scale (JFS) is a tool for assessing frailty status in older adults. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the JFS into a Chinese version (JFS-C).

Materials and methods

The study included 160 older adults as participants. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was conducted using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Convergent validity was evaluated by assessing the correlation between JFS-C and the Barthel Index, the Frail scale, and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Criterion validity was assessed by comparing JFS-C scores with the Frail scale.

Results

JFS-C demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas = 0.711) and excellent test-retest reliability over a 7 to 10-day interval (ICC = 0.949). Correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between JFS-C and the Frail scale (r = 0.786, p < 0.001), a moderate negative correlation with the Barthel Index (r = -0.598, p < 0.001), and moderate correlations with various subscales of SF-36 (r = -0.574 to -0.661). However, no significant correlations were found between JFS-C and SF-36 mental health (r = -0.363, p < 0.001) or role emotional (r = -0.350, p < 0.001). Based on the reference standard of the Frail scale phenotype (score ≥ 2), the cutoff value for JFS-C was determined to be 3.

Conclusion

JFS-C demonstrates good reliability and validity in assessing frailty among the older population in China.

Surgical Tolerability and Frailty in Elderly Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Narrative Review

Simple Summary

Life expectancy in Western countries and East Asian countries has incremented over the past decades, resulting in a rapidly aging world, while in general, radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended in elderly men aged ≥75 years. Together with the evolving technique of robotic surgeries, surgical indications for RP should be reconsidered in ‘elderly’ and ‘frail’ men, since this procedure has now become one of the safest and most effective cancer treatments for prostate cancer. One important element to determine surgical indications is surgical tolerability. However, evidence is scarce regarding the surgical tolerability in elderly men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this review, we focused on the surgical tolerability in ‘elderly’ and/or ‘frail’ men undergoing RARP, with the intent to provide up-to-date information on this matter and to support the decision making of therapeutic options in this spectrum of patients.

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has now become the gold standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. There are multiple elements in decision making for the treatment of prostate cancer. One of the important elements is life expectancy, which the current guidelines recommend as an indicator for choosing treatment options. However, determination of life expectancy can be complicated and difficult in some cases. In addition, surgical tolerability is also an important issue. Since frailty may be a major concern, it may be logical to use geriatric assessment tools to discriminate ‘surgically fit’ patients from unfit patients. Landmark studies show two valid models such as the phenotype model and the cumulative deficit model that allow for the diagnosis of frailty. Many studies have also developed geriatric screening tools such as VES-13 and G8. These tools may have the potential to directly sort out unfit patients for surgery preoperatively.

Machine learning prediction of postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events in geriatric patients: a prospective cohort study

Background

Postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) account for more than one-third of perioperative deaths. Geriatric patients are more vulnerable to postoperative MACEs than younger patients. Identifying high-risk patients in advance can help with clinical decision making and improve prognosis. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for the preoperative prediction of postoperative MACEs in geriatric patients.

Methods

We collected patients’ clinical data and laboratory tests prospectively. All patients over 65 years who underwent surgeries in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 25, 2019 to June 29, 2020 were included. Models based on extreme gradient boosting (XGB), gradient boosting machine, random forest, support vector machine, and Elastic Net logistic regression were trained. The models’ performance was compared according to area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Brier score. To minimize the influence of clinical intervention, we trained the model based on undersampling set. Variables with little contribution were excluded to simplify the model for ensuring the ease of use in clinical settings.

Results

We enrolled 5705 geriatric patients into the final dataset. Of those patients, 171 (3.0%) developed postoperative MACEs within 30 days after surgery. The XGB model outperformed other machine learning models with AUPRC of 0.404(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.219–0.589), AUROC of 0.870(95%CI: 0.786–0.938) and Brier score of 0.024(95% CI: 0.016–0.032). Model trained on undersampling set showed improved performance with AUPRC of 0.511(95% CI: 0.344–0.667, p < 0.001), AUROC of 0.912(95% CI: 0.847–0.962, p < 0.001) and Brier score of 0.020 (95% CI: 0.013–0.028, p < 0.001). After removing variables with little contribution, the undersampling model showed comparable predictive accuracy with AUPRC of 0.507(95% CI: 0.338–0.669, p = 0.36), AUROC of 0.896(95%CI: 0.826–0.953, p < 0.001) and Brier score of 0.020(95% CI: 0.013–0.028, p = 0.20).

