Staged endovascular stent-grafting and surgical treatment of a secondary aortoduodenal fistula

Management of secondary aorto-enteric fistulae: a multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are a rare, complex and life-threatening complication following aortic repair. Traditional treatment strategy has been with open aortic repair (OAR), with emergence of endovascular repair (EVAR) as a potentially viable initial treatment option. Controversy exists over optimal immediate and long-term management.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multi-institutional cohort study. Patients who had been treated for SAEF between 2003 and 2020 were identified using a standardized database. Baseline characteristics, presenting features, microbiological, operative, and post-operative variables were recorded. The primary outcomes were short and mid-term mortality. Descriptive statistics, binomial regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox age-adjusted survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Across 5 tertiary centres, a total of 47 patients treated for SAEF were included, 7 were female and the median (range) age at presentation was 74 years (48-93). In this cohort, 24 (51%) patients were treated with initially with OAR, 15 (32%) with EVAR-first and 8 (17%) non-operatively. The 30-day and 1-year mortality for all cases that underwent intervention was 21% and 46% respectively. Age-adjusted survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality in the EVAR-first group compared to the OAR-first group, HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.03, P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

In this study there was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients who had OAR or EVAR as first line treatment for SAEF. In the acute setting, alongside broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, EVAR can be considered as an initial treatment for patients with SAEF, as a primary treatment or a bridge to definitive OAR.

Complex Hybrid Repair of a Secondary Aortoenteric Fistula

Background

Secondary aortoenteric fistula is a rare, highly morbid and often difficult to diagnose, cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. It is associated with prior aortic surgery or placement of a synthetic aortic graft. Our case features staged hybrid endovascular stent-grafting, graft excision, aortoplasty using a bovine pericardial patch, extra-anatomical bypass and complex bowel repair.

Case Report

An 82-year-old man presented with gastrointestinal bleeding and Streptococcus Anginosus bacteraemia, with previous aorto-bi-iliac bypass surgery for left common iliac occlusive disease 15 years ago. Computed tomography angiography (CTA), gastroscopy, colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy identified no bleeding source. Repeat CTA showed gas locules and stranding around the graft and the third part of the duodenum, concerning for fistulous communication. On the next day, a Zenith TX2 thoracic 28x80mm stent-graft was deployed into the infrarenal aorta. On laparotomy, a fistula was present between the Dacron graft and fourth part of the duodenum. The Dacron graft was excised, followed by aortic patching with bovine pericardium. A right-to-left femoral-femoral crossover graft was constructed. CT at one-month post-laparotomy showed no signs of perigraft endoleak and interval resolution of gas locules. He was transferred to a rehabilitation facility on the 34th post-operative day with a multidisciplinary follow-up arranged.

Discussion

Aortoduodenal fistula is a challenging entity to diagnose and should be suspected in patients with GI bleeding and prior aortic surgery. Endovascular repair alone is a less invasive option but with higher re-infection and late failure rates. Liberal use of appropriate imaging modalities, a judicious repair strategy, long-term follow-up and multidisciplinary approach are critical for its management.

Adjuncts to the Management of Graft Aorto-Enteric Erosion and Fistula with in situ Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective single centre study was to determine whether different enteric reconstruction methods and adjuncts confer a benefit after in situ reconstructions (ISRs) of graft aorto-enteric erosion (AEnE) and fistula (AEnF).

