Conversion therapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases

Budget Impact of Shifting the Treatment Setting of Unresectable Liver Metastases Associated with Primary Colorectal Cancer Using Y-90 Resin Microspheres from the Outpatient Hospital to the Office-Based Laboratory

Purpose

In the wake of ever-increasing health care costs, solutions are sought to make health care more affordable, such as moving hospital outpatient procedures to office-based laboratory (OBL) settings. A budget impact model was constructed to estimate the health plan cost benefit of moving 50% of yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y-90) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) procedures for unresectable liver metastases associated with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) from a traditional hospital outpatient setting (HOPPS) to an OBL setting.

Methods

The eligible population was estimated using an incidence-based approach for a hypothetical health plan with 1 million covered lives. Modeled costs were based on 2024 Medicare reimbursement rates. Three treatment scenarios were considered: 1) base case HOPPS, 2) hybrid (HOPPS/OBL), and 3) OBL settings. Budget impacts were estimated as the differences in annual total cost of treatment after switching 50% of Y-90 SIRTs from HOPPS to the hybrid (HOPPS/OBL) or OBL setting. Per-member-per-month (PMPM) budget impacts were also calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the proportions of patients shifting settings and the treatment setting they were shifting into.

Results

Annually, 28 patients were estimated to have metastatic CRC and unresectable liver metastases in a health plan of 1 million members. Average estimated per-patient cost savings would be $8,791 by switching one patient to a hybrid setting and $17,697 for a patient switched to the OBL. Switching 50% of eligible procedures resulted in PMPM cost benefits to the plan of $0.0102 for hybrid setting and $0.0206 for OBL. In sensitivity analyses, annual cost savings for the health plan were affected by both the proportion of patients shifted and the setting they were shifted into.

Conclusion

Shifting a percentage of the treatment of unresectable liver metastases with Y-90 SIRT to the OBL setting results in modest cost benefits for US health plans.

Initial Assessment of Resectability of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Versus Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Surgery improves long-term survival for resectable, liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With no consensus definition of "resectable" disease, decisions regarding resectability are reliant on the expertise and judgement of the treating clinician working in consultation with a multidisciplinary team (MDT). This study examines the clinical outcome versus initial assessment of resectability in an Australian population with mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with liver-only mCRC diagnosed January 2009 to December 2022 were identified from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry. Patients were classified based on prospectively documented treatment assessment as "resectable," "potentially resectable," or "unresectable." The correlation between initial assessment of resectability and clinical outcome, and any impact of clinicopathologic factors were examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival based on initial resectability assessment and resection status.

RESULTS

Of 4437 patients with mCRC identified through TRACC, 1250 (28%) had liver-only disease at presentation, with 497 (43%), 277 (24%), and 374 (33%) classified as "unresectable," "potentially resectable," and "resectable," respectively. In total, 516 (41%) ultimately underwent surgical resection, including 30 (6%) of the "initially unresectable," 148 (53%) of the "potentially resectable," and 338 (90%) of the "resectable" at a median of 9.5, 5.9, and 2.4 months from the diagnosis of liver metastases, respectively. Resection in the "unresectable" patient population was associated with younger age (mean age 63 vs. 69, P = .0006), better performance status (ECOG 0-1 100% vs. 74%, P = .0017), and fewer comorbidities (Charlson index 0-3 in 73% vs. 53%, P = .0296) compared with no resection. Median overall survival was longer for resected versus nonresected patients across all categories: "unresectable" (59.2 vs. 17.6 months, P < .0001), "potentially resectable" (57.2 vs. 22.8 months, P < .0001), and "resectable" (108 vs. 55 months, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study demonstrates the potential for "initially unresectable" patients to become surgical candidates following systemic therapy, more likely in younger and fitter patients, with overall excellent survival outcomes in resected patients. This highlights the value of routine, repeated MDT assessments for patients with liver-only disease who are continuing to respond to systemic therapy, even for those initially considered never to be surgical candidates.

The benefit of conversion therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab using newly established oncological resectability criteria in Japan

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the changes in oncological resection status in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and the impact of conversion therapy following Atez/Bev treatment.

METHODS

This cohort included 631 patients with u-HCC treated with Atez/Bev. Tumors were assessed using oncological resectability criteria and categorized as borderline resectable 1 (BR1, n=166) or borderline resectable 2 (BR2, n=465).

