Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis

PROtective ileoStomy versus ProtectivE colostomy in anterior Rectal resectIon: study protocol for a multicenter, open-label, randomised conTrolled studY (PROSPERITY)

INTRODUCTION

Loop ileostomy and loop colostomy are both used to form a protective stoma after anterior resection. Evidence regarding which of these two procedures is superior is lacking. Furthermore, no studies comparing changes in the microbiome after loop ileostomy or loop colostomy exist.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, open-label, superiority, individually randomised controlled trial will include patients who undergo anterior rectal resection with primary anastomosis with a protective stoma. The exclusion criteria are patients who already have a stoma, technical inability to create either type of stoma, aged <18 years and inadequate cooperation. Patients scheduled for anterior rectal resection will be randomised intraoperatively in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either loop ileostomy or loop colostomy. The primary outcome is cumulative stoma-related adverse events within 60 days after primary surgery, measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Secondary outcomes include all postoperative complications (measured using the CCI), number of hospital-free days within 30 days after primary surgery, quality of life at 2 months (measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires-Core 30 and Colorectal 29), complications within 30 days after stoma closure (measured using the CCI) and kidney function (measured using estimated glomerular filtration rate) at 1 year. Tertiary outcomes are survival, kidney function and number of stoma site hernias at 5 years. The sample size was calculated to detect a mean difference of five CCI points between groups, resulting in a final sample size of 350 patients. Microbiome samples will be collected from the faeces and mucous membrane from patients in Helsinki University Hospital.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital approved the study (approval number 4579/2024). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06650085, registered on 20 August 2024.

PROTOCOL VERSION

Version 3.0, dated 17 April 2025.

A novel technique for the construction of an end ileostomy to prevent stoma outlet obstruction after rectal resection and total colectomy: a single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) is an early postoperative complication of rectal cancer. We devised a novel surgical technique: end-ileostomy, to reduce SOO. Here, we describe the surgical technique used for constructing an end ileostomy and assess its impact on SOO.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 78 patients who underwent low anterior resection or total colectomy with a defunctioning ileostomy (DI) between 2018 and 2022. The surgical procedure for end ileostomy can be summarized as follows: First, the ileum was separated using a linear stapler, approximately 30 cm from the Bauhin valve; then the opposite sides of the mesentery of the oral and anal ilea were sutured; and finally, end ileostomy was performed using standard techniques. End and loop ileostomies were performed in 34 and 44 patients, respectively. We assessed the independent risk factors for SOO.

RESULTS

SOO occurred in 12 patients (15.3%): 1 (2.9%) with an end ileostomy and 11 (25%) with a loop ileostomy. Multivariate analysis identified loop ileostomy as an independent risk factor for SOO (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

End ileostomy construction is a useful and safe technique for reducing the incidence of SOO in defunctioning ileostomies following rectal resection.

Risk factors and timing of incisional hernia development following ostomy reversal: a retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Former stoma-site incisional hernia (FSH) is a common complication after ostomy reversal, with a variable reported incidence of up to 50%. Current literature suggests that FSH is underreported due to the lack of a definitive understanding of the timeline of its occurrence and recurrence, making FSH prevention a clinical dilemma. This study identifies FSH risk factors and diagnostic timeline to aid surgeons' clinical decision-making.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 340 patients who underwent ostomy reversal between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Data collected include demographics, medical history, course of ostomy treatment, and hernia diagnosis. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to identify risk factors and understand the timeline of hernia occurrence.

RESULTS

The total incidence of hernia, including patients who had a parastomal hernia before ostomy reversal, FSH after reversal, or both, was 38.8%. The incidence of former stoma-site hernia alone was 24.4%. Significant risk factors identified were elevated BMI, presence of parastomal hernia, hypertension, diabetes, immunosuppression, and the emergency nature of the case. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with either parastomal hernia prior to ostomy reversal or obesity had a greater than 35% likelihood of being diagnosed with FSH within the first 2 years following reversal. Other risk factors, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, ostomy history, hernia history, smoking, and type of ostomy, lacked significance. The median time between ostomy reversal and the first FSH diagnosis was 295 days, and 84.3% of the cases were diagnosed within the first 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ostomy are at substantial risk of developing FSH throughout the entire span of ostomy treatment. Patients with a high BMI, a parastomal hernia before ostomy closure, diabetes, and hypertension are at even higher risk of developing FSH.