METHODS

Primary endpoints were in hospital mortality and AEnE/F recurrence. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and explanatory factors were searched for using uni- ± multivariable Cox regression analysis. In 2013, a multidisciplinary team meeting was convened and since then the primary operator has always been a senior surgeon.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were treated for AEnE (n = 38) and AEnF (n = 28, 42%) from 2004 to 2020. All patients with AEnF presented with gastrointestinal bleeding (vs. 0 for AEnE; p < .001). Signs of infection were seen in 50 patients (76% [37 for AEnE vs. 13 for AEnF]; p < .001). Referrals for endograft infection increased over time (n = 15, 23%; one before 2013 vs. 14 after; p = .002). Most patients underwent complete graft excision (n = 52, 79%) with increasing suprarenal cross clamping (n = 21, 32%; four before 2013 vs. 17 after; p = .015). Complex visceral reconstructions decreased over time (n = 31, 47%; 17 before 2013 vs. 14 after; p = .055), while "open abdomens" (OAs) increased (one before 2013 vs. 22 after; p < .001), reducing operating time (p = .012). In hospital mortality reached 42% (n = 28). Estimated survival reached 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.0 - 59.1) at one year and 45.6% (95% CI 33.0 - 57.3) at three years and was higher for AEnE than for AEnF (log rank p = .029). AEnE/F recurrence was noted in 12 patients (18%). Older age predicted in hospital mortality in multivariable analysis (p = .034). AEnE/F recurrence decreased with the presence of a primary senior surgeon (vs. junior; p = .003) and OA (1 [4.4%] vs. 11 [26%] for primary fascial closure; p = .045) in univariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Mortality and recurrence rates remain high after ISR of AEnE/F. Older age predicted in hospital mortality. Primary closure of enteric defects ≤ 2 cm in diameter reduced operating time without increasing the recurrence of AEnF.

Dependent functional status rather than age is a better predictor of adverse outcomes after excision of an infected abdominal aortic graft

OBJECTIVE

The optimal management of infected abdominal aortic grafts is complete surgical excision plus in situ or extra-anatomic revascularization in patients who can tolerate this morbid operation. In addition to using age and the presence of comorbidities for risk assessment, physicians form a global clinical impression when deciding whether to offer excision or to manage conservatively. Functional status is a distinct objective measure that can inform this decision. This study examines the relative impact of age and functional status on outcomes of infected abdominal aortic graft excision to guide surgical decision-making.

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology code 35907 was used to identify patients undergoing excision of infected abdominal aortic graft in the 2005 to 2017 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified by the upper age quartile (75 years old) as a cutoff, and then by functional status, independent vs dependent (as defined by NSIQIP). The patients were then stratified into four groups: Younger (<75)/Independent, Younger (<75)/Dependent, Older (≥75)/Independent, and Older (≥75)/Dependent. Outcomes measured included 30-day mortality and major organ-system dysfunction.

RESULTS

There were 814 patients who underwent infected abdominal aortic graft excision: 508 patients (62%) were Younger/Independent, 89 patients (11%) were Younger/Dependent, 176 patients (22%) were Older/Independent, and 41 patients (5%) were Older/Dependent. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality for Younger/Dependent (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-3.09; P = .536) or Older/Independent (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.19; P = .311) patients when compared with Younger/Independent patients, which suggests that neither old age nor dependent functional status by itself adversely affects mortality. However, when both factors were present, Older/Dependent patients had three times higher mortality when compared with Younger/Independent patients (41.5% vs 13.4%, respectively; OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.46-6.71; P = .003). Furthermore, as long as patients presented with independent functional status, old age by itself did not adversely affect major organ-system dysfunction (ORs for Older/Independent vs Younger/Independent were 0.76 [P = .454], 1.04 [P = .874], and 0.90 [P = .692] for cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications, respectively). On the contrary, even in younger patients, dependent functional status was significantly associated with higher pulmonary complications (Younger/Dependent vs Younger/Independent: OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.33-3.73; P = .002) and higher rates of unplanned reoperation (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.62-4.41; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dependent functional status has significant association with adverse outcomes after excision of infected abdominal aortic grafts, whereas old age alone does not. Therefore, this procedure could be considered in appropriately selected elderly patients with otherwise good functional status. However, caution should be applied in dependent patients regardless of age due to the risk of pulmonary complications.

Emergent percutaneous chimney endovascular aortic repair of a secondary aortoenteric fistula in the setting of a solitary kidney

Secondary aortoenteric fistula is a potentially lethal complication after aortic surgery. Traditional treatment consists of open graft excision with extra-anatomic bypass or in situ reconstruction. Patients who present in extremis, however, are generally poor candidates for re-do open aortic surgery. Endovascular repair has emerged as an alternative treatment modality for patients who would otherwise be unable to tolerate an extended operation. We report here a case of urgent endovascular repair of a juxtarenal secondary aortoenteric fistula via endovascular aneurysm repair with a renal artery chimney in a patient with a solitary kidney who presented in hemorrhagic and septic shock.

