Preoperative misdiagnosis of pancreatic and periampullary cancer in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: A multicentre retrospective cohort study

Intelligent Diagnosis of Pancreatic Biopsy From Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Via Stimulated Raman Histopathology

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become one of the most important preoperative diagnostic methods for pancreatic tumors, but it often faces challenges of redundant sampling from patients and complex tissue processing that hinders timely diagnosis. Intraoperative rapid on-site evaluation is an auxiliary diagnostic technique that helps assess sample quality in real time, but it heavily depends on pathologists and involves subjectivity and complex procedures. Here, we developed a rapid and label-free approach for intraoperative histology on EUS-FNA specimen via deep learning-based stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, aimed at replacing rapid on-site evaluation and providing a more efficient and objective diagnostic approach. Fresh pancreatic EUS-FNA tissues were imaged with stimulated Raman scattering and compared with hematoxylin and eosin staining to identify key histologic features. Using images from 76 patients, a convolutional neural network model was established to identify benign, malignant, and nondiagnostic areas, achieving a validation accuracy >96% on an external test set of 33 cases. Furthermore, gradient-weighted class activation mapping was able to highlight histologic profiles within individual biopsy. Our approach has potential application in efficient intraoperative assessment of pancreatic biopsy through EUS-FNA.

Pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is frequently a lethal disease with an aggressive tumour biology often presenting with non-specific symptoms. Median survival is approximately 4 months with a 5-year survival of 13%. Surveillance is recommended in individuals with familial pancreatic cancer, specific mutations, and high-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, as they are at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Chemotherapy combined with surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment. However, only a small subset of patients are candidates for surgery. Multi-agent chemotherapy has improved survival in the palliative setting for patients with metastatic disease, as (neo)adjuvant and induction therapy have in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic. Given that pancreatic cancer is predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030, novel therapies are urgently needed.

Comparison of Ampullary and Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Smaller Invasion, Common Adenomatous Components, Resectability, and Histology are Factors for Improved Survival for Patients with Ampullary Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The information on the clinicopathologic/outcome differences between ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) has been conflicting to the extent that it still is questioned whether ACs need to be recognized separately from PCs.

METHODS

The characteristics of 413 ACs were compared with those of 547 PCs.

RESULTS

The ACs had a better prognosis than the PCs (5-year survival, 57 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001). Even the pancreatobiliary (PB)-type ACs had a better prognosis (5-year survival, 46 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001). Several differences also were identified as contributing factors: (1) the preinvasive adenomatous component often constituted a significant proportion of the mass in ACs (>50 % of the tumor in 16 % vs 1.5 %; p < 0.001); (2) the mean size of the carcinoma was smaller in ACs (2.5 vs 3.2 cm; p < 0.001): when matched for invasion size, the survival advantage of AC was minimized, and when matched for invasion size larger than 2 cm, the survival advantage of AC lost its statistical significance; (3) lymph node (LN) metastases were less common in ACs (49 % vs 71 %; p < 0.001); (4) the definitive R1 rate was lower in ACs (4 % vs 23.5 %; p < 0.001); and (5) non-PB and non-tubular adenocarcinoma types were more common in ACs (17 % vs 3 %; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparatively, ACs have better clinical survival than PCs. Potential contributing factors are the relative abundance of the preinvasive component, smaller invasion, lower LN metastasis rate, higher resectability, and common occurrence of less aggressive histologic phenotypes (intestinal, medullary, mucinous). However, this survival advantage is sustained even in PB-type ACs, highlighting the importance of accurately determining the site of origin.

The value of CA19-9 and MRI features in the preoperative differential diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in periampullary carcinoma

