Predictors of undergoing multivisceral resection, margin status and survival in Dutch patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer

Impact of hospital volume on survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer - A Dutch population-based study

AIM

Locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) often necessitates complex prognosis-determining treatment. This study investigated the impact of hospital volume on short- and long-term outcomes following surgery for LACC.

METHOD

Data involving all patients with LACC categorized as clinical T4 and/or N2, between 2015 and 2019 in the Netherlands, were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals were stratified into low volume (1-19 LACC resections per year), medium volume (20-29 LACC resections per year) and high volume (≥30 LACC resections per year). Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves, logistic regression analysis and Cox-regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 49 298 patients were diagnosed with colon cancer, of whom 9206 (18.7%) had locally advanced disease. Of these 9206 patients, resection was performed in 8537 with a median age of 71 (interquartile range: 63-78) years. Patients were more likely to undergo laparoscopic procedures in high-volume hospitals than in low-volume hospitals (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12-1.46). No risk differences in anastomotic leakage or postoperative 90-day mortality were observed according to hospital volume. Five-year overall survival rates were comparable among high-, medium- and low-volume hospitals (58.7% vs. 58.0% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.62). Hospital volume was not associated with overall survival in multivariable analysis. Independent predictors of worse overall survival included older age, higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, emergency/urgent setting, anastomotic leakage, higher pTNM status, involved resection margins and no adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Despite the complexity of surgical treatment, hospital volume was not associated with survival in LACC. Hospital volume might be an imperfect surrogate for quality assessment.

Narrative review of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced colon cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with more than 1.9 million new cases reported in 2020, and is associated with major survival challenges, particularly in patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). LACC often involves T4 invasion or extensive nodal involvement and requires a multidisciplinary approach for management. Radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the primary treatment strategy for LACC. However, achieving complete tumor resection (R0) is challenging because locally advanced colon tumors typically infiltrate adjacent organs or nodes. Advancements in LACC treatment have involved neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), and neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT). Studies such as FOxTROT and PRODIGE 22 have demonstrated that NACT, particularly with FOLFOX or CAPOX, can lead to major tumor downstaging, improved survival rates, and increased R0 resection rates. Predictive biomarkers, such as mismatch repair (MMR) status and T stage, are crucial in identifying candidates who may benefit from NACT. NACRT has demonstrated promise in enhancing tumor regression, particularly in patients with rectal cancer, underscoring its potential for use with LACC. NAIT, particularly for deficient MMR tumors, has emerged as a novel approach, with studies such as NICHE-2 and NICHE-3 reporting excellent pathologic responses and pathologic complete responses. Integrating these therapies can enhance the surgical and survival outcomes of patients with LACC, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment strategies based on tumor characteristics and response to neoadjuvant interventions. This review discusses the evolving landscape of LACC management, focusing on optimizing treatment approaches for improved patient outcomes.

A systematic review of oncosurgical and quality of life outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is now the standard of care for locally advanced (LARC) and locally recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer. Reports of the significant short-term morbidity and survival advantage conferred by R0 resection are well established. However, longer-term outcomes are rarely addressed. This systematic review focuses on long-term oncosurgical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes following PE for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed®, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE® and Embase® databases was conducted, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they reported long-term outcomes following PE for LARC or LRRC. Studies with fewer than 20 patients were excluded.

FINDINGS

A total of 25 papers reported outcomes for 5,489 patients. Of these, 4,744 underwent PE for LARC (57.5%) or LRRC (42.5%). R0 resection rates ranged from 23.2% to 98.4% and from 14.9% to 77.8% respectively. The overall morbidity rates were 17.8-87.0%. The median survival ranged from 12.5 to 140.0 months. None of these studies reported functional outcomes and only four studies reported QoL outcomes. Numerous different metrics and timepoints were utilised, with QoL scores frequently returning to baseline by 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that PE is safe, with a good prospect of R0 resection and acceptable mortality rates in selected patients. Morbidity rates remain high, highlighting the importance of shared decision making with patients. Longer-term oncological outcomes as well as QoL and functional outcomes need to be addressed in future studies. Development of a core outcomes set would facilitate better reporting in this complex and challenging patient group.