RESULTS

Overall, 129 (20.4%) patients were downstaged based on oncological resectability criteria. Among them, 28 (16.8%) patients were downstaged from BR1 to resectable (R), and 49 (10.5%) and 52 (11.1%) patients were downstaged from BR2 to R and from BR2 to BR1, respectively. The percentage of patients who underwent conversion therapy was 5.4%. For patients categorized as BR1 and BR2 before Atez/Bev treatment, the rates of conversion therapy were 8.4% (14/166) and 4.3% (20/465), respectively. Overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the conversion therapy group than in the partial response group (not reached vs. 36.4 months, p=0.001), with no significant differences compared to the complete response group. The median recurrence-free survival was 15.7 months after conversion therapy. Although there were differences in patient background data at the time of conversion therapy, surgery had a significantly higher RFS than radiofrequency ablation (not reached vs. 10.0 months, p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

When feasible, conversion therapy should be considered to improve the prognosis of u-HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev. Moreover, oncological resectability criteria may provide a useful tool for investigators regarding conversion therapy.

Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer liver metastasis via miR-5692a/IL-8 axis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition

BACKGROUND

The association between the intestinal microbiota and colorectal cancer (CRC) has been extensively studied, with Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum, FN) being found in high abundance in colorectal cancer tissues. Previous research has emphasized the significant role of F. nucleatum in the occurrence of CRC. However, the impact of F. nucleatum on CRC liver metastasis has not been well understood.

METHODS

The effects of F. nucleatum on metastasis ability of CRC cell were evaluated in vitro were examined by wound-healing assay and transwell assay. The mouse model of CRC liver metastasis was constructed by spleen injection, and the degree of liver metastasis was assessed by in vivo bioluminescence imaging. The gene expression changes in CRC cells after co-culture with F. nucleatum was analyzed through transcriptome sequencing. qRT-PCR and Western Blot assays were performed to validate the expression of related genes and proteins.

RESULTS

The metastasis ability of CRC cells was significantly enhanced after co-culture with F. nucleatum in vitro. In the mouse model, F. nucleatum also promoted the development of liver metastasis in CRC. Mechanistically, F. nucleatum infection increased the expression of IL-8 by downregulated the level of miR-5692a, a regulatory microRNA of IL-8. This led to the activation of the ERK pathway and resulted in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of CRC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that F. nucleatum promotes CRC liver metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the miR-5692a/IL-8 axis. These findings provide new insights for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Explanatory Role of Conversion Surgery as a Mediator of the Mortality Risk Difference Between Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With First-Line Anti-EGFR Agents Versus Bevacizumab

INTRODUCTION

Bevacizumab and antiepidermal growth factor receptor-blocking (anti-EGFR) agents plus chemotherapy are first-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Conversion surgery may improve outcomes; however, the extent to which it explains the difference in mortality rates among treatments is unclear. Herein, we aimed to assess the effects of conversion surgery on survival outcomes of patients with unresectable mCRC treated with bevacizumab and anti-EGFR agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab and anti-EGFR agents as first-line therapy. We estimated the direct and indirect effects of treatments by comparing the mortality risk associated with targeted therapy type. Hazard ratios (HR) and the corresponding confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Mediation analysis was used to estimate hazard ratio differences, and the proportion mediated.

RESULTS

A total of 5,106 patients were included. The natural indirect effect of conversion surgery reduced mortality risk (HR: 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97), with a mediated proportion of 42% after propensity score adjustment. In subgroup analyses, KRAS wild-type (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97), left tumor sidedness (HR: 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), and liver resection (HR: 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) were associated with reduced risks of mortality. The controlled and total direct effects of targeted therapy were associated with reduced mortality risk in the anti-EGFR-treated group compared to those in the bevacizumab-treated group; however, this effect was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Conversion surgery may account for the difference in survival outcomes between users of the anti-EGFR agents and bevacizumab.

Constructing a prognostic model for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy: a study based on SEER and an external validation cohort

BACKGROUND

The combination of preoperative chemotherapy and surgical treatment has been shown to significantly enhance the prognosis of colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) patients. Nevertheless, as a result of variations in clinicopathological parameters, the prognosis of this particular group of patients differs considerably. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Cox proportional risk regression model and competing risk regression model using two patient cohorts. The goal was to provide a more precise and personalized prognostic evaluation system.

