Less extensive surgery for low-risk papillary thyroid cancers post 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines in an Australian tertiary centre

Prophylactic central lymph node dissection for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer-Impact on subsequent therapy

BACKGROUND

For small papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs) with no lateral nodal involvement, American Thyroid Association guidelines recommend performing prophylactic central lymph node dissection (pCLND) if it influences further management. Our cohort study explored to what extent performing pCLND for small PTCs can de-escalate subsequent therapy including completion thyroidectomy and adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation.

METHODS

Adults with T1, T2, and cN0 PTCs were identified from 42 centers across the prospectively maintained Australian and New Zealand Thyroid Cancer Registry (ANZTCR) between 2017 and 2023. Patients were excluded if they had clinical nodal involvement or distant metastases. Subsequent therapy and complication rates were compared between patients with and without pCLND.

RESULTS

Out of 1290 patients with T1, T2, and cN0 PTCs (78% female and median age 53 years), 660 (51%) received a total thyroidectomy and 630 (49%) received a hemithyroidectomy. Prophylactic CLND was performed for 477 patients (37%) and 36% uncovered occult lymph node metastases. After adjusting for differences in age, sex, and tumor characteristics, absence of lymph node metastasis after pCLND was independently associated with fewer completion thyroidectomies (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 0.65 and p = 0.008) and reduced RAI ablation (aRR 0.55 and p < 0.001). Additionally, pCLND was not associated with higher risks of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (p = 0.33), temporary hypocalcemia (p = 0.21), or permanent hypoparathyroidism (p = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

In specialized settings across Australia and New Zealand, identifying negative lymph nodes from pCLND is associated with reduced completion thyroidectomies and RAI ablation amongst low risk cN0 PTCs. There were no additional complications rates when performed by experienced thyroid surgeons.

Practice patterns in management of differentiated thyroid cancer since the 2014 British Thyroid Association (BTA) guidelines

BACKGROUND

The updated 2014 BTA guidelines emphasised a more conservative, risk adapted model for the management of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). In comparison to historical approach of total thyroidectomy combined with radioactive iodine, treatment de-escalation is increasingly supported.

AIMS

To evaluate the impact of the updated BTA guidelines on the management of DTC cases at regional UK centre.

METHODS

All DTC patients were retrospectively identified from regional thyroid MDT database between Jan2009-Dec2020. Oncological treatment and clinico-pathological characteristics were analysed.

RESULTS

623 DTC cases were identified; 312 (247 female: 65 male) between 2009 and 2014 and 311 (225 female: 86 male) between 2015 and 2020. Median age is 48 years (range 16-85). By comparing pre- and post-2015 cohorts, there was a significant drop in total thyroidectomy (87.1% vs 76.8%, p = 0.001) and the use of radioactive iodine (RAI) (73.1% vs 62.1%, p = 0.003) in our post-2015 cohort. When histological adverse features were analysed, extra-thyroidal extension (4.2% vs 17.0%, p=< 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (31.4% vs 50.5%, p=<0.001) and multi-centricity (26.9% vs 43.4%, p = 0.001) were significantly increased in the post 2015 cohort. Nonetheless, total thyroidectomy (TT) remains the treatment choice for low risk T1/2 N0 M0 disease in 65.3% (124/190) in post-2015 cohort for several reasons. Reasons include adverse histological features (50.8%), benign indications (32.5%), contralateral nodules (11.7%), patient preference (2.5%), and diagnostic uncertainty (2.5%).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms a move towards a more conservative approach to patients with low-risk DTC in the UK, which is in keeping with the BTA 2014 guideline and international trends, but total thyroidectomy remains prevalent for low risk T1/2 N0 M0 disease for other reasons.

Lobo-isthmectomy in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer

We have recently witnessed a rapid increase in the incidence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), particularly low and very low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. Simultaneously, the number of cancer-related deaths has remained stable for more than 30 years. Such an indolent nature and long-term survival prompted researchers and experts to an ongoing discussion on the adequacy of DTC management to avoid, on the one hand, the overtreatment of low-risk cases and, on the other hand, the undertreatment of highly aggressive ones.The most recent guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA GL) moved primary thyroid surgery in DTC towards a less aggressive approach by making lobectomy an option for patients with intrathyroidal low-risk DTC tumors up to 4 cm in diameter without evidence of extrathyroidal extension or lymph node metastases. It was one of the key changes in DTC management proposed by the ATA in 2015.Following the introduction of the 2015 ATA GL, the role of thyroid lobectomy in DTC management has slowly become increasingly important. The data coming from analyses of the large databases and retrospective studies prove that a less extensive surgical approach, even if in some reports it was related to a slight increase of the risk of recurrence, did not show a negative impact on disease-specific and overall survival in T1T2N0M0 low-risk DTC. There is no doubt that making thyroid lobectomy an option for low-risk papillary and follicular carcinomas was an essential step toward the de-escalation of treatment in thyroid carcinoma.This review summarizes the current recommendations and evidence-based data supporting the necessity of de-escalation of primary thyroid surgery in low-risk DTC. It also discusses the controversies raised by introducing new ATA guidelines and tries to resolve some open questions.

