Safe-margin surgery by plastic reconstruction in extremities or parietal trunk soft tissue sarcoma: A tertiary single centre experience

Short-term morbidity following primary closure, skin grafting and flap reconstruction after surgical resection of extremity soft-tissue sarcomas: Pushing the limits of limb preservation

INTRODUCTION

Understanding short-term morbidity following extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (ESTS) treatment remains complex due to diverse findings and the absence of a standardized wound complication assessment. This retrospective cohort study evaluated short-term morbidity following primary closure, skin grafting, and flap reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All ESTS patients treated in a sarcoma center in the Netherlands from 1-1-2010 until 1-8-2022 were included. Short-term morbidity, defined as a wound complication following surgery, was assessed by the Toronto Sarcoma Flap Score (TSFS). The TSFS is an ordinal scale, where 0 indicates the absence of complications, while 10 signifies reconstructive failure necessitating amputation. Hospital stay duration and readmission rates were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Limb preservation was achieved in 128 (97.7 %) of 131 patients. Wound complications occurred in 43 (44.3 %) of patients with primary closure, 8 (57.1 %) with skin grafting and 16 (80.0 %) with flap reconstruction, p = 0.01. Patients undergoing flap reconstructions had higher TSFSs (6 [IQR 7], versus 0 [IQR 3] for primary closure and 3 [IQR 6] for skin grafting), longer duration of hospital stays (14 [IQR 18] days versus 4 [IQR 3] days for primary closure and 5 [IQR 7] days for skin grafting, p < 0.01) and were more frequently readmitted (40.0 %, versus 17.5 % for primary closure and 21.4 % for skin grafting, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

High limb preservation rates were achieved. Reconstructive surgery allows for the closure of extensive soft-tissue defects following ESTS resection, but it adds to surgical complexity. Patients undergoing flap reconstruction seem to be at a higher risk of short-term morbidity.

The Impact of Surgical Margin Distance on Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Background and Objectives: The primary objective of surgeons treating bone and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is to achieve optimal local tumor control, ensuring a tumor-free margin and preventing local recurrence. However, the impact of surgical resection margin status on extremity STSs remains an area that requires further exploration. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of surgical resection margin status on both local recurrence and overall survival rates. Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty-five patients who underwent surgical resection with a diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma were studied. The study recorded patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical margin distance (in millimeters), and disease-related outcomes. Results: The minimum follow-up period was 24 months (24-168). The mean time to local recurrence after resection was 103.2 months (95% CI 91.73 to 114.64). The mean local recurrence-free survival was found to be 7.23 months in patients with positive surgical margins, 87.42 months in patients with ≤1 mm, and 139.80 months in patients with >1 mm (p < 0.001). Patients with surgical margins ≤1 mm were more likely to have local recurrence than patients with >1 mm (0.41 [0.21-0.81], p = 0.010). The mean overall survival was 106.72 months (95% CI 95.98 to 117.46). Positive surgical margins were associated with decreased overall survival (3.58 [1.46-8.80], p = 0.005). There was a statistically significant difference between the histologic grade in terms of local recurrence (4.50 [95% CI 2.57 to 7.88]; p < 0.001) and overall survival (3.12 [95% CI 1.52 to 6.41]; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Achieving a negative surgical margin distance of more than 1 mm appears to be correlated with a reduced risk of local recurrence. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor that detrimentally impacts overall patient survival. However, determining the appropriate margin distance for all patients poses a significant challenge.

Mesenchymal Tumor Management: Integrating Surgical and Non-Surgical Strategies in Different Clinical Scenarios

Mesenchymal tumors originate from mesenchymal cells and can be either benign or malignant, such as bone, soft tissue, and visceral sarcomas. Surgery is a cornerstone treatment in the management of mesenchymal tumors, often requiring complex procedures performed in high-volume referral centers. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted this need for alternative non-surgical approaches due to limited access to surgical resources. This review explores the role of non-surgical treatments in different clinical scenarios: for improving surgical outcomes, as a bridge to surgery, as better alternatives to surgery, and for non-curative treatment when surgery is not feasible. We discuss the effectiveness of active surveillance, cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and other ablative techniques in managing these tumors. Additionally, we examine the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and hypofractionated radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas. The Sarculator tool is highlighted for its role in stratifying high-risk sarcoma patients and personalizing treatment plans. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, integrating advanced non-surgical strategies can enhance therapeutic possibilities and patient care, especially in specific clinical settings with limitations. A multidisciplinary approach in referral centers is vital to determine the optimal treatment course for each patient.