Development of a Clinical Framework-Anastomotic Leakage Prediction Score (CF-ALPS) After Colorectal Surgery

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of colorectal surgery and is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Current predictive models vary in complexity and utility, highlighting the need for clinically accessible and accurate tools. This study aimed to develop and validate the clinical framework-anastomotic leakage prediction score (CF-ALPS) score, a practical and accessible risk prediction model for AL that integrates patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related factors. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 294 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2019 and 2024 was analyzed. Patients were categorized into the AL (n = 84) and non-AL groups (n = 210). The factors included age, sex, hypoalbuminemia, and comorbidities. Tumor-related factors included lymph node stage and neoadjuvant therapy, while surgical variables included urgency, duration, and type of procedure. The outcomes evaluated were the incidence of AL, duration of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. Independent predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The CF-ALPS score, which was developed from significant predictors, was validated using ROC curve analysis and 10-fold cross-validation. Results: A total of 294 patients who underwent colorectal surgery were included, of whom 84 (28.57%) developed AL. A male predominance was observed in the AL group (73.81% vs. 36.19%; p = 0.001). Nutritional status played a critical role, with significantly lower albumin levels in AL patients (2.8 ± 0.5 g/dL vs. 3.5 ± 0.4 g/dL; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of AL included hypoalbuminemia (<3.0 g/dL, OR: 0.52, p < 0.001), ASA score (OR, 1.85; p = 0.004), advanced lymph node stage (N2/N3, OR: 1.94, p = 0.037), neoadjuvant therapy (OR, 2.89; p = 0.002), and emergent surgery (OR, 1.67; p = 0.042). These variables formed the basis of the CF-ALPS score, which assigns weighted points based on the magnitude of their ORs. The CF-ALPS model achieved a ROC AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.89) with a sensitivity of 85.0% and specificity of 78.0%. A cutoff score ≥7 demonstrated optimal risk stratification, classifying patients into high- and low-risk groups with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.0%. Cross-validation yielded a moderate AUC of 0.44 (SD = 0.062). Conclusions: The CF-ALPS score offers a simple and effective tool for AL risk prediction in colorectal surgery, emphasizing its practicality and clinical integration. Although its predictive accuracy was moderate, further prospective multicenter validation is warranted.

Trends in the adoption of diverting loop ileostomy for acute complicated diverticulitis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Acute complicated diverticulitis poses a substantial burden to individual patients and the health care system. A significant proportion of the cases necessitate emergency operations. The choice between Hartmann's procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy remains controversial.

METHODS

Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patient user file data from 2012 to 2020, patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for nonelective sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis were identified. Major adverse events, 30-day mortality, perioperative complications, operative duration, reoperation, and 30-day readmissions were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 16,921 cases, 6.3% underwent primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy, showing a rising trend from 5.3% in 2012 to 8.4% in 2020. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy patients, compared to Hartmann's procedure, had similar demographics and fewer severe comorbidities. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy exhibited lower rates of major adverse events (24.6% vs 29.3%, P = .001). After risk adjustment, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy had similar risks of major adverse events and 30-day mortality compared to Hartmann's procedure. While having lower odds of respiratory (adjusted odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.83) and infectious (adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.93) complications, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with a 36-minute increment in operative duration and increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.57) compared to Hartmann's procedure.

CONCLUSION

Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy displayed comparable odds of major adverse events compared to Hartmann's procedure in acute complicated diverticulitis while mitigating infectious and respiratory complication risks. However, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with longer operative times and greater odds of 30-day readmission. Evolving guidelines and increasing primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy use suggest a shift favoring primary anastomosis, especially in complicated diverticulitis. Future investigation of disparities in surgical approaches and patient outcomes is warranted to optimize acute diverticulitis care pathways.

Supportive Care Needs of Patients With Temporary Ostomy in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), a global surgical quality improvement initiative, reduces the length of stay in the hospital. Temporary stoma care for rectal cancer is complex, and patients require prolonged care services to adjust to the stoma. The shorter stay durations in the new model challenge the conventional care pathways and create new patient needs.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to explore the supportive care needs of patients under the new surgical model to provide a reference for the design of ERAS nursing care plans.

METHODS

A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used in this study. Patients with temporary stomas for rectal cancer were recruited using a convenience sampling method in gastrointestinal surgery wards and wound & stoma clinics in two public tertiary care hospitals in China. Standardized questionnaires were administered to 140 patients to collect quantitative data, and semistructured interviews were conducted individually with 13 patients to collect qualitative data. The questionnaire data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and the interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

"Health system and information needs" and "care and support needs" were identified in both the qualitative and quantitative analyses as the most significant unmet needs of the participants. In addition, the qualitative analysis identified receiving focused stoma care instructions and easily understandable information as essential to fulfilling health system and information needs. Care and support needs included access to continued postdischarge services and attention from medical professionals.

CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The participants in this study experienced a variety of unmet supportive care needs under the ERAS protocol, with gaps particularly notable in two categories: "health system and information needs" and "care and support needs." Increased perioperative care and shorter hospital stays under the ERAS protocol reduce opportunities for patients to receive targeted instruction and shift much of the ostomy education and care workload out of the hospital, requiring greater attention from clinical nurses to ensure quality of care.

Risk factors for stoma prolapse after laparoscopic loop colostomy

BACKGROUND

Stoma prolapse (SP) is a common stoma-related complication, particularly in loop colostomies. This study aimed to investigate potential risk factors for SP development after laparoscopic loop colostomy.

METHODS

In total, data from 140 patients who underwent laparoscopic loop colostomy were analyzed between September 2016 and March 2022. Risk factors for SP were investigated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration after colostomy was 12.5 months, and SP occurred in 33 (23.6%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that being overweight (body mass index ≥ 25; odds ratio [OR], 8.69; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.61-46.72; p = 0.012) and having a thin rectus abdominis penetration of the stoma (< 8.9 mm; OR, 8.22; 95% CI, 2.50-27.05; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for SP. Other patient characteristics and surgical factors associated with stoma construction were unrelated to SP development.

CONCLUSIONS

Being overweight and the route penetrating the thinner rectus abdominis during stoma construction was associated with a significantly higher incidence of SP after laparoscopic loop colostomy. Selecting a construction site that penetrates the thicker rectus abdominis muscle may be crucial for preventing SP.

Management of adult intestinal stomas: The 2023 French guidelines

AIM

Digestive stoma are frequently performed. The last French guidelines have been published twenty years ago. Our aim was to update French clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative management of digestive stoma and stoma-related complications.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of French and English articles published between January 2000 and May 2022 was performed. Only digestive stoma for fecal evacuation in adults were considered. Stoma in children, urinary stoma, digestive stoma for enteral nutrition, and rare stoma (Koch, perineal) were not included.

RESULTS

Guidelines include the surgical landmarks to create digestive stoma (ideal location, mucocutaneous anastomosis, utility of support rods, use of prophylactic mesh), the perioperative clinical practice guidelines (patient education, preoperative ostomy site marking, postoperative equipment, prescriptions, and follow-up), the management of early stoma-related complications (difficulties for nursing, high output, stoma necrosis, retraction, abscess and peristomal skin complications), and the management of late stoma-related complications (stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia, stoma stenosis, late stoma retraction). A level of evidence was assigned to each statement.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines will be very useful in clinical practice, and allow to delete some outdated dogma.

Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure during versus after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer

Background

Protective ileostomy can effectively prevent severe anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal timing for ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the safety and long-term outcomes of early ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy.

Method

Patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery combined with protective ileostomy and adjuvant chemotherapy between April 2017 and April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into an early closure group during chemotherapy (group A) and a late closure group after chemotherapy (group B).

Results

A total of 215 patients were included in this study, with 115 in group A and 100 in group B. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. In group A, durations of stoma status (p < 0.001) and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) (p < 0.001) were shorter, and rectal stenosis (p=0.036) and stoma-related complications (p=0.007), especially stoma stenosis (p=0.041), were less common. However, compliance with chemotherapy was worse (p=0.009). There were no significant differences in operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, incidence and severity of LARS, disease-free survival, or overall survival between groups.

Conclusion

Early ileostomy closure can effectively reduce the duration of stoma status, duration of LARS, rectal stenosis, and stoma-related complications while not affecting surgical complications and oncological outcomes. Ileostomy closure should not be delayed because of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, follow-up should be strengthened to increase compliance and integrity with chemotherapy.

Efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for loop colostomy: a propensity-score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Colostomy is a common procedure for fecal diversion, but the optimal colostomy approach is unclear in terms of surgical outcomes and stoma-related complications. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic loop colostomy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent loop colostomy at Shizuoka Cancer Center in Japan between April 2010 and March 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical approach: the laparoscopic (LAP) and open (OPEN) groups. Surgical outcomes and the incidences of stoma-related complications such as stomal prolapse (SP), parastomal hernia (PSH), and skin disorders (SD) were compared with and without propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of the 388 eligible patients, 180 (46%) were in the LAP group and 208 (54%) were in the OPEN group. The male-to-female ratio was 5.5:4.5 in the Lap group and was 5.3:4.7 in the OPEN group, respectively. The median age was 68 years (range, 31-88 years) in the LAP group and 65 years (range, 23-93 years) in the OPEN group, respectively. The LAP group, compared with the OPEN group, had a shorter operative time and lower incidences of surgical site infection (3.9% versus 16.3%, respectively; p < 0.01) and SD (11.7% versus 24.5%, respectively; p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the LAP and OPEN groups in the incidence of SP (17.3% versus 17.3%, respectively) or PSH (8.9% versus 6.7%, respectively). After propensity score matching, the incidences of surgical site infection and SD were significantly lower in the LAP group than in the OPEN group, while there were no significant differences in the operative time or the incidences of SP and PSH.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that laparoscopic surgery could be beneficial and feasible in loop colostomy.

Ileostomy versus colostomy: impact on functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

AIM

Even if a defunctioning stoma mitigates the serious consequences of anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, the presence of a temporary stoma or having a stoma for a prolonged period of time may also be a determining factor for further morbidities and poor bowel function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of diverting stomas on clinical and functional outcomes after TME, comparing ileostomy or colostomy effects.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent TME for rectal cancer between March 2017 and December 2020 in three Italian referral centres were enrolled in the present study. For every patient sex, age, stage of the tumour, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical technique, anastomotic technique, the presence of a diverting stoma, perioperative complications and functional postoperative status were recorded. Considering the diverting stoma, the kind of stoma, length of time before closure and stoma related complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

During the study period 416 consecutive patients (63% men) were included. Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy was performed in 79%. A minimally invasive approach was performed in >95% of patients. Temporary stoma was performed during the operation in 387 patients (93%) (ileostomy 71%, colostomy 21%). The stoma was closed in 84% of patients. The median time from surgery to stoma closure was 145 days. No difference was found between ileostomy and colostomy in overall morbidity after stoma creation and closure. Moreover, increased postoperative functional disturbance seemed to be significantly proportional to the attending time for closure for ileostomy.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a defunctioning stoma seems to have a negative impact on functional bowel activity, especially for delayed closure for ileostomy. This should be considered when the kind of stoma (ileostomy vs. colostomy) is selected for each patient.

Impact of ileostomy in the adjuvant treatment and outcome of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

After tumor resection, a preventive diverting loop ileostomy creation is a routine surgical procedure to prevent anastomotic leakage and infections and to preclude secondary surgeries. Despite its benefits, several studies have proposed potential complications that extend the disease course by impairing the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy and adherence.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ileostomy complications on the adherence to adjuvant treatment and overall survival (OS) of colon cancer (CC) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study. Patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma were treated between January 2010 and December 2020 at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

χ² and t-test, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox regression. Statistical significance differences were assessed when p was bilaterally < 0.05.

RESULTS

The most frequent complications of loop-derived ileostomy were hydro-electrolytic dehydration (50%), acute kidney injury (AKI) (26%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (28%), and grade 3-4 diarrhea (21%) (p = 0.001). Patients with complete chemotherapy did not reach the median OS. In contrast, the median OS for patients with non-complete chemotherapy was 56 months (p = 0.023). Additionally, 5-year OS reached to 100% in the early restitution group, 85% in the late restitution group, and 60% in the non-restitution group (p = 0.016). Finally, AKI (p = 0.029; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.348 [1.133-9.895]), complete chemotherapy (p = 0.028; 95% CI 0.376 [0.105-0.940]), and reversed ileostomy (p = 0.001; 95% CI 0.125 [0.038-0.407]) remained as predictors of overall survival for patients with CC treated with a loop ileostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the early stoma reversal restitution as a safe and feasible alternative to prevent severe complications related to ileostomies which improve chemotherapy adherence and overall survival of colon cancer patients. This is one of the pioneer studies analyzing the impact of ileostomy on treatment adherence and outcome of Latin American patients with colon cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospective study No. 2021/045, in April 2021.

Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Virtual/Ghost Ileostomy or Defunctioning Ileostomy after Anterior Resection of the Rectum: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anterior rectal resection (ARR) represents one of the most frequently performed methods in colorectal surgery, mainly carried out for rectal cancer (RC) treatment. Defunctioning ileostomy (DI) has long been chosen as a method to "protect" colorectal or coloanal anastomosis after ARR. However, DI does not rule out risks of more or less serious complications. A proximal intra-abdominal closed-loop ileostomy, the so-called virtual/ghost ileostomy (VI/GI), could limit the number of DIs and the associated morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed by use of RevMan [Computer program] Version 5.4.