METHODS

We collected information on individuals who had a pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. We obtained data from patients who underwent pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer and got comprehensive therapy at the hospital between January 1, 2010, and June 1, 2022. The SEER data collected after screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria were separated into two cohorts: a training cohort (training cohort) and an internal validation cohort (internal validation cohort), using a random 1:1 split. Subgroup Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analyses were conducted on each of the three groups. The data that received following screening from the hospital were designated as the external validation cohort. The subsequent variables were chosen for additional examination: age, gender, marital status, race, tumor site, pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor size, T stage, N stage, pathological grade, number of tumor deposits, perineural invasion, number of regional lymph nodes examined, and number of positive regional lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). In the training cohort, we conducted univariate Cox regression analysis and utilized a stepwise regression approach, employing the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to select variables and create Cox proportional risk regression models. We evaluated the accuracy of the model using calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under curve (AUC). The effectiveness of the models was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA). To evaluate the non-cancer-related outcomes, we analyzed variables that had significant impacts using subgroup cumulative incidence function (CIF) and Gray's test. These analyses were used to create competing risk regression models. Nomograms of the two models were constructed separately and prognostic predictions were made for the same patients in SEER database.

RESULTS

This study comprised a total of 735 individuals. The mOS of the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and QDU cohort was 55.00 months (95%CI 46.97-63.03), 48.00 months (95%CI 40.65-55.35), and 68.00 months (95%CI 54.91-81.08), respectively. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, N stage, presence of perineural infiltration, number of tumor deposits and number of positive regional lymph nodes were identified as independent prognostic risk variables (p < 0.05). In comparison to the conventional TNM staging model, the Cox proportional risk regression model exhibited a higher C-index. After controlling for competing risk events, age, N stage, presence of perineural infiltration, number of tumor deposits, number of regional lymph nodes examined, and number of positive regional lymph nodes were independent predictors of the risk of cancer-specific mortality (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We have developed a prognostic model to predict the survival of patients with synchronous CRLM who undergo preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. This model has been tested internally and externally, confirming its accuracy and reliability.

Estimating Efficacy of Conversion Therapy on Patients with Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases by using MRI: Development of a Predictive Score

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The conversion success rate (CSR) has crucial implication for clinical outcomes of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) following conversion therapy. This study aimed to develop a simple predictive scoring model for identifying CSR according to baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, and confirm its performance and prognostic significance in a validation cohort.

METHODS

A total of 155 consecutive patients with initially unresectable CRLM were retrospectively reviewed in the study. A simple MRI-based predictive scoring model for identifying CSR was developed in the development cohort (n = 104) by using multivariable logistic regression analyzes. The diagnostic performance was evaluated for the predictive score. Thereafter, patients in the validation cohort (n = 51) were stratified into groups with predicted high CSR or low CSR according to the score. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between two groups using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The predictive score of CSR, named mrNISE, incorporated the number of CRLM ≥ 10, the largest size ≥ 50 mm, poorly defined tumor-liver interface, and peritumoral enhancement. The AUC of the mrNISE score was 0.845 for the development cohort and 0.776 for the validation cohort. According to the score, patients with predicted high CSR had better PFS and OS than those with low CSR in both development and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The predictive score demonstrated great performance for identifying CSR of initially unresectable CRLM. Stratifying patients by the score, personalized treatment goals can be formulated before conversion therapy to improve clinical prognosis and reduce adverse events caused by ineffective treatment.

Strategic Insight into the Combination Therapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The 5-year survival rate after curative resection is almost 80%, however, it is still less than satisfactory for metastatic CRC (mCRC). The combination approach including surgery, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy is a promising strategy due to its synergistic anticancer effect. Moreover, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has been reported to stratify the post-operative risk of recurrence, thus providing clinically valuable information for deciding to conduct adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, multiple new drugs that potentially target undruggable genes, including KRAS, have been developed. In this review, we discuss the current management of patients with mCRC and future perspectives in the light of a combination therapeutic strategy.

