The sequence of pulmonary vessels ligation during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Recipient hepatectomy technique may affect oncological outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

To date, caval sparing (CS) and total caval replacement (TCR) for recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation (LT) have been compared only in terms of surgical morbidity. Nonetheless, the CS technique is inherently associated with an increased manipulation of the native liver and later exclusion of the venous outflow, which may increase the risk of intraoperative shedding of tumor cells when LT is performed for HCC. A multicenter, retrospective study was performed to assess the impact of recipient hepatectomy (CS vs. TCR) on the risk of posttransplant HCC recurrence among 16 European transplant centers that used either TCR or CS recipient hepatectomy as an elective protocol technique. Exclusion criteria comprised cases of non-center-protocol recipient hepatectomy technique, living-donor LT, HCC diagnosis suspected on preoperative imaging but not confirmed at the pathological examination of the explanted liver, HCC in close contact with the IVC, and previous liver resection for HCC. In 2420 patients, CS and TCR approaches were used in 1452 (60%) and 968 (40%) cases, respectively. Group adjustment with inverse probability weighting was performed for high-volume center, recipient age, alcohol abuse, viral hepatitis, Child-Pugh class C, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, cold ischemia time, clinical HCC stage within Milan criteria, pre-LT downstaging/bridging therapies, pre-LT alphafetoprotein serum levels, number and size of tumor nodules, microvascular invasion, and complete necrosis of all tumor nodules (matched cohort, TCR, n = 938; CS, n = 935). In a multivariate cause-specific hazard model, CS was associated with a higher risk of HCC recurrence (HR: 1.536, p = 0.007). In conclusion, TCR recipient hepatectomy, compared to the CS approach, may be associated with some protective effect against post-LT tumor recurrence.

The prognostic value of 4L lymph node dissection in left-side operable non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

The prognostic value of 4L lymph node dissection (4L-LND) continues to be controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognosis of 4L-LND in operable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We systematically searched studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to May 1, 2023. Studies investigating the prognostic value of 4L-LND and non-4L-LND in NSCLC survival were included. Data for analysis mainly comprised postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). The Q-test and I2-test were used to assess heterogeneity. The stability of pooled hazard ratios (HRs) was examined by sensitivity analysis. Six retrospective studies with a total of 4565 NSCLC patients who received 4L-LND or did not receive 4L-LND were considered. The 4L-LND group had significantly better OS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.91, P = 0.004) and DFS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, P = 0.0002) than the non-4L-LND group, especially in the subgroup analysis of propensity score matching studies. Although no significant difference in the rate of chest tube drainage for more than 7 days (risk ratio (RR) = 0.98, 95% CI 0.31-3.08, P = 0.97), hoarseness rate (RR = 1.60, 95% CI 0.53-4.87, P = 0.51), and chylothorax rate (RR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.58-2.84, P = 0.54) was observed, those who received 4L-LND had a higher total postoperative complication rate than those who did not (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.67, P = 0.006). No significant heterogeneity existed during our analysis, and no potential publication bias was observed among these studies. Our meta-analysis showed that the 4L-LND group was significantly associated with both survival outcomes and postoperative complications compared with the non-4L-LND group in treating NSCLC patients. However, further prospective clinical trials should be designed to evaluate our conclusion owing to the lack of guideline support.

Feasibility and oncological outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy for pathologic N2 disease in non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and oncological outcomes between video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pathologic N2 (pN2) disease. Data for analysis included short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes. We calculated the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous data and the results of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were pooled using the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I² -test. Sensitivity analysis was performed to further examine the stability of pooled HRs and WMDs. In the pooled analyses of 10 eligible studies, results showed that VATS for NSCLC patients with pN2 disease yielded significantly less blood loss (WMD = -61.43; 95% confidence intervals [CI], [-87.69, -35.18]; p < 0.001), less post-operation hospital stay (WMD, -1.62; 95% CI, [-2.96, -0.28]; p = 0.02), and comparable operation time (WMD,  -8.32; 95% CI, [-23.88, 7.23]; p = 0.29), post-operation complication rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.95; 95% CI, [0.78, 1.15]; p = 0.59), chest tube duration to thoracotomy (WMD, -0.64; 95% CI, [-1.45, 0.17]; p = 0.12), extent of lymph node dissection (WMD, -1.46; 95% CI, [-3.87, 0.95]; p = 0.23) and 1-year OS (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, [0.96, 1.76]; p = 0.09) than thoracotomy. However, VATS may improve 3-year OS (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, [1.12, 1.42]; p = 0.0002) and yield comparable 1-year DFS (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, [0.89, 1.46]; p = 0.32) and 3-year DFS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, [0.88, 1.22]; p = 0.70) for NSCLC patients with pN2 disease than thoracotomy. VATS could yield less surgical trauma and improve post-operative recovery than thoracotomy. Moreover, VATS may improve the oncological outcomes of those patients.

Circulating Tumor Cells and the Non-Touch Isolation Technique in Surgery for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are dislodged from the primary tumor into the bloodstream, travel within the bloodstream to distant organs, and finally extravasate and proliferate as epithelial metastatic deposits. The relationship between the existence of CTCs and tumor prognosis has been demonstrated by many researchers. In surgery for malignancies, the surgical manipulation of tumors and tissues around the tumor may lead to the release of CTCs into the bloodstream. The non-touch isolation technique (NTIT) has been advocated to prevent the release of CTCs during surgery. The concept of NTIT is the prevention of intraoperative increment of CTCs from the primary tumor by the early blockade of outflow vessels, and ‘pulmonary vein (PV)-first lobectomy’ during surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) corresponds to this technique. The concept of PV-first lobectomy is well known among thoracic surgeons, but evidence of its efficacy for preventing the increase of intra- and postoperative CTCs and for improving postoperative prognosis is still uncertain. Our study summarizes evidence regarding the relationship between NTIT and CTCs in NSCLC and suggests the need for further research on CTCs and CTC-detecting modalities.

Vein-first Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Assessed According to the Status of Clustered Circulating Tumour Cells

BACKGROUND/AIM

Vein-first lobectomy (VFL) in lung cancer might reduce shedding of circulating tumour cells (CTCs). This study assessed the clinical significance of VFL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy and CTC testing were evaluated. The primary evaluation item was postoperative clustered CTC detection, and the secondary outcome measures were the 2-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates according to the status of VFL and postoperative clustered CTC.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with similar backgrounds, except for lobe resection and pulmonary vein dissection time, showed postoperative clustered CTC identification rates of 43.8% and 37.9% in the VFL group (n=57) and no-VFL group (n=29), respectively. However, prognosis was not significantly different, although the presence of clustered CTC after surgery was a predictor of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The status of postoperative clustered CTC was similar regardless of VFL or not, although the detection of clustered CTC was a predictor of recurrence.