Current status of endovascular treatment of aortoenteric fistula

Aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is one of the most challenging diagnostic and therapeutic entities in vascular surgery. AEF can occur either primarily involving the aorta and the gastrointestinal tract or, more commonly, secondary to previous aortic reconstructive surgery. Traditionally, the treatment of AEF includes graft excision and extra-anatomic bypass surgery or in situ graft replacement. However, recently endovascular repair has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option. In this article, we present published and current evidence for endovascular repair of primary and secondary AEF. When endovascular treatment is applied where appropriate, early outcomes seem to be superior compared to open surgery. This benefit may be lost during long-term follow-up, implying that a staged approach with early conversion to in situ grafting may realize the best patient survival and morbidity. Lifelong administration of antibiotics is associated with a reduction in re-infection. An endovascular approach used as a bridging procedure in unstable patients is recommended, followed by definitive open therapy, if feasible, in patients with good life expectancy.

Editor's Choice - Management of Secondary Aorto-enteric and Other Abdominal Arterio-enteric Fistulas: A Review and Pooled Data Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare management strategies for secondary abdominal arterio-enteric fistulas (AEFs).

METHODS

This study is a review and pooled data analysis. Medline and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1999 and 2015. Particular emphasis was given to short- and long-term outcomes in relation to AEF repair type.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixteen publications were retrieved, reporting on 823 patients. In-hospital mortality was 30.7%. Open surgery had higher in-hospital mortality (246/725, 33.9%), than endovascular methods (7/98, 7.1%, p < .001, OR 6.7, 95% CI 3-14.7, including staged endovascular to open surgery, 0/13, 0%). In-hospital mortality after graft removal/extra-anatomical bypass grafting was 31.2% (66/226), graft removal/in situ repair 34% (137/403), primary closure of the arterial defect 62.5% (10/16), and for miscellaneous open procedures 41.3% (33/80), p = .019. Among the subgroups of in situ repair, homografts were associated with a higher mortality than impregnated prosthetic grafts (p = .047). There was no difference in recurrent AEF-free rates between open and endovascular procedures. Extra-anatomical bypass/graft removal and in situ repair had a lower AEF recurrence rate than primary closure and homografts. Late sepsis occurred more often after endovascular surgery (2-year rates 42% vs. 19% for open, p = .001). The early survival benefit of endovascular surgery was blunted during follow-up, although it remained significant (p < .001). Within the in situ repair group, impregnated prosthetic grafts were associated with the worst overall and AEF related mortality free rates and vein grafts with the best. No recurrence, sepsis, or mortality was reported following staged endograft placement to open repair after a mean follow-up of 16.8 months (p = .18, p = .22, and p = .006, respectively, compared with patients in other groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular surgery, where appropriate, is associated with better early survival than open surgery for secondary AEFs. Most of this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up, implying that a staged approach with early conversion to in situ vein grafting may achieve the best results in selected patients.

Recurrent Aortoenteric Fistula: Two Different Bridge Solutions

A “recurrent” aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is very rare and in literature anecdotic. Currently, graft excision and extra-anatomic bypass are considered the treatments of choice, but are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Herein, we describe the case of a “recurrent” AEF treated before definitive extra-anatomic bypass, by two different, staged bridge solutions: allograft in situ replacement and endovascular grafting. At 1, 3 and 6-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and normally active.

Secondary aortoduodenal fistula following endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm due to Streptococcus anginosus infection: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Aortoenteric fistula is a rare but very serious complication of both surgical and endovascular abdominal aortic reconstruction. Since the advent of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), 20 cases of aortoduodenal fistula associated with aortic stent grafts have been reported.¹ However, only a handful has been reported following inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. It most commonly presents with bleeding, usually from the upper gastro-intestinal tract. With recent advances in the screening, diagnosis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms either surgically or through an endovascular approach, the diagnosis of an aortoduodenal fistula in patients with gastro-intestinal bleeding must be suspected and excluded.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We describe a case of secondary aortoduodenal fistula that occurred two and a half years following endovascular stent graft repair of an inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm. We also outline the emergency correction plan and the attempts at repair.

