Anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade improves the efficacy of a melphalan-based therapy in experimental melanoma

Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.

Upgrading Melanoma Treatment: Promising Immunotherapies Combinations in the Preclinical Mouse Model

Background:

Melanoma, known for its high metastatic potential, does not respond well to existing treatments in advanced stages. As a solution, immunotherapy-based treatments, including anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4, have been developed and evaluated in preclinical mouse models to overcome resistance. Although these treatments display the potential to suppress tumor growth, there remains a crucial requirement for a thorough assessment of long-term efficacy in preventing metastasis or recurrence and improving survival rates.

Methods:

From 2016 onwards, a thorough examination of combined immunotherapies for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma in preclinical mouse models was conducted. The search was conducted using MeSH Terms algorithms in PubMed®, resulting in the identification of forty-five studies that met the rigorous inclusion criteria for screening.

Results:

The C57 mouse model bearing B16-melanoma has been widely utilized to assess the efficacy of immunotherapies. The combination of therapies has demonstrated a synergistic impact, leading to potent antitumor activity. One extensively studied method for establishing metastatic models involves the intravenous administration of malignant cells, with several combined therapies under investigation. The primary focus of evaluation has been on combined immunotherapies utilizing PD- 1/L1 and CTLA-4 blockade, although alternative immunotherapies not involving PD-1/L1 and CTLA-4 blockade have also been identified. Additionally, the review provides detailed treatment regimens for each combined approach.

Conclusion:

The identification of techniques for generating simulated models of metastatic melanoma and investigating various therapeutic combinations will greatly aid in evaluating the overall systemic efficacy of immunotherapy. This will be especially valuable for conducting short-term preclinical experiments that have the potential for clinical studies.

Isolated hyperthermic perfusions for cutaneous melanoma in-transit metastasis of the limb and uveal melanoma metastasis to the liver

Patients with cutaneous melanoma can develop in-transit metastases (ITM), most often localized to limbs. For patients with uveal melanoma that develop metastatic disease, the overall majority develop isolated liver metastases. For these types of metastases, regional cancer therapies have evolved as effective treatments. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP), isolated limb infusion (ILI), isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) and percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) achieve a high local concentration of chemotherapy with minimal systemic exposure. This review discusses the mechanism and available literature on locoregional treatment modalities in the era of modern immunotherapy.

The effect of a single dose of nivolumab prior to isolated limb perfusion for patients with in-transit melanoma metastases: An interim analysis of a phase Ib/II randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (NivoILP trial)

OBJECTIVE

ILP has shown to achieve high response rates in patients with melanoma ITM. Possibly there is a synergistic mechanism of action of ILP and anti-PD1. The aim of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of adding a single dose of systemic anti-PD1 to isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM).

METHODS

In this placebo controlled double-blind phase Ib/II trial, patients with melanoma ITM were randomized 1:1 to either a single systemic dose of nivolumab or placebo one day prior to ILP. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at three months, and safety in terms of incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were included. AEs of any grade occurred in 90% of patients in the nivolumab arm and in 80% in the placebo arm within three months after ILP. Grade 3 AEs were reported in 40% and 30% respectively, most commonly related to wound infection, wound dehiscence, or skin necrosis. There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs reported. The CR rate was 75% in the nivolumab arm and 60% in the placebo arm. The 1-year local progression-free rate was 86% in the nivolumab arm and 67% in the placebo arm. The 1-year OS was 100% in both arms.

CONCLUSION

For patients with melanoma ITM, the addition of a single systemic dose of nivolumab the day before ILP is considered safe and feasible with promising efficacy. Accrual will continue in a phase 2 trial.

Effects of the Introduction of Modern Immunotherapy on the Outcome of Isolated Limb Perfusion for Melanoma In-Transit Metastases

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is an effective locoregional treatment for melanoma in-transit metastasis, but the advent of modern effective immunotherapy, such as ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitors), has changed the treatment landscape. The primary aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of the patient population receiving ILP before and after the introduction of modern systemic treatments and to assess if outcomes after ILP were influenced by previous immunotherapy treatment. A single-centre analysis of patients that underwent ILP for melanoma in-transit metastasis between 2010 and 2021 was conducted, with patients grouped and compared by treatment time period: pre-ICI era (2010-2014) and ICI era (2017-2021). 218 patients were included. Patients undergoing ILP in the ICI era were slightly older (median age 73 vs. 68 years) compared to the pre-ICI era, with no other difference found. The overall response rate (ORR) was 83% vs. 84% and the complete response (CR) rate was 52% vs. 47% for the pre-ICI era and the ICI era, respectively. For patients that had received and failed immunotherapy prior to ILP (n = 20), the ORR was 75% and the CR rate was 50%. Melanoma-specific survival has improved, with a 3-year survival rate of 54% in the pre-ICI era vs. 86% in the ICI era. The patient population undergoing ILP for in-transit melanoma is largely unchanged in the current era of effective systemic treatments. Response rates have not decreased, and prior ICI treatment did not affect response rates, making ILP still a valid treatment option for this patient group.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma in-transit with or without nodal metastases - A multicenter cohort study

PURPOSE

Guidelines addressing melanoma in-transit metastasis (ITM) recommend immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as a first-line treatment option, despite the fact that there are no efficacy data available from prospective trials for exclusively ITM disease. The study aims to analyze the outcome of patients with ITM treated with ICI based on data from a large cohort of patients treated at international referral clinics.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated between January 2015 and December 2020 from Australia, Europe, and the USA, evaluating treatment with ICI for ITM with or without nodal involvement (AJCC8 N1c, N2c, and N3c) and without distant disease (M0). Treatment was with PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and/or CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab). The response was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria modified for cutaneous lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients from 21 institutions in eight countries were included. Immunotherapy was first-line treatment in 64 (22%) patients. PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitor monotherapy was given in 233 (81%) and 23 (8%) patients, respectively, while 31 (11%) received both in combination. The overall response rate was 56%, complete response (CR) rate was 36%, and progressive disease (PD) rate was 32%. Median PFS was ten months (95% CI 7.4-12.6 months) with a one-, two-, and five-year PFS rate of 48%, 33%, and 18%, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, and the one-, two-, and five-year MSS rates were 95%, 83%, and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Systemic immunotherapy is an effective treatment for melanoma ITM. Future studies should evaluate the role of systemic immunotherapy in the context of multimodality therapy, including locoregional treatments such as surgery, intralesional therapy, and regional therapies.