RESULTS

The five included comparative studies (VI/GI or DI) covering an approximately 20-year study period (2008-2021). All included studies were observational ones and originated from European countries. Meta-analysis indicated VI/GI as significantly associated with lower short-term morbidity rates related to VI/GI or DI after primary surgery (RR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.64, p = 0.006), fewer dehydration (RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.75, p = 0.02) and ileus episodes after primary surgery (RR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.77, p = 0.02), fewer readmissions after primary surgery (RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.43, p = 0.0002) and readmissions after primary surgery plus stoma closure surgery (RR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.30, p < 0.00001) than the DI group. On the contrary, no differences were identified in terms of AL after primary surgery, short-term morbidity after primary surgery, major complications (CD ≥ III) after primary surgery and length of hospital stay after primary surgery. Conclusions: Given the significant biases among meta-analyzed studies (small overall sample size and the small number of events analyzed, in particular), our results require careful interpretation. Further randomized, possibly multi-center trials may be of paramount importance in confirming our results.

A comparative study of stoma-related complications from diverting loop ileostomy or colostomy after colorectal surgery

PURPOSE

Even though minor, stoma-related complications significantly impact quality of life, they are often excluded from clinical analyses that compare short-term postoperative outcomes of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. This study compares stoma-related complications between loop ileostomy and loop colostomy after rectal resection, including minor complications, and discusses the characteristics of diverting stoma types.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in patients who underwent diverting stoma construction after rectal resection. Data on patient background and postoperative short-term outcomes, including stoma-related complications and morbidity after stoma closure, were collected and compared between loop ileostomy and loop colostomy groups. Morbidities of all severity grades were targeted for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (27 loop ileostomy, 20 loop colostomy) underwent diverting stoma construction following rectal resection. Overall stoma-related complications, incidence of skin irritation, high-output stoma, and outlet obstruction were significantly higher in the loop ileostomy group but high-output stoma and outlet obstruction were absent in the loop colostomy group. Regarding morbidity after stoma closure, operation times and surgical site infections were significantly higher in the loop colostomy group while anastomotic leakage after diverting stoma closure occurred (2 cases; 15%) in the loop colostomy group but not the loop ileostomy group.

CONCLUSION

Because stoma-related complications were significantly higher in the loop ileostomy group, and even these minor complications may impair QOL, early loop ileostomy closure is recommended. For loop colostomy, stoma-related morbidities are lower but post-closure leakage is a calculated risk.

Major renal morbidity following elective rectal cancer resection by the type of diverting ostomy

AIM

Patients with rectal cancer often undergo faecal diversion, yet the existing literature cursorily reports renal sequelae by the type of ostomy. We aimed to determine whether the presence of an ileostomy or colostomy was associated with postoperative renal morbidity.

METHODS

We identified patients with rectal cancer undergoing elective resection with primary anastomosis without diversion, with an ileostomy and with a colostomy by 21 possible procedures in the colectomy- and proctectomy-specific National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files. The odds of major renal events (renal failure [dialysis initiated] or progressive renal insufficiency [>2 mg/dl increase in creatinine without dialysis]), progressive renal insufficiency alone and readmissions were assessed using propensity score weighting and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 15 075 patients (63.7% Stage II-III, 85.7% creatinine values obtained ≤30 days preoperatively), 37.7% were not diverted, 39.5% had an ileostomy and 22.9% a colostomy. Compared to non-diverted patients, diversion was associated with major renal events (ileostomy, odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9; colostomy, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5), progressive renal insufficiency (ileostomy, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.7-3.5; colostomy, OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.9), readmissions for renal failure (ileostomy, OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.1-5.0; colostomy, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-4.1) and readmissions for fluid/electrolyte abnormalities (ileostomy, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.6-3.3; colostomy, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.6).

CONCLUSION

Diverting ostomies after elective rectal cancer resection are strongly associated with renal morbidity. The decision to divert is complex, and it is unclear whether select patients may benefit from a colostomy from a renal perspective.

Artificial intelligence assists surgeons' decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection

BACKGROUND

Due to the difficult evaluation of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, the decision to perform a temporary ileostomy is not easily distinguishable. The aim of the present study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying the risk of AL to assist surgeons in the selective implementation of a temporary ileostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data from 2240 patients with rectal cancer who received anterior resection were collected, and these patients were divided into one training and two test cohorts. Five AI algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and random forest (RF) were employed to develop predictive models using clinical variables and were assessed using the two test cohorts.