Position paper from the Endocrine Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) on the management and shared decision making in patients with low-risk micro papillary thyroid carcinoma

The incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has been increasing worldwide, mostly, as an increase in the incidental detection of micro papillary thyroid carcinomas (microPTCs), many of which are potentially overtreated, as suggested by the unchanged mortality. Several international guidelines have suggested a less aggressive approach. More recently, it has been shown that active surveillance or minimally invasive treatments (MIT) are good alternatives for the management of these patients. In this context, patient participation in the decision-making process is paramount. The Endocrine Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has undertaken the task to establish consensus and define its position based on the scientific evidence concerning, 1) the current state of diagnostic and management options in microPTCs, including the current opinion of physicians about shared decision making (SDM), 2) the available evidence concerning patients' needs and the available decision instruments, and 3) to provide practical suggestions for implementation of SDM in this context. To improve SDM and patients' participation, knowledge gaps and research directions were highlighted.

Role and Extent of Neck Dissection for Neck Lymph Node Metastases in Differentiated Thyroid Cancers

Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) consist of 95% of thyroid tumors and include papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), and Hurthle cell thyroid cancer (HTC). Rates of lymph node metastases are different depending on histologic subtypes and <5% in FTC and between 5% and 13% in HTC. Lymph node metastasis is more frequent in PTC and while rate of clinical metastasis can be seen approximately 30% rate of routine micrometastasis can be seen up to 80%. Lymph node metastasis of DTC mostly develops first in the Level VI lymph nodes at the central compartment starting from the ipsilateral paratracheal lymph nodes and then spreading to the contralateral paratracheal lymph nodes. Spread to the Level VII is mostly after Level VI invasion. Subsequent spread is to the lateral neck compartments of Levels IV, III, IIA, and VB and sometimes to the Levels IIB and VA. Occasionally skip metastasis to the lateral neck compartments develop without spreading to the central compartments and this situation is more frequent in upper pole tumors. Although application of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in DTC increases the rate of complication, due to its unclear effects on oncologic results and quality of life, the interest to the pCND is decreasing and debate on its surgical extent is increasing. pCND is not essential in DTC and characteristics of patient and tumor and experience of surgeon should be considered when deciding for pCND. Due to lower complication rate of one sided pCND compared to bilateral central neck dissection (CND), low possibility of contralateral central neck metastasis and low risk of recurrence, application of one-sided CND is logical. Although therapeutic CND (tCND) is the standart treatment when there is a clinically involved lymph node, extent of dissection is a matter of debate. A case-based decision for the extent of tCND can be made by considering patient and tumor characteristics and experience of the surgeon. Due to the higher complication risk of bilateral CND, unilateral tCND can be performed if there is no suspicious lymph node on the contralateral side and bilateral tCND can be applied when there is a suspicion for metastasis only on the contralateral side or there are features for risk of metastasis to the contralateral side. In patients with clinical central metastasis owing to intra-operative pathology results by frozen section procedure are compatible with post-operative pathology results, when there is a suspicion for contralateral metastasis, a decision for one- or two-sided dissection can be made using frozen section procedure. In DTC, it can be stated that there is a consensus in the literature about not performing prophylactic lateral neck dissection (LND), but performing therapeutic LND (tLND). In addition, there is a debate on the extent of tLND. In a meta-analysis about lateral metastasis, the rates of metastasis to the Levels IIA, IIB, III, IV, VA, and VB were 53.1%, 15.5%, 70.5%, 66.3%, 7.9%, and 21.5%, respectively. Ultrasonography (USG) is an effective procedure for detection of cervical nodal metastasis on lateral compartment. Pre-operative imaging with USG and/or combination with the fine needle aspiration biopsy (cytology/molecular test/Thyroglobulin test) can allow pre-operative detection and verification of lateral lymph node metastasis. Extent of tLND can be determined to minimize morbidity considering pre-operative USG findings, pre-operative tumor and clinical features of lateral metastasis. Especially in the presence of limited lateral metastases, limited selective LND such as Levels III, IV or Levels IIA, III, IV can be applied according to the patient. Levels IIB and VB should be added to the dissection in the presence of metastases in these regions. In cases that increase the risk of Level IIB involvement, such as presence of metastasis at Level IIA, extranodal tumor involvement, presence of multifocal tumor, and in cases that increase the risk of Level VB involvement such as macroscopic extranodal spread, and simultaneous metastases at Levels II, III, IV; Levels IIB and VB can be added to dissection material. Levels I and VA should be added to the dissection in the presence of clinically detected metastases.