Wound healing after surgery for soft tissue sarcomas, and the effect of primary plastic reconstruction - A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Immediate vascularized reconstruction after sarcoma resection may reduce wound complications common in primary closure, but previous research is conflicting. The present study analysed wound complication rates and compared wound-related outcomes among immediate vascularized reconstruction with primary closure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient- and tumour characteristics were collected from patients who received primary surgery with curative intent between 2010 and 2020 at the Stockholm Sarcoma Centre. Clinical outcomes were sought in free text in medical records. The primary outcome measures were early (<30 days) wound complications. Secondary outcome measures included late (30-day to 2-year) wound complications, time to wound healing, 30-day postoperative complications according to Clavien Dindo, and health care consumption.

RESULTS

A total of 482 patients were included, of whom 69 had immediate vascularized reconstruction. Comparison of early complications for reconstructive surgery with primary closure revealed a significantly higher complication rate for the first group (59.4 % vs 29.8 %, p < 0.01). The groups had comparable health care consumption the first and second postoperative years. In-depth analyses identified BMI >25, smoking and high-grade lesions as factors with adverse effects on wound healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcoma patients experience high rates of wound complications and consume considerable health care resources. Reconstructed individuals were more susceptible to such complications than were subjects with primary closure.

Improved Metastatic-Free Survival after Systematic Re-Excision Following Complete Macroscopic Unplanned Excision of Limb or Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Whether re-excision (RE) of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of limb or trunk should be systematized as adjuvant care and if it would improve metastatic free survival (MFS) are still debated. The impact of resection margins after unplanned macroscopically complete excision (UE) performed out of a NETSARC reference center or after second resection was further investigated.

METHODS

This large nationwide series used data from patients having experienced UE outside of a reference center from 2010 to 2019, collected in a French nationwide exhaustive prospective cohort NETSARC. Patient characteristics and survival distributions in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) are reported. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to adjust for classical prognosis factors. Subgroup analysis were performed to identify which patients may benefit from RE.

RESULTS

Out of 2371 patients with UE for STS performed outside NETSARC reference centers, 1692 patients were not reviewed by multidisciplinary board before treatment decision and had a second operation documented. Among them, 913 patients experienced re-excision, and 779 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, size, depth, grade and histotype in patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). In univariate analysis, final R0 margins are associated with a better MFS, patients with R1 margins documented at first surgery had a better MFS as compared to patients with first R0 resection. The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for MFS (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53-0.93; p = 0.013). All subgroups except older patients (>70 years) and patients with large tumors (>10 cm) had superior MFS with RE.

CONCLUSIONS

RE might be considered in patients with STS of limb or trunk, with UE with macroscopic complete resection performed out of a reference center, and also in originally defined R0 margin resections, to improve LRFS and MFS. Systematic RE should not be advocated for patients older than 70 years, or with tumors greater than 10 cm.

System describing surgical field extension associated with flap reconstruction after resection of a superficial malignant soft tissue tumor

BACKGROUND

Flap reconstruction after resection of a superficial malignant soft tissue tumor extends the surgical field and is an indicator for potential recurrence sites.

AIM

To describe a grading system for surgical field extension of soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

Grading system: CD-grading is a description system consisting of C and D values in the surgical field extension, which are related to the compartmental position of the flap beyond the nearby large joint and deeper extension for the pedicle, respectively. C1/D1 are positive values and C0/D0 are negative. With a known location, 1/0 values can be "p" (proximal), "d" (distal), and "b" (in the tumor bed), and the description method is as follows: flap type, CxDx [x = 0, 1, p, d or b].

RESULTS

Four representative patients with subcutaneous sarcomas who underwent reconstruction using fasciocutaneous flaps are presented. The cases involved a distal upper arm (elbow) synovial sarcoma reconstructed using a pedicled latissimus dorsi (pedicled flap: CpDp); a distal upper arm (elbow) pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma reconstructed using a transpositional flap from the forearm (transpositional flap: CdD0); an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in the buttocks reconstructed using a transpositional flap (transpositional flap: C0D0); and a myxofibrosarcoma in the buttocks reconstructed using a propeller flap from the thigh (pedicled flap: CdDd).