RESULTS

The SVM model indicated good discernment of AL, and might have increased the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients with AL in the training cohort (p < 0.001). Following the assessment of the two test cohorts, the SVM model could identify AL in a favorable manner, which performed with positive predictive values of 0.150 (0.091-0.234) and 0.151 (0.091-0.237), and negative predictive values of 0.977 (0.958-0.988) and 0.986 (0.969-0.994), respectively. It is important to note that the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients without AL would have been significantly reduced (p < 0.001) and which would have been significantly increased in patients with AL (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The model (https://alrisk.21cloudbox.com/) indicated good discernment of AL, which may be used to assist the surgeon's decision-making of performing temporary ileostomy.

Day-case loop ileostomy reversal based on the community hospital joined enhanced recovery after surgery (CHJ-ERAS) program in China: Safe and feasible

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine the feasibility of Day-case loop ileostomy reversal (DLIR) in China based on the community hospital joined enhanced recovery after surgery (CHJ-ERAS) program.

METHOD

Patients who underwent loop ileostomy were enrolled in the CHJ-ERAS program for DLIR after rigorous evaluation. The primary outcome was the results of short-term follow-ups.

RESULTS

From August 2017 to April 2022, 216 patients have been enrolled in the CHJ-ERAS program for DLIR. After DLIR, 14 patients (14/216, 6.5%) have recorded 17 episodes of postoperative complications within 1 month after surgery, including 10 readmission and 2 reoperation. Compared with in-patient loop ileostomy reversal, DLIR based on CHJ-ERAS did not increase the postoperative complications and reoperations.

CONCLUSION

The CMJ-ERAS program for DLIR in our center is a safe and feasible alternative option for inpatient LIR and an acceptable transitional approach for the development of day-case DLIR in developing countries.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Ileostomy Complications: An Updated Review

An ileostomy is associated with multiple complications that may frequently or persistently affect the life of ostomates. All healthcare professionals should have knowledge of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ileostomy complications. Peristomal dermatitis is caused by watery and highly alkaline effluent. Skin protective products are typically used for local treatment. Ischemia/necrosis occurs due to insufficient arterial blood supply. Retraction is seen in patients with a bulky mesentery and occurs following ischemia. Convex stoma appliances can be used for skin protection against fecal leakage. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and occurs only at the stoma site. Trans-stomal decompression is most effective in these cases. High output stoma (HOS) is defined as a condition when the output exceeds 1,000- 2,000 ml/day, lasting for one to three days. Treatment includes intravenous fluid and electrolyte resuscitation followed by restriction of hypotonic fluid and the use of antimotility (and antisecretory) drugs. Stomal prolapse is a full-thickness protrusion of an inverted bowel. Manual reduction is attempted initially, whereas emergency bowel resection may be needed for incarcerated cases. A parastomal hernia (PSH) is an incisional hernia of the stoma site. Surgery is considered in cases of incarceration, but most cases are manageable with non-surgical treatment.

A diversion stoma after anterior resection for rectal cancer

This review covers the problem of forming a diverting stoma during resections of the rectum with primary anastomosis. The incidence of rectal cancer tends to increase, and surgical resection remains the main method of treatment. Anastomotic leakage significantly increases the postoperative mortality. The most effective way to prevent severe complications is the formation of a diverting stoma. However, the indications, the choice of a specific technique and the timing of the stoma elimination are not clearly defined. This review discusses the state of the problem, special attention is paid to the choice of the level of stoma formation (ileostomy or transversostomy).

Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer

Anastomotic leak (AL) represents one of the most detrimental complications after colorectal surgery. The patient-related factors and surgery-related factors leading to AL have been identified in previous studies. Through early identification and timely adjustment of risk factors, preventive measures can be taken to reduce potential AL. However, there are still many problems associated with AL. The debate about preventive measures such as preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), intraoperative drainage, and surgical scope also continues. Recently, the gut microbiota has received more attention due to its important role in various diseases. Although the underlying mechanisms of gut microbiota on AL have not been validated completely, new strategies that manipulate intrinsic mechanisms are expected to prevent and treat AL. Moreover, laboratory examinations for AL prediction and methods for blood perfusion assessment are likely to be promoted in clinical practice. This review outlines possible risk factors for AL and suggests some preventive measures in terms of patient, surgery, and gut microbiota.