DISCUSSION

This case defies the general concept that patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms are relatively immune to rupture. Although the presence of a peri-aneurysm thick inflammatory membrane decreases the possibility of rupture, these patients are more susceptible to other related complications such as aorto-enteric and aorto-caval fistulas.² This case also demonstrates the peculiar presence of Streptococcus anginosus as the pathological organism leading to graft infection and subsequent fistula, as opposed to enterococci which are often found in endograft infection.

CONCLUSION

Aorto-enteric fistulas are associated with a grave prognosis. Early diagnosis is crucial and extra vigilance should be taken in cases of inflammatory AAA.

Primary aortoduodenal fistula: A case report

Primary abdominoaortic fistula is an extremely rare cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The diagnosis is frequently delayed due to the rarity of the disease and low index of suspicion by physicians. A range of invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tools are available, but helical computer tomography (CT) remains the mainstay. Surgery offers the only hope for survival. This case report presents a 47-year-old male with massive upper GI bleeding. Various diagnostic tests and an exploratory laparotomy failed to identify the diagnosis. Later, a primary aortoduodenal fistula was confirmed by CT scan which necessitated surgical repair of the fistula and a Goretex graft for the abdominal aortic aneurysm. The patient made an uneventful recovery and remained well to the first postoperative visit in the clinic 2 wk after surgery.

Delayed superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm following distal femoral shaft fracture: a case report

A 69-year-old man presented with an expanding tissue mass over the medial aspect of his left thigh 6 weeks after a fracture of the distal femur shaft. Imaging studies confirmed a rare traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the superficial femoral artery. For the massive hematoma and persistent exsanguinating hemorrhage, staged interventions were taken. First, the pseudoaneurysm was hemodynamically isolated with an endovascular stent-graft placement. Subsequent surgical exploration and aneurysmectomy were performed later for the evacuation of the formed hematoma and the relief of the resultant compressive symptoms. Because traumatic pseudoaneurysm can have an insidious onset and delayed presentation, surgeons should consider the possible complication even after initial fracture fixation.

Endovascular management of arterioenteric fistulas: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the literature

PURPOSE

To present a systemic review and meta-analysis investigating the outcomes of endovascular management of arterioenteric fistula (AEF).

METHODS

Literature review on AEF management with endovascular surgery using MEDLINE search, including two cases managed by the authors.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (50 men; mean age 68 years, range 23-90) were identified. AEF was successfully managed in 55 (93%) patients and 30-day mortality was 8.5% (5/59). During follow-up, 10 (19%) patients developed recurrent bleeding, which occurred more often in AEFs due to cancer. The freedom from recurrence rate at 12 and 24 months was 71.5%. Seventeen (32%) patients developed sepsis, which was managed conservatively in 8 (7 successful). Freedom from sepsis at 12 and 24 months was 64%, while the freedom from combined recurrence and sepsis at 12 and 24 months was 59%. Patients who did not have intestinal repair had a higher rate of combined recurrence and sepsis compared to patients who did; the freedom from combined recurrence and sepsis at 12 months was 52% for patients not having intestinal repair versus 100% in patients who did (p = 0.022). Total AEF-related mortality rates at 12 and 24 months were 15% and 19%, respectively, significantly worse when AEF recurred (p = 0.001). Overall survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 68% and 52%; prognosis was worse in patients with perioperative sepsis, large bowel fistulization, tube graft placement, no intestinal repair, and recurrent AEF.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular management of AEF can achieve satisfactory short and midterm results, better than those historically reported for open surgery, despite the high rate of recurrent bleeding and sepsis. Further investigation of the role played by intestinal repair is warranted.

Acutely Bleeding Aortoduodenal Fistula: Staged Endovascular and Open Surgical Repair

Secondary aortoduodenal fistula is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication that can occur after aortic reconstruction surgery and usually presents with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Taking into account the accompanying multiple comorbidities of those patients, conventional open surgical repair carries with it significant mortality and morbidity rates. The purpose of this case report is to describe the successful combined endovascular and open surgical repair of an acutely ruptured aortoduodenal fistula in a 67-year-old male patient. Four months after the procedure, the patient remains well.