CONCLUSION

The reconstruction method is chosen by the surgeon based on size, location, and other tumor characteristics; however, the final surgical field cannot be determined based on preoperative images alone. CD-grading is a description system consisting of C and D values in the surgical field extension that are related to the compartmental position of the flap beyond the nearby large joint and deeper extension for the pedicle, respectively. The CD-grading system gives a new perspective to the flap reconstruction classification. The CD-grading system also provides important information for follow-up imaging of a possible recurrence.

The incidence, risk factors and outcomes of wound complications after preoperative radiotherapy and surgery for high grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas: A 14-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the wound complication (WC) rate and to determine the risk factors for WC in patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated with preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgical resection.

METHODS

Using the database of Oxford University Hospital (OUH) we retrospectively studied 126 cases of soft tissue sarcomas treated with preoperative radiotherapy and surgery between 2007 and 2021. WC were defined as minor wound complication (MiWC) not requiring surgical intervention or major wound complication (MaWC) if they received a secondary surgical intervention. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed using frequency of WC and MaWC as a dependent variable.

RESULTS

The incidence of WC and MaWC was 43.7% (55/126) and 19% (24/126). Age (OR:1.03, 95%CI: 1.00-1.06, p = 0.016), tumor size (OR:1.11, 95%CI:1.01-1.21, p = 0.027) and tumor site namely proximal lower limb vs upper limb (OR:10.87, 95%CI 1.15-103.03, p = 0.038) were risk factors on multivariate analysis. In nested case control analysis, the incidence of MaWC was 43.6% (24/55), the mean recovery time is 143 days in patients with MaWC. Smoking increases the risk for MaWC (OR:8.32, 95%CI:1.36-49.99, p = 0.022). The time interval between surgery and wound complication reduces the risk for MaWC (OR:0.91, 95%CI:0.84-0.99, p = 0.028) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, tumor site and size are risk factors for WC requiring preoperative radiotherapy. Smoking and the time interval between surgery and wound complication are risk factors for MaWC as compared with MiWC. MaWC rate (19%) are comparable to those in postoperative radiotherapy and surgery alone.

Final safety and HRQoL results of the phase II/III Act.In.Sarc study with preoperative NBTXR3 plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy in locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

XXXX(Anonymized) demonstrated that the first-in-class radioenhancer NBTXR3, activated by preoperative radiotherapy, doubled the rate of pathological complete response after resection compared with preoperative radiotherapy alone in adult patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity or trunk wall (16.1% versus 7.9%, P=0.045), and more patients achieved R0 resections (77.0% versus 64.0%, P=0.042). These are the toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

XXXX(Anonymized) randomized eligible patients 1:1 to either NBTXR3 (single intratumoral injection, volume equivalent to 10% of baseline tumor volume, at 53.3 g/L) activated by external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (Arm A) or EBRT alone (Arm B) (50 Gy in 25 fractions), followed by surgery in both arms. Here, we report the safety analyses in the all-treated population with a long-term follow-up of at least two-years, and HRQoL in the intention-to-treat full analysis set.

RESULTS

During the on-treatment period serious adverse events (SAEs) of all grades related to NBTXR3 occurred in 10.1% (9/89) of patients (Arm A), SAEs related to radiotherapy occurred in 5.6% (5/89) (Arm A) versus 5.6% (5/90) (Arm B); and post-surgery hospitalization due to SAEs occurred in 15.7% (14/89) (Arm A) versus 24.4% (22/90) (Arm B). During the follow-up period, post-treatment SAEs (regardless of relationship) occurred in 13.5% (12/89) (Arm A) versus 24.4% (22/90) (Arm B). NBTXR3 did not negatively impact on HRQoL, during the follow-up period, there was an improvement in most mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), EQ5D02-EQ Visual Analog Scale, Reintegration to Normal Living Index, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Rating Scale scores.

CONCLUSIONS

NBTXR3 did not negatively impact safety or HRQoL. Long-term safety results reinforce the favorable benefit-risk ratio of NBTXR3 plus radiotherapy.