PURPOSE

To explore the value of laboratory serum markers and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) features in the preoperative differential diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in periampullary carcinoma (PAC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 105 PAC patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy was conducted, including 33 cases of PDAC (observation group) and 72 cases of non-PDAC (control group), with 25 cases of ampullary carcinoma, 38 cases of distal bile duct carcinoma, and 9 cases of periampullary duodenal carcinoma. Laboratory serum markers, MRI features, and pathological diagnosis data were compared between the two groups to analyze the value of laboratory serum markers and MRI features for differential diagnosis of PDAC within PAC.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, the observation group had higher proportions in total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9 (CA19-9), quadruple duct sign, pancreatobiliary junction angle, main pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic head side branch duct dilation, and hypovascular mass in pancreatic head, consistency of imaging and pathology diagnosis, perineural invasion (p < 0.05).The common bile duct diameter was smaller in the observation group (p < 0.05). The sensitivities of CA19-9, main pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic head side branch duct dilation, and hypovascular mass in pancreatic head in PDAC within PAC are 53.8%, 51%, 84.6%, and 81.1%, respectively; the specificities are 81.8%, 87%, 86.1%, and 95.6%, respectively; and the areas under the ROC curve are 0.74, 0.749, 0.806, and 0.906, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the preoperative diagnosis of PAC, CA19-9, main pancreatic duct diameter, hypovascular mass in pancreatic head, and pancreatic head side branch duct dilation are effective indicators for distinguishing PDAC.

Preoperative profiles of plasma amino acids and derivatives distinguish periampullary cancer and benign disease

Periampullary cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, ampullary-, cholangio-, and duodenal carcinoma, are frequently diagnosed in an advanced stage and are associated with poor overall survival. They are difficult to differentiate from each other and challenging to distinguish from benign periampullary disease preoperatively. To improve the preoperative diagnostics of periampullary neoplasms, clinical or biological markers are warranted.In this study, 28 blood plasma amino acids and derivatives from preoperative patients with benign (N = 45) and malignant (N = 72) periampullary disease were analyzed by LC-MS/MS.Principal component analysis and consensus clustering both separated the patients with cancer and the patients with benign disease. Glutamic acid had significantly higher plasma expression and 15 other metabolites significantly lower plasma expression in patients with malignant disease compared with patients having benign disease. Phenylalanine was the only metabolite associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.50, CI 0.30-0.83, P < 0.01).Taken together, plasma metabolite profiles from patients with malignant and benign periampullary disease were significantly different and have the potential to distinguish malignant from benign disease preoperatively.

Endoscopic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration or Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) are currently recommended for the pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions (PSLs). The application of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) could aid the endoscopist during an FNA and/or FNB procedure. CEUS is indeed able to better differentiate the pathologic tissue from the surrounding healthy pancreatic parenchyma and to detect necrotic areas and vessels.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate if ECEUS could reduce the number of needle passes and side effects and increase the diagnostic efficacy of FNA and/or FNB.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to explore if ECEUS-FNA or FNB could increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce the number of needle passes and adverse effects compared to standard EUS-FNA or FNB. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned.

RESULTS

The proportion of established diagnoses of ECEUS was 90.9% compared to 88.3% of EUS, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.14). The diagnosis was made through a single step in 70.9% of ECEUS patients and in 65.3% of EUS patients, without statistical significance (p = 0.24). The incidence of adverse reactions was substantially comparable across both groups (p = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

ECEUS-FNA and FNB do not appear superior to standard EUS-FNA and FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.

Investigating misdiagnosis of suspected cancer among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: three decades of experience

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic error can result in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) being mistakenly performed for benign disease. The aims of this study were to observe the error rate in PD over three decades and identify characteristics of benign disease that can mimic malignancy.

METHODS

Patients with a benign histological diagnosis after having PD performed for suspected malignancy between 1988 and 2019 were selected for review. Preoperative clinical features, imaging and pathological samples were reviewed alongside resection specimens to identify features that may have led to misdiagnosis.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 1812 patients underwent PD for suspected malignancy and 97 (5.2 %) of these had a final benign diagnosis. The rate of benign cases reduced across the study period. Some 62 patients proceeded to surgery without a preoperative tissue diagnosis; the decision to operate was made upon clinical and radiologic features alone. There were six patients who had a preoperative pathological sample suspicious for malignancy, of which two had autoimmune pancreatitis in the postoperative histology specimen.

DISCUSSION

Benign conditions, notably autoimmune and chronic pancreatitis, can mimic malignancy even with the use of EUS-FNA. The results of all available diagnostic modalities should be interpreted by a multidisciplinary team and honest discussions with the patient should follow.

Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of published fistula risk models by external validation, and to identify independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

BACKGROUND

Multiple risk models have been developed to predict POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. External validation in high-quality prospective cohorts is, however, lacking or only performed for individual models.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of data from the stepped-wedge cluster cluster-randomized Care After Pancreatic Resection According to an Algorithm for Early Detection and Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Fistula versus Current Practice (PORSCH) trial was performed. Included were all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands (January 2018-November 2019). Risk models on POPF were identified by a systematic literature search. Model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) and calibration plots. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with clinically relevant POPF.

RESULTS

Overall, 1358 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 341 patients (25%) developed clinically relevant POPF. Fourteen risk models for POPF were evaluated, with AUCs ranging from 0.62 to 0.70. The updated alternative fistula risk score had an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.69-0.72). The alternative fistula risk score demonstrated an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.689-0.71), whilst an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.699-0.71) was also found for the model by Petrova and colleagues. Soft pancreatic texture, pathology other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or chronic pancreatitis, small pancreatic duct diameter, higher body mass index, minimally invasive resection and male sex were identified as independent predictors of POPF.

CONCLUSION

Published risk models predicting clinically relevant POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy have a moderate predictive accuracy. Their clinical applicability to identify high-risk patients and guide treatment strategies is therefore questionable.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Ampullary Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Ampullary or papillary carcinoma is a malignant tumor arising from the mucosa in the region of the major duodenal papilla, also known as the ampulla of Vater. Uniform treatment recommendations are lacking both for the adjuvant situation and for palliative care.

METHODS

A selective literature search was carried out in PubMed in order to identify the most informative publications concerning the epidemiology, clinico-pathological background, and surgical and medical treatment of this condition.

RESULTS

Ampullary carcinoma has an incidence of 0.5 to 0.9 per 100 000 persons and a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 41% to 45% for locally confined and 4% to 7% for metastatic disease. Most such tumors are of an intestinal or a pan - creaticobiliary immunohistochemical subtype; the latter has a worse prognosis (median survival, 72-80 vs. 33-41 months). Targeted treatment is not yet available for either subtype, nor is there enough scientific evidence available for the formulation of specific therapeutic recommendations in either the adjuvant or the palliative situation. The treatment of choice for ampullary carcinoma is radical oncological resection of the head of the pancreas with systematic lymphadenectomy. Five-year overall survival is between 10% and 75% depending on the stage. No definitive recommendation for adjuvant therapy can be given. Palliative therapy can be oriented to the published treatment strategies for cancer of the colon, pancreas, and bile duct.

CONCLUSION

The current state of the evidence on the treatment of ampullary carcinoma is poor. Therapeutic decisions should be discussed in an interdisciplinary tumor board and should, in our opinion, take the histological subtype into account.

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic tissue acquisition for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the PREOPANC and PREOPANC-2 trials

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has increased, necessitating histopathologic confirmation of cancer. This study evaluates the performance of endoscopic tissue acquisition (TA) procedures for borderline resectable and resectable PDAC.

METHODS

Pathology reports of patients included in two nationwide randomized controlled trials (PREOPANC and PREOPANC-2) were reviewed. The primary outcome was sensitivity for malignancy (SFM), considering both "suspicious for" and "malignant" as positive. Secondary outcomes were rate of adequate sampling (RAS) and diagnoses other than PDAC.

RESULTS

Overall, 892 endoscopic procedures were performed in 617 patients, including endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided TA in 550 (89.1%), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided brush cytology in 188 (30.5%), and periampullary biopsies in 61 patients (9.9%). The SFM was 85.2% for EUS, 88.2% for repeat EUS, 52.7% for ERCP, and 37.7% for periampullary biopsies. The RAS ranged 94-100%. Diagnoses other than PDAC were other periampullary cancers in 24 (5.4%), premalignant disease in five (1.1%), and pancreatitis in three patients (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-guided TA of patients with borderline resectable and resectable PDAC included in RCTs had an SFM above 85% for both first and repeat procedures, meeting international standards. Two percent had false positive result for malignancy and 5% had other (non-PDAC) periampullary cancers.

