Bariatric surgery reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with obesity before the age of 50 years: A nationwide administrative data study in France

Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery Reduces Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Over 3.7 Million Adults, Independent of Type 2 Diabetes Status

AIMS

To investigate the impact of Metabolic-Bariatric surgery (MBS) on pancreatic cancer (PCa) risk in individuals with obesity based on type 2 diabetes(T2D) status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022367749). The primary outcomes were the PCa incidence rates in participants with or without T2D who underwent MBS compared with the control (non-MBS) group. Subgroup analyses based on the MBS types were performed and a random-effects model was employed. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by applying the leave-one-out meta-analysis technique and excluding studies with a short follow-up. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 index and Cochran's Q test. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's test and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, with 3,711,243 participants, were included. PCa risk was lower in the MBS group for both T2D and the overall population than in the non-MBS group (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.71 and RR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.57, respectively), with consistent findings after excluding studies with < 3-year follow-up. A favourable impact was also observed in individuals without T2D (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.78). When comparing the types of MBS versus control, a significant difference was observed for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (RR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.46 for SG and RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.09 for Roux-En-Y bypass). Egger's test showed no indication of publication bias (p = 0.417).

CONCLUSIONS

MBS is associated with reduced PCa risk regardless of T2D, with a more pronounced effect in T2D patients. Additional research is needed to investigate the impact of MBS types on PCa.

Long-term systemic effects of metabolic bariatric surgery: A multidisciplinary perspective

Background

Obesity is a global health crisis with profound implications on various body systems, contributing to a series of comorbidities. Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS) has emerged as an effective treatment option for severe obesity, with significant weight reduction and potential systemic physiological alterations.

Objectives

This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the long-term effects of MBS on a wide array of body systems, including the heart, liver, kidneys, reproductive system, skin, lungs, digestive tract, pancreas, and blood, as well as related cancers of these organs.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in academic databases (PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus) for observational studies and reviews published between July 2000 and December 2023, investigating the association between MBS and the subsequent function of different organ systems. High-quality studies were prioritized to ensure reliable evidence synthesis.

Results

MBS has demonstrated favorable outcomes in reducing cardiovascular disease risk, improving cardiac function, and alleviating heart failure symptoms. It has also been associated with improved respiratory function, remission of obstructive sleep apnea, and reduced cancer incidence and mortality. Additionally, MBS has shown benefits in managing gastrointestinal disorders, enhancing glycemic control, and promoting pancreatic beta-cell regeneration in type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, some methods of MBS are associated with a higher risk of cholelithiasis, GERD, and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.

Conclusion

MBS has far-reaching systemic effects beyond weight loss, offering potential long-term benefits for various organ systems and comorbidities associated with obesity. For many patients with severe obesity, the potential benefits of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) can outweigh the associated risks. However, careful evaluation by a qualified healthcare professional is crucial to determine candidacy and ensure a successful outcome. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the long-term impacts and tailor personalized treatment approaches.

Incidence of cancer for patients after bariatric surgery: evidence from 33 cohort studies

BACKGROUND

With the rising prevalence of severe obesity, bariatric surgery has emerged as a crucial treatment option. As the number of surgeries performed worldwide increases, there has been growing interest in the impact of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence. While several studies have examined this relationship, the topic remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this systematic review of cohort studies with meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery versus nonsurgical treatment on overall cancer incidence. However, the effects may vary when focusing on specific cancer types, surgical procedures, or gender, so we conducted additional subgroup analyses.

SETTING

A meta-analysis. University hospital.

METHODS

The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies from 1 January 2000 to 1 December 2022. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the pooled effect and further implemented subgroup analysis stratified by cancer type, operation type, and sex.

RESULTS

All cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis from 18,216 studies. The overall cancer incidence demonstrated a significant decrease in the group with bariatric surgery (odds ratios [OR] = .56, P = .000, 95% CI .46 to .68). In subgroup analysis, similar decrease effect was found in 9 cancers. Furthermore, the incidence of cancer decreased significantly in male (OR = .66, P = .001, 95% CI .51 to .85) and female patients (OR = .63, P = .000, 95% CI .57 to .69) and patients undergoing gastric bypass (OR = .46, P = .000, 95% CI .33 to .63) or sleeve gastrectomy (OR = .44, P = .001, 95% CI .27 to .70).

CONCLUSIONS

In the overall analysis, bariatric surgery could reduce the incidence of cancer significantly. Further large-scale well-matched studies are needed to verify the protective effect of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence.

Association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of incident pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Background and objectives

Since the results of previous observational studies on the relationship between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and pancreatic cancer were still controversial and inconsistent, we performed a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of cohort studies to assess any potential association.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from the database's inception up to November 30, 2023. For summary purposes, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed as well. The Egger's test and Begg's test were utilized to detect the publication bias.

Results

This meta-analysis included nine cohort studies with a total of 10,428,926 participants. The meta-analysis demonstrated an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in those with MASLD (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10-1.59, P = 0.003) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 54%, P = 0.03). Subsequent subgroup analyses revealed that the pooled HRs remained significantly unchanged, irrespective of the study area, nomenclature of fatty liver disease, and sample size. The results of the sensitivity analyses remained unchanged. No evidence of publication bias was found.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicated that MASLD was associated with a higher risk of pancreatic cancer. To further strengthen the association, future prospective cohort studies should take into account different ethnic groups, diagnostic methods of fatty liver, the severity of MASLD, and potential confounding factors, as well as explore the potential mechanisms of pancreatic cancer development in MASLD patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42023489137.

Risk reduction of non-hormonal cancers following bariatric surgery

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective intervention for weight loss leading to significant resolution of obesity-related medical conditions. Recent literature has demonstrated risk reduction of certain cancer types after MBS. Studies have shown an overall reduction in the risk of hormonal cancer, such as breast and endometrial cancer. However, the association between bariatric surgery and the incidence of various types of non-hormonal cancer such as esophageal, gastric, liver, gallbladder, colorectal, pancreatic and kidney cancer remains contested. The aim of this study was to highlight obesity and its relationship to cancer development as well as bariatric surgery and its role in cancer reduction with focus on non-hormonal cancers.

Bariatric surgery in the prevention of obesity-associated cancers: mechanistic implications

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of at least 13 different cancers, as well as worse cancer outcomes and increased cancer mortality. As rates continue to rise both in the United States and worldwide, obesity is poised to become the leading lifestyle-related risk factor for cancer. Currently, the most effective treatment for patients with severe obesity is bariatric surgery. Multiple cohort studies have demonstrated a consistent >30% decreased risk of cancer incidence in women, but not men, following bariatric surgery. However, the physiologic mechanisms driving obesity-associated cancer and the cancer-protective effect of bariatric surgery are not clearly defined. In this review, we highlight emerging concepts in the mechanistic understanding of obesity-associated cancer. Evidence from both human studies and preclinical animal models suggest that obesity drives carcinogenesis through dysregulation of systemic metabolism, immune dysfunction, and an altered gut microbiome. Additionally, we present related findings to suggest that bariatric surgery may disrupt and even reverse many of these mechanisms. Finally, we discuss the use of preclinical bariatric surgery animal models in the study of cancer biology. The prevention of cancer is emerging as an important indication for bariatric surgery. Elucidating the mechanisms through which bariatric surgery limits carcinogenesis is critical to developing a variety of interventions that intercept obesity-driven cancer.