Outcome after endovascular stent graft repair of aortoenteric fistula: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is a critical clinical condition, which may present with gastrointestinal hemorrhage, with or without signs of sepsis. Conventional open surgical repair is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Endovascular stent graft repair has been attempted, but recurrent infection remains of major concern. We conducted a systematic review to assess potential factors associated with poor outcome after endovascular treatment.

METHODS

The English literature was searched using the MEDLINE electronic database up to April 2008. All studies reporting on the primary management of primary or secondary AEF with endovascular stent graft repair were considered.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 33 reports that included 41 patients and were entered in the final analysis. Persistent/recurrent/new infection or recurrent hemorrhage developed in 44% of the patients, after a mean follow-up period of 13 months (range, 0.13-36). Secondary, as compared to primary, AEF had an almost threefold increased risk of persistent/recurrent infection. Evidence of sepsis preoperatively was found to be a factor indicating unfavorable outcome (P < .05). Persistent/recurrent/new infection after treatment was associated with worse 30-day and overall survival compared with those who did not develop sepsis (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular stent graft repair of AEF was associated with a high incidence of infection or recurrent bleeding postoperatively. Evidence of sepsis preoperatively was indicating poor outcome.

Unusual forms of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Over 95% of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) rupture into the retroperitoneal space. Rare types of AAA ruptures comprise ruptures into the inferior vena cava with aortocaval fistula formation (ACF), ruptures into the duodenum with formation of a primary aortoduodenal fistula (ADF), and chronic contained ruptures (CCRs). This article presents a study of 41 cases with unusual forms of ruptured AAA of a series of 506 patients with AAA rupture treated within a 14-year period. There were 11 cases of CCR, 5 cases with ADF, and 25 cases with ACF. The correct preoperative diagnosis was established in 6 (of 11) cases of CCR, in 2 (of 5) cases of primary ADF, and in 13 (of 25) cases of ACF. AAA replacement was performed in 8 cases using a tube graft, whereas a bifurcated graft was used in 31 patients because of the distant extent of the atherosclerotic/aneurysmatic lesions engaging iliac arteries. Two patients had an axillobifemoral bypass. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 19% (8 of 41), with subgroup mortality rates of 0 (CCR), 60% (ADF), and 20% (ACF). Diagnosis and treatment are simplest in cases of CCR and the most complicated in cases of ADF.

[Repair of secondary aortoenteric fistulas. A systematic review]

We performed a systematic review of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of secondary aortoenteric fistulas (AEF). A MEDLINE search was performed of articles published in English or Spanish between January 1991 and August 2006. Diagnostic methods, treatment modalities and the results of surgical treatment were analyzed. The most frequent first aortic surgery associated with AEF was repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (54.31%). The most common form of presentation was gastrointestinal bleeding. Repair through in situ prosthetic replacement had the lowest early mortality rates (8-13.3%) compared with graft excision and extraanatomic revascularization (18.2-44%). AEF is a serious entity and diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion based on clinical findings and indirect data from imaging techniques (computed tomography). The most appropriate therapeutic option continues to be controversial.

Endovascular Repair of an Actively Hemorrhaging Aortoduodenal Fistula

Aortoenteric fistulae require urgent definitive intervention and traditionally carry a high mortality. We describe a patient who suffered a traumatic aortic dissection following an auto versus pedestrian collision. He underwent open fenestration of his infrarenal aorta and visceral resection, complicated by abdominal sepsis and enterocutaneous fistulae. One month later he developed massive hematemesis, and endoscopic examination revealed an aortoduodenal fistula. Due to an impassable abdominal wall, a stent-graft repair was performed. This report describes the successful use of endovascular techniques to achieve immediate hemostasis in an actively hemorrhaging aortoduodenal fistula. An endovascular approach provides a valuable option in settings where a hostile abdomen precludes the traditional open technique and may serve as a bridge to later definitive repair.