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of the Expression of Specific Membrane Antigens in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

(1) Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. The lack of validated disease biomarkers makes timely diagnosis challenging in most cases. Cell membrane and surface proteins play a crucial role in several routes of oncogenesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of six membrane antigens on PDAC (CA 19-9, mucin 1 and 4 (MUC1, MUC4), mesothelin (MSLN), Annexin A10 (ANXA10), Glypican-1 (GPC-1)) and their correlation with oncologic outcomes. (2) Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for CA 19.9, MUC1, MUC4, MSLN, ANXA10, and GPC-1 of surgical samples of 50 consecutive patients with PDAC was performed. Antigen expression for tumor, ductal, and acinar tissues was classified according to the histo-score (H-score) by two pathologists. (3) Results: Recurrence rate was 47% and 18 patients (36%) deceased (median follow-up 21.5 months). Immunostaining for CA 19-9 and MUC1 showed a significantly higher expression in the neoplastic tissue compared to non-tumor ductal and acinar tissues (p < 0.001). MUC4, MSLN, ANXA10, and GPC-1 were selectively expressed in the neoplastic tissue (p < 0.001). A CA 19-9 H-score value >270 was independently associated with a worse overall survival (p = 0.05) and disease-free survival (p = 0.05). (4) Conclusions: CA 19-9 and MUC1 are highly expressed in PDAC cells. The histological expression of CA 19-9 may predict prognosis. MUC4, MSLN, ANXA10, and GPC-1 are selectively expressed by neoplastic tissue and may represent a potential histological biomarker of disease.

Fistula Risk Score for Auditing Pancreatoduodenectomy: The Auditing-FRS

OBJECTIVE

To develop a fistula risk score for auditing, to be able to compare postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy among hospitals.

BACKGROUND

For proper comparisons of outcomes in surgical audits, case-mix variation should be accounted for.

METHODS

This study included consecutive patients after pancreatoduodenectomy from the mandatory nationwide Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Derivation of the score was performed with the data from 2014 to 2018 and validation with 2019 to 2020 data. The primary endpoint of the study was POPF (grade B or C). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for case-mix adjustment of known risk factors.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, 3271 patients were included, of whom 479 (14.6%) developed POPF. Male sex [odds ratio (OR)=1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.66], higher body mass index (OR=1.07; 95% CI: 1.05-1.10), a final diagnosis other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma/pancreatitis (OR=2.41; 95% CI: 1.90-3.06), and a smaller duct diameter (OR=1.43/mm decrease; 95% CI: 1.32-1.55) were independently associated with POPF. Diabetes mellitus (OR=0.73; 95% CI: 0.55-0.98) was independently associated with a decreased risk of POPF. Model discrimination was good with a C -statistic of 0.73 in the derivation cohort and 0.75 in the validation cohort (n=913). Hospitals differed in particular in the proportion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma/pancreatitis patients, ranging from 36.0% to 58.1%. The observed POPF risk per center ranged from 2.9% to 25.4%. The expected POPF rate based on the 5 risk factors ranged from 11.6% to 18.0% among hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The auditing fistula risk score was successful in case-mix adjustment and enables fair comparisons of POPF rates among hospitals.

Efficacy and safety comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery for treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Currently, surgical resection is the most commonly performed and effective treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) worldwide. However, the prognosis of ICC is unsatisfactory. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery in treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The study also intends to explore whether chemotherapy should be introduced before surgery and which populations should be considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHOD

Four databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception dates to January 2022 for relevant articles. The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager Software (version5.3). The non-randomized interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies and the overall quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Moreover, the primary outcomes included 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes were R0 resection, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 2412 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year RFS, postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality between the two groups. However, the meta-analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had a better 5-year OS benefit in ICC patients than the upfront surgery group (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02-1.58), while the R0 resection rate was lower in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group than that in the upfront surgery group (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.91).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery could prolong the 5-year OS without increasing the risk of postoperative complications in ICC patients. Considering that the patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery group had more advanced ICC cases, the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be more significant in patients with more advanced ICC.

Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Current landscape and future prospects

The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer has not been completely clear, there is no highly sensitive and specific detection method, so early diagnosis is very difficult. Despite the rapid development of tumor diagnosis and treatment, it is difficult to break through in the short term and the overall 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is less than 8%. In the face of the increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, in addition to strengthening basic research, exploring its etiology and pathogenesis, it is urgent to optimize the existing diagnosis and treatment methods through standard multidisciplinary team (MDT), and formulate personalized treatment plan to achieve the purpose of improving the curative effect. However, there are some problems in MDT, such as insufficient understanding and enthusiasm of some doctors, failure to operate MDT according to the system, lack of good communication between domestic and foreign peers, and lack of attention in personnel training and talent echelon construction. It is expected to protect the rights and interests of doctors in the future and ensure the continuous operation of MDT. To strengthen the research on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer, MDT can try the Internet +MDT mode to improve the efficiency of MDT.

Preoperative Misdiagnosis in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy

Distal bile duct cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary adenocarcinoma, duodenal carcinoma, and ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head of the pancreas usually have similar clinical presentation since they arise in the same circumscribed anatomical area, within 2 cm of the major duodenal papilla [...].

Machine learning models for predicting survival in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to predict the long-term survival probability of patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC), which would provide a theoretical basis for the long-term care of these patients.

METHODS

Data on patients with AAC during 2004-2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, which were split at a 7:3 ratio into two independent cohorts: training and testing cohorts. Differences in survival between the two groups were tested using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test methods. We constructed six survival analysis methods: the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage, Cox Proportional Hazards regression, CoxTime, DeepSurv, XGBoost Survival Embeddings, and Random Survival Forest. The performances of these models were evaluated using the C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and calibration curves.

RESULTS

This study included 2,935 patients with AAC. Univariate Cox regression analyses of the training cohort indicated that race, marital status at diagnosis, scope of regional lymph node surgery, tumor grade, summary stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, TNM stage T, and TNM stage N were important factors affecting survival (P ​< ​0.05). The results of the C-index indicated that DeepSurv performed the best among the six models, with the highest C-index of 0.731. The areas under the ROC curves of the DeepSurv model at the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year time points were 0.823, 0.786, 0.803, and 0.813, respectively. The calibration curve indicated that DeepSurv performed well, with good calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning models such as DeepSurv have a stronger performance in the survival analysis of patients with AAC.

Treatment and overall survival of four types of non-metastatic periampullary cancer: nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Periampullary adenocarcinoma consists of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), distal cholangiocarcinoma (DC), ampullary cancer (AC), and duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA). The aim of this study was to assess treatment modalities and overall survival by tumor origin.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic periampullary cancer in 2012-2018 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. OS was studied with Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression analyses, stratified by origin.

RESULTS

Among the 8758 patients included, 68% had PDAC, 13% DC, 12% AC, and 7% DA. Resection was performed in 35% of PDAC, 56% of DC, 70% of AC, and 59% of DA. Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy was administered in 22% of PDAC, 7% of DC, 7% of AC, and 12% of DA. Three-year OS was highest for AC (37%) and DA (34%), followed by DC (21%) and PDAC (11%). Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved OS among PDAC (HR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.55-0.69) and DC (HR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.98), but not AC (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.62-1.22) and DA (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.48-1.50).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study identified considerable differences in treatment modalities and OS between the four periampullary cancer origins in daily clinical practice. An improved OS after adjuvant chemotherapy could not be demonstrated in patients with AC and DA.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Dutch Randomized PREOPANC Trial

PURPOSE

The benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Initial results of the PREOPANC trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. The long-term results are reported.

METHODS

In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or upfront surgery in 16 Dutch centers. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine combined with 36 Gy radiotherapy in 15 fractions during the second cycle. After restaging, patients underwent surgery followed by four cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. Patients in the upfront surgery group underwent surgery followed by six cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary outcome was OS by intention-to-treat. No safety data were collected beyond the initial report of the trial.

RESULTS

Between April 24, 2013, and July 25, 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 119) and upfront surgery (n = 127). At a median follow-up of 59 months, the OS was better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group than in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.96; P = .025). Although the difference in median survival was only 1.4 months (15.7 months v 14.3 months), the 5-year OS rate was 20.5% (95% CI, 14.2 to 29.8) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 6.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.7) with upfront surgery. The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was consistent across the prespecified subgroups, including resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine improves OS compared with upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

[Ampullary neoplasms: surgical management]

BACKGROUND

Endoscopically unresectable adenomas and carcinomas of the greater duodenal papilla and ampulla of the bile duct necessitate surgical resection. The surgical techniques need to be adapted to local tumor expansion and patterns of infiltrative growth.