PD-1 blockade enhances the effect of targeted chemotherapy on locally advanced pMMR/MSS colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with DNA mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC), which accounts for 85% of all CRC cases, display a poor respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e., anti-PD-1 antibodies). pMMR/MSS CRC patients with locally advanced cancers need effective combined therapies.

METHODS

In this pilot study, we administered six preoperative doses of each 2-week cycle of the anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab (at a fixed dose of 200 mg), oxaliplatin, and 5-FU/CF (mFOLFOX6) combined with five doses of bevacizumab (the number of doses was reduced to prevent surgical delays) to patients with cT4NxM0 colon or upper rectal cancers. And radical surgery was performed approximately 2 weeks after the last dose of neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was a pathologic complete response (pCR). We also evaluated major pathologic response (MPR, ≤10% residual viable tumor), radiological and pathological regression, safety, and tumor mutation burden (TMB), and tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics.

RESULTS

By the cutoff date (September 2023), 22 patients with cT4NxM0 pMMR/MSS colon or upper rectal cancers were enrolled and the median follow-up was 24.7 months (IQR: 21.1-26.1). All patients underwent R0 surgical resection without treatment-related surgical delays. pCR occurred in 12 of 22 resected tumors (54.5%) and MPR occurred in 18 of 22 (81.8%) patients. At the cutoff date, all patients were alive, and 21/22 were recurrence-free. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in of 2/22 (9.1%) patients. Among the pCR tumors, two were found to harbor POLE mutations. The degree of pathological regression was significantly greater than that of radiological regression (p = 1.35 × 10-8). The number of CD3+/CD4+ cells in the tumor and stroma in pretreated biopsied tissues was markedly lower in pCR tumors than in non-pCR tumors (p = 0.038 and p = 0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6 was associated with few side effects, did not delay surgery, and led to pCR and non-pCR in 54.5% and 81.8% of the cases, respectively. Downregulation of CD3/CD4 expression in the tumor and stroma is related to pCR. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying PD-1 blockade-enhanced targeted chemotherapy require further investigation.

Pancreaticoduodenectomies with Concurrent Colectomies: Indications, Technical Issues, Complications, and Oncological Outcomes

Multi-visceral resections for colon and pancreatic cancer (PDAC) are feasible, safe, and justified for early and late outcomes. However, the use of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with concurrent colectomies is highly debatable in terms of morbidity and oncological benefits. Based on current literature data, this review assesses the early and long-term outcomes of PD with colectomies. The association represents a challenging but feasible option for a few patients with PDAC or locally advanced right colon cancer when negative resection margins are anticipated because long-term survival can be achieved. Concurrent colectomies during PD should be cautiously approached because they may significantly increase complication rates, including severe ones. Thus, patients should be fit enough to overcome potential severe complications. Patients with PD and colectomies can be classified as borderline resectable, considering the high risk of developing postoperative complications. Carefully selecting patients suitable for PD with concurrent colectomies is paramount to mitigate the potentially severe complications of the two surgical procedures and maximize the oncological benefits. These procedures should be performed at high-volume centers with extensive experience in pancreatectomies and colectomies, and each patient situation should be assessed using a multimodal approach, including high-quality imaging and neoadjuvant therapies, in a multidisciplinary team discussion.

Cancer-Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought infectious and contagious diseases back to the forefront of medical concerns worldwide [...].

Comprehensive Review of Biomarkers for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Colon Cancer

Despite the implementation of global screening programs, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. More than 10% of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed as having locally advanced disease with a relatively poor five-year survival rate. Locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) presents surgical challenges to R0 resection. The advantages and disadvantages of preoperative radiotherapy for LACC remain undetermined. Although several reliable novel biomarkers have been proposed for the prediction and prognosis of CRC, few studies have focused solely on the treatment of LACC. This comprehensive review highlights the role of predictive biomarkers for treatment and postoperative oncological outcomes for patients with LACC. Moreover, this review discusses emerging needs and approaches for the discovery of biomarkers that can facilitate the development of new therapeutic targets and surveillance of patients with LACC.