Conclusions

In this prospective study, we developed machine learning models for preoperative prediction of postoperative MACEs in geriatric patients. The XGB model showed the best performance. Undersampling method achieved further improvement of model performance.

Trial registration

The protocol of this study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (15/08/2019, ChiCTR1900025160)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01827-x.

Frailty and its associated factors among older adults with cancer undergoing chemotherapy as outpatients: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Frailty can affect cancer treatment decisions and outcomes. Depression, fatigue, and cognitive impairment often experienced by patients with cancer are expected to be associated with frailty. We aimed to identify frailty and its related factors in older adults with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study in a Korean urban tertiary hospital. A structured self-report questionnaire was used including frailty and its related variables and measured heart rate variability (HRV). Multinomial logistic regression was performed to identify the factors related to frailty.

RESULTS

Data from 124 out of 136 patients with stomach, colorectal, and lung cancers were analyzed. Approximately 90% of the participants were in the pre-frail and frail groups. There were significant differences among the three groups in terms of depression (p = 0.006) and HRV (p = 0.041). The factor associated with higher frailty levels was depression across groups (pre-frail odds ratio (OR): 1.31, 95% CI: 1.14-1.51; frail OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.11-1.49). However, only deficits observed or commented on by others were retained as factors significantly associated with higher frailty in the pre-frail group (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.40-4.13). In contrast, increased HRV (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13-0.95) was associated with lower frailty levels in the frail group.

CONCLUSION

It is important to classify older adult patients with cancer into pre-frail and frail groups so that interventions can be provided on time. Understanding the characteristics associated with frailty in older adult patients with cancer can positively affect their health-related quality of life and treatment outcomes.

Outcomes After Major Surgical Procedures in Octogenarians: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Introduction

Aging of the worldwide population has been observed, and postoperative outcomes could be worse in elderly patients. This nationwide study assessed trends in number of surgical resections in octogenarians regarding various major surgical procedures and associated postoperative outcomes.

Methods

All patients who underwent surgery between 2014 and 2018 were included from Dutch nationwide quality registries regarding esophageal, stomach, pancreas, colorectal liver metastases, colorectal cancer, lung cancer and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). For each quality registry, the number of patients who were 80 years or older (octogenarians) was calculated per year. Postoperative outcomes were length of stay (LOS), 30 day major morbidity and 30 day mortality between octogenarians and younger patients.

Results

No increase in absolute number and proportion of octogenarians that underwent surgery was observed. Median LOS was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, colorectal liver metastases, lung cancer, pancreatic disease and esophageal cancer. 30 day major morbidity was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colon cancer, esophageal cancer and elective AAA-repair. 30 day mortality was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, lung cancer, stomach cancer, pancreatic disease, esophageal cancer and elective AAA-repair. Median LOS decreased between 2014 and 2018 in octogenarians who underwent surgery for stomach cancer and colorectal cancer. 30 day major morbidity decreased between 2014 and 2018 in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colon cancer. No trends were observed in octogenarians regarding 30 day mortality between 2014 and 2018.

Conclusion

No increase over time in absolute number and proportion of octogenarians that underwent major surgery was observed in the Netherlands. Postoperative outcomes were worse in octogenarians.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-022-06642-6.

