Risk stratification and adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection based on the clinical risk scores of patients with stage IB-IIA non-small cell lung cancer

Evaluating the prognostic impact of EGFR mutation on adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in grade 3 stage IB lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is controversial, particularly in those with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ACT in stage IB LUAD with Grade 3 and explore the prognostic impact of EGFR mutations status on chemotherapy effectiveness.

METHODS

We identified 707 high-risk (Grade 3) stage IB LUAD patients who underwent complete resection between 2014 and 2018. The Kaplan-Meier curves was used to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model, and propensity score matching was applied to reduce bias from confounding variables.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, patients who received ACT showed significantly better 5-year RFS and OS compared to those who did not (P < 0.001 for both). Among 247 patients without EGFR mutations, 125 (50.6 %) received ACT and 122 (49.4 %) did not. In the propensity score-matched cohort of 84 pairs, those treated with ACT had significantly better 5-year RFS and OS (P < 0.01 for both). Among 460 patients with EGFR mutations, 237 (51.5 %) received ACT and 223 (48.5 %) did not. In the matched cohort of 184 pairs, ACT recipients had significantly better prognoses. Multivariable analysis confirmed ACT was an independent prognostic factor, while EGFR mutation status was not.

CONCLUSIONS

ACT significantly improves the prognosis of patients with Grade 3 stage IB LUAD, irrespective of EGFR mutation status. These findings support the clinical adoption of ACT for this patient subgroup.

Neoadjuvant targeted therapy versus targeted combined with chemotherapy for resectable EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective controlled real-world study

Background

This study aimed to assess the role and effect of neoadjuvant targeted therapy (TT) versus targeted combined with chemotherapy (TC) for resectable EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Between March 2021 and June 2023, 20 patients with stage IA3-IIIB NSCLC were enrolled in the study. Eleven patients received EGFR-TKIs in the TT group, while nine patients received EGFR-TKIs and two cycles of cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy (TC group). We compare the differences between the two groups through the following variables, including age, sex, surgical approach, postoperative complications, neoadjuvant therapy adverse events, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), objective response rate (ORR), major pathologic response (MPR), and pathologic complete response (pCR).

Results

Patients were predominantly female (75%) and never-smokers (95%). The average age was 59.2 years (range 46-79 years). Fifty-five percent harbored an exon 19 EGFR mutation and 45% an exon 21 mutation. The average targeted drug dosing time was 2.91 ± 1.7 (range 1-6) months in the TT group and 3.56 ± 3.54 (range 1-12) months in the TC group (P=0.598). The most common side effects were rash and diarrhea. No grade 5 events with neoadjuvant therapy were observed. The rate of R0 resection was 100% in all patients. Among the 11 patients in the TT group, 6 achieved a PR and 5 had SD, resulting in an ORR of 54.5%. Among the 9 patients in the TC group, 6 had PR and the remaining 3 had SD, resulting in an ORR of 66.6%. one patient (11.1%) in the TC group achieved pCR, while no patients in the TT group achieved pCR (P = 0.142). Two patients (18.2%) in the TT group reached MPR, and 2 patients (22.2%) in the TC group reached MPR (P = 0.257). The overall clinical downstage rate is 60%. Only 9 (45%) cases of yield clinical TNM (ycTNM) were consistent with yield pathologic TNM (ypTNM).

Conclusion

Results from this retrospective controlled research indicate that the neoadjuvant TT group is likely to be more effective outcomes and has safer profile in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC than the neoadjuvant TC group. However, our results need to be validated in a multicenter, large sample prospective study.

Potential therapies targeting nuclear metabolic regulation in cancer

The interplay between genetic alterations and metabolic dysregulation is increasingly recognized as a pivotal axis in cancer pathogenesis. Both elements are mutually reinforcing, thereby expediting the ontogeny and progression of malignant neoplasms. Intriguingly, recent findings have highlighted the translocation of metabolites and metabolic enzymes from the cytoplasm into the nuclear compartment, where they appear to be intimately associated with tumor cell proliferation. Despite these advancements, significant gaps persist in our understanding of their specific roles within the nuclear milieu, their modulatory effects on gene transcription and cellular proliferation, and the intricacies of their coordination with the genomic landscape. In this comprehensive review, we endeavor to elucidate the regulatory landscape of metabolic signaling within the nuclear domain, namely nuclear metabolic signaling involving metabolites and metabolic enzymes. We explore the roles and molecular mechanisms through which metabolic flux and enzymatic activity impact critical nuclear processes, including epigenetic modulation, DNA damage repair, and gene expression regulation. In conclusion, we underscore the paramount significance of nuclear metabolic signaling in cancer biology and enumerate potential therapeutic targets, associated pharmacological interventions, and implications for clinical applications. Importantly, these emergent findings not only augment our conceptual understanding of tumoral metabolism but also herald the potential for innovative therapeutic paradigms targeting the metabolism-genome transcriptional axis.

Surgically Treated pT2aN0M0 (Stage IB) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 20-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study

Introduction The suitability of adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still under debate considering the cost-benefit ratio between improvement in survival and side effects. We retrospectively evaluated survival and incidence of recurrence in radically resected stage IB NSCLC, to determine whether AT could significantly improve prognosis. Methods Between 1998 and 2020, 4692 consecutive patients underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for NSCLC. Two hundred nineteen patients were pathological T2aN0M0 (>3 and ≤4 cm) NSCLC 8th TNM. None received preoperative or AT. Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and the cumulative incidence of relapse were plotted and log-rank or Gray's tests were used to assess the difference in outcome between groups. Results The most frequent histology was adenocarcinoma (66.7%). Median OS was 146 months. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year OS rates were 79%, 60%, and 47%, whereas the 5-, 10-, and 15-year CSS were 88%, 85%, and 83%, respectively. OS was significantly related to age (p < 0.001) and cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.04), whereas number of LNs removed was an independent prognostic factor of CSS (p = 0.02). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 5-, 10-, and 15-year were 23%, 31%, and 32%, respectively, and significantly related to the number of LNs removed (p = 0.01). Patients with more than 20 LNs removed and clinical stage I had a significantly lower relapse (p = 0.02). Conclusions Excellent CSS, up to 83% at 15-year, and relatively low risk of recurrence for stage IB NSCLC (8th TNM) patients suggested that AT for those patients could be reserved only for very selected high-risk cases.

Can quantitative peritumoral CT radiomics features predict the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overarching evaluation of the value of peritumoral CT radiomics features for predicting the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer and to assess the quality of the available studies.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies predicting the prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using CT-based peritumoral radiomics features. Information about the patient, CT-scanner, and radiomics analyses were all extracted for the included studies. Study quality was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included with 2942 patients from 2017 to 2022. Only one study was prospective, and the others were all retrospectively designed. Manual segmentation and multicenter studies were performed by 69% and 46% of the included studies, respectively. 3D-Slicer and MATLAB software were most commonly used for the segmentation of lesions and extraction of features. The peritumoral region was most frequently defined as dilated from the tumor boundary of 15 mm, 20 mm, or 30 mm. The median RQS of the studies was 13 (range 4-19), while all of included studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias (ROB) overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritumoral radiomics features based on CT images showed promise in predicting the prognosis of NSCLC, although well-designed studies and further biological validation are still needed.

KEY POINTS

• Peritumoral radiomics features based on CT images are promising and encouraging for predicting the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. • The peritumoral region was often dilated from the tumor boundary of 15 mm or 20 mm because these were considered safe margins. • The median Radiomics Quality Score of the included studies was 13 (range 4-19), and all of studies were considered to have a high risk of bias overall.