A predictive model for early therapeutic efficacy of colorectal liver metastases using multimodal MRI data

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases is a pivotal factor of death in patients with colorectal cancer. The longitudinal data of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during treatment can monitor and reflect treatment efficacy and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to establish a radiomic model based on longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict chemotherapy response in patients with CRLM.

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled longitudinal MRI data of five modalities on 100 patients. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), 42 and 58 patients were identified as responders and non-responders, respectively. First, radiomic features were computed from different modalities of image data acquired pre-treatment and early-treatment, as well as their differences (Δ). Next, the features were screened by a two-sample t-test, max-relevance and min-redundancy (mRMR), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Then, several ensemble radiomic models that integrate support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), gradient boost decision tree (GBDT) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) were established based on voting method to predict chemotherapy response. Data samples were divided into training and verification queues using a ratio of 8:2. Finally, we used the area under ROC curve (AUC) to evaluate model performance.

RESULTS

Using the ensemble model developed using featue differences (Δ) computed from the longitudinal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images, AUC is 0.9007±0.0436 for the training cohort. Applying to the testing cohort, AUC is 0.8958 and overall accuracy is 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results demonstrate advantages and high performance of the ensemble radiomic model based on the radiomics feature difference of the longitudinal ADC images in predicting chemotherapy response, which has potential to assist treatment decision-making and improve clinical outcome.

Liver regeneration after extensive hepatectomy in rats: effect of preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative intravenous chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration in an experimental model of major hepatectomy in rats.

METHODS

Wistar rats were divided into two groups of 20 animals each and submitted to 70% hepatectomy 24 h after intravenous injection of 5-fluorouracil 20 mg/kg (fluorouracil group, FG) or 0.9% saline (control group, CG). After hepatectomy, each group was subdivided into two subgroups of 10 animals each according to the day of sacrifice (24 h or 7 days). Liver weight during regeneration, liver regeneration rate using Kwon formula, and the immunohistochemical markers proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67 were used to assess liver regeneration.

RESULTS

At early phase (24 h after hepatectomy) it was demonstrated the negative effect of 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration when assessed by Kwon formula (p < 0.0001), PCNA analysis (p = 0.02). With regeneration process complete (7 days), it was possible to demonstrate the sustained impairment of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on hepatocytes regeneration phenomenon when measured by Kwon formula (p = 0.009), PCNA analysis (p = 0.0001) and Ki-67 analysis (0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemotherapy with intravenous 5-fluorouracil negatively affected the mechanisms of liver regeneration after major hepatectomy in rats.

Conversion Strategy in Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Unresectable Liver-Limited Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients frequently develop liver metastases. Different treatment strategies are available according to the timing of appearance, the burden of metastatic disease, and the performance status of the patient. Systemic treatment (ST) represents the cornerstone of metastatic disease management. However, in select cases, combined ST and surgical resection can lead to remarkable survival outcomes. In the present multicentric cohort study, we explored the efficacy of a conversion strategy in a selected population of left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type CRC patients with liver-limited metastatic disease. Methods: The primary endpoint was to compare survival outcomes of patients undergoing ST not leading to surgery, liver resection after conversion ST, and hepatic resection with perioperative ST. Furthermore, we explored survival outcomes depending on whether the case was discussed within a multidisciplinary team. Results: Between 2012 and 2020, data from 690 patients respecting the inclusion criteria were collected. Among these, 272 patients were deemed eligible for the analysis. The conversion rate was 24.1% of cases. Fifty-six (20.6%) patients undergoing surgical resection after induction treatment (i.e., ultimately resectable) had a significant survival advantage compared to those receiving systemic treatment not leading to surgery (176 pts, 64.7%) (5-year OS 60.8% and 11.7%, respectively, Log Rank test p < 0.001; HR = 0.273; 95% CI: 0.16−0.46; p < 0.001; 5-year PFS 22.2% and 6.3%, respectively, Log Rank test p < 0.001; HR = 0.447; 95% CI: 0.32−0.63; p < 0.001). There was no difference in survival between ultimately resectable patients and those who had liver resection with perioperative systemic treatment (potentially resectable—40 pts) (5-year OS 71.1%, Log Rank test p = 0.311. HR = 0.671; 95% CI: 0.31−1.46; p = 0.314; 5-year PFS 25.7%, Log Rank test p = 0.305. HR = 0.782; 95% CI: 0.49−1.25; p = 0.306). Conclusions: In our selected population of left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer patients with liver-limited disease, a conversion strategy was confirmed to provide a survival benefit. Patients not deemed surgical candidates at the time of diagnosis and patients judged resectable with perioperative systemic treatment have similar survival outcomes.

Clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of the digestive system in clinical practice. Due to the anatomical characteristics of the colorectum itself, colorectal cancer is prone to liver metastasis. Approximately 15%-25% of colorectal cancer cases are complicated with liver metastasis at diagnosis, 15%-25% are complicated with liver metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer, and 80%-90% with liver metastasis cannot undergo radical resection initially. The 5-year survival rate is less than 5%, and liver metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. In recent years, with the clinical application of effective chemotherapy and molecular targeted drugs, as well as the rapid development of surgical techniques, an individualized safe, efficient, fast, treatment plan can be formulated according to patients' age, primary colorectal tumor location, degree of differentiation, Ras and B-Raf gene status, tumor size, number and distribution of metastases in the liver. By shrinking the tumor volume in the liver and increasing the residual liver volume, liver metastatic tumors can undergo surgical resection or disease-free status can be achieved in patients with liver metastasis. As a result, patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve a 5-year survival rate of 30%-57%, which greatly improves the prognosis after operation. According to the postoperative adverse factors, individualized preventive measures are worked out to reduce the impact of adverse factors and improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases. In this paper, we systematically discuss the clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases by reviewing the relevant domestic and foreign literature, so as to provide a theoretical reference for the selection of clinical treatment and program for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Current Surgical Management Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancer diagnoses in the world. At least half of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will develop metastatic disease, with most being identified in the liver. Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is potentially curative. Surgical resection of CRLM, however, remains underutilized despite the continued expansion of operative strategies available. This is likely due to differing views on resectability. Resectability is a surgical assessment, and the classification of CRLM as unresectable should only be made by an experienced hepatobiliary surgeon. Obtaining a surgical evaluation at the time of liver metastasis discovery may help mitigate the challenge of assessing resectability and the determination of potential operative time windows within current multimodal management strategies. The aim of this review is to help facilitate discussions surrounding resectability as well as the timing and sequencing of both surgical and non-surgical therapies.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosis in the world, and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite significant progress in management strategies for colorectal cancer over the last several decades, metastatic disease remains difficult to treat and is often considered incurable. However, for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), surgical resection offers the best opportunity for survival, can be curative, and remains the gold standard. Unfortunately, surgical treatment options are underutilized. Misperceptions regarding resectable and unresectable CRLM likely play a role in this. The assessment of factors that impact resectability status like medical fitness, technical considerations, and disease biology can be difficult, necessitating careful multidisciplinary input and discussion. The identification of ideal operative time windows that align with the multimodal management of these patients can also be perplexing. For all patients with CRLM it may therefore be advantageous to obtain surgical evaluation at the time of discovering liver metastases to mitigate these challenges and minimize the risk of undertreatment. In this review we summarize current surgical management strategies for CRLM and discuss factors to be considered when determining resectability.

The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of Multivisceral Liver Resection (MLR) on the outcome of patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis (CRLM) is unclear. The present systematic review aimed to compare patients with CRLM who underwent MLR versus standard hepatectomy regarding short- and long-term outcomes. MLR is a feasible procedure but has a higher risk of major complications. MLR did not negatively affect long-term survival, suggesting that an extended resection is an option for potentially curative treatment for selected patients with CRLM.

Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases and Biotherapies

(1) Background: colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the deadliest causes of death by cancer worldwide. Its first main metastatic diffusion spreads to the liver. Different mechanisms such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis are the characteristics of this invasion. At this stage, different options are possible and still in debate, especially regarding the use of targeted therapeutics and biotherapies. (2) Methods: A review of the literature has been done focusing on the clinical management of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer and the contribution of biotherapies in this field. (3) Results: In a clinical setting, surgeons and oncologists consider liver metastasis in CRC into two groups to launch adapted therapeutics: resectable and non-resectable. Around these two entities, the combination of targeted therapies and biotherapies are of high interest and are currently tested to know in which molecular and clinical conditions they have to be applied to impact positively both on survival and quality of life of patients.