Patient-Reported and Physiologic Outcomes Following Pelvic Exenteration for Non-Repairable Radiated Rectourethral Fistula

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of pelvic exenteration (PelvEX) on patient-reported pain, distress, and quality of life along with physiologic indicators of health in cancer survivors with radiated, non-repairable rectourethral fistula (RUF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed a prospectively maintained quality improvement database of RUF patients at our institution from 2012 to 2020. Patients with radiated, non-repairable RUF who underwent PelvEX and had follow up to 1 year were included. Pain and distress scores were collected preoperatively and at 1-year follow up. Number of narcotic prescriptions in the 3 months before surgery and the year after surgery were abstracted. Short Form 12 surveys were administered in the postoperative period. Serum albumin, creatinine, carbon dioxide, hematocrit, and glucose were abstracted from electronic health records. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

Eleven patients met inclusion criteria. Patient-reported pain significantly decreased at 1 year follow-up compared to preoperative scores (median pre: 4 vs 1 year post: 0, P = .0312). Patient-reported distress significantly decreased pre- versus post-PelvEX (median pre: 5 vs post: 0, P = .0156). At the time of postoperative pain and distress surveys, 9 (82.8%) patients did not have narcotic prescriptions. Postoperative Short Form 12 scores were similar to an age-matched United States population (mental: P = .3125; physical: P = .1484). Serum-based indicators of health were not different in the pre- versus postoperative period (all P >.05).

CONCLUSION

PelvEX may be a valuable treatment option to decrease patient-reported pain and distress without compromising quality of life or physiologic health in patients with radiated, non-repairable RUF.

Impact of frailty on the long-term outcomes of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify the association between frailty evaluated using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and outcomes in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 67 patients (aged ≥ 75 years) diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (tumor depth ≥ m3) between 2011 and 2016. The patients were retrospectively evaluated and categorized according to their CFS scores (1-7) and divided into non-frailty (scores 1-2) and frailty groups (scores 3-7). Postoperative complications, 5 year survival rate, and prognostic risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant differences in performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status score, Charlson comorbidity index, and treatment type were observed between the two groups. Thirty-six patients underwent surgery, and morbidities with Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ II and ≥ IIIa were found in 72.2 and 47.2% of the patients, respectively. The remaining 31 patients underwent endoscopic resection and/or chemo (radio) therapy. The morbidity rate did not differ between the two groups. The 5 year survival rate was 75.3% overall and 92.7 and 60.8% in patients in the non-frailty and frailty groups, respectively (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed that frailty and cStage ≥ II were independent risk factors of overall survival (p = 0.005 and p = 0.013, respectively) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.048 and p = 0.027, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty greatly impacts the prognosis of elderly patients with esophageal cancer, regardless of surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The CFS score could be a useful prognostic predictor.

Evaluation of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) tool as a predictor of postoperative complications following major oncological abdominal surgery in geriatric patients

Introduction

The concept of frailty extends beyond chronological age. Identifying frailty using a two-step approach, starting with the use of a screening tool (G8) followed by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), may be useful in guiding treatment decisions and follow-up. This study evaluated the association between G8 and CGA, and the risk of 90-day postoperative complications risk, in oncogeriatric patients.

Methods

Data on geriatric patients with major oncological abdominal surgery was retrospectively collected from our hospital records between 2016 and 2019. Patients with an impaired G8 screening score, who subsequently underwent CGA geriatric screening, were included. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CD), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The association between the individual components of the geriatric assessment tools and the 90-day postoperative complications risk was analyzed.

Results

One hundred and twelve patients, aged ≥ 70 years, operated for an intra-abdominal tumor with curative intent, were included. Seventy-six patients (67.9%) presented with an impaired G8, out of whom sixty-six (58.9%) had a CGA performed. On univariate analysis, altered nutritional status assessed by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form was the only variable associated with higher postoperative total complication rate (p = 0.01). Patients with an impaired G8 had significantly more postoperative complications and higher 1-year mortality rates than patients with normal G8. Fifteen patients (13.4%) had grade III-IVb complications. A CCI > 50 was recorded in 16 patients (14.3%). All-cause 90-day postoperative mortality was 10.7%.

Conclusion

Identifying an altered preoperative nutritional status, as part of the CGA, in patients screening positive for frailty, is a potentially modifiable risk factor that can enhance preoperative management and optimize treatment decision making. G8 may be a predictive factor for postoperative complications in oncogeriatric patients.

