Safety of Arch Aortography for Assessment of Carotid Arteries

Discharge on the first postoperative day after elective carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Medical complications may prolong the hospital stay after elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We prospectively assessed the social and medical feasibility and safety of patient discharge on the first postoperative day after elective CEA and unplanned readmissions.

METHODS

Between June 2011 and January 2012, 57 consecutive patients scheduled for elective CEA were enrolled with the aim of discharge on the first postoperative day if there were no medical contraindications and on the condition that the patient should not be left alone during the first day and night at home. CEA was carried out under local or general anesthesia. After discharge, the patients were contacted to ascertain the occurrence of arterial hypertension, cerebral hyperperfusion, focal cerebral ischemia, or hospital readmission.

RESULTS

Sixty-two CEA were carried out in 57 patients (33 men and 24 women ranging in age from 51-89 years). The indications for CEA were: asymptomatic high grade stenosis in 27, hemispheric transient ischemic attack in 12, amaurosis fugax in 6, recovered stroke in 16, and nonlateralizing signs in 1. There were no cases of perioperative stroke or death. Discharge on the first postoperative day was achieved in 45 cases (73%). In 15 cases (24%), discharge was on the second postoperative day because of the absence of a relative (12 cases) or for medical reasons (3 cases). Discharge was on day 3 in 1 case, and on day 10 in another, both for medical reasons. No cases of severe arterial hypertension, stroke, mortality, or readmission for reasons related to the CEA procedure were recorded up to postoperative day 30.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the majority of patients undergoing elective CEA were discharged safely on the first postoperative day. Social reasons, rather than medical reasons, underlied most cases of later discharge. There were no unplanned readmissions for complications of CEA.

Long-Term Results of Carotid Artery Stents to Manage Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis and Factors That Affect Outcome

Background— Limited data are available about the long-term outcomes of the use of carotid artery stents in symptomatic patients and the impact of patient variables on the durability of endovascular carotid procedures. Outcome data previously reported from registry series mix symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. We present analysis of long-term follow-up, with independent neurological assessment, for patients with symptomatic high-grade carotid lesions undergoing stenting to identify patients at risk of recurrence.

Methods and Results— Prospectively collected data on 563 carotid stenting procedures in a single center were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate techniques were used to identify risk groups and beneficial technical adaptations. Ipsilateral stroke rates for all patients were 4.8%, 7.0%, and 9.5% at 30 days, 1 year, and 4 years, respectively. The rates improved to 2.7%, 4.1%, and 4.5% when patients were treated with optimal therapy. Retinal events had a lower risk of long-term recurrent ipsilateral stroke (hazard ratio=0.228, CI=0.082 to 0.632, P =0.004) than cerebral events. A recurrent or residual stenosis of >50% had a statistically significant effect on long-term stroke recurrence in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio=2.187, CI=1.173 to 4.078, P =0.014).

Conclusions— Patients with retinal presentations are a lower risk group to treat. Residual stenosis or restenosis >50% has a statistically significant trend to an increased risk of recurrence for ipsilateral stroke in the long term in this population. In our patients, a combination of procedural modifications and pharmacological changes seems to improve outcomes.