OBJECTIVE

Based on the current scientific data and developments this article provides an overview of indications for surgical resection, surgical strategies and dissection techniques for ampullary tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the literature addressing surgical management of ampullary neoplasms was performed. Current evidence and recommendations were summarized.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Ampullary neoplasms can originate from intestinal or pancreatobiliary epithelial cells. Differentiating these histopathological subtypes is of crucial relevance concerning therapeutic strategy and prognosis in ampullary adenocarcinoma. All ampullary adenomas carry a risk of malignant transformation and therefore justify resection. Endoscopic papillectomy, surgical transduodenal ampullectomy and partial pancreatoduodenectomy are suitable resection techniques for ampullary adenoma. The selection of the procedure depends on intraductal tumor extension, tumor size and degree of dysplasia. Ampullary carcinoma is managed by upfront pancreatoduodenectomy comprising systematic lymph node dissection and level II dissection of the mesopancreas. Lymph node status and perineural sheath invasion are key prognostic factors concerning overall survival.

[Preoperative diagnostics in periampullary adenocarcinomas]

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30-40% of pancreatoduodenectomies for adenocarcinomas result in nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma as the final diagnosis. Depending on the origin, a distinction is made between four different carcinomas with histomorphological subtypes.

OBJECTIVE

Carcinoma location and subtype are of prognostic and therapeutic relevance; however, the preoperative differentiation is often incorrect despite modern diagnostics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Overview of the current literature on the classification and preoperative diagnostics of periampullary adenocarcinomas.

RESULTS

A precise knowledge of the papillary anatomy is necessary for the correct classification of diagnostic findings. Current studies demonstrate diagnostically valuable information from the anamnesis, imaging and endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

In ca. 70-80% of cases a correct diagnosis of the type of periampullary adenocarcinoma is possible on the basis of interdisciplinary diagnostics. This potentially enables a correspondingly individualized treatment planning in the preoperative phase.

[Surgery for periampullary pancreatic cancer]

Periampullary neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of different tumor entities arising from the periampullary region, of which pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common subgroup with 60-70%. As typical for pancreatic adenocarcinomas, periampullary pancreatic cancer is characterized by an aggressive growth and early systemic progression. Due to the anatomical location in close relationship to the papilla of Vater symptoms occur at an earlier stage of the disease, so that treatment options and prognosis are overall more favorable compared to pancreatic carcinomas at other locations. Nevertheless, the principles of treatment for periampullary pancreatic cancer are not substantially different from the standards for pancreatic cancer at other locations. A potentially curative approach for non-metastatic periampullary pancreatic cancer is a multimodal therapy concept, which includes partial pancreatoduodenectomy as a radical oncological resection in combination with a systemic adjuvant chemotherapy. As a result, long-term survival can be achieved in patients with favorable prognostic factors. In addition, with the continous development of surgery and systemic treatment potentially curative treatment concepts for advanced initially nonresectable tumors were also established, after completion of neoadjuvant treatment. This article presents the current surgical principles of a radical oncological resection for periampullary pancreatic cancer in the context of a multimodal treatment concept with an outlook for future developments of treatment.

[Multimodal treatment of periampullary carcinoma]

Ampullary carcinoma is a rare malignant neoplasm and arises in the region of Vater's ampulla. The differentiation from pancreatic and distal cholangiocarcinoma can be difficult. The prognosis is more favorable than for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma but recurrences are frequent. An exact diagnostic clarification and differentiation from pancreatic carcinoma is therefore essential. Although the resection of periampullary carcinoma is established, prospectively controlled studies on the role of multimodal treatment are rare. Adjuvant chemotherapy is oriented to the protocols for pancreatic carcinoma and could be of benefit in lymph node metastases, advanced T stage and low differentiation of tumors. Intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes can be differentiated histologically, which is relevant for systemic treatment strategies. Patients with pancreatobiliary differentiated tumors in particular could benefit from gemcitabine-based treatment but insufficient evidence exists for chemoradiotherapy. The role of neoadjuvant and perioperative treatment strategies is currently unclear. Molecular characterization can help to identify familial risk constellations and targeted treatment strategies for this rare tumor entity.