Patient Frailty and Functional Use of Hemodialysis Vascular Access: A Retrospective Study of the US Renal Data System

Rationale & Objective:

Despite the high prevalence of frailty among dialysis patients, it is unknown whether frailty is associated with dialysis vascular access failure. This study examined the association between frailty and functional use of vascular access.

Study Design:

Retrospective observational study.

Setting & Participants:

Patients who initiated hemodialysis through a tunneled catheter in the US Renal Data System database from 2012 through 2017 and underwent subsequent creation of an arteriovenous fistula or graft.

Predictors:

The “claims-based frailty indicator” (CFI) was calculated using a validated claims-based disability status model anchored to a well-described frailty phenotype.

Outcomes:

Time to functional use for fistulas and grafts defined as the time from initiation of hemodialysis to treatments using the index vascular access with 2 needles.

Analytical Approach:

Fine and Gray competing risk models separately examining fistula and graft outcomes. Patient survival was modeled for the entire cohort using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results:

A total of 41,471 patients met inclusion criteria, including 33,212 who underwent fistula creation and 8,259 who underwent graft placement. Higher CFI quartiles were associated with a greater rate of mortality. Patients in the highest CFI quartile had more than 2 times the rate of mortality compared with patients in the lowest CFI quartile (hazard ratio [HR], 2.49 [95% CI, 2.41–2.58]). In multivariable analyses, the highest CFI quartile was significantly associated with longer time to functional use of fistulas (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62–0.69]) and grafts (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.79–0.98]).

Limitations:

Generalizability may be limited by the requirement of 12 months of Medicare claims availability before initiation of dialysis. There were no data on patient anatomic characteristics or surgeon characteristics and limited patient-specific sociodemographic data.

Conclusions:

Higher degrees of frailty are associated with longer times to vascular access functional use. Frailty may be useful for informing clinical decision-making regarding choice of vascular access.

Exercise interventions for older people at risk for frailty: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a state of age-related reduced physiological reserve characterized by an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Studies have shown that exercise can improve frailty in older people. However, it remains to be seen which exercises will most improve the fitness of older people with frailty or those at the risk for frailty.Objective: This protocol aims to determine whether physical exercise can improve frailty in older people, and if which methods are most effective.

METHODS

We searched the following databases for relevant articles published between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2021: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Clinical Trials Database, and the Science Network. Two independent reviewers will carry out data extraction, discuss and resolve differences, and obtain consensus from the third author. We will select randomized control trials (RCTs) according to the preformulated inclusion criteria. The main outcomes in this study are scores from Fried Frailty Phenotype Criteria; the Frailty Trait Scale-short form; the SHARE Frailty Instrument; the FRAIL scale; the Gérontopôle Frailty Screening Tool; the Clinical Frailty Scale, the Rockwood and Mitnitsky Frailty Index; the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Index; the Edmonton Frailty Scale; the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness and Loss of Weight Index; the Multidimensional Prognostic Index; the Tilburg Frailty Indicator; PRISMA-7; the Groningen Frailty Indicator; the Sherbrooke Postal Questionnaire; and the Kihon Checklist. Secondary outcomes are muscle strength, gait velocity, stair-climbing power, and level of spontaneous physical activity. If the heterogeneity test shows slight or no statistical heterogeneity, a fixed effects model will be used for data synthesis; otherwise, a random effects model will be used. We will develop a unified data extraction table that includes a number of parameters. The Cochrane Cooperative Bias Risk Tool will be used to evaluate the methodological quality of the selected RCTs. RevMan Manager 5.3 and STATA 14.0 will be used for data analysis if enough RCTs (more than 10) are identified and selected.

RESULT

The final results will provide information on the effectiveness of intervention programs for frail older adul and further demonstrate which exercise programs are more effective and which methods can significantly improve frailty.

CONCLUSION

This protocol will contribute to the development of more effective interventions for elderly individuals with frailty.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study applies existing literature references; therefore, ethical approval is not required.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202130107.